Regular Council Minutes & Exhibit

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Regular City Council Meeting was held on January 27, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. with Council President Anderson presiding. Council members present were Mr. Hare, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, Ms. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Dr. Sudler, and Mr. Lewis. Staff members present were Fire Chief Carey, Police Chief Johnson, Mr. Hugg, Ms. Marney, Ms. Duca, Ms. Melson-Williams, Mr. Rodriguez, and Ms. Bennett. Mayor Christiansen was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 6:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Anderson declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. William Faust, 136 Orchard Drive, expressed concerns about the snow removal fines, city audits for the years 2023 and 2024, and overflow refund. He thought it was atrocious that for the first offense, it was $100 if snow was not removed. He was concerned because he had received phone calls from several people who were handicapped and senior citizens. Another concern he had was that the city audits of 2023 and 2024 had not been posted on the website. He wanted to see the city thrive. Mr. Faust wanted to know if the city was on the verge of bankruptcy. His last concern was the overflow refund, and he had not gotten his refund back. He wanted to know if they would raise taxes or the fees if they ran out of electric funds. Mr. Faust believed they deserved answers. He noted that constituents have a responsibility and a right to know how well council is doing their jobs. Responding to Mr. Faust, Ms. Marney stated that the Fiscal Year 2023 audit was being evaluated for several factors. She noted that the Finance Department had incurred significant staff turnover. She pointed out that as of last week, she had met with the auditor, and they were waiting for the final sign-off letters for the Fiscal Year 2023 audit to be released. Ms. Marney had been concerned with the electric fund bond covenants and further explained there were missing details that were discovered due to the turnover in staff, and gave assurances that the details had been added to the financial report so that it could be reported accurately to the public. She noted that with the inclusion of the PCA debit, which was billed in Fiscal Year 2023, the electric revenues had put the city within their bond covenant ranges for the year. As far as the Fiscal Year 2024 audit was concerned, that is still ongoing. Ms. Marney mentioned that she had been in contact with the Customer Service Director over the past few weeks regarding the stormwater utility refund. The anticipation of having the refunds issued by January 31st may be extended due to a city-wide system outage. However, they were actively working on applying credits to customer service utility accounts. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Marney clarified that the city’s bond ratings are AA with a stable outlook and that the city is not going bankrupt. Doug Hall, 718 South Governors Avenue, expressed concerns regarding drug addicts, trash, and small businesses. He expressed concern that small businesses come and go downtown within six

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 2 (6) months. He noted that the previous governor had given $25 million to the Downtown Dover Partnership for the property and that the parking lot had become a dangerous area for drugs and prostitution. Mr. Hall stated that the homeless problem was not as bad as the addiction problem and that they cannot keep putting a band-aid on it, businesses are leaving because of the drug addicts. Mr. Hall would like to see Dover thrive, but it will never thrive with what is happening on Governors Avenue. Mr. Hall stated that the city has phenomenal police officers and a good chief, but that they need to do more. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Faust stated that he was referring to the stormwater overflow fee. He was concerned that residents were charged $30 or more. He noted that he had heard rumors that taxes would be raised, or a fee would be put in place. He wanted to know what they were doing to bring money in. Mr. Faust was concerned about how money was coming into the city since businesses were coming in and closing. He wanted to know if they were cherry-picking which laws would be enforced since the district attorney was not prosecuting prostitution. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Elder Ellis B. Loudon. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilwoman Arndt. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Boggerty, and carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the consent agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. PROCLAMATION – BLACK HISTORY MONTH The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, since 1976, the United States has celebrated Black History Month in February to recognize and honor the profound contributions, achievements, and resilience of African Americans throughout our nation's history; and WHEREAS, Black history is an integral part of American history, encompassing the struggle for freedom and equality, the pursuit of excellence in arts, science, education, public service, and countless other fields, and the enduring legacy of courage, leadership, and determination that continues to inspire us all; and WHEREAS, the theme for Black History Month 2025, "African Americans and Labor, "focuses

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 3 on the various and profound ways that work intersects with the collective experiences of African Americans; and WHEREAS, work has been central to much of Black history and culture, from the agricultural labor of enslaved Africans to debates among African American educators on vocational training, from self-help strategies and entrepreneurship in Black communities to organized labor's role in combating economic and social injustice. Everywhere we look, Black people's work has transformed societies across the nation; and WHEREAS, Black leaders throughout our nation's history, such as Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Bayard Rustin, Thurgood Marshall, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Langston Hughes, John Lewis, and many others, have worked tirelessly to create a more fair, just, and equitable society; and WHEREAS, we honor the contributions of African American residents who have enriched our community through their leadership, service, and cultural contributions; NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE do hereby proclaim February 2025 as BLACK HISTORY MONTH in the City of Dover and encourage all citizens to recognize black owned businesses in our community. PROCLAMATION – HUMAN TRAFFICKING AWARENESS MONTH The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, according to the National Human Trafficking Hotline, "Human trafficking is a crime involving the exploitation of someone for the purpose of compelled labor or a commercial sex act through the use of force, fraud, or coercion. It affects individuals across the world, including the United States, and affects every community in the United States across age, gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic backgrounds"; and WHEREAS, forced labor and forced sexual exploitation have risen to an estimated $236 billion in profits worldwide every year. The 2021 International Labour Organization report estimates 49.6 million adults and children were victims of modern slavery globally. An estimated 27.6 million were in forced labor including 17.3 million exploited in the private sector, 6.3 million in forced commercial sexual exploitation and 3.9 million in forced labor imposed by state. Traffickers often take advantage of instability caused by natural disasters, conflict, or a pandemic to exploit others; and WHEREAS, since 2007, the Human Trafficking Hotline for Delaware has received close to 870 signals, such as phone calls, texts, emails and online tips, and identified over 600 victims included in 269 cases of human trafficking; and WHEREAS, in 2009, Trafficking Victims Protection Act passed by Congress establishing methods for prosecuting traffickers, preventing human trafficking and protecting victims and survivors of trafficking. Recognizing potential red flags and knowing the indicators of human trafficking is a key step in identifying more victims and helping them find assistance. Delaware

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 4 leaders, social organizations and Delaware Healthcare Association all are devoting efforts to raise awareness and help stop the epidemic. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE do hereby proclaim January 2025 as HUMAN TRAFFICKING AWARENESS MONTH in the City of Dover and urge all residents to take action by being informed, spread awareness and know the signs for it could save someone's life. PRESENTATION – RECOGNITION OF SERVICE – LISA ENRIGHT – ETHICS COMMISSION (AUGUST 2017-DECEMBER 2024) On behalf of members of Council, Mayor Christiansen presented Lisa Enright with a Dover Cup in recognition of her service on the Ethics Commission from August 2017 through December 2024. PRESENTATION – DOVER HOPE ZONE Mr. Darius Brown and Ms. Tina Custis briefed members on the Dover Hope Zone. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-01 – SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING – ALLEY ABANDONMENT – DOWNTOWN MOBILITY CENTER PROJECT Ms. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner, briefed the members of council on the proposed Resolution No. 2025-01 – Setting of Public Hearing – Alley Abandonment – Downtown Mobility Center Project. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that as a member of the Planning Staff, she was not aware of any appraisal of the landmass being completed. A portion of the alley crosses adjoining parcels, some of which are within the right of way and are currently fully maintained by the City of Dover. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that he did not have the information available, but he would get the information to him before they made a decision. For the record, Dr. Sudler stated that he had asked for information during the Utility Committee discussion and that it would be provided to him. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Madam Clerk Bennett explained that the Tyler system was currently down and clarified that the issue was primarily financial. She explained that the process involves running a public hearing advertisement, which is a legal requirement to be published 10 days prior to the hearing to inform the public of the upcoming event. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the Planning Commission had conducted their own public hearings and there was a notice as part of the Planning Commission meeting agenda. She noted that any other notification would be with the City Clerk’s Office. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Madam Clerk Bennett stated that they notified the surrounding businesses, but not the public. She explained that their procedures, in accordance with the code, involve sending out notification letters and publishing a public hearing advertisement, which is part of the city clerk’s responsibilities. It is part of the code and their procedure that they send

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 5 out letters and run a public hearing ad, on the city clerk’s part. Ms. Arndt pointed out that the project has had a considerable amount of public outreach. The Mobility Center and the Downtown Redevelopment Project have had the information put out to the public. She noted that people should know that they are having a public hearing on the alleyway abandonment since it is for redevelopment. She believes that they need to lend their support to the Downtown Dover Partnership for the project. Ms. Arndt moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-01 and the setting of the public hearing date for February 10, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil. Dr. Sudler stated that he would like to have the information regarding the value of the portion that the city owns in the reading of the record. He explained that based on their previous conversation city council could request that it be purchased from them and since they are at a point where they need to generate revenue, it would be a great alternative to see what the constituents wanted to do. It was a decision that required public input and knowledge regarding how they would want council to vote as their representatives. He believed that any opportunity that they have to generate income should at least be reviewed. Then whether they choose to take advantage of that opportunity or not, they should hear from the constituents and keep them informed about council’s actions. The constituents may want it to be purchased since it is public property. He wanted to state for the record that the alley portion being abandoned had a certain value and that this information should be made known to the constituents when read into the public hearing record. Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the amended Resolution No. 2025-01 to ensure the approximate value of the property is disclosed. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis. Ms. Arndt stated a point of order, since it was a request for information, she believed that they did not need to make a motion to receive the information. She noted that they should trust that since it has been asked, it would be answered. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Dr. Sudler stated that he had requested the information twice before and was told it would be provided. He believed the best course of action would be to make a motion so that the information would be provided. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Ms. Marney stated that the property does not have a parcel ID assigned to it, so they are unable to look up the current assessment value. She noted there was a difference between an assessed value versus an appraised value, unfortunately, they are not able to look that information up in their systems. They would need to get an appraisal to get a value for the property. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated typically streets and alleys do not have a parcel ID. They are simply marked on the parcel maps the same way city streets are shown as public rightaways. He noted that the property, alley, and the properties adjacent to it have been owned by the city for decades and are maintained regularly as part of the city and the downtown partnership. Mr. Hugg reminded council that they approved the transfer of the adjacent city properties to the Downtown Development District for redevelopment a few months ago and that

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 6 the property in question happens to be the alley that falls between those two (2) properties. For the record, at the time there was no concern raised about the value of the property. Mr. Neil stated that taxpayers’ money had been taken care of the property by keeping it clean and doing whatever was necessary. If there was a value, they might be flipping the value from what they had to do to what the object was for now. It may cost more to get an assessment of what it would be if they had built a house, and a house cannot be built since the property is too small. He noted that, with the abandonment of the alley, they no longer have to spend money to maintain the property. Mr. Neil also mentioned that if the alley had been causing problems with things happening downtown, they would be getting rid of that particular problem. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that the alley is very narrow, the dimensions are 12 feet wide, and it is not a high-priority designated emergency access. He pointed out that it provides access to two (2) parking lots that are adjacent to it, which would be incorporated into the Mobility Center when it is completed, and then they will have access from Governors Avenue, Bradford Street, and Minor Street. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Chief Johnson stated that there has been crime activity on the Minor Street Alley. He noted that there has been violent crime in that area periodically. He cannot speak about too many accidents with a criminal component as it is a traffic way or a roadway, but its proximity to some of the other places that council is aware of has had events happen over the last several years. It has been connected to several criminal events. Responding to Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Anderson stated that they are voting on the amendment and asking to have the approximate value brought to the next meeting, which is scheduled for February 10, 2025. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Anderson stated that the motion did not say it had to be assessed, it could have a market assessment. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that to find out the assessed value for the alleyway, they would have to spend money. To the best of his knowledge, there was no assessed value for the alley itself. The adjacent parcels have an assessed value associated with them whether they are owned by the city or by the Downtown Partnership. The only way they would get some kind of value would be to get at least an informal appraisal from an appraisal firm. Mr. Hugg noted that he does not know the cost, but that it would not be free. Dr. Sudler rescinded his motion based on the new information about the property not having a parcel ID. Dr. Sudler stated that he would not support the adoption because there was no parcel ID, that could provide who has the right to legal ownership. To the best of his knowledge, a court judgement would be needed stating that the city owns the property since they have been taking care of it for over twenty years. Dr. Sudler stated that the city does not have proof of legal ownership by law and for that reason, he cannot support the adoption of the ordinance. Mr. Lewis withdrew his second for Dr. Sudler’s motion, stating that Dr. Sudler’s property concerns were valid. He was surprised that the city did not have a value for the property. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rodriguez stated that he would look into the property. He

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 7 thought it was a regular alley abandonment, which they do all the time. He continued to state that there was no question about the city’s ownership and that this was the basis for their decision to abandon it. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Ms. Melson-Williams explained that the alley, located within a separate right-of-way, crosses three (3) parcels, one (1) of which is owned by the City of Dover. She confirmed that the city charter gives council the authority to vacate or abandon streets and rights-of-way. While the City of Dover’s zoning ordinance and land subdivision regulations do not specifically outline a process for alley abandonments, the city clerk’s office has established procedures, based on city policy documents, that are used by the various boards and commissions. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that there were a series of multiple different ownership entities that were involved. She further stated that because of the collective use of a portion of that area as public parking spaces that were previously managed by the Dover Parking Authority, and now by its successor, the Downtown Dover Partnership. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the request intended that the alley being utilized and designated would return to the adjacent property ownership. The six (6) parcels and an additional parcel were involved in a redevelopment plan, which would consolidate all six (6) tracks of land into one (1) large parcel for development activity. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that he could not answer that question directly. However, he explained that the state had allocated $25 million to the Downtown Partnership, with about $11 million for utility work in the adjacent area. Around $14 million was available to the Downtown Partnership for redevelopment, which included the acquisition of two (2) parcels on Bradford Street, one (1) of which had already settled. The funding also included the design, engineering, and construction of a parking garage. Mr. Hugg clarified that the city’s contribution to the initiative involved transferring the city-owned parking lot to the Downtown Partnership so that they could build a public parking facility on that site. The properties surrounding the Downtown Dover Development Corporation include those of the City of Dover (Capital City Transformational Alliance subsidiary), the CBI properties (being acquired by the partnership), Downtown Delaware Development, the Dover Parking Authority, and other lands owned by the City of Dover. He noted that all of the land involved in the alley process is owned by either the City of Dover directly or by the Downtown Dover Partnership and will ultimately be Downtown Dover Partnership property. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Rodriguez stated that he believes that the property is shown on plots, and that, by default, indicated a dedication to the City of Dover unless there was a prior reservation made. He believes that the recording of it amounted to an automatic dedication and that the city owns it. It is a normal procedure. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that the site plan for the project shows that all of the alleyways are encompassed in the six (6) parcels which would have parcel numbers and parcel IDs. It is no different than a public street. He noted that they do not have a parcel ID number for South Redford Street because it is public property. It is shown on public records, plot plans, maps, part of the highway, and the transportation system of the city. He pointed out that Mr.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 8 Rodriguez stated that it has been long carried and long shown as a public right of way. Mr. Hugg explained that it occupies portions of six (6) properties, that have ID numbers that are appraised and owned by a public agency. He was not sure that the absence of a partial ID number was critical to the question of abandonment of an alley that has been in public use on public land, part of the parking process downtown and to be used again in the future by a quasi-public organization. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that the map was provided in the packet. He stated that the cross-hatched area on the survey depicted the alley and property ownership. He was unsure what further documentation could be provided Mr. Anderson stated that Mr. Rodriguez would need to review it before the final vote. Responding to Mr. Hare, Mr. Anderson clarified that the city could stop plowing, cleaning the streets, and performing any other maintenance to the property because it would not be their property. It would become the homeowner’s responsibility that live there. Mr. Hare stated that it would save the city money by not having to clean and plow the streets. Mr. Hare agreed with Mr. Anderson, adding that they should get the final say. He pointed out if the city was going to start charging for the alley, then they should also charge for the streets since they do not have parcel IDs. Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the amended Resolution No. 2025-01 to ensure the approximate value of the property being abandoned. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and failed by a roll call vote of two (2) yes (Lewis and Sudler), and seven no (7) (Hare, Boggerty, Neil, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Anderson). Ms. Arndt moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-01 for setting the public hearing date for February 10, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and carried, by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes (Hare, Boggerty, Neil, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Anderson), two (2) no (Lewis and Sudler). ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 2025 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 13, 2025, were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Neil, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT OF – JANUARY 14, 2025 The Council Committee of the Whole met on January 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. with Council President Anderson presiding. Members of Council present were Ms. Arndt, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Hare, Mr. Lewis (via WebEx), Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Rocha, and Dr. Sudler. Mayor Christiansen was also present. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Garfinkel, and Mr. Shevock (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). Mr. Iriowen and Mr. Wilson (Utility) were absent.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 9 ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. Council Reports – December 2024 First District Dr. Pillsbury reported that she attended their First District Town Hall in December. She explained that it was not well attended but very helpful. She also reported attending all the holiday celebrations and especially enjoyed the Kwanza celebration. Mr. Rocha reported that he attended the same events as Dr. Pillsbury. He was present for the tree lighting ceremony and was the Master of Ceremonies (MC) for the Dashing Through Downtown Dover Parade on Loockerman Street. Second District Mr. Hare reported that the tree lighting ceremony was cold and many of the kids were gone by the time Santa arrived. Mr. Lewis had nothing to report. Third District Mr. Neil reported that he and Ms. Arndt attended the tree lighting ceremony and they “knocked it out of the ballpark” on “We Wish You a Merry Christmas”. He received a constituent complaint regarding shots heard in the Garrison Track, the constituent wanted to know if hunting is still allowed there. He also received a complaint regarding an exceptionally high water bill which Jason Lyon promptly followed up on. He reported receiving multiple complaints regarding snow removal in Wild Meadows. He attended the Library Board meeting and noted that statistically, Kent County residents are using the library more than city residents. Under the new formula, the reimbursement to the city continues to drop. Brian Sylvester, Library Director, intends to prepare a presentation for Kent County Levy Court to request adjusting the formula. Mr. Neil reported sending alerts to the Third District Civic and Homeowners Association leaders regarding the January 13, 2025, Safety Action Workshop held at the Modern Maturity Center, KnowBe4 Scam Alerts, snow removal updates, and resumption of trash pickup. Ms. Arndt reported that she attended the wonderful holiday events. She thanked the staff and volunteers who made the events possible. She also thanked the Dover Fire Department for allowing her to ride in the fire engine so that she did not have to walk in the cold during the parade. She emphasized her enthusiasm for being able to use the fire siren. She attended the 10th anniversary event of the Downtown Development District held at Rail Haus which celebrated the City of Dover's 10 years in the program. Lastly, she attended the Loockerman Street Tour with Governor-Elect Meyer. She explained that it was nice to spend time with him

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 10 but even more so with the merchants on Loockerman. She explained that there is a lot of energy and excitement about what is to come, and she is looking forward to supporting them as a council member. Fourth District Dr. Sudler reported that he attended the celebration and final walk for Deputy Chief Spicer as well as the tree lighting ceremony. He received complaints about overgrown tree limbs on Forest Avenue as well as Conwell Street. He stated he would turn the pictures over to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager to aid in getting those complaints addressed. He reported receiving a call from a constituent asking the city to create a Homeowner Association Task Force. The constituent stated that those who are part of a homeowners association do not feel they are being treated fairly. At-Large Mr. Boggerty reported that he attended the swearing-in ceremony of Bethany Hall-Long as well as the inauguration of the 153rd General Assembly of Delaware. Mr. Boggerty also paid his respects to Richard “Mouse” Smith, Delaware NAACP President, who tragically passed away unexpectedly. Lastly, Mr. Boggerty reported that on February 8, 2025, he will be hosting a faith-based workshop sponsored by the Gospel Music Workshop of America. They will be showcasing the local youth, artists, and music. Youths aged 10 to high school are welcome to register with talents ranging from singing, writing, musical instruments, dance, and art. Registration will be free and the event is scheduled to be held at The WELL Church. On January 31, 2025, a round table discussion will be held regarding the movie The Forge at The WELL Church. The discussion will be geared towards young men, fathers, and uncles. Council President Anderson Council President Anderson reported that he was unable to attend the tree-lighting ceremony due to being ill. He commended Sankofa on raising the bar on events surrounding the December holidays. He stated they always bring an international flavor to Christmas from different places around the world and he is looking forward to their Martin Luther King events on January 20, 2025. Mr. Anderson reported that on January 18, 2025, he will be attending a preinaugural reception to provide a positive opportunity for the city. He stated there have been positive interactions and meetings with legislators, creating a partnership to represent the mutual constituents. He reported that the constituents from Kirkwood Street had some complaints regarding snow removal, but Queen Street noted that everything was handled perfectly. He praised the sanitation crews for picking up five days' worth of trash in three days after working 12-hour shifts during the snowstorm. Mr. Anderson also reported attending the 10th anniversary event of the Downtown Development District held at Rail Haus. Selection Process of New City Solicitor (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, reviewed the background information regarding the selection process of a new city solicitor.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 11 Responding to Mr. Hugg, Dr. Sudler thanked him for compiling the data. Dr. Sudler requested a list be compiled of the services that the city is currently paying for. He would like to see the top three areas for which they provide services. He recommended that the conceptual models be provided to the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee so that they can absorb which model might be the best fit for the city. Whether they would like to hire an attorney who would work directly and solely for the City of Dover or what they have been traditionally doing. Dr. Sudler requested that the city publicly post the position and refrain from contacting any individuals directly, to ensure an unbiased hiring process. Dr. Sudler also recommended going outside of Delaware to see what small municipalities in Maryland are doing and bring that to the committee. Dr. Sudler would like to use that information to compile criteria. He would like to see the top five issues that the new solicitor will be dealing with. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that he could certainly do that. He also stated that any individual chosen must be a member of the Delaware Bar and have been practicing law in Delaware. Mr. Hugg stated that they will also need to include attorneys who specialize in other areas such as unions and police matters. Dr. Sudler requested the breakdown of funds that the City is paying by specialty or expertise (unions/police matters) versus how much the city pays the City Solicitor. Dr. Sudler hopes to find an attorney who specializes in many different areas to save the city money. Dr. Sudler noted that currently in the code it does not state that the city has authority to hire outside attorneys, so that may need to be changed. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that some of the attorneys on the list only represent one municipality and a lot of that sometimes depends on where their offices are located. There are a few others who have made representing municipalities a specialty. Mr. Hugg noted that they could specify that the attorney would only represent the City of Dover. Mr. Hugg did reference the City of Rehoboth’s Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and how they did discuss in- house counsel as a full-time employee. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that he believes there is enough work for an in-house attorney and that an in-house attorney would make sense. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that having an in-house attorney could save the city money and give them more access to an attorney who does not charge $400 an hour every 15 minutes. The attorney would be available for Council meetings, Committee meetings, and other meetings as requested. Mr. Hugg noted that there are some advantages to having an in-house attorney. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that he does not believe that they could find an attorney who fits all their needs and that he would not recommend that either. He explained that having worked with bond counsel, labor union, and

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 12 employment counsel, they are specialized fields and he would be very cautious of the in-house attorney handling everything. Mr. Hugg noted that right now the City Solicitor and himself are the ones that reach out and work with outside counsel on a regular basis. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Ms. Arndt recommended not making the RFQ process restricted. She recommended creating a list that was fairly general but still encompassed all the necessary requirements. That would give Council the opportunity to negotiate further once they see the proposals. Then at that point, if there are other items that they may want to include, they can negotiate with the applicant. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Hugg stated that if they look at the Rehoboth RFQ documents, under requirements and duties, the fifth one mentions that there are items that the attorney should be familiar with. Then it sets out a list of possible areas of law, so it does not only state land use, zoning, or finance. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Ms. Arndt stated she believes that the Rehoboth RFQ is a good one to build from. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Mr. Boggerty stated that he would be cautious about attempting to find a one-stop shop. While they can have a general attorney who can advise and guide them, they want subject matter experts to the best of their ability, especially because of the time restraints that it could take to perform the task. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that the code does not give them a whole lot of advice as far as the Deputy Solicitor. It requires that there be an attorney licensed to practice in Delaware in a manner as determined by the city solicitor. He stated that historically they have not had a great deal of involvement in selecting the Deputy Solicitor. Mr. Hugg noted that he would be very concerned about having a deputy in a different firm. Mr. Hugg stated that they may want to think about the deputy position and tighten the criteria a bit or define a little more thoroughly what the deputy’s primary role is. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Hugg stated that he would not recommend having an RFQ for each position. Mr. Hugg noted that the language in the code is very vague so it may be to their advantage to at least spell it out more. In addition to stating that they are to be a member of the Delaware Bar and practice for at least five years, maybe a little more specificity with three years’ experience in land use law, and two years’ experience in another field that defines a little more of what the job is. Mr. Hare stated that if they hire a solicitor or if they hire an in-house solicitor, they are going to be held responsible for the advice they give the city to act on. He believes that the solicitor should have the majority of the input on who their deputy is going to be. Mr. Hare explained that if the solicitor is not available then

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 13 the deputy solicitor attends in their place. Mr. Hare stated that they should hire the solicitor, and then have the solicitor make recommendations for the Deputy Solicitor position. He believes that their main focus should be to get the solicitor hired and then worry about the deputy, but not do both at the same time. Dr. Sudler suggested hiring two hybrid lawyers and a hybrid paralegal who has multiple skill sets. Dr. Sudler stated that his main concern is that sometimes, the deputy solicitor is being paid the same amount as the solicitor. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg noted that in other contracts there is a $50 to $100 difference because the primary solicitors are charging $500 an hour to begin with. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that it was Crystal Carey, who is another attorney at Schmittinger and Rodriguez. She practices a lot as if she were an outside specialty attorney for the city. He believes she handles employment and finance law. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Dr. Sudler stated that he would like to add to the code that the deputy solicitor has at least five years of practicing law experience as well. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that Mr. Rodriguez did indicate to him that they would continue to provide services if the city is not able to hire a new solicitor by May. Mr. Rodriguez has indicated that they will not walk away from the city, but they have indicated clearly that they do not want to continue to be the city’s solicitor on a full-time basis. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Dr. Sudler stated that he would like to see a clause added to the code that the outgoing city solicitor must provide the city with more than 90 or 120 days to properly search for a new solicitor. Possibly a six-month process. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Council President Anderson stated that he does not think that they should shy away from sending notifications to all the firms that provide municipal law as long as they send it to all of them. They cannot pick and choose who to send the notice to. They will also be sending it out in a variety of ways, such as the legal section of the newspaper, the city’s website, and the Delaware League of Local Governments. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that there is a subscription service through the Delaware Bar for attorney solicitations as well. Mr. Rocha stated that he would like to have the Legislative, Finance, and Administration committee sit down with Mr. Hugg to figure out the best way to produce the RFQ.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 14 Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that at the bottom of page three of Rehoboth’s RFQ, there is a reference to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) opinion that the selection must be open to the public. Mr. Hugg requested the city clerk to research that particular FOIA decision so they would know precisely what the issues were that resulted in that decision. UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee met with Chairman Neil presiding. Adoption of Agenda Dr. Pillsbury moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. (City Clerk’s Office Note: Mr. Iriowen was noted as being present prior to the committee meeting but did not successfully contact the clerk, therefore he is considered absent.) Request for Alley Abandonment (Improved) – Downtown Mobility Center Project (Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner) – (Alley extending north from Minor Street. Alley which is located in the block between South Governors Avenue and South Bradford Street) Ms. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the request for abandonment of the improved alley. Staff recommended that the referenced alley be abandoned. If the Utility Committee and/or City Council was in favor of proceeding with the proposed abandonment the following actions were recommended: 1) The Downtown Dover Partnership would have to work with Public Works to relocate two dumpsters for downtown business trash removal and that a waterline would also need to be relocated; 2) That City Council adopt a Resolution setting a public hearing regarding the proposed abandonment for February 10, 2025. Mr. Hare moved to accept staff recommendations. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that currently the alley is improved, meaning it has pavement, and it is owned as a public alley that the city would hold ownership of. In some cases, it crosses individual property lines, but it has been treated as a public alley. She explained that the abandonment is a process to relinquish the ownership of the land mass and that the alley was distributed to the adjacent property owners. In this case, the adjacent property owners at the time are a mix of different individual organizations, including the City of Dover. Ms. Melson-Williams noted that the long-term plan for the six parcels is to be consolidated into one large tract of land for the development of a building. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that parcels 148 and 150 are owned by an entity that was associated with representatives of the partnership.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 15 She noted that the process would be that the Utility Committee make a recommendation and that it would be forwarded to City Council. City Council has a few steps that they would have to take for the abandonment of an alley, which would include a public hearing at a council meeting and the adoption of a resolution to take such action. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the short answer would be yes that the Downtown Dover Partnership would have control of the property, or some entity would. She noted that there has been separate action by council regarding some of the city-owned parcels in that area, but this would be a specific process focused on the area of the alley. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that currently, the City of Dover maintains that property. She was unsure if it was in the Charter or the Dover Code of Ordinances that would give council the power to lay out, locate, abandon, et cetera, the streets, sidewalks, alleys, and the like. There were statements about the abandonment in that it would mean a transfer of ownership, not necessarily one of neglect. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated it would be located in Article Two, Section 27, but was unsure if that was the Dover Code of Ordinance reference or a Charter reference. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hare stated that it would have been easier if it had said that this was the alley where they wanted to build the parking garage and that the city would be turning the property over to the Downtown Dover Partnership. He believed that everyone would have understood that without going through all the abandonment discussion, and that the Downtown Dover Partnership would be responsible for that property once it went through all the approvals, not the city. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the developer of the project would have to fund the relocation of the water line in conjunction with the plans approved by the city’s Department of Water and Wastewater. She does not believe it would be part of the overall utility project in the Loockerman Street Corridor. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the alley would become part of the development area for the building. It would be dissolved, as Mr. Lewis said. She noted that the land that currently served as that alley would become part of the overall development project area, and the building would take up the six parcels. It would no longer be a way to cross that area because the proposed building is a large rectangle that would encompass that area. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams clarified that the alleyway would not be in existence.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 16 Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated the planning office was not involved with knowing the value of the property. She believed that the code gave council the discretion regarding how the transfer occurs and whether it would need to be purchased or other considerations in transferring the title to it. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that code citation could be found in Article Two (2), Section 27, Power of Council to locate, layout, and locate abandoned streets and sidewalks. She believed that it was part of their Charter. Mr. Hare moved to accept staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Ms. Arndt and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project Update (Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director) Mr. Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director, reviewed the background and analysis of the Meeting House Branch Drainage Improvement Project. Staff recommended that the committee provide a recommended direction, based upon the two options provided by staff, to City Council for acceptance and implementation. Dr. Sudler stated that with a lot of financial constraints that the city has gone through, he would go with option two, reduce the scope of the project to meet the minimum requirements of the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP). Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon confirmed with the state that the bond bill money could not be used for the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP). Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that it would be removing the clarifying rings, planting a meadow, and landscape, and providing a repairing buffer. He noted that a repairing buffer was like a filter before the water goes into the river, but there would be no drainage improvements with that. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that the original plan was kind of an open channel through that area, and then revised that to be a culvert, which would allow for future development. The plan was that they would remove any of the contaminated soil as part of the drainage project in concert and the clarifying rings would then stay there because they were thinking about redeveloping it. They would renegotiate with them to eventually redevelop the site. He noted that they do not want to dump a bunch of money into it now until they can get it figured out.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 17 Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that they could go with option two, it could be redeveloped but the drainage would not be there to help. In his opinion, it would not be prudent to develop that site with not enough drainage to pull that through that area, it would be a flooded mess. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Lyon stated that the Bayhealth property area was prone to flooding, even though they have been lucky not to experience an event so far. He noted that any event exceeding a 10-year storm, which would have a one in ten chance of happening, would result in flooding in that area. Mr. Neil stated that the idea of having stormwater as an enterprise fund was a wise decision, but the outcome was not wise. He believed that they needed to go back to that because they needed that as a permanent source of funding for stormwater. He explained that the first step would be to take a look as fast as possible at reverse engineering the financials. Mr. Neil stated that they need to consider all properties, including those that do not pay taxes, and divide it up in terms of the money that they need using the smaller houses that are located throughout the city, moving up to how much it would cost them, and then move up to the larger buildings and see what the costs would be for those. There needs to be another method of figuring out how to make the equity between the actual size of the houses or buildings that they are dealing with. Mr. Neil explained that when 30% or more of the properties were not paying taxes, the amount should not have exceeded what it did, so the process had to be reversed. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Lyon stated that if they went with the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP), there would be no upstream drainage improvement project. He noted that it would just do the minimum and the meadow would be there, which would not improve any drainage issues. Mr. Lyon explained that in the notes, they would have to break those agreements, and those discussions would have to happen with the consultants and the organizations involved. He stated that it would be imperative that they have a game plan for sustainable payments for this, but it is not his jurisdiction. He believed that they should get the drainage improvement project done. It is just a matter of making sure that they have a sustainable plan going forward for it and that it would be the biggest anchor of their capital program for stormwater in the next five years and it needs to be accounted for. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Lyon stated that there has been a conversation with DNREC about the Environmental Improvement Project (EIP). They have been willing to work with the city on a timeline, in regard to the bond bill money, the $8.3 million that would come from the state. He mentioned that they have funds that need to be used before June 30, 2026, but he had received verbal confirmation from the state that they would extend the date if needed. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Lyon acknowledged that there are taxes and payments are out-of-pocket expenses for constituents but reminded them that if the project keeps getting delayed, the cost will rise due to inflation.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 18 Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Lyon stated that his prediction for the cost to go up would be roughly 3.5% per year. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Lyon stated that they had not considered the idea of bonding the project. He noted that it would come with interest, but they could take a look at that and bring it back to the committee. Mr. Neil suggested that Mr. Lyon work with his staff to find out what the process would be for bonding and reinstating the enterprise fund in a different formula so that they could have options to look at and how it would work. No action was taken at this time. Evaluation of Proposals – White Oak Road Pump Station Grit Removal System Engineering Support (Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director) Mr. Jason Lyon, Water/Wastewater Director, reviewed the background and analysis of the evaluation of proposals for the White Oak Road Pump Station Grit Removal System Engineering Support. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Century Engineering for the White Oak Road Pump Station Grit Removal System Engineering Support, RFP #25- 0013WW, for the amount of $65,620. Dr. Sudler moved to accept staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Utility Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Rocha presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. Economic Development Fund and Community Development Fund Guidelines (David S. Hugg, III, City Manager) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, reviewed the proposed Economic Development Fund and Community Development Fund guidelines. Staff recommended approval of the recommended guidelines.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 19 Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Hugg agreed that they would need something more specific and directed to administer a project. He stated that it was part of the plan and that he was going to take one piece at a time to make sure that council was on board with how they were going to do things. He would then bring something to them depending on whether the application was to be approved by council or not, but he could bring that to them in the next few weeks. Ms. Arndt moved to add a follow-up on receipts or proof that funds were administered in the way that they were intended, a specified timeline so that money is not administered and sit for several years, a means to claw back the funds if the project is not completed and to make sure that it is not to benefit one person, property, or business owner, it is to benefit the community and that must be demonstrated. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and carried with Mr. Lewis abstaining. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Ms. Arndt clarified that she intended to approve the guidelines with the inclusion of the items listed, along with the understanding that they will be developing a process. Proposed Ordinance #2025-02 – Project Carry-Forward Budget Balances/Proposed Budget Amendments (Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer) Ms. Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer reviewed the proposed carry-forward budget balances and Proposed Ordinance #2025-02. Staff recommended approval of the proposed Budget Amendments totaling $24,744,582 for Fiscal Year 2025 and adoption of Ordinance #2025-02. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Marney stated that the items that they would need to look out for would be the stormwater utility. She mentioned that they are reviewing different qualifications and how they can continually fund stormwater utility expenditures. As of right now, they have moved back to the general fund. Fortunately, they have not finished transferring all of the transfers for assets and the employees through the financials as far as booking those entries. As they are looking at the budget being carried forward, those items are already in the general fund. She noted that the documentation was provided in the packet. Ms. Marney stated that they do need to work together as a team to re-evaluate the needs for stormwater utility and come back with a different plan. She believes that they would need a tax increase and then how they packaged that to the citizens going forward would be a challenge for all of them.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 20 Ms. Arndt moved to accept the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Rocha moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole Report, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. QUARTERLY REVENUE REPORT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024 Members were provided the Quarterly Revenue Report as of December 31, 2024. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for acceptance of the Quarterly Revenue Report as of December 31, 2024, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. QUARTERLY REVIEW – CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP) (OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, AND DECEMBER) Members were provided the Quarterly Report for the Capital Investment Plan (CIP) as of December 31, 2024. By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for acceptance of the Quarterly Report for the Capital Investment Plan (CIP) December 31, 2024, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. CONFIRMATION OF POLICE PENSION ELECTION By consent agenda, Mr. Neil moved for acceptance of the Confirmation of Police Pension Election, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Confirmation of Police Pension Election - Retired Sergeant Steve Rogers - Three (3) Year Term to Expire January 31, 2028. ORDINANCE/FIRST READING – PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2025-02 – PROJECT CARRY-FORWARD BUDGET BALANCES/PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENTS (PATRICIA MARNEY, CONTROLLER/TREASURER) Council President Anderson reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinances were available on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government," or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 736-7008 or cityclerk@dover.de.us. Council President Anderson further stated that the Final Action by City Council will take place during the Second Reading on February 10, 2025.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 21 Ms. Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the proposed Ordinance #2025-02 – Project Carry – Forward Budget Balances/Proposed Budget Amendments. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney confirmed that the ordinance was done to rebudget project balances that were not spent in prior years. She noted that some projects were not completed. Responding to Ms. Marney, Mr. Lewis requested that he receive a quarterly project report for follow-up. He noted that it would show him how long some of the projects have been in progress and would question the ones that have been ongoing for years, ones that have no expenses yet, and why they have not started. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney stated that she could start working on putting the information together. She believed that she had those details when they went through the budgetary process. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2025-02 – PROJECT CARRY – FORWARD BUDGET BALANCES/PROPOSED BUDGET AMENDMENTS CITY MANAGER'S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Hugg had no announcements. MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Christiansen requested a moment of silence in honor of Holocaust Remembrance Day, acknowledging the six (6) million lives lost and expressing hope that such a tragedy never occurs again. He then read comments addressing concerns and questions he had received throughout the week regarding federal immigration laws. (Exhibit #1) COUNCIL MEMBERS' ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Boggerty shared that as he continued his community service in Dover, he and local community leaders will host an event on Friday, January 31, 2025, featuring a screening of The Forge, at 6:00 p.m. The event would be free, food would be provided and there would be discussion sessions about the movie. It will be held at The Well Church, Delaware and Beyond. He noted that on February 8, 2025, there would be a citywide arts workshop for all kids in the Dover area and that there would be a performance at 6:30 p.m. that same evening. Mr. Lewis reported that he attended the Dover Fire Department 2025 Annual Banquet and Award ceremony at the Hyatt in Dewey Beach. He expressed wholehearted support for the fire department. He noted that Dr. Pillsbury attended the event as well. He announced he attended the Governor’s inauguration and looks forward to working with him. Mr. Lewis stated that he has been dealing with numerous constituent concerns regarding icy roads and sidewalk snow removal.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2025 PAGE 22 Dr. Pillsbury thanked the fire department for a lovely event, and that she enjoyed it. It was her third time going and it continues to get better each year. Mr. Anderson announced that anyone interested in giving their input regarding the snow removal and fines, et cetera is encouraged to attend the Committee of the Whole meeting on January 28, 2025. He noted that there would be time for public comments, during the committee items but not at the beginning of the meeting. He explained the format difference between council meetings and committee meetings, stating that while council meetings include a designated public forum, committee meetings allow public input after each agenda item is presented. Mr. Anderson mentioned that the Biggs Museum is offering a free eight (8) session art class for veterans, held on Fridays from 1:00 to 3:30 p.m., beginning on February 7, 2025. The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. ANDRIA L. BENNETT CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by the City Council during their Regular Meeting of January 27, 2025, are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /AB Exhibits Exhibit #1 – Mayor Christiansen’s Letter for the City of Dover’s Relationship to Federal Immigration Laws

EXHIBIT #1 Regular City Council Meeting of 01/27/2025