Regular Council Packet - MM

CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, July 12, 2021 at 7:30 PM City Hall Council Chambers, 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware AGENDA This meeting will be held in City Hall Council Chambers with electronic access via WebEx. Public Participation information is as follows: Dial: 1-408-418-9388 Link: https://rb.gy/31hseq Event number: 179 904 9480 Event password: DOVER (if needed) If you are new to WebEx, get the app now at https://www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting starts. The meeting can also be viewed on Comcast Channel 14, Verizon Channel 20, and on the City's Streaming Player located on www.cityofdover.com under "Quick Links". OPEN FORUM - 15 Minutes Prior to Official Meeting (7:15 p.m.) The “Open Forum” segment is provided to extend the opportunity to the general public to share their questions, thoughts, comments, concerns, and complaints. Discussion of any item appearing on the agenda as a public hearing is prohibited during the Open Forum as an opportunity will be provided during consideration of that item. Citizen comments are limited to three (3) minutes. Council is prohibited from taking action since they are not in official session; however, they may schedule such items as regular agenda items and act upon them in the future. INVOCATION - Elder Ellis Louden PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Councilman Taylor ADOPTION OF AGENDA ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. Page 1

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 12, 2021 PAGE 2 MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS - MAY 2021 1. Council President Sudler 2. First District 3. Second District 4. Third District 5. Fourth District 6. At-Large 7. Mayor Christiansen PRESENTATIONS 8. Recognition of Service - Thomas J. Dix - Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement (May 2019 - May 2021) 9. Recognition of Service - James J. Galvin, Jr. - Board of Assessment Appeals (March 2010 - May 2021) PUBLIC HEARING FINAL READING - The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance was accomplished during the Council meeting of May 24, 2021. The ordinance is available at the entrance of the Council Chambers and on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government." 10. Ordinance #2021-12 Amending Appendix B - Zoning, Article III - District Regulations, Section 17 - Shopping Center Development, Subsection 17.33 - Regional Shopping Center (SC-3) Permitted Uses. (Planning Reference: MI-21-07) REZONING REQUESTS/FINAL READING - The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinances were accomplished during the Council meeting of May 24, 2021. The ordinances are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers and on the City's website at www.cityofdover.com under "Government." 11. Ordinance #2021-13 - Lands of Peter F. and Bonnie S. Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road Review of Rezoning Application for a parcel of land consisting of 1.248 acres. The property is zoned CPO (Commercial Professional Office Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the southwest corner of Forrest Avenue and Mifflin Road. (Property Owners: Peter F. & Bonnie S. Reidy. Property Address: 4 Mifflin Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000. Planning Reference: Z-21-04. Council District 1.) Page 2

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 12, 2021 PAGE 3 12. Ordinance #2021-14 - Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue Review of a Rezoning Application for a parcel of land consisting of 5.04 acres. The property is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the north side of Forrest Avenue and adjacent to Cranberry Run Drive. (Property Owner: Draper Farm Properties LLC. Property Address: 1617 Forrest Avenue. Tax Parcel: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000. Planning Reference: Z-21-05. Council District 1.) (Received request to postpone until August 9, 2021) CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTION OF MINUTES 13. Special Council Meeting of June 28, 2021 14. Regular Council Meeting of June 28, 2021 COMMITTEE REPORTS 15. Council Committee of the Whole Report - June 29, 2021 Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee 16. Discussion - Fiscal Year 2021 Audit Program (Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer) (Committee recommendation: Acceptance of the audit program) 17. National Council on Agricultural Life and Labor Research Fund, Inc. (NCALL) Restoring Central Dover Community Renewal Plan - Request for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds (Will Grimes, Director of Operations, NCALL) (Committee Recommendation: Refer to Staff for qualifications of the supplemental American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) appropriation.) 18. North Bradford Street – Street, Sidewalk and Tree Plan (Phase 1) (Sharon Duca, Public Works Director) (Committee recommendation: Direct Staff continue to develop a plan for North Bradford Street paving and curbing with input from Delaware Forest Service Professionals and the public.) 19. City Manager Search A. Consultant/Head Hunter or In-house B. Review of Job Description C. Process For Offer/Acceptance and Presentation of Recommended Candidate to Council for Confirmation D. Travel Expenses for In-person Interviews (Committee Recommendation: For Council President to appoint a City Manager Search Committee to bring their suggestions and recommendations to City Council for approval.) (This item will be considered during the latter part of the meeting - see item #29) Page 3

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 12, 2021 PAGE 4 20. Selection of Interview Committee for City Manager and City Clerk (Committee Recommendation: Acceptance of the appointments to the Interview Committee for the positions of City Manager and City Clerk, as recommended by Council President Sudler.) (This item will be considered during the latter part of the meeting - see item #30) Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee 21. Strategies for a Safer Dover (Councilman Ralph L. Taylor, Jr.) A. Debriefing of Townhall meeting on Tuesday, June 22, 2021 B. Review citizens concerns C. Review of feasibility of strategies suggested during the meeting D. Clarity on the purpose of the proposed Mobile Command Center MONTHLY REPORTS - May 2021 22. City Assessor's Report 23. City Council’s Community Enhancement Fund Report 24. City Manager’s Report 25. City Planner’s Report 26. Controller/Treasurer’s Budget Report 27. Police Chief's Report ITEMS NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA 28. Proposed Cancellation of August Meetings (Recommendation: Cancellation of Council Meeting of August 9, 2021 and Council Committee of the Whole Meeting of August 10, 2021.) 29. City Manager Search A. Consultant/Head Hunter or In-house B. Review of Job Description C. Process For Offer/Acceptance and Presentation of Recommended Candidate to Council for Confirmation D. Travel Expenses for In-person Interviews (The Council Committee of the Whole Report of June 29, 2021 is listed on the agenda as item #15) 30. Selection of Interview Committee for City Manager and City Clerk (The Council Committee of the Whole Report of June 29, 2021 is listed on the agenda as item #15) Page 4

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - July 12, 2021 PAGE 5 INTERIM CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS COUNCIL MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS ADJOURNMENT THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO 29 DEL. C. §10004(e)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING Page 5

Item #10. PETITION TO AMEND TEXT of City of Dover Zoning Ordinance Public Hearing Before the Dover City Council July 12, 2021 Recommendation from Planning Commission Meeting of June 21, 2021 With Staff and Development Advisory Committee Review Proposed Changes: Text Amendments to the following: • Zoning Ordinance, Appendix B – Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 17 Shopping center Development, Subsection 17.33 – Regional Shopping Center (SC-3) Summary of Amendments: The proposed text amendment adds “warehousing, transshipment and distribution, and logistics support” to the list of permitted uses in a regional shopping center (SC-3) and removes “by market analysis” from the findings needed for permitted uses. Ordinance Number: Proposed Ordinance #2021-12 File Number: MI-21-07 Planning Commission Recommendation: The Application (MI-21-07) for a Text Amendment to amend the Zoning Ordinance regarding the permitted uses in the SC-3 zoning district was considered. A Public Hearing was conducted on June 21, 2021 where no members of the public spoke regarding the Zoning Text Amendment and no written comments were received. The Planning Commission voted 8-0 (one member was absent) to recommend approval of the Zoning Text Amendment (Draft Meeting Minutes attached.) APPLICATION: MI-21-07 Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3Zone Background on Development of Text Amendment: Across the county older malls, especially class B & C centers, are losing anchors and experiencing decline. In some instances, this is simply a function of their age and obsolescence but, in most cases, it reflects changing customer concepts of shopping, the decline of the traditional large format retailer, the influence of online retail options, and the evolution of the wholesale and logistics distribution sector. Dover Mall (Dover’s only current Regional Shopping Center) has suffered the same issues, slowly losing ground to alternative retail options and most recently witnessing the closure of an Page 6

MI-20-07 Text Amendment – Article 3, Section 17.33 – Regional Shopping Center (SC-3) Planning Commission recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Item #10. Page 2 of 4 anchor store, representing about 12% of the total leasable floor space of the Mall at over 111,000 square feet in size. It is unlikely to be reoccupied as a single user retail facility and given the availability of other smaller spaces in the Mall and current conditions. It may not attract new retail users. Such empty retail spaces across the county are being repurposed for a variety of other uses, including offices, educational facilities, medical facilities, housing, entertainment venues, warehousing and logistics spaces, churches and even industrial uses. Some of these uses occupy Dover’s original mall, the Blue Hen Corporate Center, which was closed as a retail center years ago and rezoned in 2015 as a Community Shopping Center (SC-2) to support offices, call centers, and similar commercial uses, and increasingly medical activities. By virtue of being zoned SC-3 (Shopping Center Development Zone: Regional Shopping Center), the Dover Mall is limited to “retail, office, personal services, recreational and institutional facilities.” This SC-3 zoning classification does not allow distribution, warehousing or logistics uses, light manufacturing, or goods processing activities, all of which have been identified as key industrial targets for inclusion in the County’s and City’s economic development plans. Although interest is tentative at this time, the existing vacant anchor facility with its size, 19-foot ceilings, available ground and trailer height loading docks and ample parking has garnered some attention. The primary Dover Mall owner, Simon Properties, has expressed interest in alternative uses, but there are no firm proposals outstanding. Code Review & Analysis The definition of “Shopping Center” (Appendix B, - Zoning, Article 12. Definitions) reads: Shopping center: A retail commercial complex of three or more establishments, which is designed, developed, operated and controlled by a single ownership, with accessory off- street parking located on the site to serve jointly all establishments in the complex. The current definition of “Warehouse” (Appendix B – Zoning, Article 12. Definition) reads: Warehouse: A building where goods or wares are held in storage for sale or distribution later. The current definition of “Warehousing” (Appendix B – Zoning, Article 12. Definitions) reads: Warehousing: The act of storing goods and materials that will be sold or distributed later; the keeping of business inventories for future use, but not where sales are made primarily to retail customers. Warehousing excludes places designed and operated where individual units are rented out for the purpose of storing personal belongings, as in self-storage or mini-storage facilities. The current definition of “Logistics” (Appendix B – Zoning, Article 12. Definition) reads: Logistics: The process of planning, implementing and controlling the procurement, management and inventory control of materials, semi-finished goods, and finished products to meet business requirements. There are no Zoning Ordinance definitions applicable to “transshipment” or “distribution.” Page 7

MI-20-07 Text Amendment – Article 3, Section 17.33 – Regional Shopping Center (SC-3) Planning Commission recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Item #10. Page 3 of 4 Proposed Text Amendments The proposed Text Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance as found in Dover Code of Ordinances, Appendix B: Zoning, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 17 – Shopping Center Development, Subsection 17.33 – Regional Shopping Center Development is limited to the following: • Add specific wording permitting “warehousing, transshipment and distribution, and logistics support” as permitted uses. • Deleting wording “by market analysis” from the criteria as being otherwise undefined and vague. Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 17 - Shopping Center Development, Subsection 17.33 - Regional Shopping Center (SC-3) Permitted Uses of the Dover Code is proposed to be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue font and deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows: - 17.33 In a regional shopping center (SC-3), [the following are permitted uses:] All retail, office, personal service, recreational and institutional facilities, warehousing, transshipment and distribution, and logistics support, which can be shown, by market analysis, to be needed, and which will have no adverse effect on adjacent land uses. Because this is a Text Amendment proposed to the Zoning Ordinance, a Public Hearing and Recommendation by the Planning Commission are required. This review process began when the proposed Ordinance was submitted to the City Council for First Reading on May 24, 2021. City Council has referred the Ordinance to the Planning Commission for a Public Hearing and consideration on June 21, 2021. Then it is scheduled for Final Reading, Public Hearing and Final Action by Council on July 12, 2021. At that meeting City Council may act to adopt the whole Ordinance, to reject it, to adopt part of the Ordinance, and/or to make other amendments to the proposed text. Planning Review and Recommendations: Planning Staff developed the proposed Ordinance for the Text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance, Article 3, Section 17.33 as a result of consideration of economic development strategies and interaction with developers/property owners. The Planning Office is in support of these changes to the permitted uses in the SC-3 zoning district. 1. The Planning Office provided an opportunity to Development Advisory Committee (DAC) members to comment on the proposed Text Amendment at their meetings on June 2 and June 9, 2021. No other Agency which partakes in the DAC process had any significant comment or objection with regards to the proposed Text Amendment. 2. The Proposed Ordinance is also subject to Legal Review by the City Solicitor which may identify additional clarifications or corrections. 3. The approval of this Text Amendment does not authorize the establishment of the uses on properties with the SC-3 zone. Prior to establishment of a use, the appropriate Page 8

MI-20-07 Text Amendment – Article 3, Section 17.33 – Regional Shopping Center (SC-3) Planning Commission recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Item #10. Page 4 of 4 applications for site development activity review, Building Permits and other construction activity Permits, Business and Occupancy Licensing, etc. are required. RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: At the Virtual Planning Commission Meeting of June 21, 2021, the Application (MI-21-07) for a Zoning Text Amendment was represented by Planning Staff. During the Public Hearing, no members of the public spoke, and no written comments were provided regarding the proposed Zoning Text Amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed Zoning Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone by a vote of 8-0 (one member was absent). See also the included excerpt of the DRAFT Meeting Minutes of the June 21, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. The comments received from the other member agencies of the Development Advisory Committee (D.A.C.) are also provided. ATTACHMENTS: • Development Advisory Committee Comments from City of Dover Public Works Department, Department of Water & Wastewater, Electric Department, City Office of the Fire Marshal, DelDOT, and Kent Conservation District • Excerpt from DRAFT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 • Proposed Ordinance #2021-12 Page 9

Item #10. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone FILE #: MI-21-07 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PERSON: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 CONTACT PHONE #: jlyon@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. Our office has no objections to the proposed text amendment of permitted uses within the SC-3 Zone. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. None ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. None I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . Page 10

Item #10. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone FILE #: MI-21-07 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Public Works CONTACT PERSON: Sharon J. Duca, P.E. CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION 1. None. GENERAL 1. Our office has no objection to the text amendment. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS, PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE CONTACT PERSON AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Page 11

Item #10. CITY OF DOVER ELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone FILE #: MI-21-07 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric Department CONTACT PERSON: Paul Waddell, Electric Director CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7072 CONTACT EMAIL #: pwaddell@dover.de.us T HE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE , PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY ’ S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE . T HE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC 1. Electric Department has no objections to the proposed text amendment referencing Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES 1. None ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT 1. None I F YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS , PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE CONTACT PERSON AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE . Page 12

C F #10. MI-21-07 Item I I T R MI-21-07CITY OF DOVER Y E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M F A APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY R D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 06/02/21 D S O H V A E L R APPLICATION: Text Amendment Permitted uses within SC-3 Zone FILE #: MI-21-07 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. This is a text amendment. This office has no objections. APPLICABLE CODES LISTED BELOW (NOT LIMITED TO): 2015 NFPA 1 Fire Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2015 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2009 IBC (International Building Code) Latest editions of all other NFPA Codes as defined by the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations City of Dover Code of Ordinances *If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person listed. Page 13

Item #10. CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Text Amendment (Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone) FILE#: MI-21-07 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Joshua Schwartz PHONE#: 302-760-2768 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: No person, firm, corporation or the like shall construct, open, reconstruct, maintain, modify or use any crossing or entrance onto a state-maintained highway, street or road, including any drainage modifications leading into or carried by the highway drainage system, without first having complied with standards and regulations adopted by the Department and having obtained a permit issued by the Department. Please contact the Delaware Department of Transportation - Development Coordination section to begin permit process. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1. No comment to the Text Amendment Page 14

KENT CONSERVATION DISTRICT Item #10. 1679 SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY • DOVER, DELAWARE 19901• (302) 608-5370 • WWW.KENTCD.ORG CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY June 2021 APPLICATION: Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone FILE #: MI-21-07 REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District CONTACT PERSON: Kate Owens PHONE #: 302-608-5370 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: Source: 2019 Delaware Sediment and Stormwater Regulations CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: Kent Conservation District has no objection to the text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 17 – Shopping Center Development Zone. Page 15

Item #10. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION June 21, 2021 Excerpt from Meeting Minutes – Draft The Meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission was held on Monday, June 21, 2021 at 7:00 PM as a Virtual Meeting using the phone/videoconferencing system WebEx due to Delaware’s Declaration of the State of Emergency for COVID-19. The Meeting Session was conducted with Chair Mrs. Maucher presiding. Members present were Mr. Adams, Mr. Roach, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Lord, Mrs. Welsh, Dr. Jones and Mrs. Maucher. Mr. Baldwin was absent. Staff members present were Mr. Dave Hugg, Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Mr. Julian Swierczek, Mr. Jason Lyon and Mrs. Kristen Mullaney. MI-21-07 Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone - Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council of Text Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 – District Regulations, Section 17 – Shopping Center Development Zone. The proposed Ordinance outlines additional permitted land uses within the existing zoning designation of SC-3 (Shopping Center Development Zone: Regional Shopping Center). The proposed amendment to the Ordinance is to retain current permitted uses, but additionally include within the SC-3 Zone: “warehousing, transshipment and distribution, and logistics support.” The proposed changes reflect changing customer concepts of shopping, the decline of the traditionally large format retailer, the influence of online retail operations, and the evolution of wholesale and the logistics distribution sector. Ordinance #2021-12. Representatives: None Mr. Hugg stated that we are all aware that across the country traditional shopping centers and traditional shopping malls are in decline. This is happening for a variety of reasons. Some of them are because these are older and somewhat obsolete but more importantly because the change in shopping and customer desires. In fact, we are seeing a lot of the large world established retailers evolving into different kinds of businesses than they have traditional been involved in. They have seen the growth in online retail, including something that he learned about which is “buy online and pickup in store”. That is actually what is happening with Macy’s. And also the fact that wholesaling supply processes that we used to know have changed substantially. The Dover Mall certainly hasn’t escaped with all of these things going on in the country. As a result, about 12% of the Mall is empty. For example, the Sears Store at 112,000 SF is unlikely to ever be the retail anchor store. They have had some inquiries from time to time in the City of Dover about facilities for wholesale and distribution logistics to support particularly on the retail side, as they have witnessed with the Macy’s activity. Unfortunately, our current SC-3 Zone does not permit that kind of use. It doesn’t prohibit it; it simply doesn’t include it at all. The amendment that is before the Commission is trying to provide some additional flexibility in the SC-3 (Regional Shopping Center) that would allow potential use of those areas for wholesale, distribution and logistics. The Amendment before you would add wording to allow wholesale, distribution and logistics. It would also clean up the language striking some language Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 1 of 2 Page 16

Item #10. that is undefined in the current Ordinance. They have had some inquiries about the Dover Mall. They don’t have anything immediately pressing but this is a move that they are hoping to make to make the City and the facility more interesting and accessible to other uses. Mr. Hartman stated that the zoning doesn’t prohibit these activities. Would it be in the realm of things to suggest a Conditional Use rather than a change to the zoning language? He doesn’t know who else would benefit from this besides the Dover Mall. Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mr. Hugg stated that at the moment, the only property under this zoning is the Dover Mall. Some years ago the original mall, the Blue Hen Mall, was rezoned to SC-2 which is more of an office focus. That is where the Social Security Office, Bayhealth, and the Veteran’s Administration have located. He doesn’t know whether requiring this to be a Conditional Use as opposed to allowing the use under this zone; he is not sure what that achieves. The proposal here is simply to add it to the list of other uses that are allowed. Mrs. Maucher opened a public hearing and after seeing no one wishing to speak, closed the public hearing. Mrs. Welsh moved to recommend approval to City Council for MI-21-07 Text Amendment: Permitted Uses within the SC-3 Zone, seconded by Mr. Adams and the motion was carried 8-0 by roll call vote with Mr. Baldwin absent. Mrs. Welsh voting yes; based on Mr. Hugg’s comments and after reviewing the application, it is appropriate for the upcoming consideration for that facility. Dr. Jones voting yes; based upon Mr. Hugg’s presentation and the fact that she would like to see the Dover Mall form another personality. Mr. Adams voting yes; for the reasons previously stated. Mr. Roach voting yes; for reasons previously stated. Mrs. Malone voting yes; based on previous reasons stated. Mr. Hartman voting yes; based on the Report to the Dover Planning Commission dated June 21, 2021. Mrs. Lord voting yes; based on what Dr. Jones stated. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; based on reasons previously stated. Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 2 of 2 Page 17

FINAL READING Item #10. CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2021-12 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN 2 COUNCIL MET: 3 That Chapter Appendix B - Zoning, Article 3 - District Regulations, Section 17 - Shopping Center 4 Development, Subsection 17.33 - Regional Shopping Center (SC-3) Permitted Uses of the Dover 5 Code be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue font and deleting the text indicated in 6 red strikeout as follows: 7 17.3 Permitted uses. 8 17.33 In a regional shopping center (SC-3), [the following are permitted uses:] 9 1. All retail, office, personal service, recreational and institutional 10 facilities, warehousing, transshipment and distribution, and 11 logistics support, which can be shown, by market analysis, to be 12 needed, and which will have no adverse effect on adjacent land uses. 13 (Ord. of 4-12-1982, § 1; Ord. of 4-25-1994; Ord. of 2-12-2001; Ord. No. 2011-25, 12-12-2011; Ord. 14 No. 2014-06, 5-12-2014 ) 15 ADOPTED: * 16 S:\ORDINANCES\2021\DRAFT\ORDINANCE #2021-12 - APPX B, ART III, SEC 17 - REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER\ORDINANCE 2021-12 APP B ART III SEC 17 - SC-3 REGIONAL 17 SHOP CTR Final Reading.wpd 18 SYNOPSIS 19 This amendment adds "warehousing, transshipment and distribution, and logistics 20 support" to the list of permitted uses in a regional shopping center as a result of the 21 ongoing evolution of such centers across the country away from primarily retail to 22 a mix of uses. These changes reflect changing customer concepts of shopping, the 23 decline of the traditionally large format retailer, the influence of online retail 24 operations, and the evolution of the wholesale, and logistics distribution sector. 25 (SPONSORS: ANDERSON AND NEIL) 26 Actions History (Most recent first) 27 07/12/2021 - Scheduled for Public Hearing/Final Reading - City Council 28 06/21/2021 - Public Hearing - Planning Commission 29 05/24/2021 - Introduction/First Reading - City Council Page 18

Item #11. PETITION TO AMEND ZONING DISTRICT Public Hearing Before the Dover City Council July 12, 2021 Recommendation from Planning Commission Meeting of June 21, 2021 With Staff and Development Advisory Committee Review Owners: Peter F. & Bonnie S. Reidy Address: 4 Mifflin Road, Dover DE Location: Southwest corner of Forrest Avenue and Mifflin Road Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000 Size: 1.248 acres (54,362.9 SF) Present Use: Single-family dwelling (vacant) Proposed Use: Service Establishment (Car Service with Drive-through) 2019 Comprehensive Plan Designation – Land Use Classification: Commercial Low-Intensity Present Zoning: CPO (Commercial & Professional Office Zone) and COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Proposed Zoning: C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Reason for Request: To amend the zoning of the 1.248+/- acre parcel at 4 Mifflin Road, Dover DE 19904 from CPO to C-2A (while retaining COZ-1 Overlay). File Number: Z-21-04 Ordinance Number: 2021-13 Page 19

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 2 Planning Commission Recommendation: The Application (Z-21-04) for Rezoning of 4 Mifflin Road was represented the applicant’s engineering firm. A Public Hearing was conducted on June 21, 2021 where two members of the public spoke regarding the Rezoning application and no written comments were received. The Planning Commission’s motion to recommend approval of the proposed Rezoning from CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 resulted in a tie vote of 4-4 (one member was absent). (Draft Meeting Minutes attached.) APPLICATION: Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 I. APPLICATION SUMMARY This rezoning application consists of one parcel of land totaling 1.248 +/- acres located on the southwest corner of Forrest Avenue and Mifflin Road. The property is zoned CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) and is subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) while remaining subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The owner of record is Peter F. & Bonnie S. Reidy. Property Address: 4 Mifflin Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000. Existing Property: The property has frontage along both Mifflin Road to the east and Forrest Avenue to the north; and it contains a single family (one-family detached) dwelling unit that is currently vacant. The single vehicle access point to the site is via a driveway toward the southern property line off of Mifflin Road. There is no sidewalk or other pedestrian facilities along either the Forrest Avenue or Mifflin Road frontages, and there is consequently no pedestrian access on the site. With the exception of the existing house and its associated site features (accessory garage structure and driveway), the property is largely grass with several mature trees. The applicant is seeking rezoning to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) to allow for a Service Establishment (Car Wash) use to be established with associated site improvements. The development of the site will require a separate Site Development Plan Application be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission. This Application only seeks rezoning of the property from CPO to C-2A; the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) designation will remain. Previous Application: This property was subject to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application (MI-12-01: Item A) which sought to amend the previous 2008 Comprehensive Plan’s Land Use designation of this property (and the adjoining properties of 24 Mifflin Road to the south and 1510 Forrest Avenue to the west) from Residential Low Density to Commercial. Originally, Planning Staff had recommended the land use be changed to Commercial noting the expansion of the commercial corridor westward along Forrest Avenue, but City Council instead noted public testimony and instead established the Land Use as Residential Low-Intensity in adopting the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application of 2012 to change the Page 20

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 3 designation to Commercial was however approved by the City Council at their March 2012 meeting. The MI-12-01 Comprehensive Plan Amendment was associated with the rezoning application Z- 12-01 Lands of Reidy, Lucas and Klewans which initially sought a rezoning to C-2A. Planning Staff recommended CPO zoning as a less intense commercial zone due to adjacent residential uses. The proposed rezoning received a recommendation of approval from the Planning Commission at their March 2012 meeting. However, after hearing public testimony, the City Council instead approved a rezoning of the properties to CPO. No development was proposed specifically with the 2012 Comprehensive Plan Amendment and subsequent Rezoning. The Applicant had instead proposed the Rezoning in order to allow for development of the properties as commercial uses. Surrounding Land Uses The property is surrounded by parcels inside the City of Dover adjoining to the west and south, across Forrest Avenue to the north, and across Mifflin Road to the east. The properties immediately adjacent within the City of Dover are also zoned CPO and similarly contain single family homes. The property across Mifflin Road to the east is zoned CPO and contains a branch of the WSFS Bank. The property across Forrest Avenue to the north is zoned RG-2 and contains a series of Apartment Buildings which are part of the overall Dover Country Club Apartments Complex. Properties to the southwest of the subject site are within Kent County and are zoned AC (Agricultural Conservation), and RS-1 (Single-family Residential) and contain a variety of single family homes and a farmstead. All properties in the vicinity additionally subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) which is an overlay along Forrest Avenue. II. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW Comprehensive Plan: In the 2019 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Plan (Map 12-1) recommends that this property be used for Commercial Low Intensity. The 2019 Comprehensive Plan references Commercial Low Intensity Land Use Category beginning on page 12-11 as one of a series of commercial Land Use Categories: The following are excerpts from the 2019 Comprehensive Plan regarding Commercial Low Intensity land uses (page 12-11): Goal: Commercial Land Uses – in General: Maintain and improve the City’s position as a regional commercial center while providing its citizens convenient access to needed goods and services through well-designed and spaced regional, community, and neighborhood commercial centers/opportunities. Commercial Land Uses: Historically and today Dover serves as a regional center for commerce and trade within the Delmarva Peninsula. Its character is defined by the ebb and flow of its dominance as a center of business throughout its long history. Today, an integrated transportation system consisting of arterial highways, freight rail service, and air transport provide for the efficient movement of goods to and from Dover in support of business development and activities. Within a hierarchy of intensities, the Land Development Plan designates a series of commercial land use categories: Commercial-Entertainment; Commercial – High Intensity; and Commercial – Low Intensity. New to this plan is a Commercial land use category specifically associated with large scale Page 21

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 4 commercial entertainment activities reflecting this increasingly important aspect of Dover’s economy. More intensive regional commercial development is directed toward the US Route 13/DuPont Highway and Bay Road corridors close to existing highway commercial shopping center establishments. Route 8/Forrest Avenue, west of the railroad tracks, has also become a key commercial corridor within the City. Dover’s residential neighborhoods also create various local commercial needs. The Land Development Plan also identifies specific locations for the development of neighborhood retail and community shopping center uses within the suburban fringe. Commercial - Low Intensity Commercial Areas: The Plan identifies areas for Commercial Low Intensity areas intended for predominately neighborhood commercial use to meet the convenience retail and service needs of existing and future residential areas. These uses can be accommodated in newly constructed purpose-built buildings, in renovated existing buildings, or as part of mixed-use redevelopment initiatives. The Rezoning Request is consistent with the Land Use Classification of Commercial Low Intensity. Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix (from the 2019 Comprehensive Plan) specifies that the following zones are compatible with this land use classification. C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) C-1A (Limited Commercial) C-2 (central Commercial) Commercial -Low C-2A (Limited Central Commercial) Intensity RGO (General Residence and Office) CPO (Commercial and Professional Office) IO (Institutional and Office) III. ZONING REVIEW Request for C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) Zoning • The following description of the C-2A zoning district is provided from Article 3 §14 of the Zoning Ordinance. Article 3 Section 14. – Limited Central Commercial Zone (C-2A). 14.1 Uses permitted. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: (a) Retail Stores (b) Business, professional or government offices (c) Personal service establishments. (d) Restaurants. (e) Service establishments. (f) Hotels. (g) Places of public assembly. (h) Drive-throughs. (i) One family residences, including attached and semi-detached dwellings, complying with the bulk standards of the RG-1 (General Residence) zone. Page 22

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 5 (j) Apartments and multi-family dwellings 14.2 Conditional Uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: (a) Parking lots and parking structures as a principal use on suitably landscaped lots. (b) Fuel pumps accessory to a permitted use. 14.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the city planner. 14.4 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in article 5, section 8.1. 14.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change of use. COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) The purpose and requirements of the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) are given in Article 3 §27 of the Zoning Ordinance. The COZ-1 regulations include the following: Article 3 Section 27. – Corridor Overlay Zone-1 (COZ-1). 14.1 Purpose. The corridor overlay zone (COZ) is established for the following reasons: (a) To promote superior urban corridor development and the highest quality built environment; (b) To foster coordination and linkage among corridor properties and with adjacent lands; (c) To preserve the functionality and efficiency of the roadway for traffic movement; and (d) To achieve a visually balanced streetscape environment which is friendly to the pedestrian and motorist alike. 27.2 Superior urban design. For the purposes of this ordinance the term "superior urban design" shall meet the following criteria: (a) Superior urban design places a strict and primary importance on the pedestrian. The concept should lend itself to interconnectivity while presenting building structures as aspects of the street, not simply islands existing in the "sea of roads". The design should encourage fewer car-trips, as well as promote automobile trips on an interconnected local street system rather than trips that utilize the arterials. In demonstrating superior urban design, an applicant must show that the plan presented exceeds the requirements of the zoning ordinance in at least two of the following areas: (i) Transportation amenities for bicycles, pedestrians and transit that exceed those required by the zoning ordinance; (ii) Architectural features including, but not limited to: LEED-certified buildings; unique architecture not replicated in other locations; use of architectural elements Page 23

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 6 such as entry porticos, porte-cocheres, colonnades, cornices, porch columns and balusters, band courses, coins, water tables and other trim that enhances visual quality and function of the structure; and use of the highest-quality construction materials. (iii) Landscaping that exceeds the requirements of this section, including robust use of trees, shrubbery, and flowering plants to screen parked cars; water gardens and ponds; arboretums; tree preservation measures; (iv) Public spaces and art including, but not limited to, sculpture, memorials, murals, public court yards and pocket parks, and fountains; (v) Green technologies for stormwater management, as well as green energy technologies such as geothermal heating and cooling and solar energy supplies. (b) The city planner shall develop policy guidance on how the concept of superior urban design will be evaluated. 27.3 Zone boundaries. The COZ encompasses the lands adjacent to the following roadways as outlined on the City of Dover Zoning Map as set forth in article 2, section 2 of this ordinance: (a) Delaware Route 8 (Forrest and Division Streets) from the railroad tracks in a westerly direction to the city limit line. (b) McKee/Saulsbury Road (County Road 156) from the intersection at Dennys Road (County Road 100) in a southerly direction to the terminal intersection with West North Street (County Road 73). 27.4 Permitted uses. Land use shall be governed by those provisions of this ordinance related to the specific zoning district designations of each property as depicted on the zoning map. 27.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change in use. When the zoning district regulations specify that a particular use requires conditional use approval in accordance with article 10, section 1, the provisions of that article shall apply. Site development plans and conditional use site plans for properties within the COZ shall reflect compliance with the development guidelines of this article, in addition to all other applicable codes and regulations. 27.6 Development guidelines. 27.61 Setbacks: a. Front yards. Residential Nonresidential Min. Max. Min. Max. McKee/Saulsbury 60' to 80' 40' to 50' * Route 8—Artis Drive to Mifflin Road 60' to 80' None Route 8—Mifflin Road to Saulsbury 40' to 60' 40' to 60' * Road Route 8—Saulsbury Road to R.R. line 20' to 30' 20' to 30' Page 24

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 7 Residential Nonresidential Min. Max. Min. Max. Subdivision streets (Setback provisions of article 4 shall apply) * When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission through the site plan review process that the proposal involves a superior urban design, the maximum setback may be increased to no more than 90 feet from the property line on Route 8 from Mifflin Road to Saulsbury Road and on McKee and Saulsbury Roads. 27.62 Building placement. Buildings shall be situated on the property so as to maximize the use of the frontage along the roadway and shall have the longest side of the building arranged parallel and square to the roadway. When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission that, due to specific constraints related to lot configuration, alternative building placements may be permitted. 27.63 Parking. (a) Location. Parking shall not be permitted to be situated within the front yard, nor between the right-of-way line and the building, except in the following instances: (i) Automobile service stations; (ii) Properties in a shopping center (SC) zoning district, in which case, parking may be permitted between the building and the roadway, provided that such parking [shall] be limited to five rows of single parking spaces between the road and the storefront; (iii) When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission through the site plan review process that the design presented involves a superior urban design, parking may be permitted between the building and the street, provided that such parking within this area shall be adequately landscaped and screened from the roadway. (b) Required number of spaces. See specific district requirements in article 4. (c) Layout. (i) Parking lots shall be arranged in such a manner so that not more than 20 parking spaces in a row shall be permitted without a landscaped island. No more than six rows of 20 spaces shall be provided without provision for a landscaped median. Parking islands shall be a minimum of ten feet wide and planting medians shall be no less than eight feet wide. (ii) There shall be a landscaped buffer area of at least 12 feet in width between the building and parking lot and drive areas. The buffer area shall include provisions for a sidewalk of at least six feet and no greater than eight feet in width. The buffer area and sidewalk shall be grade separated from the parking lot by concrete curbing of at least six inches in height. (d) Landscaping. Design shall be simple and easy to maintain and shall consist of a combination of hardy canopy trees, low evergreen shrubs and turf grass, and shall be designed in accordance with landscape guidelines set forth in article 5, section 15 of this ordinance and as follows: (i) Interior landscaping. A minimum of five percent of the interior area of a parking lot shall be reserved for landscape purposes. This provision shall include the landscaping of all required parking islands and medians. Shade trees shall be incorporated within the landscaped islands whenever and wherever practicable. Page 25

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 8 (ii) Parking lot screening adjacent to public right-of-way. Low profile screening shall be required when parking spaces would result in vehicles facing onto the roadway. Screening may consist of a low wall, evergreen hedge with a minimum height of two feet at the time of planting, planted three feet apart on center, and a maximum height of three feet at maturity, or earth berm. Should a low wall be used, such wall shall be accompanied by evergreen shrub plantings on the roadway side of the wall and spaced ten feet apart on center. (iii) Reserved. 27.64 Site access. (a) Entrance width and radii. Site entrances shall have a minimum width of 24 feet. Entrances involving a median divider shall be at least 35 feet in width. Entrance radii shall be a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet. (b) Number of entrances and curb cut spacing. One curb cut shall be permitted for each street which abuts a site. For sites with street frontage in excess of 300 linear feet, one additional curb cut may be permitted. For sites with street frontage in excess of 600 linear feet, two additional curb cuts may be permitted. Multiple curb cuts on a property shall have a minimum spacing distance in accordance with the following schedule: Speed Limit Maximum Spacing (Ft.) 25 105 30 125 35 150 40 185 45 230 50 275 (c) [Shared access.] Shared access shall be provided, whenever possible, for entrances to adjoining uses, including residential driveways. (d) [Cross access.] Cross access shall be provided among abutting uses of similar use categories, whenever possible, to provide linkage between properties as an alternative to re-entering the corridor to access both existing and future neighboring properties. (e) Entrance locations for adjoining properties. Commercial site entrances shall be no closer than 25 feet to an adjoining property which is zoned residential and no closer than ten feet to an adjoining property which is in a nonresidential zoning category. 27.65 [Signs.] Signs shall meet the regulations found in article 5, section 4, supplementary sign regulations. 27.66 Building height. (a) Buildings shall be limited in overall height to 35 feet and shall not exceed two stories. 27.67 Open space and landscaping. Page 26

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 9 (a) Lot coverage. Each lot shall have a minimum of 25 percent of the lot area dedicated to be landscaped open space. A lesser amount of landscaped open space may be permitted when it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the planning commission, through the site plan review process, that, due to lot configuration and existing built conditions, the required minimum is impractical. (b) Frontage. Each lot shall have a landscaped open space of at least 25 feet in width, measured from the back of curb along the entire frontage of the lot, except at points of site access. Trees shall be provided along the frontage perimeter at a minimum rate of one tree for each 50 linear feet of frontage. (c) Side and rear yards. A minimum of 15 feet of landscaped open space shall be provided along all side and rear lot lines when abutting a residential use and a minimum of five feet when abutting a nonresidential use. Tree plantings shall be provided along all nonfrontage perimeters at a minimum rate of one tree for each 75 linear feet. (d) Stormwater detention ponds. Detention ponds may be counted toward the minimum 25 percent open space area, provided that such ponds are designed to emulate natural features by incorporating irregular outline, gradual slopes (no greater than 1:4), and appropriate landscape plantings. (e) Landscaping. Landscaped open spaces shall be designed in accordance with the provisions of this section, as well as the landscaping guidelines as set forth in article 5, section 9 of this ordinance. (f) Screening. The following items shall be located so as to minimize visibility from the roadway, adjacent properties and other public areas, and shall be screened from public view: (1) Service bays; (2) Loading docks and platforms; (3) Rooftop utilities; (4) Satellite dishes; (5) Dumpsters; (6) Storage areas. (g) Standard for tree plantings. Trees shall be of a high canopy variety and shall be limbed to a minimum height of 12 feet above grade at maturity. (h) Standards for shrubbery. Shrubbery shall be of a low evergreen variety and shall be limited to use as foundation plantings and for screening purposes. (i) Standards for ground cover. Ground cover shall be limited to turf and ornamental grasses and ornamental evergreen ground cover plantings within required landscape areas. 27.68 Lot configuration. All lots within the corridor overlay district created after the enactment of this section shall conform to the following: (a) Minimum lot area [shall be] 10,000 square feet. Service stations [shall have a minimum lot area of] 20,000 square feet. (b) Minimum lot depth shall be 100 feet. In the C-3 (service commercial) district, the minimum lot depth shall be 150 feet. (c) Minimum road frontage shall be at least 100 feet. In the C-3 (service commercial) district, the minimum road frontage shall be 150 feet. Page 27

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 10 27.69 Architectural review. The side of any building which faces the corridor (or corridors) shall be referred to as the "corridor elevation." Buildings in the COZ-1 shall be designed to front on the corridor, and the corridor elevation shall contain architectural elements traditionally associated with the front of a building. Blank walls without functioning windows are prohibited along the corridor. Windows must be incorporated into the overall design concept of the corridor elevation. Providing one or several small windows on a large corridor elevation shall not constitute compliance with this ordinance. A "functioning window" shall be defined as a window which lets light into the interior of the structure, and is integrated and related to the interior layout of the space. In addition to functioning windows, the corridor elevation shall have the following elements: (a) A primary entrance door or doors (except for loading doors). (b) A primary entrance feature, such as a porch, portico, awning, entrance walk, or other similar feature. In addition, the corridor elevation shall have one of the following elements: (a) Landscaping integrated into the building design concept. (b) Architectural or urban design elements which link adjacent structures together, such as plazas, walkways, colonnades, or similar features. (c) Architectural relief, such as vertical and horizontal offsets in exterior wall elevations, band courses, lintels and sill courses, cornices, and the like, to create shadow lines. The applicant shall submit 12 copies of the corridor elevation at the time of application. The city planner or his/her designee shall determine whether compliance with the provisions of this ordinance has been achieved. 27.7 Properties located on a corner lot with two frontages within the Corridor Overlay Zone. When a property is located on the corner of two corridors within the Corridor Overlay Zone, only one of the two corridors shall be subject to the requirements of Section 27.61 Setbacks and Section 27.63 Parking, Subsection (a) Location. The frontage of the property on which the identifiable front of the building is located shall be the frontage that is subject to the requirements of Section 27.61 And Section 27.63, Subsection (a). In designing the site, in order to qualify for the relief under this subsection, the applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission that the design incorporates the principles of superior urban design as defined in Section 27.2. Zoning Definitions: Service establishment: Any establishment whose primary activity is the provision of assistance, as opposed to products, to individuals, business, industry, government, and other enterprises. IV. RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING STAFF: The C-2A zone has a range of permitted uses that include commercial uses such as retail, office, personal service & service establishments, restaurants, and places of public assembly. The C-2A zone also includes permitted uses that are residential in nature including one-family residences (detached dwellings and duplex units), apartments and multi-family dwellings (more than 2 dwelling units in same building). The C-2A zone also includes conditional uses (uses subject to specific review for approval) for parking lots/structures and for fuel pumps as accessory to a permitted use. The current use as a one-family detached dwelling unit (single-family house) is a permitted use. Page 28

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 11 Staff recommends that the Rezoning be granted to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) as requested, as the proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the Commercial: Low Intensity Land Use Classification. The use as a Service Establishment (Car Wash with Drive-through) is permitted in the C-2A Zone. Staff also recommends that the property remain subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) due to its frontage on Forrest Avenue. The purposes of the COZ-1 are to promote superior urban corridor development; to foster coordination and linkage among corridor properties; to preserve functionality and efficiency of the roadway for traffic movement; and to achieve a visually balanced streetscape environment friendly to the pedestrian and motorist. (Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 §27). The COZ-1 includes a number of additional buffers/setbacks, landscaping enhancements, and site layout design requirements. Planning Staff notes that access design for this site is subject to DelDOT review and approval. Given the relative limited area of the property, and its proximity to the intersection of Forrest Avenue and Mifflin Road, access design may be complex due to the intended use of the property. Were the application for Rezoning to be recommended by the Planning Commission and subsequently approved by the City Council, the applicant would still have to submit Site Development Plan for review and approval by the Planning Commission, as well as all relevant Building Permits, in order for the use of the site to be established. This recommendation is being made without that benefit of hearing the comments of surrounding landowners and residents. A public hearing is required on this matter and those comments should be given consideration. V. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1) The applicant shall be aware that approval of any rezoning application does not represent Site Development Plan or Record Plan approval. Following any decision made by City Council in regard to this rezoning, then an application for a Site Plan, Subdivision Plan, and/or appropriate Building Permits must be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the establishment of a use, development activity, or any construction activity on the site. The applicant should contact the Planning Staff to determine the appropriate review process for any proposed projects. 2) The applicant shall be aware that approval of any rezoning application does not represent a Building Permit, Sign Permit or other construction activity permit approval. A separate application submission is required before issuance of permits by the City of Dover. 3) The applicant shall be aware that any future use of the existing structures may be subject to a separate permitting or licensing process through the City of Dover Licensing and Permitting Division. Certain types of uses also require a Public Occupancy Permit or Rental Dwelling Permits. RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: At the Virtual Planning Commission Meeting of June 21, 2021, the Application (Z-21-04) was represented by Jonathan Street of the application’s engineering firm the Becker Morgan Group. Page 29

Item #11. Z-21-04 Lands of Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road: Rezoning CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 12 During the Public Hearing, two (2) members of the public spoke regarding the Rezoning application. The Planning Commission’s motion to recommend approval of the proposed Rezoning from CPO with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 resulted in a tie vote of 4-4 (one member was absent). See also the included excerpt of the DRAFT Meeting Minutes of the June 21, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. The comments received from the other member agencies of the Development Advisory Committee (D.A.C.) are also provided. ATTACHMENTS: • Zoning Map Exhibit • Application Z-21-04 Submission: o Application Submission Letter o Rezoning Exhibit Plan Sheet • Development Advisory Committee Comments from City of Dover Public Works Department, Department of Water & Wastewater, Electric Department, City Office of the Fire Marshal, DelDOT, and Kent Conservation District • Excerpt from DRAFT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 • Proposed Ordinance #2021-13 Page 30

City of Dover Application No.: Z-21-04 Item #11. Department of Planning & Inspections N Ca ro line Pl Hampton Dr ROS RG-3 ROS Par Haven Dr ay irw Fa Dr RG-2 La k es ide Dr u rts RG-3 null Co h null Mars k Ln C re e RG-3 ve Forr est A Site CPO C-2A CPO R-8 fflinR Mi d St awn R-8 F R-8 R-10 ROS R-8 Tile: Lands of Reidy Ordinance #: 2021-13 Addresses: 4 Mifflin Road Legend « Parcel ID: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000 Subject Property Existing Zoning: CPO Commercial Professional Office Zone and COZ-1 Corridor Overlay Zone 2012 Buildings Proposed Zoning: C-2A Limited Central Commercial Zone Zoning COZ-1 Corridor Overlay Zone Owner: Peter F. & Bonnie Reidy Dover Parcels Date: 05/13/2021 Corridor Overlay Zone 0 125 250 500 Feet Page 31

Item #11. Page 32

Item #11. SITE DATA 1. OWNER OF RECORD: PETER F. REIDY 4 MIFFLIN RD. DOVER, DE 19904 (302) 730 - 2923 2. EQUITABLE OWNER: RAJ SYAN 1013 MATTHEW WAY NEW CASTLE, DE 19720 (610) 316 - 1105 ZONING - RG - 2 GENERAL RESIDENCE ZONING - ROS RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 3. ENGINEER BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVENUE ZONING - RG - 3 GROUP HOUSING DOVER, DE 19904 (302) 743 - 7950 ZONING - RG2 - GENERAL RESIDENCE ZONING - ROS RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 4. PROPERTY MAP NUMBER: 2-05-07609-01-1100-00001 5. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: EXISTING: C-PO - COMMERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACE PROPOSED: C-2A - LIMITED CENTRAL COMMERCIAL ZONE ZONING - ROS ZONING - RG - 3 GROUP HOUSING RECREATION & OPEN SPACE 6. DEED SUMMARY: 0040 - 0179 ZONING - R - 20 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 7. PRESENT USE: VACANT RESIDENTIAL HOME 9. PROPOSED USE: CAR SERVICE WITH DRIVE THROUGH ZONING - RG - 3 GROUP HOUSING 10. TOTAL SITE AREA: 1.248 ACRES ± 11. SOURCE OF WATER: CITY OF DOVER 12. SOURCE OF SEWER: CITY OF DOVER ZONING - R - 20 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - RG2 - GENERAL RESIDENCE ZONING - RG - 3 GROUP HOUSING AV ANUE FORREST SITE MI ZONING - C-PO - COMMERCIAL & PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE ZONING - C-2A LANDS N/F FF ZONING - C-2A LIMITED CENTRAL COMMERCIAL LIMITED CENTRAL COMMERCIAL ZONING - SC-1 LIN PETER F. REIDY NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER ZONING - RS1 T.P. 05-076.09-01-11.00 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - C-PO - COMMERCIAL & PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE 1.248 ACRES ± RO ZONING - C-PO - COMMERCIAL & PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE AD ZONING - R - 10 ZONING - C-PO - COMMERCIAL & PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE ZONING - AC ZONING - R - 8 AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION DISTRICT ZONING - R - 8 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - R - 8 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - C-PO - COMMERCIAL & PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE ZONING - R - 8 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - R - 8 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - R - 8 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAYER STATE: MIFFLIN ROAD ARCH I T E C TURE ENG I NE E R I NG BMG: 2021074.00 1" = 150' 0 75 150 SCALE: REZONING EXHIBIT Dover, DE DATE: 05/06/2021 ZONING - ROS 309 S. Governors Ave. DRAWN BY: A.C.F. RECREATION & OPEN SPACE Dover, DE 19904 Do Not Explode - Select Scale CITY OF DOVER Ph. 302.734.7950 SCALE: 1" = 150' KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE Fax 302.734.7965 1Page 33 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2021\2021074\DWG\2021074-AERIAL.dwg, May 07, 2021 - 2:14pm 2021-05-07

Item #11. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Peter F. and Bonnie S. Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road FILE #: Z-21-04 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Public Works CONTACT PERSON: Sharon J. Duca, P.E. CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION 1. None. GENERAL 1. Our office has no objection to the rezoning of tax parcel ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS, PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE CONTACT PERSON AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Page 34

Item #11. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Peter F. and Bonnie S. Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road FILE #: Z-21-04 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PERSON: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 CONTACT PHONE #: jlyon@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER / WASTEWATER 1. Our office has no objection to the rezoning of tax parcels: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000 RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. Should this site be redeveloped, which includes modifications to the use, the applicant / developer will be responsible for all costs associated with providing the appropriate meter / service / main to this site based upon the use including any necessary system upgrades or extensions. The appropriateness and adequacy of water and sewer services and meters will be assessed at that time. (Please note that each water meter registered with the City of Dover must have a separate service line.) Should the existing water and sanitary sewer services no longer be required based upon the proposed use, they must be properly abandoned at the mains in accordance with all City of Dover Water / Wastewater Handbook. 2. Any redevelopment shall adhere to the City of Dover Water / Wastewater Handbook. 3. Please note that renovations and or change of use projects must ensure that the water and wastewater service is brought up to current requirements. This may include relocating the water meter outside or changing service line sizes. Please ensure you schedule a meeting with the Department of Water & Wastewater during the planning phase for this site. Additional impact fees may apply for future development. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. None I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . Page 35

Item #11. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Peter F. & Bonnie S. Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road FILE #: Z-21-04 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric Department CONTACT PERSON: Paul Waddell, Electric Director CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7072 CONTACT EMAIL #: pwaddell@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC Our office has no objection to the rezoning of: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000 RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC 1. Should this site be redeveloped, which includes modifications to the use, the applicant / developer will be responsible for all costs associated with providing the appropriate meter / service to this site based upon the use including any necessary system upgrades or extensions. The appropriateness and adequacy of electric and meters will be assessed at that time. 2. Any redevelopment shall adhere to the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. https://evogov.s3.amazonaws.com/media/27/media/13108.pdf. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC 1. None. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . Page 36

C F #11. Z-21-04 Item I I T R CITY OF DOVER Y E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M F A APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY R D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 06/02/21 D S O H V A E L R APPLICATION: Lands of Peter F and Bonnie S Reidy at 4 Mifflin Rd FILE #: Z-21-04 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. This is a rezoning request. This office has no objections. 2. Every house, building or structure used or intended for use as living quarters or as a place for conducting business, and having any wall facing or abutting any public or private street or alley, shall have displayed on that wall, in legible, easily read characters which are of contrasting color to the background, the proper street number for such house, building, or structure in accordance with the following: One-family and two-family residential structures, height, the number shall measure a minimum of four inches in height, location, the number shall be placed on the house above or to the left or right of the front entrance, color, the number shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers shall be Arabic numerals. Multiple-family dwellings, measurements, the number shall measure a minimum of six inches when identifying individual apartments with exterior doors, and 12 inches when identifying buildings with apartment complexes where there are two or more buildings not assigned street addresses. Individual buildings with street addresses shall have numbers measuring six inches, location, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, color, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals. Commercial, industrial and office buildings, height, the numbers shall measure a minimum of 12 inches in height, location generally, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the Page 37

Item #11. street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, property line or driveway, should the building be located far enough from a public or private road so that the numbers are not clearly visible from the street, then the street address shall also be posted on the property at or near the property line or driveway to said building, color; each building, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color and shall be placed on each building in the complex, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals, Shopping centers. Shopping centers consisting of two or more stores shall have a tenant or suite number affixed to the front of the tenant space and on the outside of the rear door which corresponds with that tenant space. Numbers shall measure six inches in height. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances, 98-344) APPLICABLE CODES LISTED BELOW (NOT LIMITED TO): 2015 NFPA 1 Fire Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2015 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2009 IBC (International Building Code) Latest editions of all other NFPA Codes as defined by the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations City of Dover Code of Ordinances *If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person listed. Page 38

Item #11. CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Lands of Peter F. and Bonnie S. Reidy (4 Mifflin Road) FILE#: Z-21-04 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Joshua Schwartz PHONE#: 302-760-2768 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: No person, firm, corporation or the like shall construct, open, reconstruct, maintain, modify or use any crossing or entrance onto a state-maintained highway, street or road, including any drainage modifications leading into or carried by the highway drainage system, without first having complied with standards and regulations adopted by the Department and having obtained a permit issued by the Department. Please contact the Delaware Department of Transportation - Development Coordination section to begin permit process. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1. No comments to the rezoning. 2. At such time the property develops it shall be submitted to DelDOT. At that time schedule a pre-submittal meeting to begin the process. Page 39

KENT CONSERVATION DISTRICT Item #11. 1679 SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY • DOVER, DELAWARE 19901• (302) 608-5370 • WWW.KENTCD.ORG CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY June 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Peter F. and Bonnie S. Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road FILE #: Z-21-04 REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District CONTACT PERSON: Kate Owens PHONE #: 302-608-5370 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: Source: 2019 Delaware Sediment and Stormwater Regulations CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: Kent Conservation District has no objection to the proposed rezoning of the above referenced site. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: Soil disturbance (e.g. clearing, grading, excavations, tree clearing, or stoning) equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet requires a Sediment and Stormwater Management Plan to be submitted and approved by the Kent Conversation District prior to the commencement of disturbance. Page 40

Item #11. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION June 21, 2021 Excerpt from Meeting Minutes – Draft The Meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission was held on Monday, June 21, 2021 at 7:00 PM as a Virtual Meeting using the phone/videoconferencing system WebEx due to Delaware’s Declaration of the State of Emergency for COVID-19. The Meeting Session was conducted with Chair Mrs. Maucher presiding. Members present were Mr. Adams, Mr. Roach, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Lord, Mrs. Welsh, Dr. Jones and Mrs. Maucher. Mr. Baldwin was absent. Staff members present were Mr. Dave Hugg, Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Mr. Julian Swierczek, Mr. Jason Lyon and Mrs. Kristen Mullaney. Z-21-04 Lands of Peter F. and Bonnie S. Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road - Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council on a Rezoning Application for a parcel of land consisting of 1.248 acres. The property is zoned CPO (Commercial Professional Office Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the southwest corner of Forrest Avenue and Mifflin Road. The owners of record are Peter F. & Bonnie S. Reidy. Property Address: 4 Mifflin Road. Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000. Council District 1. Ordinance #2021-13. Representatives: Mr. Jonathan Street, Becker Morgan Group Mr. Swierczek stated that this is an application for a Rezoning at the corner of Forrest Avenue and Mifflin Road. It is a 1.248 acre site; its currently the location of a single family dwelling that is vacant. This is the proposal only for the Rezoning; however, the applicant has indicated that they would intend to put in a service establishment specifically noting a car service with drive- thru. That would be subject to a separate Site Development Plan and review application. Again, this would only be for the Rezoning. The current zoning designation of CPO (Commercial Professional Office Zone) with the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) is to go to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) while retaining that COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) designation. There is a single vehicle access point on the site via driveway toward the south of the property. There is no pedestrian access onto the site at the moment. With this property in the immediate vicinity, they do have a Land-Use designation of Low Density Commercial; however, it is still retaining some of the original Low Density Residential character. The properties were subject originally in the previous 2008 Comprehensive Plan. They were designated Low Density Residential; however, in 2012 the owner of this property and the two neighboring properties to the west and south had sought a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Land-Use designation to Low Density Commercial. It is from that change of Land-Use that allowed the Rezoning to be the current CPO (Commercial Professional Office Zone). The Rezoning proposed today to the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) is consistent with the 2019 Comprehensive Plan Land Use which recognizes the fact that Forrest Avenue is in a commercial corridor. It has developed significantly over the years as this main access point to Downtown Dover from the west has developed. Planning Staff is recommending approval. It is again, Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 1 of 3 Page 41

Item #11. consistent with the Land Use designation of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. They are proposing to retain the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) which again is a zoning overlay which is to have added specificity in terms of attractiveness, design and its relation to the main road frontage. They do note that a service establishment would be a permitted use in the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) but again, emphasizing that any development of the property would be subject to a separate Site Development Plan Application to the Planning Commission and would have its own public hearing. Mr. Street stated that the application in front of them is a Rezoning. It is the corner piece of property shown on the exhibit on the screen. A Rezoning within the City needs to meet three tests. One is compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, second is access of public services available to the site, and the third is compatibility with the existing zoning in the surrounding area. Staff has already indicated compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Public services are available for the area as it is right on the western edge of the City itself. He will take a moment to discuss why they feel that this is compatible with the existing zonings in the area. As Mr. Swierczek indicated, Forrest Avenue has become the main access point to the City from the west. Development of the City is actually projected to be from the west. The City’s own Comprehensive Plan shows Category 2 and Category 3 (Annexation Areas) are on the western edge of the City’s current boundary. He would submit that the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) is an appropriate zoning for the area. As you can see from the exhibit, there is a Wawa and a McDonald’s in the area that are also zoned C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone). CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) is a commercial zone that is in the area and surrounding parcels. As you move east, you get into more of the strip center type zones where the Talbots are located and the bank across the street along with Greentree Shopping Center. With that, he would submit that they meet the three-legged test of a Rezoning. They are in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, they have access to public facilities, and it is compatible with the existing zonings in the area. As Mr. Swierczek has indicated, with this application the applicant has indicated that they do wish to further develop the site into a service establishment. There are no formal plans. It is just their desire that they have expressed that to him but there is nothing further. Mr. Adams questioned what allows this application to C-2A; was it the previous Rezoning that was done just recently in the last couple years that designated those three parcels altogether as commercial? Responding to Mr. Adams, Mr. Swierczek stated that is correct. In the 2008 Comprehensive Plan these properties were retaining a Low Density Residential designation for the Land Use. In 2012, the owners of the three properties jointly filed for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to have them changed from Low Density Residential to Low Density Commercial. That allowed the Rezoning then to CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) which it is today. In the 2019 Comprehensive Plan update, which they have finally been getting towards the end of, those properties do retain the Low Density Commercial recognizing the expansion of the commercial east/west corridor of Dover. Mrs. Maucher opened the public hearing. Mr. Bob Harrison & Mrs. Rose Harrison – 24 Mifflin Road Dover, DE 19904 Mrs. Harrison stated that they would like to raise some concerns that they have regarding the application. This application is stated to be for a drive-through car wash. These facilities are Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 2 of 3 Page 42

Item #11. known for adverse environmental impacts including noise from blowers and vacuums. A high- volume service such as a car wash or should this deal fall through, would it mean increased confusion at an already busy intersection. It is used by pedestrians of all ages throughout the day and for vehicular access for the residents living on Mifflin Road and for those transferring between Route 8 and Route 15. Their third concern is for the other impacts of a car wash or other C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) establishment in this residential neighborhood. This is the eastern edge of the residential area along Forrest Avenue. They urge that the zoning remain CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone). They hope that Mr. and Mrs. Reidy find a suitable buyer for uses within the current zoning. Mrs. Maucher closed the public hearing. Mr. Adams moved to recommend approval to City Council for Z-21-04 Lands of Peter F. and Bonnie S. Reidy at 4 Mifflin Road to rezone the property to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone), seconded by Mrs. Malone and the motion tied 4-4 by roll call with Mr. Baldwin absent. Mr. Adams voting yes; he would note that any development of this project would come back to the Commission for full review and oversight. Mr. Roach voting no; due to the fact that we already know that their intention is a drive-through car wash and because of the amount of traffic volume that we already have on that road from Wawa, McDonald’s, Dover High School and the apartment complexes. Anyone who has been on that road at one point in time can agree that a car service with a drive through would make it very hectic on that road. Mrs. Malone voting yes; based on the comments from Mr. Street and Mr. Adams. Mr. Hartman voting no; based on the concerns with traffic. Mrs. Lord voting yes; based on the fact that it is mostly an industrial traffic area. Mrs. Welsh voting no; for the same reasons as stated by Mr. Roach. Dr. Jones voting yes; with reservation. She echoes Mr. Adams’ concerns but for the sake of the Rezoning she votes yes. Mrs. Maucher voting no; it is still zoned CPO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) so there are other opportunities for projects under that zoning. She shares the concerns with traffic and at this point, the more restrictive zoning is appropriate for that particular intersection. Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that with a 4-4 vote, they can pass that information along to City Council. There is technically not a recommendation one way or the other. She isn’t sure if Mr. Hugg has any guidance to give to them at this point. Mr. Hugg stated that she is correct. It would go forward to City Council with no definitive action from the Planning Commission. It was a split result ending in a tie. Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Page 43

Item #11. FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2021-13 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY 2 OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3 4 MIFFLIN ROAD 4 5 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the 6 limits of the City of Dover; and 7 WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property 8 described below from CPO (Commercial Professional Office Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 9 (Corridor Overlay Zone) to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial zone) and subject to the COZ-1 10 (Corridor Overlay Zone). 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 12 DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 13 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning 14 Ordinance of the City of Dover have been amended by changing the zoning designation from CPO 15 (Commercial Professional Office Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) to C-2A 16 (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) on that 17 property located at 4 Mifflin Road (on the southwest corner of Forrest Avenue and Mifflin Road), 18 consisting of 1.248+/- acres, owned by Peter F. And Bonnie S. Reidy. 19 (Tax Parcel: ED-05-076.09-01-11.00-000; Planning Reference: Z-21-04; First Council District) 20 21 ADOPTED: * 22 S:\ORDINANCES\2021\DRAFT\ORDINANCE #2021-13 - REZONING - 4 MIFFLIN ROAD\ORDINANCE #2021-13 - REZONING - 4 MIFFLIN ROAD 23 - FINAL READING.wpd 24 Actions History 25 07/12/2021 - Scheduled for Public Hearing/Final Reading - City Council 26 06/21/2021 - Public Hearing - Planning Commission 27 05/24/2021 - First Reading - City Council Page 44

Item #12. PETITION TO AMEND ZONING DISTRICT Public Hearing Before the Dover City Council July 12, 2021 Recommendation from Planning Commission Meeting of June 21, 2021 With Staff and Development Advisory Committee Review Owner: Draper Farm Properties, LLC Address: 1617 Forrest Avenue Location: North side of Forrest Avenue, east of Cranberry Run Drive Tax Parcel: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000 Size: 5 acres (217,800 SF) Present Use: Vacant (Previous residence demolished and with associated agricultural outbuildings and land in cultivation) Proposed Use: Retail Store & Accessory Use (Convenience Store with Fuel Pumps) 2019 Comprehensive Plan Designation – Land Use Category: Mixed Use Present Zoning: R-10 (One-Family Residence Zone) and COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Proposed Zoning: C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) Reason for Request: To amend the zoning of the 5.04+/- acre parcel at 1617 Forrest Avenue, Dover DE 19904 from R-10 to C-2A (while retaining COZ-1 Overlay). File Number: Z-21-05 Ordinance Number: 2021-14 Page 45

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 2 Planning Commission Recommendation: The Application (Z-21-05) for Rezoning of 1617 Forrest Avenue was represented the applicant’s engineering firm. A Public Hearing was conducted on June 21, 2021 where thirteen (13) members of the public spoke regarding the Rezoning application and over twenty-one (21) written comment items were received (See Public Comment Sets). The Planning Commission recommends to not approve the proposed Rezoning from R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 by a vote of 8-0 (one member was absent). Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends denial of the Rezoning Request. (Draft Meeting Minutes attached.) APPLICATION: Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties, LLC at 1617 Forrest Avenue: Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 I. APPLICATION SUMMARY This Rezoning Application is for a parcel of land consisting of 5.04 acres. The property is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the north side of Forrest Avenue and adjacent to Cranberry Run Drive. The owner of record is Draper Farm Properties LLC. Property Address: 1617 Forrest Avenue. Tax Parcel: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000. Council District 1. Ordinance #2021-14. Existing Property: The property consisted of 5.04 acres is located at the northeast corner of Forrest Avenue and Cranberry Run Drive. The property has frontage of over 750 feet along Forrest Avenue/Route 8 and frontage of over 300 feet on Cranberry Run Drive. The property has a farmstead location (previous dwelling now demolished) and a series of accessory structures that appeared to have served as agricultural buildings. A majority of the property has been in agricultural cultivation. Both street frontages have existing sidewalks and existing curb cuts for the former dwelling location (from Forrest Avenue) and to the field/ accessory structures (from Cranberry Run Drive). This application only seeks rezoning of the property from R-10 to C-2A; the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) designation will remain. The applicant is seeking rezoning to allow for future development of the property. They identified a potential use as a Convenience Store with Fuel Pump. Under the Zoning Ordinance, the Convenience Store would be considered a permitted use a retail store and the fuel pumps would be an accessory use requiring Conditional Use approval. The redevelopment of the site will be subject to a separate application submission. Previous Application: This property was subject to a Request during the review process for the adoption of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan. As Request for Changes to DRAFT 2019 Comprehensive Plan - Request Page 46

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 3 #1, the property owner requested a change in the Land Use Classification (on Land Development Plan Map 12-1) from the proposed Residential Medium Density Land Use Classification to Mixed Use or Commercial Land Use Classification. On December 16, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended (by a vote of 5-2) a Land Use Classification of Mixed Use. Then, the Land Use Classification Category of Mixed Use for this property was approved by City Council on January 13, 2020 as part of the review and adoption of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan document and maps. Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding parcels are zoned residential. The properties immediately adjacent on the north and to the west of the property are zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone). This is a residential subdivision of single family detached dwellings known as Cranberry Run. Adjacent to the east are properties zoned RM-1 (Residential Medium Density Zone) as another residential subdivision of Heatherfield consisting of single family detached dwellings and duplexes along Stoney Drive. There are more residential developments along Forrest Avenue as you move east until to each the extensive commercial corridor which starts about Mifflin Road and continues east. Across Forrest Avenue/Route 8 to the south are a series of nine (9) parcels with eight (8) single family detached dwellings located under Kent County’s jurisdiction. Also, to the south (and surrounding these residences) is the campus of the Dover High School. Access to the Dover High School, is via Dover High Drive with its signalized intersection with Forrest Avenue (0.36 miles west of the subject site) and at the campus entrance with HAWK Signal at the intersection of Heatherfield Way and Forrest Avenue. II. COMPRENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW In the 2019 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Development Plan (Map 12-1) recommends that this property be used for Mixed Use. Regarding Mixed Use Areas and the Land Use Classification of Mixed Use, this is discussed in Chapter 12 – Land Development Plan beginning on page 12-7. The goals and for Mixed Use Areas Land Use are listed in the 2019 Comprehensive Plan excerpts presented below: Goals: Mixed Land Use The overall goals for Mixed Use areas are: 1. Encourage creation of neighborhood centers. 2. Within the close-knit neighborhood fabric there are opportunities for the creation of urban centers. These centers should be established along major roadways and feature mixed use development, pedestrian-friendly public environments and opportunities for connection to future transit. 3. In order to encourage non-automobile access to the center, the activities should be clustered within a one-half mile radius (or 10-minute walk) and be located so as to draw upon residents from a number of surrounding neighborhoods. 4. Develop strategies that will encourage the creation of well-defined public street spaces and pedestrian-friendly village areas that encourage walking and bicycle use. This may Page 47

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 4 include on-street and behind building parking, and the creation of build-to lines for new development. 5. Improve access that limits public access to open spaces areas such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit networks to parks and natural areas. 6. Encourage the Mixed Use of residential and commercial uses in the Downtown area. The Comprehensive Plan notes that Mixed Use Areas “can be an area where a new development should foster walkability and close interactions among activities and uses in a traditional neighborhood setting.” Chapter 9 – Transportation Plan from the Comprehensive Plan identifies Forrest Avenue/Route 8 as a Minor Arterial Street and the need to focus efforts on improvements along the Route 8 corridor “that would improve safety, better manage access, reduce congestions, and provide improved traffic flow.” The development and implementation of strategies for addressing East/West Traffic in the City is Recommendation 7 from that Chapter. The Rezoning Request to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) is consistent with the Land Use Classification of Mixed Use. Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix (from the 2019 Comprehensive Plan) specifies that the following zones are compatible with this land use classification. See the excerpt from Table 12-1 given below. It is noted that Table 12-1 for the Mixed Use Land Use Category identifies other zoning districts that allow for a mixed of commercial and residential uses but may be more limiting in the specific types of uses permitted. C-2 (Central Commercial) (Downtown Redevelopment Target Area Only) C-2A (Limited Central Commercial) TND (Traditional Neighborhood Design) C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) C-1A (Limited Commercial) RGO (General Residence and Office) (Downtown Redevelopment Target Area Only) Mixed-Use R-8 (One Family Residence) R-10 (One Family Residence) RG-1 (General Residence) RG-2 (General Residence) RG-4 (General Resident - Multi-Story Apartments) C-3 (Service Commercial) CPO (Commercial and Professional Office) IO (Institutional and Office) III. ZONING REVIEW Request for C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) Zoning The types of permitted uses and conditional uses in the C-2A zone are given Article 3 §14 of the Zoning Ordinance. See the following code excerpt. Article 3 Section 14. – Limited Central Commercial Zone (C-2A). 14.1 Uses permitted. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected, which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose, except the following: (a) Retail Stores (b) Business, professional or government offices Page 48

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 5 (c) Personal service establishments. (d) Restaurants. (e) Service establishments. (f) Hotels. (g) Places of public assembly. (h) Drive-throughs. (i) One family residences, including attached and semi-detached dwellings, complying with the bulk standards of the RG-1 (General Residence) zone. (j) Apartments and multi-family dwellings 14.2 Conditional Uses. The following uses are permitted, conditional upon the approval of the planning commission in accordance with the procedures and subject to the general conditions set forth in article 10, section 1: (a) Parking lots and parking structures as a principal use on suitably landscaped lots. (b) Fuel pumps accessory to a permitted use. 14.3 Enclosed buildings. All permitted uses and all storage accessory thereto, other than off street parking, shall be carried on in buildings fully enclosed on all sides, except for outdoor eating areas associated with restaurants and outdoor sales areas approved by the city planner. 14.4 Performance standards. All uses are subject to performance standards as set forth in article 5, section 8.1. 14.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 hereof shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change of use. COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) The provisions of the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) are established to “promote superior urban corridor development and the highest quality-built environment.” There are a series architectural, parking, and landscaping guidelines that would be required by the COZ-1 zoning district, if development of the property is proposed. The purpose and requirements of the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) are given in Article 3 §27 of the Zoning Ordinance. See the following code excerpt. Article 3 Section 27. – Corridor Overlay Zone 1 (COZ-1) 27.1 Purpose. The corridor overlay zone (COZ) is established for the following reasons: (a) To promote superior urban corridor development and the highest quality built environment; (b) To foster coordination and linkage among corridor properties and with adjacent lands; (c) To preserve the functionality and efficiency of the roadway for traffic movement; and (d) To achieve a visually balanced streetscape environment which is friendly to the pedestrian and motorist alike. 27.2 Superior urban design. For the purposes of this ordinance the term "superior urban design" shall meet the following criteria: Page 49

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 6 (a) Superior urban design places a strict and primary importance on the pedestrian. The concept should lend itself to interconnectivity while presenting building structures as aspects of the street, not simply islands existing in the "sea of roads". The design should encourage fewer car-trips, as well as promote automobile trips on an interconnected local street system rather than trips that utilize the arterials. In demonstrating superior urban design, an applicant must show that the plan presented exceeds the requirements of the zoning ordinance in at least two of the following areas: (i) Transportation amenities for bicycles, pedestrians and transit that exceed those required by the zoning ordinance; (ii) Architectural features including, but not limited to: LEED-certified buildings; unique architecture not replicated in other locations; use of architectural elements such as entry porticos, porte-cocheres, colonnades, cornices, porch columns and balusters, band courses, coins, water tables and other trim that enhances visual quality and function of the structure; and use of the highest-quality construction materials. (iii) Landscaping that exceeds the requirements of this section, including robust use of trees, shrubbery, and flowering plants to screen parked cars; water gardens and ponds; arboretums; tree preservation measures; (iv) Public spaces and art including, but not limited to, sculpture, memorials, murals, public court yards and pocket parks, and fountains; (v) Green technologies for stormwater management, as well as green energy technologies such as geothermal heating and cooling and solar energy supplies. (b) The city planner shall develop policy guidance on how the concept of superior urban design will be evaluated. 27.3 Zone boundaries. The COZ encompasses the lands adjacent to the following roadways as outlined on the City of Dover Zoning Map as set forth in article 2, section 2 of this ordinance: (a) Delaware Route 8 (Forrest and Division Streets) from the railroad tracks in a westerly direction to the city limit line. (b) McKee/Saulsbury Road (County Road 156) from the intersection at Dennys Road (County Road 100) in a southerly direction to the terminal intersection with West North Street (County Road 73). 27.4 Permitted uses. Land use shall be governed by those provisions of this ordinance related to the specific zoning district designations of each property as depicted on the zoning map. 27.5 Site development plan approval. Site development plan approval in accordance with article 10, section 2 shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits for the erection or enlargement of all structures and prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for any change in use. When the zoning district regulations specify that a particular use requires conditional use approval in accordance with article 10, section 1, the provisions of that article shall apply. Site development plans and conditional use site plans for properties within the COZ shall reflect compliance with the development guidelines of this article, in addition to all other applicable codes and regulations. 27.6 Development guidelines. Page 50

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 7 27.61 Setbacks: a. Front yards. Residential Nonresidential Min. Max. Min. Max. McKee/Saulsbury 60' to 80' 40' to 50' * Route 8—Artis Drive to Mifflin Road 60' to 80' None Route 8—Mifflin Road to Saulsbury 40' to 60' 40' to 60' * Road Route 8—Saulsbury Road to R.R. line 20' to 30' 20' to 30' Subdivision streets (Setback provisions of article 4 shall apply) * When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission through the site plan review process that the proposal involves a superior urban design, the maximum setback may be increased to no more than 90 feet from the property line on Route 8 from Mifflin Road to Saulsbury Road and on McKee and Saulsbury Roads. 27.62 Building placement. Buildings shall be situated on the property so as to maximize the use of the frontage along the roadway and shall have the longest side of the building arranged parallel and square to the roadway. When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission that, due to specific constraints related to lot configuration, alternative building placements may be permitted. 27.63 Parking. (a) Location. Parking shall not be permitted to be situated within the front yard, nor between the right-of-way line and the building, except in the following instances: (i) Automobile service stations; (ii) Properties in a shopping center (SC) zoning district, in which case, parking may be permitted between the building and the roadway, provided that such parking [shall] be limited to five rows of single parking spaces between the road and the storefront; (iii) When the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission through the site plan review process that the design presented involves a superior urban design, parking may be permitted between the building and the street, provided that such parking within this area shall be adequately landscaped and screened from the roadway. (b) Required number of spaces. See specific district requirements in article 4. (c) Layout. (i) Parking lots shall be arranged in such a manner so that not more than 20 parking spaces in a row shall be permitted without a landscaped island. No more than six rows of 20 spaces shall be provided without provision for a landscaped median. Parking islands shall be a minimum of ten feet wide and planting medians shall be no less than eight feet wide. (ii) There shall be a landscaped buffer area of at least 12 feet in width between the building and parking lot and drive areas. The buffer area shall include provisions for a sidewalk of at least six feet and no greater than eight feet in width. The buffer area and sidewalk shall be grade separated from the parking lot by concrete curbing of at least six inches in height. Page 51

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 8 (d) Landscaping. Design shall be simple and easy to maintain and shall consist of a combination of hardy canopy trees, low evergreen shrubs and turf grass, and shall be designed in accordance with landscape guidelines set forth in article 5, section 15 of this ordinance and as follows: (i) Interior landscaping. A minimum of five percent of the interior area of a parking lot shall be reserved for landscape purposes. This provision shall include the landscaping of all required parking islands and medians. Shade trees shall be incorporated within the landscaped islands whenever and wherever practicable. (ii) Parking lot screening adjacent to public right-of-way. Low profile screening shall be required when parking spaces would result in vehicles facing onto the roadway. Screening may consist of a low wall, evergreen hedge with a minimum height of two feet at the time of planting, planted three feet apart on center, and a maximum height of three feet at maturity, or earth berm. Should a low wall be used, such wall shall be accompanied by evergreen shrub plantings on the roadway side of the wall and spaced ten feet apart on center. (iii) Reserved. 27.64 Site access. (a) Entrance width and radii. Site entrances shall have a minimum width of 24 feet. Entrances involving a median divider shall be at least 35 feet in width. Entrance radii shall be a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 25 feet. (b) Number of entrances and curb cut spacing. One curb cut shall be permitted for each street which abuts a site. For sites with street frontage in excess of 300 linear feet, one additional curb cut may be permitted. For sites with street frontage in excess of 600 linear feet, two additional curb cuts may be permitted. Multiple curb cuts on a property shall have a minimum spacing distance in accordance with the following schedule: Speed Limit Maximum Spacing (Ft.) 25 105 30 125 35 150 40 185 45 230 50 275 (c) [Shared access.] Shared access shall be provided, whenever possible, for entrances to adjoining uses, including residential driveways. (d) [Cross access.] Cross access shall be provided among abutting uses of similar use categories, whenever possible, to provide linkage between properties as an alternative to re-entering the corridor to access both existing and future neighboring properties. (e) Entrance locations for adjoining properties. Commercial site entrances shall be no closer than 25 feet to an adjoining property which is zoned residential and no closer than ten feet to an adjoining property which is in a nonresidential zoning category. Page 52

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 9 27.65 [Signs.] Signs shall meet the regulations found in article 5, section 4, supplementary sign regulations. 27.66 Building height. (a) Buildings shall be limited in overall height to 35 feet and shall not exceed two stories. 27.67 Open space and landscaping. (a) Lot coverage. Each lot shall have a minimum of 25 percent of the lot area dedicated to be landscaped open space. A lesser amount of landscaped open space may be permitted when it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the planning commission, through the site plan review process, that, due to lot configuration and existing built conditions, the required minimum is impractical. (b) Frontage. Each lot shall have a landscaped open space of at least 25 feet in width, measured from the back of curb along the entire frontage of the lot, except at points of site access. Trees shall be provided along the frontage perimeter at a minimum rate of one tree for each 50 linear feet of frontage. (c) Side and rear yards. A minimum of 15 feet of landscaped open space shall be provided along all side and rear lot lines when abutting a residential use and a minimum of five feet when abutting a nonresidential use. Tree plantings shall be provided along all nonfrontage perimeters at a minimum rate of one tree for each 75 linear feet. (d) Stormwater detention ponds. Detention ponds may be counted toward the minimum 25 percent open space area, provided that such ponds are designed to emulate natural features by incorporating irregular outline, gradual slopes (no greater than 1:4), and appropriate landscape plantings. (e) Landscaping. Landscaped open spaces shall be designed in accordance with the provisions of this section, as well as the landscaping guidelines as set forth in article 5, section 9 of this ordinance. (f) Screening. The following items shall be located so as to minimize visibility from the roadway, adjacent properties and other public areas, and shall be screened from public view: (1) Service bays; (2) Loading docks and platforms; (3) Rooftop utilities; (4) Satellite dishes; (5) Dumpsters; (6) Storage areas. (g) Standard for tree plantings. Trees shall be of a high canopy variety and shall be limbed to a minimum height of 12 feet above grade at maturity. (h) Standards for shrubbery. Shrubbery shall be of a low evergreen variety and shall be limited to use as foundation plantings and for screening purposes. (i) Standards for ground cover. Ground cover shall be limited to turf and ornamental grasses and ornamental evergreen ground cover plantings within required landscape areas. Page 53

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 10 27.68 Lot configuration. All lots within the corridor overlay district created after the enactment of this section shall conform to the following: (a) Minimum lot area [shall be] 10,000 square feet. Service stations [shall have a minimum lot area of] 20,000 square feet. (b) Minimum lot depth shall be 100 feet. In the C-3 (service commercial) district, the minimum lot depth shall be 150 feet. (c) Minimum road frontage shall be at least 100 feet. In the C-3 (service commercial) district, the minimum road frontage shall be 150 feet. 27.69 Architectural review. The side of any building which faces the corridor (or corridors) shall be referred to as the "corridor elevation." Buildings in the COZ-1 shall be designed to front on the corridor, and the corridor elevation shall contain architectural elements traditionally associated with the front of a building. Blank walls without functioning windows are prohibited along the corridor. Windows must be incorporated into the overall design concept of the corridor elevation. Providing one or several small windows on a large corridor elevation shall not constitute compliance with this ordinance. A "functioning window" shall be defined as a window which lets light into the interior of the structure, and is integrated and related to the interior layout of the space. In addition to functioning windows, the corridor elevation shall have the following elements: (a) A primary entrance door or doors (except for loading doors). (b) A primary entrance feature, such as a porch, portico, awning, entrance walk, or other similar feature. In addition, the corridor elevation shall have one of the following elements: (a) Landscaping integrated into the building design concept. (b) Architectural or urban design elements which link adjacent structures together, such as plazas, walkways, colonnades, or similar features. (c) Architectural relief, such as vertical and horizontal offsets in exterior wall elevations, band courses, lintels and sill courses, cornices, and the like, to create shadow lines. The applicant shall submit 12 copies of the corridor elevation at the time of application. The city planner or his/her designee shall determine whether compliance with the provisions of this ordinance has been achieved. 27.7 Properties located on a corner lot with two frontages within the Corridor Overlay Zone. When a property is located on the corner of two corridors within the Corridor Overlay Zone, only one of the two corridors shall be subject to the requirements of Section 27.61 Setbacks and Section 27.63 Parking, Subsection (a) Location. The frontage of the property on which the identifiable front of the building is located shall be the frontage that is subject to the requirements of Section 27.61 And Section 27.63, Subsection (a). In designing the site, in order to qualify for the relief under this subsection, the applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning commission that the design incorporates the principles of superior urban design as defined in Section 27.2. IV. RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING STAFF: This Request is to rezone lands from R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone). The property would remain subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The permitted uses allowed in the current zoning district of R-10 focus on residential uses as one-family detached residences and also provides the ability for consideration of conditional uses for places of worship, schools, and certain other institutional types uses. The proposed Rezoning to C-2A zone is a zoning district offering a mix of uses. For the C-2A zone, the range of permitted uses that are commercial uses include retail, office, personal service & Page 54

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 11 service establishments, restaurants, and places of public assembly. The C-2A zone also includes permitted uses that are residential in nature including one-family residences (detached dwellings and duplex units), apartments and multi-family dwellings (more than 2 dwelling units in same building). The C-2A zone also includes conditional uses (uses subject to specific review for approval) for parking lots/structures and for fuel pumps as accessory to a permitted use. Staff recommends that the rezoning for C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) while retaining the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) be granted as requested, as the proposed zoning is consistent with the 2019 Comprehensive Plan (as amended) for the Mixed Use Land Use Classification Category. Staff also recommends that the property remain subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) due to its frontage on Forest Street. The purposes of the COZ-1 are to promote superior urban corridor development; to foster coordination and linkage among corridor properties; to preserve functionality and efficiency of the roadway for traffic movement; and to achieve a visually balanced streetscape environment friendly to the pedestrian and motorist. (Zoning Ordinance, Article 3 §27). The COZ-1 includes a number of additional buffers/setbacks, landscaping enhancements, and site layout design requirements. This area is part of the gateway leading into the City of Dover and is also along a key west-east corridor in the transportation system. The area is a transition from the rural areas west of Dover as the corridor becomes residential and then a more heavily commercial area as it moves towards the central core of the City. However, given the residential character surrounding this subject property, a different zoning district allowable by the Land Use and Zoning Matrix could also be considered that would allow for smaller scale community activity in this portion of the corridor to serve the local residential area. This Rezoning Request does not grant approval of a specific use for the property but makes its land use subject to a listing of uses permitted and potential conditional uses as allowed in the C-2A zoning district. Staff again notes that any potential development for the site would have to be in line with the zoning classifications and would similarly have to follow all development design guidelines of the Zoning Ordinance. Were the application for Rezoning to be recommended by the Planning Commission and subsequently approved by the City Council, the applicant would still have to submit Site Development Plans for review for any use of the site to be established. Staff notes that the parcel proposed for Rezoning meets the 100-foot lot depth requirement of the C-2A zone. Any non-conformity of the existing buildings’ uses and placement regarding the bulk standards of the C-2A and COZ-1 would be subject to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Article 7 – Nonconforming Buildings and Uses. Any development of the property once zoned C-2A with the COZ-1 would be subject to the bulk standards and provisions and the review processes for site development. This recommendation is being made without that benefit of hearing the comments of surrounding landowners and residents. A public hearing is required on this matter and the Planning Commission should give those comments consideration. V. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: Page 55

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 12 1) The applicant shall be aware that approval of any rezoning application does not represent Site Development Plan or Record Plan approval. Following any decision made by City Council in regard to this rezoning, then an application for a Site Plan, Subdivision Plan, and/or appropriate Building Permits must be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the establishment of a use, development activity, or any construction activity on the site. The applicant should contact the Planning Staff to determine the appropriate review process for any proposed projects. 2) The property is subject to the requirements of the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) related to development. 3) The applicant shall be aware that approval of any rezoning application does not represent a Building Permit, Sign Permit or other construction activity permit approval. A separate application submission is required before issuance of permits by the City of Dover. 4) The applicant shall be aware that any future use of the existing structures may be subject to a separate permitting or licensing process through the City of Dover Licensing and Permitting Division. All businesses operating in the City of Dover are required to obtain a City of Dover Business Licenses. Certain types of uses also require a Public Occupancy Permit or Rental Dwelling Permits. RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: At the Virtual Planning Commission Meeting of June 21, 2021, the Application (Z-21-04) was represented by Jonathan Street of the application’s engineering firm the Becker Morgan Group and Mr. Doug Walker as a representative of the application. During the Public Hearing, thirteen (13) members of the public spoke regarding the Rezoning application. Written Comments (21 items) on the Rezoning application were also received; see Public Comments Sets. The Planning Commission’s motion recommended to not approve the proposed Rezoning from R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A with COZ-1 by a vote of 8-0 (one member was absent). Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends denial of the Rezoning Request. (Draft Meeting Minutes attached.) See also the included excerpt of the DRAFT Meeting Minutes of the June 21, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. The comments received from the other member agencies of the Development Advisory Committee (D.A.C.) are also provided. ATTACHMENTS: • Zoning Map Exhibit • Application Z-21-05 Submission: o Application Submission Letter o Rezoning Exhibit Plan Sheet Page 56

Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre parcel): Rezoning R-10 with COZ-1 to C-2A Item #12. with COZ-1 Planning Commission Recommendation Report of June 21, 2021 Page 13 • Development Advisory Committee Comments from City of Dover Public Works Department, Department of Water & Wastewater, Electric Department, City Office of the Fire Marshal, DelDOT, and Kent Conservation District • Public Comments Sets: o Set #1: Public Comments Received Through June 11, 2021 at 10:30am – 2 items. Set #1 was included in the Planning Commission Meeting Packet distribution and referenced into the Meeting Record by listing. o Set #2: Public Comments Received Through June 21, 2021 at 4:00pm – 17 items. Set #2 was emailed to Planning Commission members in preparation for evening meeting and referenced into the Meeting Record by listing. o Set #3: Public Comments Received on June 21, 2021 after 4:00pm and during Meeting – 3 items. Set #3 was referenced during the Planning Commission Meeting as individuals spoke. o Set #4: Additional Public Comments Received After Planning Commission Meeting Through July 2, 2021 – 3 items. • Excerpt from DRAFT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 • Proposed Ordinance #2021-14 Page 57

City of Dover Application No.: Z-21-05 Item #12. Department of Planning & Inspections ROS Chelsea W ay R-10 R-8 R-10 F almou th W ay Stoney Dr RM-1 Cranberry Run D r R-10 R-10 Yarmouth Way R-8 Site R-10 Forrest Ave R-10 Tile: Lands of Draper Farm Properties LLC Ordinance #: 2021-14 Addresses: 1617 Forrest Avenue Legend « Parcel ID: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000 Subject Property Existing Zoning: R-10 One-Family Residence Zone COZ-1 Corridor Overlay Zone 2012 Buildings Proposed Zoning: C-2A Limited Central Commercial Zone Zoning COZ-1 Corridor Overlay Zone Owner: Draper Farm Properties LLC Dover Parcels Date: 05/13/2021 Corridor Overlay Zone 0 125 250 500 Feet Page 58

Item #12. Page 59

Item #12. ZONING - R - 10 ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE SITE DATA 1. OWNER OF RECORD: DRAPER FARM PROPERTIES, LLC 23 ZION ROAD ZONING - ROS RECREATION & OPEN SPACE SMYRNA, DE 19977 2. ENGINEER: BECKER MORGAN GROUP INC. 309 SOUTH GOVERNORS AVENUE DOVER, DE 19904 ZONING - R - 10 ZONING - R - 10 ONE FAMILY (302) 743 - 7950 ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE RESIDENCE ZONE 3. PROPERTY MAP NUMBER: 2-05-07500-01-0700-00001 4. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: EXISTING: R-10 - ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE PROPOSED: C-2A - LIMITED CENTRAL COMMERCIAL ZONE 5. DEED SUMMARY: 9233 - 0253 & 7548 - 0312 ZONING - R - 10 ONE FAMILY 6. PRESENT USE: VACANT RESIDENTIAL HOME RESIDENCE ZONE 7. PROPOSED USE: CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS 8. TOTAL SITE AREA: 5.00 ACRES ± 9. SOURCE OF WATER: CITY OF DOVER ZONING - R - 10 SOURCE OF SEWER: CITY OF DOVER ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE ZONING - R - 10 ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE ZONING - RG - 2 GENERAL RESIDENCE RECREAZO NING - RO TION & OP S EN SPACE ZONING - R - 10 ONE FAMILY ZONING - R - 10 RESIDENCE ZONE ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE ZONING - R - 10 CRANBERRY RUN DRIVE ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE SITE LANDS N/F DRAPER FARM PROPERTIES, LLC. T.P. 2-05-07500-01-0700-00001 ZONING - R - 10 - ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE ZONING - A 5.00 ACRES ± AGRICULTURAL ZONING - R - 10 ONE FAMILY ZONING - R - 20 RESIDENCE ZONE ZONING - R-M1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - R - 20 MEDIUM DENSITY ZONING - R-M1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RESIDNECE MEDIUM DENSITY ZONING - R - 8 ZONING - R - 8 RESIDNECE ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FORREST AVENUE ZONING - R - 10 ZONING - RS1 ONE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING - R - 10 ZONING - RS1 RESIDENCE ZONE ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAYER STATE: 11x17 FORREST AVENUE ARCH I T E C TURE ENG I NE E R I NG BMG: 2021070.00 1" = 150' 0 75 150 SCALE: REZONING EXHIBIT Dover, DE DATE: 05/06/2021 309 S. Governors Ave. DRAWN BY: A.C.F. Dover, DE 19904 Do Not Explode - Select Scale CITY OF DOVER Ph. 302.734.7950 SCALE: 1" = 150' KENT COUNTY, DELAWARE Fax 302.734.7965 1Page 60 F:\AutoCAD\Projects\2021\2021070\DWG\2021070-AERIAL.dwg, May 07, 2021 - 2:11pm 2021-05-07

Item #12. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue FILE #: Z-21-05 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Public Works CONTACT PERSON: Sharon J. Duca, P.E. CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION 1. None. GENERAL 1. Our office has no objection to the rezoning of tax parcel ED-05-075.00-01-07.00.00-000. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: STORMWATER / STREETS / SANITATION / GENERAL 1. None. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS, PLEASE CALL THE ABOVE CONTACT PERSON AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Page 61

Item #12. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue FILE #: Z-21-05 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Department of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PERSON: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7025 CONTACT PHONE #: jlyon@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER / WASTEWATER 1. Our office has no objection to the rezoning of tax parcels: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. Should this site be redeveloped, which includes modifications to the use, the applicant / developer will be responsible for all costs associated with providing the appropriate meter / service / main to this site based upon the use including any necessary system upgrades or extensions. The appropriateness and adequacy of water and sewer services and meters will be assessed at that time. (Please note that each water meter registered with the City of Dover must have a separate service line.) Should the existing water and sanitary sewer services no longer be required based upon the proposed use, they must be properly abandoned at the mains in accordance with all City of Dover Water / Wastewater Handbook. 2. Any redevelopment shall adhere to the City of Dover Water / Wastewater Handbook. 3. Please note that renovations and or change of use projects must ensure that the water and wastewater service is brought up to current requirements. This may include relocating the water meter outside or changing service line sizes. Please ensure you schedule a meeting with the Department of Water & Wastewater during the planning phase for this site. Additional impact fees may apply for future development. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT WATER / WASTEWATER / GENERAL 1. None I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . Page 62

Item #12. CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY STAFF D.A.C. MEETING DATE: JUNE 2, 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue FILE #: Z-21-05 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover Electric Department CONTACT PERSON: Paul Waddell, Electric Director CONTACT PHONE #: 302-736-7072 CONTACT EMAIL #: pwaddell@dover.de.us T HE S UBJECT P ROPOSAL HAS BEEN R EVIEWED FOR C ODE C OMPLIANCE , P LAN C ONFORMITY AND C OMPLETENESS IN A CCORDANCE WITH THIS A GENCY ’ S A UTHORITY AND A REA OF E XPERTISE . T HE F OLLOWING I TEMS HAVE BEEN I DENTIFIED AS E LEMENTS W HICH N EED TO BE A DDRESSED BY THE A PPLICANT : CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS ELECTRIC Our office has no objection to the rezoning of: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00.00-000. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES ELECTRIC 1. Should this site be redeveloped, which includes modifications to the use, the applicant / developer will be responsible for all costs associated with providing the appropriate meter / service to this site based upon the use including any necessary system upgrades or extensions. The appropriateness and adequacy of electric and meters will be assessed at that time. 2. Any redevelopment shall adhere to the City of Dover’s Electric Service Handbook. https://evogov.s3.amazonaws.com/media/27/media/13108.pdf. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT ELECTRIC 1. None. I F Y OU H AVE A NY Q UESTIONS OR N EED TO D ISCUSS ANY OF THE A BOVE C OMMENTS , P LEASE C ALL THE A BOVE C ONTACT P ERSON AND THE P LANNING D EPARTMENT AS S OON AS P OSSIBLE . Page 63

C F #12. Z-21-05 Item I I T R CITY OF DOVER Y E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE O M F A APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY R D.A.C. MEETING DATE: 06/02/21 D S O H V A E L R APPLICATION: Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue FILE #: Z-21-05 REVIEWING AGENCY: City of Dover, Office of the Fire Marshal CONTACT PERSON: Jason Osika, Fire Marshal PHONE #: (302) 736-4457 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY, AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESS BY THE APPLICANT: CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. This is a rezoning request. This office has no objections. 2. Every house, building or structure used or intended for use as living quarters or as a place for conducting business, and having any wall facing or abutting any public or private street or alley, shall have displayed on that wall, in legible, easily read characters which are of contrasting color to the background, the proper street number for such house, building, or structure in accordance with the following: One-family and two-family residential structures, height, the number shall measure a minimum of four inches in height, location, the number shall be placed on the house above or to the left or right of the front entrance, color, the number shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers shall be Arabic numerals. Multiple-family dwellings, measurements, the number shall measure a minimum of six inches when identifying individual apartments with exterior doors, and 12 inches when identifying buildings with apartment complexes where there are two or more buildings not assigned street addresses. Individual buildings with street addresses shall have numbers measuring six inches, location, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, color, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals. Commercial, industrial and office buildings, height, the numbers shall measure a minimum of 12 inches in height, location generally, numbers shall be placed either in the center of the building or on the Page 64

Item #12. street end of the building so as to be visible from either the public or private street or from the parking lot, property line or driveway, should the building be located far enough from a public or private road so that the numbers are not clearly visible from the street, then the street address shall also be posted on the property at or near the property line or driveway to said building, color; each building, numbers shall be contrasting to the background color and shall be placed on each building in the complex, Arabic numerals, all numbers used shall be Arabic numerals, Shopping centers. Shopping centers consisting of two or more stores shall have a tenant or suite number affixed to the front of the tenant space and on the outside of the rear door which corresponds with that tenant space. Numbers shall measure six inches in height. (City of Dover Code of Ordinances, 98-344) APPLICABLE CODES LISTED BELOW (NOT LIMITED TO): 2015 NFPA 1 Fire Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2015 NFPA 101 Life Safety Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2013 NFPA 13 Installation of Sprinkler Systems (NFPA; National Fire Protection Association) 2009 IBC (International Building Code) Latest editions of all other NFPA Codes as defined by the Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations 2015 Delaware State Fire Prevention Regulations City of Dover Code of Ordinances *If you have any questions or need to discuss any of the above comments, please call the above contact person listed. Page 65

Item #12. CITY OF DOVER D E DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE L APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY D O T =============================================================== APPLICATION: Draper Farm (1617 Forest Avenue) FILE#: Z-21-05 REVIEWING AGENCY: DelDOT CONTACT PERSON: Joshua Schwartz PHONE#: 302-760-2768 =============================================================== THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY'S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: CITY & STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: No person, firm, corporation or the like shall construct, open, reconstruct, maintain, modify or use any crossing or entrance onto a state-maintained highway, street or road, including any drainage modifications leading into or carried by the highway drainage system, without first having complied with standards and regulations adopted by the Department and having obtained a permit issued by the Department. Please contact the Delaware Department of Transportation - Development Coordination section to begin permit process. RECOMMENDATIONS SUGGESTED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MEET CODE OBJECTIVES: ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: 1. No comments to the rezoning. 2. At such time the property develops it shall be submitted to DelDOT. At that time schedule a pre-submittal meeting to begin the process. Page 66

KENT CONSERVATION DISTRICT Item #12. 1679 SOUTH DUPONT HIGHWAY • DOVER, DELAWARE 19901• (302) 608-5370 • WWW.KENTCD.ORG CITY OF DOVER DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTARY June 2021 APPLICATION: Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue FILE #: Z-21-05 REVIEWING AGENCY: Kent Conservation District CONTACT PERSON: Kate Owens PHONE #: 302-608-5370 THE SUBJECT PROPOSAL HAS BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE, PLAN CONFORMITY AND COMPLETENESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGENCY’S AUTHORITY AND AREA OF EXPERTISE. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS ELEMENTS WHICH NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT: Source: 2019 Delaware Sediment and Stormwater Regulations CITY AND STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS: Kent Conservation District has no objection to the proposed rezoning of the above referenced site. ADVISORY COMMENTS TO THE APPLICANT: Soil disturbance (e.g. clearing, grading, excavations, tree clearing, or stoning) equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet requires a Sediment and Stormwater Management Plan to be submitted and approved by the Kent Conversation District prior to the commencement of disturbance. Page 67

Item #12. Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties, LLC at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre Parcel): Rezoning R-10/COZ-1 to C-2A/COZ-1 Public Comments Received Through June 11, 2021 (at 10:30am): 1. Email from Jaime and Lenni Palanca of 110 Falmouth Way in Cranberry Run Development received June 4, 2021: Objection to Rezoning 2. Email from Richard and Victoria Stoops of 1590 Forrest Avenue received June 9, 2021: Objection to Rezoning Page 68

Item #12. From: jimpalanca@aol.com To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Commercial Rezoning Application--Cranberry Run Drive Date: Friday, June 04, 2021 5:27:26 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern: We are long time residents of Cranberry Run Development and have lived in the development since September of 1998. We are writing this email in response to a Notice of Hearing on an application to the City of Dover for commercial rezoning of part of the development's frontage. It is our understanding that this is essentially on a proposal to convert the subject area to a cluster of commercial establishments. We would like to go on record with our objections to this rezoning initiative as it is our desire to retain the quiet residential character of our immediate surroundings. We have enjoyed this environment for over 20 years. The prospect of living in a quiet and almost rustic setting was what attracted us to the property almost 25 years ago. With this tranquil environment , we created memories of raising our young family and it is these memories of our early days as a family that our children continue to go home to , or would want to come back and revisit. The advent of hyper development and urban sprawl drastically erases those memories as well as the character of what we have always loved as a peaceful space we call home. For whatever our insights amount to , in the process of building a consensus toward deciding on the initiative--- we would like to weigh in on the side of the opposition. Keep the property's residential character the way it has always been. Sincerely, Jaime G. and Lenni Palanca 110 Falmouth Way Dover, DE 19904 p.s.: We may reconsider if the applicant is amenable to a WAWA convenience store being built right next to their place of residence. Page 69

Item #12. From: vvns14@aol.com To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Fwd: Application Z-21-05, Ordinance #2021-14 Date: Wednesday, June 09, 2021 10:55:55 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Resending this letter, didn't go though the first time. Please confirm you received with an O.K. Thank you. Vicki Stoops -----Original Message----- From: Richard Stoops <vvns14@aol.com> To: Vicki Stoops <vvns14@aol.com> Sent: Tue, Jun 8, 2021 9:54 am Subject: Application Z-21-05, Ordinance #2021-14 To Whom it May Concern We received a Notice Hearing on Application to City of Dover Planning Commission and City Council for property at 1617 Forrest Avenue, Dover, DE and are writing to give you our reason why the property should stay zoned R-10 (one family residence zone). We have lived on Forrest Avenue for 53 years, and know how it has changed over the years, especially with the new Dover High School. The traffic is very bad at different times of the day. I watch the youth crossing the road in different spots, not always at the hawk light. If a store is put across from the school that could be very dangerous with the youth coming back and forth. Plus with the cars turning into the store and coming out makes more problems on a already busy area. This area is a residential area with two developments next door. It will not add anything to the area. Just down the road we already have a MacDonald’s, WaWa and gas station, plus shopping center! Please consider turning this application down! Thank you for the opportunity to make our voices heard. Sincerely, Richard and Victoria Stoops 1590 Forrest Avenue Dover, DE Sent from my iPad Page 70

Item #12. Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties, LLC at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre Parcel): Rezoning R-10/COZ-1 to C-2A/COZ-1 Set #2 Public Comments Received Through June 21, 2021 (at 4:00pm): Emails received June 19, 2021: 1. Email from Richard Smith: Objection to Rezoning 2. Email from Beverly Sutton of 1618 Forrest Avenue: Opposed to Rezoning 3. Email from Jack Sutton of 1618 Forrest Avenue: Against Rezoning 4. Email from R. Nesline of Cranberry Run: Against Rezoning 5. Email from Jessica Parcher of Heatherfield neighborhood: Opposed to Rezoning 6. Email from Conner Mahoney (? of Heatherfield): Opposed to Rezoning Emails received June 20, 2021: 7. Email from C. Faubel: Objection to Rezoning 8. Email from James W. Ritter and Jean M. Ritter: Concerns/Opposed to Rezoning 9. Email from Judi Weiner of 21 Stoney Drive: Objection to Rezoning Emails received June 21, 2021: 10. Email from Karen Nickerson of 24 Stoney Drive: Opposed to Rezoning 11. Email Yvonne Biddle: Against Rezoning 12. Email from John Davis requesting opportunity to speak at Meeting 13. Email from Richard Heisler: Opposed to Rezoning 14. Email from Robert Hice of 124 Chelsea Way (Cranberry Run): Opposed to Rezoning 15. Email from LaTende Henry of 118 Falmouth Way (Cranberry Run): Opposed to Rezoning 16. Email from Patricia Cohen of 1602 Forrest Avenue: Concerns with Rezoning 17. Email from Jackie George of Cranberry Run: Against the Rezoning Page 71

Item #12. From: dsmith1142@gmail.com To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Rezoning of Tax Parcel: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000 Date: Saturday, June 19, 2021 11:39:59 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am strongly opposed to the rezoning proposal of this property from its current R-10 to C-2A. Traffic on this section of Forrest Avenue is well known to travel well in excess of postered limits. Approval of this proposal will greatly increase the danger of severe vehicle and pedestrian accidents. Richard Smith Sent from my iPad Page 72

Item #12. From: Bev Sutton To: CompPlan Cc: Bev Sutton; AAJack Subject: EXTERNAL: Against File number Z-21-05 Ordinance number 2021-14 Date: Saturday, June 19, 2021 12:38:44 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a 18year resident of 1618 Forrest Ave Dover, De. 19904. I am totally against this rezoning. Traffic in front of our home is already very congested; not to mention Rt 8 is an emergency route. The children walking to and from Dover High School will be in even greater danger of traffic injuries if re-zoned a convenience store built as proposed. Many people use the Dover High school sidewalks to jog, walk dogs, walk with family etc at all times of day and night. To change the zoning and to add commercial store would only Amplify Adverse issue with traffic and safety of our mainly residential area. I am against this application for re-zoning. Beverly Sutton Page 73

Item #12. From: pipefitter623 To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Against file number Z-21-05. Ordinance number2021-14 Date: Saturday, June 19, 2021 12:48:51 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a 18year resident of 1618 Forrest Ave Dover, De. 19904. I am totally against this rezoning. Traffic in front of our home is already very congested; not to mention Rt 8 is an emergency route. The children walking to and from Dover High School will be in even greater danger of traffic injuries if re-zoned a convenience store built as proposed. Many people use the Dover High school sidewalks to jog, walk dogs, walk with family etc at all times of day and night. To change the zoning and to add commercial store would only Amplify Adverse issue with traffic and safety of our mainly residential area. Not to even mention how many more traffic accidents will happen. I am against this application for re-zoning. Jack Sutton Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Page 74

Item #12. From: rnesline@verizon.net To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Zoning, file # Z-21-05 Date: Saturday, June 19, 2021 2:01:13 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am adamantly opposed to the Draper Farms request to rezone 5 acres on Forrest Ave. to build a convenience store. I live in Cranberry Run within steps of that property and that is not who I want to have as a neighbor!!!!!!!!!!!! What an awful thing to do to some very nice neighborhoods. Traffic problems on route 8 are bad enough. A convenience store with gas pumps will only make it things worse. The only appropriate use for this land is single family dwellings. Anything else is just madness. Do you want a convenience store in the middle of YOUR neighborhood? Rnesline@verizon.net Page 75

Item #12. From: Jessica Parcher To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Rezoning of Rt.8 property Date: Saturday, June 19, 2021 4:31:20 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, my name is Jessica and I am a resident of the Heatherfield neighborhood. As I may not be able to attend the public hearing on June 21st, I wanted to express my concerns over the rezoning of the 5 acres of land on Forrest Ave. I feel that making this area into a commercial zone will exacerbate the already present traffic congestion, potentially decrease property values to homes adjacent to what is being built, and impair the residential character of our quite and safe neighborhoods. Additionally, this change may potentiate hazards to the children going to and from school on foot. I sincerely hope that my concerns and the concerns of many others in the surrounding neighborhoods are taken seriously, and that this zoning change does not go through. Thank you for your time. Page 76

Item #12. From: Conner Mahoney To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Concern Regarding rezoning near Stoney Dr and Rt 8 Date: Saturday, June 19, 2021 4:55:04 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, While I understand that growth is necessary for a city, the current plan to rezone the area near Heatherfield into a gas station(or any other commercial area) will only compound the problems this area already faces. These issues namely being traffic problems, speeding problems, and problems with litter, all of which seem to not be taken care of by anyone in the first place. I realize that these responsibilities do not necessarily fall on the City of Dover; I am stating that proper maintanence and safeguarding are not being upheld in this area as-is, and a gas station will only exacerbate these problems. As it stands now, I dissent with the current plan to rezone these 5 acres into commercial property. This opinion is based on the idea that the problems already affecting Heatherfield, as well as the area around it, will not be considerably managed after the introduction of commercial properties such as those planned. Thank you for your consideration, Conner Mahoney Page 77

Item #12. From: cmfddf@verizon.net To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Rezoning of 5 acres on Rt. 8-request of Draper Farm Properties Date: Sunday, June 20, 2021 6:59:30 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern: We strongly object to the referenced rezoning application. There are already two convenience stores with fuel pumps within 1.25 miles. There is absolutely no need for a third. Additionally, this type of commercial project would be located in an area completely surrounded by subdivisions and is inappropriate under those circumstances. Thank you. C. Faubel Page 78

Item #12. From: Jean Ritter To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Rezoning Draper Farms PropertiesLLC Date: Sunday, June 20, 2021 7:16:15 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission Members: I am writing this email to express my concerns about the proposed rezoning of the property owned by Draper Farms Properties, LLC located On Forrest Ave, Route 8, Dover, DE. Currently this property is zoned as R-10 and COZ-1; proposed zoning would be C-2A and COZ-1. This change in zoning is totally inappropriate for this land. The current zoning of Single Family dwelling is the only logical and appropriate use of this land that maintains the character and integrity of these neighborhoods. The traffic congestion leading into and out of Cranberry Run is enough to disqualify this rezoning. Traffic issues into and out of Dover High School will only be exacerbated by this rezoning. Other concerns: Lighting of a Convenience Store with Fuel pump 24/7 (lights from the high school already light- up the night sky) School truancy Noise levels (already can hear school activities when in session, ie. track meets, football games, marching band) Rodent infestation Thank you for your consideration of this resident of Dover, DE; my wife and I have been proud to call this home for over 20 years. This area was our choice to retire to and look forward to more years in our home. Best regards, James w. Ritter Jean M. Ritter Page 79

Item #12. From: Judi Weiner To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Petition to Amend Zoning District Date: Sunday, June 20, 2021 8:01:24 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello. My name is Judi Weiner and I live at 21 Stony Dr. In Heatherfield community. I’ve been a homeowner there since 1997. I would like to go on record of objecting to the rezoning request made by Draper Farm Properties on the 5 acres of land on Forest Avenue. I feel it is totally inappropriate since residents of the community want to keep this area residential and not invite more traffic in and out of our neighborhoods , due to the rezoning. Thank you for voting against this rezoning. Sent from my iPhone Page 80

Item #12. From: Karen J Nickerson To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Draper Farm Properties Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 8:56:09 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Commissioners: I am opposed to the rezoning of the Draper Farm Properties. This rezoning to C-2A is inappropriate for this area. We are one of the last residential areas at the western most edge of the City limits. There are several convenience stores and gas stations within a mile or so of this property. It will draw students from the high school running across busy Route 8. Flood lights will more than likely be on 24/7 if a gas station is approved. Heatherfield and Cranberry Run currently have enough problems getting out of the developments for work, etc... Please stop using up every vacant space in the City for retail. This will have a huge impact on our quality of life. Karen Nickerson 24 Stoney Drive Heatherfield Page 81

Item #12. From: Yvonne Biddle To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Tax parcel ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000 Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 9:42:41 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern , This parcel is directly across the street from my home. There are already 3 exits from developments , 2 exits from the high school , not to mention all the single family homes along that stretch of road. The traffic nightmare it would cause having a convenience store and gas pumps in that location is not a good idea. I am very against this zoning change. It would not be in the best interest of this area at all. Sincerely, Yvonne Biddle Sent from my iPad Page 82

Item #12. From: John Davis To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: tonight"s meeting Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 9:59:13 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Commission and staff, I would like an opportunity to address the commission at tonight's meeting. Sincerely, John Davis Page 83

Item #12. From: Richard Heisler To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Rezone of parcel ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000. 1617 Forrest Ave Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 10:46:57 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I want to go on record as opposed to the zoning change to commercial of this property. We have zero need for this. With Dover High and the neighborhoods close by the change would just add traffic to an already crowded situation. Adding a traffic light would not take away any congestion. A left turn lane would probably be added and with a new sidewalk on the North side of Forrest Ave. we will loose property to accommodate their property. I don’t think that is fair. Another issue is the noise. Also the light pollution from the brightly lit area. As a side note, the two hundred year old tree would be taken down. I can not think of one good benefit from this project. Thank you, Richard Heisler Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad Page 84

Item #12. From: rhice86591@aol.com To: City Clerks Office Cc: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 12:08:56 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, My name is Robert Hice and I live at 124 Chelsea way, Dover Delaware, This is in the Cranberry Run Development on Forest Ave across from Dover High School. There is an attempt to rezone a 5 acre parcel of land in front of Cranberry Run from single family home to commercial. I and many of my neighbors want to go on the record as opposing this rezoning effort for the following reasons. First, the traffic is already horrendous to say the least, not that has ever stopped any development in the past. Second, I've already had my vehicle broken into several times and allowing a business would increase undesirable characters in the area that similar businesses have. Third, it would create to much congestion in the front of our development. The addition of access roads, traffic lights etc. would just make a bad situation worse. Fourth, There are plenty of kids/ students walking along the road to and from the high school and a lot of them don't use sidewalks and walk in the street now. A number of them like to ignore traffic and just walk out in front of vehicles that seems to becoming popular these days. Fifth, residents on the opposite side of the road have several yard sales each year. When they do, both sides of the roadway are lined up with vehicles already making it a challenge to exit out development.. Six, the noise is going to be an issue with loud stereos playing, exhaust systems and more. Seven, the bright lights at night time are going to be a nuisance as well. Will I be expected to invest in new darkening blinds after just installing new blinds? I could go on but I don't have the time at the moment and needing to get this out. I/we ask that you consider the residents for once rather than the dollar. Sincerely, Robert Hice, USAF Ret. 124 Chelsea Way Dover, DE 19904 302-672-6458 rhice86591@aol.com Page 85

Item #12. From: lhenry424@aol.com To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Opposition to rezoning Draper Farm Properties on Forrest Avenue and Route 8 Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 1:25:35 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern: My name is LaTende Henry, and I have been a resident at 118 Falmouth Way, Cranberry Run, for 17 years…since December 2003. I chose this neighborhood because I was raising three children and wanted a quiet and safe neighborhood. I plan to retire and stay in this neighborhood for those same reasons. I was shocked and upset to hear recently that the owners of the farm located directly behind my house are trying to rezone the land to a Commercial Zone. I am very opposed to this change. My property backs directly up to the property in question. I’ve also heard that rezoning the land would allow them to proceed with plans to put up a gas station, convenience store or some other type of business. If this is approved, it would have a significant negative impact on, not only my life, but those of my fellow neighbors. A business of this type would bring additional patrons and unwanted people that would jeopardize my safety and privacy. It would also bring disruptive smells and noises. In addition, it would add more traffic congestion to our neighborhood, which already has traffic problems when the new Dover High School was built. I urge you to consider the quality of life issues that rezoning would present to the residents of Cranberry Run and me especially since this is literally right behind my house. In addition, I would urge you to also consider the already existing commercial zones that are less than a mile from this location. There are at least three other gas stations and a number of convenience stores and businesses not a mile from this location. The community does not need yet another gas station or convenience store and definitely not one that would infringe on our daily quality of life. Thank you for your consideration, LaTende Henry Page 86

Item #12. From: P Cohen To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: RT 8 Rezoning Application Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 2:23:02 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission Members, I am writing in regard to Item Z-21-05 on the 6/21/21 Agenda. I wish to express my objection to the application submitted by Draper Farm Properties LLC, to rezone the land located at 1617 Forrest Ave., Dover, DE 19904, to Central Zone Commercial. My concerns are as follows: The increase in traffic generated will not only bring about more congestion, but will also pose safety issues for current residents, motorists, potential customers, and pedestrians, many of whom are students who walk to Dover High School. Also, The 35 MPH speed limit is presently largely ignored, so an increase in the amount of traffic is quite a detriment. The amount of traffic, noise, and trash would negatively impact the surrounding neighborhoods. Also, how many traffic lights will need to be installed? Secondly, a left-turn lane heading East will need to be placed at the entranceway, and the road will need to be widened to accommodate access, which could necessitate removing part of the front lawns of property owners across from the entrance. As a homeowner, I am concerned about the reduction in property value and believe that a commercial endeavor will have an adverse effect on the integrity of the surrounding residential properties. In addition, This location is home to a tree which has been standing for at least one to two centuries. Other trees on the property were already sacrificed. It would be devastating to defile the property by destroying this tree, as well. I hope that you will give some serious thought to the above-mentioned concerns and the ramifications of your decisions. Sincerely, Ms. Patricia B.J. Cohen 1602 Forrest Ave. Dover, DE 19904 Sent from my iPad Page 87

Item #12. From: Dovfox3 To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Rezoning of 1617 Forrest Avenue Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 9:54:42 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I have been a homeowner in Cranberry Run for over 20 years. I am against the rezoning of the above property at the entrance of my development. A convenience store/gas station will result in increased traffic, noise, lights and crime. We have already had problems with students attending Dover High School parking on our streets. Having a convenience store across the street from the school may also cause more traffic accidents due to students crossing Route 8. We don't need another convenience store/gas station when there is a Wawa and other stores less than a mile away. Jackie George Cranberry Run Dover, DE. 19904 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Page 88

Item #12. Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties, LLC at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre Parcel): Rezoning R-10/COZ-1 to C-2A/COZ-1 Set #3 Public Comments Received on June 21, 2021 after 4:00pm and during Planning Commission Meeting: 1. Email from Richard Heisler: Objection to Rezoning (Email similar to Set #2 Item #13) 2. Email from Chuck and Heather Hampton of 13 Stoney Drive: Not in favor of Rezoning (They spoke during Public Hearing.) 3. Email from Lynn Sadusky of 16 Stoney Drive: Opposed to Rezoning (She spoke during Public Hearing.) Page 89

Item #12. From: Richard Heisler To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: 1617 Forrest Ave ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000 Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 5:00:18 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I would like to go on record as strongly opposed to the zoning change proposed. This change would add to the congestion we already have. I realize adding a traffic light would manage the traffic better but will not alleviate it. In addition a turn lane would be necessary resulting in another loss of property on our side. We already lost 10 feet with the new school. There will also be noise and light pollution. There is absolutely no need for this business here. There is also the issue of a 200 year old tree that will be eliminated. Richard Heisler Sent from my iPhone Page 90

Item #12. From: Chuck Hampton To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Draper Farm Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 6:56:13 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Dawn! This is Chuck and I want it to be known that I and My spouse Heather are not in favor of the development of Royal Farms rezoning. Sincerely, Chuck and Heather Hampton Page 91

Item #12. From: LYNN SADUSKY To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Rezoning of the Draper Farm Property Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 7:01:53 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, Please note that I am speaking to ask that the Draper Farm remain as Zoned as a residential property. We already have far too much traffic in our neighborhood when trying to enter Rt. 8. Especially when the high school is in full session, it is nearly impossible to exit our neighborhood from Stoney Drive. We are a residential neighborhood and are surrounded by residences. A Convenience store would block traffic terribly and would create an unsurmountable amount of traffic and congestion. We, the neighbors of Heatherfield and Cranberry Run are extremely opposed to this rezoning. Please pay attention to the folks who live in this area before considering this rezoning. We live here and we know how difficult our lives would become if this were to pass. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Lynne Sadusky Page 92

Item #12. Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties, LLC at 1617 Forrest Avenue (5-Acre Parcel): Rezoning R-10/COZ-1 to C-2A/COZ-1 Set #4 Additional Public Comments Received After Planning Commission Meeting Through July 2, 2021: 1. Email from Jason Abernathey: Opposes Rezoning 2. Email from Sean Patterson of 215 Chelsea Way in Cranberry Run: Opposes Rezoning 3. Email from Gilbert Thompson of 204 Falmouth Way: Opposed to Rezoning Page 93

Item #12. From: Jason Abernathey To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Draper farms rezoning. Date: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 11:26:08 AM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I oppose the rezoning of draper farms property. I believe the proximity of the property to the high school would cause severe congestion. Wawa is only a few blocks away and has multiple traffic signals to regulate traffic flow. Page 94

Item #12. From: Sean Patterson To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Citizen against rezoning Draper Farm Properties Date: Thursday, June 24, 2021 4:44:30 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Planning Commission for the City of Dover: My family lives in Cranberry Run on route 8 adjacent to the property Owned by Draper farm properties LLC. We understand that a request has been made to rezone that property which would allow a convenience store, restaurant, or other similar business to develop that land. We are VEHEMENTLY opposed to this rezoning. This stretch of root 8 is rural residential, and we would like it to remain such. A commercial property at this address would cause traffic problems. A commercial property at that location would draw more traffic to the area, and we already live in a neighborhood that doesn't have a turnlane. We already face traffic hazards with people failing to slow down while we turn into our neighborhood. Having additional motorists trying to access a commercial property would draw even more traffic issues. This property is also directly across from Dover high school grounds. This would draw a lot of foot traffic from the high schoolers over to our side of the neighborhood. This would mean that there would be a lot more litter around our neighborhood and the farm field surrounding that commercial property. This would cause the value of our homes and the appearance of the general area to drop in their quality. The only benefit in reasoning this property will be to the owner of the property. Neither the city of Dover nor the residence surrounding this property will benefit from a change in the zony of this property. Quite the contrary. I'm happy to answer any questions, clarify any comments, or provide any additional insight from my family or my neighborhood regarding the reasoning of this property. Please feel free to contact me at this email address. Respectfully, Sean Patterson 215 Chelsea Way Dover, DE 19904 Page 95

Item #12. From: Brenda Thompson To: CompPlan Subject: EXTERNAL: Draper Farm Properties redone application Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 6:14:21 PM WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am Gilbert Thompson, I have been the homeowner at 204 Falmouth Way for over 16 years. I’m opposed to the rezoning of the land on Forest Avenue for commercial use. Currently there are Convenience stores strip malls grocery stores beauty salons pharmacies gas stations beauty salons pizzerias McDonald’s etc. within 1 mile of the property in question. I do understand the need for growth, however, I’m not seeing how rezoning that land to commercial would promote growth when there are vacancies/rental spaces available (commercial zoned)within 1 mile from the property in question. I am Opposed to the rezoning of the Draper Farms Property located on Forest Ave in Dover De. Thank you. Sent from my iPhone Page 96

Item #12. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING COMMISSION June 21, 2021 Excerpt from Meeting Minutes – Draft The Meeting of the City of Dover Planning Commission was held on Monday, June 21, 2021 at 7:00 PM as a Virtual Meeting using the phone/videoconferencing system WebEx due to Delaware’s Declaration of the State of Emergency for COVID-19. The Meeting Session was conducted with Chair Mrs. Maucher presiding. Members present were Mr. Adams, Mr. Roach, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Lord, Mrs. Welsh, Dr. Jones and Mrs. Maucher. Mr. Baldwin was absent. Staff members present were Mr. Dave Hugg, Mrs. Dawn Melson-Williams, Mr. Julian Swierczek, Mr. Jason Lyon and Mrs. Kristen Mullaney. Z-21-05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue - Public Hearing and Review for Recommendation to City Council on a Rezoning Application for a parcel of land consisting of 5.04 acres. The property is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The proposed zoning is C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The property is located on the north side of Forrest Avenue and adjacent to Cranberry Run Drive. The owner of record is Draper Farm Properties LLC. Property Address: 1617 Forrest Avenue. Tax Parcel: ED-05- 075.00-01-07.00-000. Council District 1. Ordinance #2021-14. Representatives: Mr. Jonathan Street, Becker Morgan Group; Mr. Doug Walker Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that this is a request for Rezoning. The site is the bright blue colored parcel that is located on the north side of Forrest Avenue right at the intersection with Cranberry Run Drive that goes into the residential neighborhood known as Cranberry Run. You can see from the aerial that there are a number of residences surrounding this parcel. The parcel itself previously did have a dwelling unit on it and a series of agricultural related outbuildings; and it was under active cultivation. The property owner is Draper Farm Properties, LLC. That same entity also owns other properties a little further to the west also on the north side of Forrest Avenue; however, this Rezoning application is only pertaining to this five-acre tract of land that is designated here directly adjacent to the Cranberry Run Drive. The property currently is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) and is subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). As noted, the applicant is seeking rezoning of the property to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) and also remaining subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). The City’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan for this property in particular, has a Land-Use Category of Mixed Use. The Comprehensive Plan talks about the goals for Mixed Use land areas. It was actually a specific request during our Comprehensive Plan review process that happened a couple of years ago. The property owner at the time sought that land use classification of Mixed Use. With a Mixed Use Land Use Category, there are a number of zoning districts that are eligible under that Land Use Category. With a Land Use Category, it gives them a list of potential zoning districts. Those include the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone), TND, C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial Zone), C-1A (Limited Commercial Zone), and then a series of residential zones including R-8 (One Family Residence Zone), the R-10 (One Family ) that it is now RG-1 (General Residence Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 1 of 11 Page 97

Item #12. Zone), RG-2 (General Residence Zone), RG-4 (General Residence Zone for Multistory Apartments ), C-3 (Service Commercial Zone), CPO (Commercial Professional Office Zone), and IO (Institutional and Office Zone). The COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) is a zoning overlay. It is not related to use but related more to development activity. It places a series of what we would deem architectural, parking and landscaping guidelines to be followed during the development of a particular property. The use of the property is subject to what the base zoning is and in this case, they are seeking the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) that allows for a variety of uses. With a Rezoning comes the ability to reference that use list. Tonight does not approve any particular use for the property. It would provide for a different zoning district to potentially be applied to the property for future development activities. The C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) has a mix of retail, service establishments, restaurants, places of public assembly, and also some residential types of development in the form of one family residences. Duplex units, apartments or multi-family dwellings are also an opportunity under this zoning district. The C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) also has several Conditional Uses that would be subject to a specific review and authorization process and that is where they find the use of fuel pumps as accessory to a permitted use. The owner, as noted in their application, was seeking for the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) to potentially develop the site for a retail store with fuel pumps which would be an accessory use. That is not being locked in tonight; we are just considering the Rezoning of the property. In the DAC Report, they provided advisory comments as well as the Planning Staff recommendations. Planning Staff is recommending for approval of the Rezoning to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone). They find that it is consistent with the 2019 Comprehensive Plan in the Mixed Use Land Use Classification. However, they do note that there is significant residential character to this area and that perhaps a different zoning district may be more appropriate that could certainly be considered that would allow for some type of commercial activity but on a smaller scale that is perhaps better to serve the immediate residential area. The Rezoning as noted tonight does not grant approval for a specific use of the property but makes the future development and land use of the property subject to a specific list of uses permitted or potential conditional uses. The DAC members did provide comments for Rezoning and most of those are no objection to Rezoning with some advisory comments regarding future development activity should that occur. Planning Commission is making a recommendation on this application; that recommendation gets forwarded to City Council. Mr. Street stated that they are asking for Rezoning of the parcel. This is a Rezoning so it has to meet the three tests. One is the Comprehensive Plan, two is the public services and the third test is, is it compatible with the existing zonings in the area? He would submit that it is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. There are public services available on Forrest Avenue although they are a little bit further west and they are probably on the furthest west lot with the exception of Cranberry Run to the City of Dover. As stated before, Forrest Avenue is the main corridor from the west into the City. He would submit tonight, as you travel the corridor and you look at the City itself, they are the furthest west within the City itself. If you look at the corridor as a whole running all the way out west to the Royal Farms at the light to get into Hartly, you have a smattering of residential properties, agricultural uses and commercial zoned or commercially utilized properties. They are not in large groups. They usually occur around intersections but there is that smattering of commercial uses along that entire corridor. As stated previously in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the City’s expansion is basically to the west. If you look at the Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 2 of 11 Page 98

Item #12. Comprehensive Plan Map 13-1 showing Potential Annexation Areas, everything on the left hand side of the City is in a Category 2 or Category 3 priority in long term annexation targeted areas. There have been a lot of comments tonight, especially on the previous application, about traffic. He had a list of about 19 people that have emailed, called or written in opposition of this application. He would suggest that the Planning Commission understand that this is a Rezoning; this is not a Site Plan. This application actually has no future plan. This is a step one of a multiple step process. Even if they were to do anything with fuel pumps, they would have to come back before the Planning Commission for not only a Site Plan but for Conditional Use of fuel pumps. There is no plan for that; there is no equitable owner on this. Any traffic or pedestrian issues or safety issues that are brought up would have to be dealt with within the Site Plan itself. Those would definitely be dealt with either with Staff or through DelDOT. They have spent a considerable amount of time with DelDOT on entrances and improvements like this and he would submit that probably twice the amount of time that they used to in the past. He read all of the emails in the two different packets to the Commissioners and the majority if not all of the concerns are site related issues like safety, traffic, lighting, and noise. He doesn’t fault them for their concerns but it is a perfect opportunity at Site Plan time to bring up these concerns. Quite frankly since they have made an effort to actually write their concerns down on paper, all it does is give the owner of the property a list of things that they need to consider when they are developing this piece of property in the future. They can work with within those parameters and take them into consideration as they develop the site but as of right now, they don’t have those plans. A lot of those things would have to be met during a Site Plan process. As for the Rezoning itself, zoning has to meet three legs of a stool; compatibility with existing zonings, access to public services and compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Although he understands that there is a large amount of public opposition to it, the public opposition is in relation to a Site Plan that they just don’t have. He would ask that the Commission make a positive recommendation to City Council for the Rezoning to allow them to possibly get to Step 2 and Step 3 which are developing something. That is what this does; this enables the owner and the developer to come up with a plan and right now, they don’t have one. Mr. Walker stated that the one thing that he would add is that there is an incredible overlay district as well. There is a whole different set of requirements for what needs to be done there. He thinks that Mr. Street stated it well. Mr. Hartman stated that he opposes this and he would like to disagree with Mr. Street; this isn’t Step 1 of the process, this is Step 2. Step 1 occurred back when the Comprehensive Plan was drafted and Mrs. Melson-Williams referenced that a little bit. But in order to give the public a better view of what went on at that August 2019 meeting, he would like to cover just a few of the basics. He would also like to direct the public to go to the City website, download those meeting minutes from December 16, 2019 and see what the applicant said about this parcel of land then when they were advocating that the land designation be changed to Mixed Use. At that time, the Planning Office was advocating that the parcel remain Residential. He is reading from the minutes; the Planning Office said “they can’t recommend the change in the land use. The character and the existing use of the immediate area of the subject parcel is residential.” The Planning Office was not supporting any change at that time. Unfortunately when the applicant came before this Commission, they made some assurances about what was going in here and the flexibility of the Mixed Use designation. Five of the six Commission members agreed with that and voted to approve this Mixed Use land (use) category which opened the door to what we are Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 3 of 11 Page 99

Item #12. seeing tonight. Would the Planning Office consider C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) designation a high intensity commercial? Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) is definitely a mix of commercial opportunities from a use perspective. In the Comprehensive Plan, the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) category falls into both what they would consider Commercial Low Intensity and Commercial High Intensity from a Land Use Category perspective. It really comes down on a question of intensity to ultimately what is the built-out version of the property. With this subject site, the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) is going to have a lot of implications on the buildout of the site because of the significant buffering and design placement requirements. She thinks that certainly the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) on the question of intensity can lean both ways. She doesn’t know if Mr. Hugg has any additional comments on that from more of the economic development side of things. Mr. Hartman stated that with the designation of C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone), he thinks it is pretty clear in the Comprehensive Plan. The separation of high intensity and low intensity is in Chapter 12. Would you consider a convenience store as low intensity? Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that it depends on the design of the site and its general location. Mr. Hartman further questioned if she would consider a convenience store with gas pumps a low intensity? Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that when you have basically two uses, you certainly increase intensity. With the gas pumps, you have certainly more traffic that could be visiting that site because you are offering another retail component. Mr. Hartman stated that he would advise the residents that are opposing this tonight to go to the Comprehensive Plan and look in Chapter 12 at the Commercial Low Intensity areas on Page 12- 13 and the Commercial High Intensity areas also on Page 12-13 and remember that when you go to City Council. The City Council meets on July 12, 2021 so the residents opposing this should definitely be at City Council to voice their opinions there. He hopes that they take those meeting minutes from December 16, 2019 and Chapter 12 from the Comprehensive Plan to City Council to discuss this. Also the fact that the Planning Office itself in 2019 was saying that High Intensity Commercial should not go in there and that it should be residential. Mr. Adams stated that he can always count on Mr. Hartman to do his homework and he commends him for that great work. His question is sort of piggy-backing on his comments. Given the opposition back then, it appears that there has been a change of heart with Planning Staff. Now, Staff does recommend that the property be rezoned to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) while retaining the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). How do we marry those two things together? The opposition from the original Rezoning with the idea that it should be kept residential. And now, we have sort of swung the other way to recommending this Rezoning, certainly understanding that Rezoning is not a Site Plan approval. Responding to Mr. Adams, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that in the Comprehensive Plan, she believes that the applicants original request was for straight up Commercial Land Use Classification and a number of those don’t allow for residential or are a very limited residential. The C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) is truly a mixed zone. They see a lot of activity and C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) may be more of that is commercial but it allows for a mix of uses to happen on the property. Be it in the same building or in separate buildings, it allows that opportunity for Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 4 of 11 Page 100

Item #12. mixed use. When they go to the Comprehensive Plan as adopted to place the Land Use Category of Mixed Use on this parcel, then they are looking at the goals of the Mixed Use area as part of the Comprehensive Plan. They cited that in their Report where it is discussed. The goals for Mixed Use areas are to encourage neighborhood centers. Some of that allows for commercial services perhaps to be within walking distance of residential areas and to promote both what could be vehicle access as well as pedestrian access or multi-modal opportunities. This is a pocket of truly residential with a large school site nearby. They do recognize that but they think that there are opportunities for a mix of uses. Just a straight Commercial zone probably at the time that they were looking at the Comprehensive Plan was the reason for the original opposition. But for the Mixed Use, they are encouraging that life is changing how land uses are not as segregated as they once were throughout the City. They think that this is an opportunity which is why they recognize that C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) is compliant with the Comprehensive Plan. They do note in their comments that if that is a zone that is a little bit too much, there are some other commercial zones that could be considered as more appropriate for the location. They didn’t make any particular recommendation but there are certainly others that could be considered as more appropriate. She would also go to Mr. Hugg for additional comments on this transition and more from the Planning Office in their opinion of what was presented from consideration. Mr. Hugg stated that he thinks Mrs. Melson-Williams summarized quite well the deliberations that we had. As Mr. Hartman points out, this matter did come back to the Planning Commission where it was discussed again at some length. He thinks that their collected judgement after some reconsideration and looking at the goals from Mixed Use was that it was a more appropriate land use designation and that land use designation carries a variety of opportunities for commercial and residential activities to occur. The C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone) category is perhaps at the edge of where one might describe commercial as low intensity or high intensity. It is certainly not in the same class as the kind of high intensity commercial uses that they have designated elsewhere in the City where that kind of activity makes more sense. Mrs. Welsh stated that during the presentation from Mr. Street, it was mentioned a couple of times that there is really no plans as of yet as to what they want to do with the property. So, she is a little bit confused as to why the application says that the identified potential use would be a convenience store with fuel pumps. It seems like that is the primary consideration for any future plans. Is there some other use planned that could be different than that that would be more in line with a lesser commercial use or more in tune with some residential use? Responding to Mrs. Welsh, Mr. Street stated that they struggle more often than not with Rezonings or tying a Site Plan to a Rezoning. There is a line item that asks what the intended use is and that is how they get tied into Site Plans with Rezonings. Thank you to Mr. Hartman for the history; he was not involved in those meetings. You always do your homework with past issues on the project. What was requested from Staff previously, he is unaware of. His understanding of the conversations is the potential for something of that nature, but he has no knowledge of any formal plans or any formal uses for that. Clearly, they picked the most controversial use that they could possibly pick for C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone), but they are trying to engineer and discuss a Site Plan that they just don’t have a Site Plan for. Mr. Roach stated that this is probably his first time of ever being on the Planning Commission and not being in favor of two applications in the same meeting. He doesn’t think that it has ever Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 5 of 11 Page 101

Item #12. happened with them. He thinks that they are really progressive in regards to site developments and land developments and approval of rezoning. But he just wants to continue his reluctance when it comes to rezoning situations because yes, it is just a Rezoning but once they do rezone it does allow permitted uses. They have run into situations where once they rezone the property, they have been more handcuffed and have less say so because if it is a permitted us, it becomes a little more difficult for them to say that they disagree. Also, it is a five-acre site. So, he is just imagining that when he is looking at uses that are permitted for the C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone), it is for retail, hotels, restaurants or a lot of other things that they could put there even if it’s not a gas station. He is a social worker and putting something like that right across the street from a high school with kids that have a lot of walking back and forth is an issue. Again, it is on Route 8. It is a five-acre site smack dab in the middle of residential area where there are eighteen people in that area who are already opposed to the Rezoning. He thinks that they are playing with fire. This is a five-acre site with opportunity to do a lot of different things. He appreciates Mr. Street for being very upfront in saying that he doesn’t have an idea. But again, the same thing that Mrs. Welsh said; it says right on the application the intended use is a retail store with accessory use for gas pumps. So if you don’t know, you at least have an idea of what you direction you are going. Honestly to him, putting a gas station right across the street in this area would not be beneficial in his opinion. He appreciates everyone and all of the residents that reached out; continue to do so because at the end of the day yes, we want to build up our developments, but he believes that the people of Dover are the people who should be actually having a voice in this situation. Mrs. Maucher opened a public hearing. Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that she wanted to make reference to the written public comments that they received. A number of those people are on the call tonight hoping to participate but she just wants to make sure that their written comments are referenced. In the Planning Commission Packet that went out on June 11, 2021, they received two emails. The first one being from Jaime and Lenny Palanca of 110 Falmouth Way which is within the Cranberry Run subdivision objecting to the Rezoning. The second email was from Richard and Victoria Stoops for 1590 Forrest Avenue; again, objecting to the Rezoning. Those emails went out the Planning Commission packets and those were entered into the record this evening. Today, Staff gathered the comments that they received over the last few days. There is a total of seventeen of them plus another one that came in after they were distributed to the Commission. This is the Public Comment Set #2 and it is a series of emails received through 4pm today, June 21, 2021. These were collected, inventoried and emailed to the Planning Commission members. She is just going to quickly read through them. These are all opposed or noting some type of rejection to the Rezoning with the exception of one which was ensuring that they were requesting an opportunity to speak this evening. We have emails from Richard Smith; an email from Beverly Sutton at 1618 Forrest Avenue; an email from Jack Sutton also from 1618 Forrest Avenue; an email from R. Nesline of Cranberry Run; an email from Jessica Parcher in the Heatherfield neighborhood; an email from Connor Mahoney also from Heatherfield: an email from C. Faubel objecting; an email from James and Jean Ritter also opposing the Rezoning; and an email from Judy Weiner of 21 Stoney Drive. Emails received today include those from Karen Nickerson of 24 Stoney Drive; an email from Yvonne Biddle; an email from John Davis requesting the opportunity to speak this Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 6 of 11 Page 102

Item #12. evening, and two emails from Richard Heisler (one that was received this morning and then one that was received after 4PM). Both are similar in content but she will reference both of them for the record. There is an email from Robert Hice of 124 Chelsea Way in Cranberry Run. There is an email from LaTende Henry of 118 Falmouth Way. There is an email from Patricia Cohen of 1602 Forrest Avenue. The last is an email from Jackie George of Cranberry Run. All of those emails are entered into the record and were provided to the Planning Commission members. Mr. Jack Sutton – 1618 Forrest Avenue Dover, DE 19904 Mr. Sutton stated that he has lived here for 18 years and this is a great side of the town to live on. They built the school back here and they really enjoy the school. He didn’t approve of it at first, but he really enjoys the school. The kids and everybody does a good job. This is a great place to live; everybody knows everybody here and there is no trouble. He loves it here. You need to keep that place residential with just single-family dwellings. This is a hell of a place to raise kids or even for elderly people. We all stick together on this side of town. There is so much traffic here as it is. If you put something here, it is just going to amplify accidents or kids getting hit. We have all kinds of people that jog or walk here. There are elderly and young and they walk with their families and pets. This is a great place to live; don’t mess it up by sticking something like that in here. This is a place that you want your kids to grow up. Don’t screw something up that works. That’s the problem with government and companies; everybody wants to make money. And sometimes it is not all about the money; it is about a good quality of life. He is begging the Commission to please leave it residential. This works and we need to keep something in Dover that works. Ms. Karen Nickerson – 24 Stoney Drive Dover, DE 19904 Ms. Nickerson stated that she won’t be redundant and say what she has already wrote but the traffic on Route 8 is horrendous. If anybody tries to get out of Heatherfield or Cranberry Run, they sit and wait. They don’t need something else between our two developments that is going to produce more traffic and more waiting. These two developments are the westernmost residential areas in the City limits if she is looking at the correct map. She believes that the Commission needs to leave it residential. Mr. Guy Smith – 8 Yarmouth Way Dover, DE 19904 Mr. Smith stated that there is a lot of traffic on Route 8 especially since they have built the school. They have basically one area to get across the street for all of the students living in the four subdivisions on the north side to get to the school. A lot of them have to walk two or three blocks in the wrong direction to cross the street safely and walk back. High school students don’t do that. They are already coming out of Cranberry Run and go right across the street right at the end of the residential areas on the south side. He sees people that are walking and jogging doing it also. From what he understands, when all of the school was developed they said that they could not put a stop light at Cranberry Run or Heatherfield because of the proximity of the other two down at Mifflin Road and at the other end of the school. If you put in any type of commercial endeavor here with no light, you’ve got three subdivisions and a bunch of individual homeowners that only have one access to the road. We already sit and wait. Sometimes in the morning he could wait 30 minutes to get out of his subdivision. You can’t continue adding more and more traffic without additional ways to alleviate that traffic. He doesn’t care so much if they say they are going to change it to some other zoning that might keep it to a low density or if you Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 7 of 11 Page 103

Item #12. say you are going to put duplexes or something other than single family homes but it needs to stay residential. It needs to have the access to the main road which right now, is very limited as it is. He doesn’t know who you are going to get more and more people on this road safely. If you put a convenience store here, he can guarantee you that those high school kids are going to go to lunch crossing that highway to get to the convenience store. You have already said that they can’t put more crosswalks or things like that in there because of the proximity of others. You are going to be increasing the danger to our children and to other residents that are going to be crossing this street more than what they do now. He hopes that the Commission really takes that into consideration and keeps this in the residential arena. Ms. Louise Bordley – 43 Stoney Drive Dover, DE 19904 Ms. Bordley stated that she has been here for 20 years and has seen a lot of changes. She knows that you have heard over and over again how bad the traffic is but what you don’t know is this. She is 69 years old and she has always been a safe driver. She is now taking chances trying to get on the other side and almost having accidents. She believes that if you rezone now, then they are going to come right back to try to stop what they are going to build. Mr. Chuck Hampton – 13 Stoney Drive Dover, DE 19904 Mr. Hampton thanked Staff and the Commission for their patience and kindness. He believes that it compromises the neighborhood. A gas station will not only put gas in your car but crime will increase in the neighborhoods and can endanger the lives of the high school kids. This can also create a negative impact for the sale of homes. When you look at that beautiful area, putting a gas station there just doesn’t work and it doesn’t look nice. Mrs. Heather Hampton – 13 Stoney Drive Dover, DE 19904 Mrs. Hampton stated that her main concern is the noise level. Based on the Wawa down the street, there are constantly motorcycles with their radios on and she just thinks that is an awful thing to have. Mr. Griffin DuBreuil – 23 Stoney Drive Dover, DE 19904 Mr. DuBreuil stated that he would be opposed to this Rezoning attempt. He has been here for 35+ years and the traffic has increased exponentially over the years. Should this be rezoned to commercial, you could have a potential for higher crime. Should a gas station get built here, it will cause crime, light pollution, gas pollution and water pollution. It would just ruin the character of this side of town; and he is so hardly opposed to this Rezoning. Ms. Yvonne Biddle – 1598 Forrest Avenue Dover, DE 19904 Ms. Biddle stated that she lives directly across from the property. She agrees 100% with everything that has been said. Ms. Jean Ritter – 106 Falmouth Way Dover, DE 19904 (technical difficulties speaking) Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that Ms. Riddle wrote in the chat, “With more understanding of what C-2A (Limited Central Commercial Zone), this Rezoning opens pandora’s box. Basically, it allows just about anything to be put on this property. This is not a logical change with mostly residential and a high school within close proximity. Please add this to the public record.” Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 8 of 11 Page 104

Item #12. Mr. John Davis – 4 Stoney Drive Dover, DE 19904 Mr. Davis thanked the Planning Staff for the help that they have given him. He also wanted to thank Commissioner Hartman for the information. Mr. Street mentions that the proposed use as a convenience store and that there is no plan. The fact of the matter is that this particular zoning will in fact allow something for that and they have expressed an interest in a Conditional Use. When you pass this zoning law, that will in fact be an allowable use. He thinks that it is totally inappropriate. He has researched some of the potential retail establishments along these lines. One of the reviews that they got was that this was the place to be at 2AM in the morning because they’ve got everything you need. When you look at that and compare it to Wawa, which at one time because of some problems with after parties that were going on over on College Road, they had to shut down. There have also been burglars constantly patrolling Wawa lots. None of these stores are equipped to police those places. One of the things that concerns him is that as somebody who has had experience in public schools is that this particular place is going to attract kids from Dover High School. Granted the High School is going to do a stellar job to keep those kids on campus, but they are going to run across the street and someone is going to get hit. When you look at the map, that as opposed to the previous project on Forrest Avenue, which is a mile away from this particular location, it is all single-family dwellings. Every single one of those go on the west side of Stoney Drive, across the street on Forrest Avenue, and all of Cranberry Run are all single-family dwellings and he thinks that is what the propriate zoning should be. He is opposed to any kind of change. Ms. LaTende Henry – 118 Falmouth Way Dover, DE 19904 Ms. Henry stated in the chat that she is here for the Route 8 Rezoning and she will not be speaking since she sent an email earlier. Ms. Lynn Sadusky – 16 Stoney Drive Dover, DE 19904 Ms. Sadusky stated that she is a new resident to Heatherfield but not to Dover. She has lived here since 1969. She wants to second what everyone said tonight especially Mr. Hartman and Mr. Roach. She wants to thank them very much for speaking up for the residents in the Dover community that live surrounding this site. She thinks that they have at least 150 families in East Heatherfield. She is sure that there is an excess of 80 families in Cranberry Run, at least 50 in Heatherfield West,0 and then the neighbors across Route 8 who would be severely impacted. She is opposed to this Rezoning. The property is surrounded by residential areas and this property should stay residential. She thinks that one of the biggest concerns in addition to the traffic problem that we are already facing when trying to leave the neighborhood is the students at Dover High School and the unsafe situation that it would put them in. She just wants to say that when the High School first opened up, she was working at Dover High School. If she left the house at 7AM, there was no way that she could get into the high school traveling just 5 miles because of the traffic on Route 8 when school is in full swing. She would have to go around through Sharon Hill Road and Deer Track Lane and come in from the west side just to get into Dover High School on time. It has been a problem and it remains a problem. She thinks that one of her neighbors said that she has to schedule doctor’s appointment around other times of the day instead of start and end times for school because it is very difficult to get out of the Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 9 of 11 Page 105

Item #12. neighborhood. She just wants to urge everyone to please pay attention to the neighbors who will be immediately impacted by such a change. This is our home; this is where we live and people want to feel safe and comfortable in their homes. Such a development of commercial use for that property would make us feel less safe and less comfortable. She also wants to ask everyone listening, especially the Commissioners and developers. Would you like to live in Cranberry Run or Heatherfield or across the street on Route 8 or if you had a child attending Dover High School, would you want this property to be Rezoned? Mr. Adewunmi Kuforiji- Capital School District 198 Commerce Way Dover, DE 19904 Mr. Kuforiji stated that as the Commission makes their decisions, he wants to encourage them to make sure that they think about the investment that the community made with Dover High School being set at that location. It is a great learning environment and he thinks that it is a great flagship for the community. He hopes that it brings people into our community. They have tried to build a learning environment that is safe for our students. Mrs. Maucher closed the public hearing. Mr. Hartman questioned that in the event that Commissioners thought that this land use designation of Mixed Use was possibly a mistake, what would be the protocol for us to initiate a return to the previous land use designation? This would be to prevent other applicants from going down this same path. This is a residential area. What would be the protocol to change the Comprehensive Plan to return this to the designation as a residential area? Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and how that process works is outlined in the Comprehensive Plan itself in Chapter 15. The Comprehensive Plan on Page 15-10 notes that any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are approved by City Council by recommendation of the Planning Commission and they have a review process with the Office of State Planning Coordination. Specific requests to amend the Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by Planning Staff, City Council or applications from the general public. It doesn’t specifically list the Planning Commission there, but she thinks that it would take at least a motion to that affect to have Staff perhaps initiate that. They do Comprehensive Plan amendments once a year and that filing timeframe is in December of each year and then they are considered in the January through March timeframe of the following year. Mr. Hartman stated in the event that this is not approved, if the residents don’t want to face this in the future, you should contact your City Councilman or look at the Comprehensive Plan and initiate a change to the land use designation for this area so that it returns to residential. Take that Mixed Use category away from here and you won’t be faced with these commercial uses again. To Planning Staff, would you be willing to initiate a change to the Comprehensive Plan to revert back to residential from Mixed Use? Responding to Mr. Hartman, Mrs. Melson-Williams stated that she thinks that they would be looking at the Comprehensive Plan and if there was significant change in a neighborhood area, they could bring forward something. She doesn’t know if Mr. Hugg has any other thoughts. Typically, Staff has not necessarily done requests such as this that she is aware of. She knows that they just did a series of amendments that were identified because of zoning concerns related to their Comprehensive Rezoning Project. Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 10 of 11 Page 106

Item #12. Mr. Hugg stated that he thinks that first the matter before you tonight needs to be resolved because you have an active application in front of you. They would certainly give full consideration should the Planning Commission determine that is the direction that they would like to see them move. Again, as Mrs. Melson-Williams indicated, the timing for such action is specified in the Comprehensive Plan. But he thinks in fairness to the applicants and in fairness to the process, you need to resolve this matter at both the Commission’s level and at City Council’s level before we consider moving forward with some other change. He thinks that they owe that much to all of the parties involved, whatever the ultimate recommendation tonight is. Mr. Hartman moved to recommend to not approve (denial) to City Council for application Z-21- 05 Lands of Draper Farm Properties at 1617 Forrest Avenue and that is taking into consideration public safety, the health and welfare, comfort and convenience of the general public and the residents of the immediate residential area and particularly the comments that they have read and heard this evening. Leave this at its current R-10 (One Family Residence Zone), seconded by Mrs. Welsh and the motion was carried 8-0 by roll call vote with Mr. Baldwin absent. Mr. Hartman voting yes to not approve; for reasons previously stated. Mrs. Lord voting yes to not approve. Mrs. Welsh voting yes in favor of not approving; for reasons stated in the motion. Dr. Jones voting yes; for reasons stated by Mr. Hartman and certainly for the concerns and comments made by the residents in that area. Mr. Adams voting yes; he is quite torn here but certainly tips towards the residents and their passion to please with respect to this property. Mr. Roach voting yes; for reasons previously stated and due to all of the residents sharing their concerns. He echoes those concerns and again he definitely is all in favor of rezoning when it makes sense in regards to the area. But when you have this many people opposed to it, he has to definitely vote in favor of the motion to not allow the rezoning for this property. Mrs. Malone voting yes; for reasons stated, Mr. Hartman’s reasons, and also the residents and property owner’s reasons. Mrs. Maucher voting yes; in looking at the goals of the mixed land use, she thinks that there is opportunity for some commercial that blends mixed land use toward pedestrian use and bicycle use which some of these larger commercial zones would not allow. Excerpt of Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2021 Page 11 of 11 Page 107

Item #12. FINAL READING CITY OF DOVER PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2021-14 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY 2 OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3 1617 FORREST AVENUE 4 5 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the 6 limits of the City of Dover; and 7 WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property 8 described below from R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) 9 to C-2A (Limited Central Commercial zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 11 DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 12 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning 13 Ordinance of the City of Dover have been amended by changing the zoning designation from R-10 14 (One Family Residence Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) to C-2A (Limited 15 Central Commercial Zone) and subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone) on that property 16 located at 1617 Forrest Avenue (on the north side of Forrest Avenue and adjacent to Cranberry Run 17 Drive), consisting of 5.04+/- acres, owned by Draper Farm Properties, LLC. 18 (Tax Parcel: ED-05-075.00-01-07.00-000; Planning Reference: Z-21-05; First Council District) 19 20 ADOPTED: * 21 S:\ORDINANCES\2021\DRAFT\ORDINANCE #2021-14 - REZONING - 1617 FORREST AVENUE\ORDINANCE #2021-14 - REZONING - 1617 FORREST 22 AVENUE - FINAL READING.wpd 23 Actions History 24 07/12/2021 - Scheduled for Public Hearing/Final Reading - City Council 25 06/21/2021 - Public Hearing - Planning Commission 26 05/24/2021 - First Reading - City Council Page 108

Item #12. From: John W. Paradee To: City Clerks Office; Ramsey, Megan R. Cc: Jonathan N. Street; Doug Walker; Eric Good (eric@shorelinevinyl.com); Melson-Williams, Dawn; Hugg, Dave; Lori W. Rebuck Subject: EXTERNAL: FW: Message from "dover-mp2554" Date: Thursday, July 1, 2021 3:34:14 PM Attachments: 20210702153312790.pdf Importance: High WARNING: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. See the attached correspondence. My secretary will send out hard copies via regular mail. Please LMK if you have any questions. Thanks very much, and best regards. John W. Paradee, Esq. 6 S. State Street | Dover, Delaware 19901 (302) 677-0061 (tel) | (302) 677-0065 (fax) john@bmbde.com This Electronic Message contains privileged client attorney communications from the law firm of Baird Mandalas Brockstedt, LLC. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: BMB Scans <bmbscan@bmbde.com> Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 3:33 PM To: John W. Paradee <john@bmbde.com> Subject: Message from "dover-mp2554" This E-mail was sent from "dover-mp2554" (MP 2554). Scan Date: 07.02.2021 15:33:12 (-0400) Queries to: bmbscan@bmbde.com Page 109

Item #12. Page 110

Item #13. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING A Special City Council Meeting was held on June 28, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. with Council President Sudler presiding. Members present were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare (arrived at 5:49 p.m.), Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor (arrived at 5:34 p.m.), and Mr. Lindell. Mayor Christiansen was also present. Council staff members present were Mr. Harline, Ms. Peddicord, Mrs. McDowell, Mr. Rodriguez, and Mr. Hugg (6:08 p.m. - 6:50 p.m.). Other staff members present were Mrs. Hawkins (6:50 p.m. - 7:19 p.m.), Chief Johnson (7:12 p.m. - 7:19 p.m.), Mr. Lyon (5:30 p.m. - 6:05 p.m.), and Ms. Mills (5:30 p.m. - 6:05 p.m.). Also present were Ms. Victoria Petrone, Esquire, of Baird Mandalas Brockstedt LLC (5:30 p.m. - 6:05 p.m.) and Ms. Linda Parkowski, Executive Director Kent Economic Partnership (6:08 p.m. - 6:50 p.m.). ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved to recess into Executive Session pursuant to 29 Del. C. §10004(b)(2) - Preliminary discussions on site acquisitions for any publicly funded capital improvements, or sales or leases of real property and Pursuant to 29 Del. C. §10004(b)(4) - Strategy sessions, including those involving legal advice or opinion from an attorney-at-law, with respect to collective bargaining or pending or potential litigation, but only when an open meeting would have an adverse effect on the bargaining or litigation position of the public body. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. The Special Council Meeting recessed into Executive Session at 5:31 p.m. The Executive Session adjourned at 7:19 p.m. ACTION RESULTING FROM THE EXECUTIVE SESSION Update on Pending Litigation During the executive session members were provided an update on pending litigation. Mr. Neil moved for approval of the mediation agreement. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Tentative Labor Agreements During the executive session members were briefed on the terms of the following tentative labor agreements: Dover Organization of Employees (DOE) Mr. Anderson moved for approval of the Dover Organization of Employees (DOE) contract. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) Mr. Anderson moved for approval of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) contract. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Page 111

Item #13. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 2 Mr. Neil moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. The Special Council Meeting adjourned at 7:29 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by City Council during their Special Meeting of June 28, 2021 are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /TM S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2021\06-28-2021 SPECIAL ES ACTION (PUBLIC) - Land, Litigation and Contract Negotiations.wpd Page 112

Item #14. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Regular City Council Meeting was held by video conference on June 28, 2021 at 7:36 p.m. with Council President Sudler presiding. Council members present via video or telephone were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Lindell. Staff members present via video or telephone were Police Chief Johnson, Ms. Peddicord, Mr. Harline, Mr. Hugg, Mr. Rodriguez, and Mrs. McDowell. Mayor Christiansen was also present. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Mayor Christiansen. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Rocha. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the consent agenda, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. PRESENTATION - CITY OF DOVER ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT (DOVER DOWNS CASINO) Mr. Tony Rohrer, Vice President and General Manager at Dover Downs Hotel and Casino, presented a plaque to Mr. Paul Waddell, Electric Department Director. Mr. Rohrer also presented a check in the amount of $500 to the Electric Morale Fund. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - BUDGET REVIEW OF JUNE 1 - 2, 2021 The Minutes of the Special Council Meeting - Budget Review of June 1 - 2, 2021 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Neil and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 The Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of June 14, 2021 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Neil and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. Page 113

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 2 ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 14, 2021 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 14, 2021 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Neil and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT - APRIL 13, 2021 The Economic Development Committee Meeting was held by video conference on April 13, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. with Mayor Robin R. Christiansen presiding. Committee Members present via video or telephone were Councilman David Anderson, Kim Adams, Dave Hugg-City Planner, Randy Robertson - City Manager, and Diane Laird were present. Councilman Roy Sudler and Clayton E. Hammond II were not present. Guests present Kevin Quinn and Matthew Suchodolski from Economic Development Administration. WELCOME At 4:00 pm Mayor Robin R. Christiansen called the Economic Development Meeting to order. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mayor Christiansen called for a motion to adopt the Agenda. Dave Hugg moved for adoption of agenda, seconded by Councilman David Anderson, unanimously carried. (Councilman Roy Sudler and Clayton E. Hammond II absent). ADOPTION OF MINUTES Mayor Christiansen called for a motion to adopt February 9, 2021 minutes. Diane Laird moved for adoption of minutes, seconded by Councilman Anderson, unanimously carried. (Councilman Roy Sudler and Clayton E. Hammond II absent). KEVIN QUINN - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION - DISCUSS SPECIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES Kevin Quinn and Matthew Suchodolski from the Economic Development Administration (EDA) gave a PowerPoint presentation please see Attachment 1. Matthew Suchodolski states his appreciation for time tonight. The Delaware State University Center very important project funding requested in 2011. 2021 EDA was able to feature Delaware State University this past summer coordinated outreach with National Association of Development Organizations (NADO) as a historically black college and University were able demonstrate the good work the students of Economic Development and Business programming do and can do. They have been recognized International Economic Development Council as a model program. They obtain the course work to allow them to be equipped for Economic Development Certification. The alignment with Delaware State can not be overlooked they were one of 11 universities throughout the nation that were featured. Page 114

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 3 Matthew Suchodolski states Councilman Anderson had early questions relative to Dover Air Force Base for Department of Defense programming. Outreached to Douglas Edward Brown whom shared notice of funding opportunities that will be apparent this fiscal year. Matthew Suchodolski will share that information via email. Councilman Anderson asks when it comes to the Covid Grants and opportunity zones would something like money for small business revolving loan fund (RLF) would that qualify for Covid funding. Kevin Quinn state the RLF granted to the state will cover all three counties, as well as three additional RLFs one per each county. The City of Dover could start RLF specifically for Dover, but they cannot cross, business cannot get funding from multiple RLFs. Councilman Anderson next question is who handles destination funds? Kevin Quinn states he is not familiar with these funds. Matthew Suchodolski state under American Recovery Plan the congressional appropriation speaks to a certain percentage of that appropriation for EDA to be for travel, tourism, and outdoor recreation. There will be funds just do not have terms of engagement yet. Mayor Christiansen welcomes Mr. Randy Robertson our new City Manager Diane Laird, she and Lisa have been working on grant request through USDA that was submitted on March 31 for a revolving loan fund. It is nice to know that we may be able to look for more additional funding. Would EDA funding be available for Master Planning Downtown. Kevin Quinn said yes please send him a proposal for RLF also that is not duplicating efforts from other RLF in Delaware. Also, yes the EDA helps with master planning and feasibility studies would be happy to discuss further down the road and off line. They will assist with sewer, roads, outdated infrastructure, and attracting business that will hire. Mr. Randy Robertson asks Mr. Hugg is this same planning process we spoke a week ago with Ms. Parkowski or is it different. Dave Hugg states it is the same notion. Mr. Robertson asks if this is the same RFP conceptually and Dave Hugg confirmed. Dave Hugg asks if infrastructure funding would apply if City is interested in developing or redevelop municipal complex example a new City Hall. Kevin Quinn states not it is not it has be in regards to job creation. Example when he was in Tennessee that brought in Volkswagen, they had an area of undeveloped land. They gave them a grant to clear land, redo rail lines, water and sewer. That is more classic EDA Public Works for funding. Dave asks if underutilized unused farm land as a future employment zone linked to air force base those would be eligible, and Mr. Kevin Quinn stated yes. Page 115

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 4 Lisa Chase asks Kevin if she can talk off line, he agrees to go through each project that they have lined up. Lisa asks if there is a funding cap on these grants. Kevin says yes and no for example if you ask for 20 million for an RLF you must bring it down. You have to be realistic and have match. Lisa asks if it will be a one to one match, Kevin says yes match makes your application more competitive. Councilman Anderson, the hospital expanded and other job opportunities, but the water sewer piping would need to expand would EDA give match for it. Kevin Quinn states yes that is what EDA does and that would be competitive under Public Works. Councilman Anderson would be enhancing with smart technology to bring more people in and getting competitive grants with Verizon 5g broadband and electric cars. Kevin Quinn says yes that would qualify. Dave Hugg asks if funds from American Rescue Plan be able to use as match. Kevin Quinn says the guidelines for that money has not come out, yet he would have to check with his legal team. Mr. Suchodolski states their lawyers are currently looking at that and reaching out to treasury. CITY OF DOVER PLANNING UPDATE GIVEN BY DAVE HUGG Dave Hugg advises we took advantage and submitted seven projects through Congressional Authorization Procreations Process some would qualify for EDA funding mostly infrastructure projects. Also, submitted four projects to Representative Blunt Rochester for community projects including two planning projects if we cannot get funded otherwise. Waiting for guidelines from US Treasury of American Rescue Plan should be on or around May 10. MAYORS ANNOUNCEMENT Next meeting will have a guest speaker thanks to Councilman Anderson will give insight on new directions we can go. NEXT MEETING DATE May 11, 2021 at 4:00 PM via ZOOM ADJOURNMENT Mayor Robin R. Christiansen called for a motion to adjourn. Councilman Anderson moved for adjournment, seconded by Diane Laird, unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned 5:00PM. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Economic Development Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Page 116

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 5 COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT - JUNE 15, 2021 The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held by video conference on June 15, 2021 at 6:00 p.m., with Council President Sudler presiding. Members of Council present via video or telephone were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Lindell. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Contant and Mr. Shevock (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Anderson presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Anderson requested the agenda be amended by moving Item# 6 - Presentation - Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) Master Plan to be considered first. Mr. Sudler moved for adoption of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Presentation - Downtown Dover Partnership (DDP) Master Plan (Diane Laird, Executive Director, DDP) Ms. Diane Laird, Executive Director, DDP, reviewed the Downtown Dover Partnership Master Plan presentation. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Laird stated that considering the current workforce, the potential workforce gain from DSU locating downtown would be a key factor in a successful outcome, not only for entrepreneurial types that want to open small businesses, but all for other professional businesses that may arise. Mr. Neil suggested that the Downtown Dover Partnership consider including the Riverwalk previously proposed by Mr. Taylor as a part of the plan. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Ms. Laird stated that they had not sought funding from private industry or a public private collaborative. She stated that she tried to keep things condensed while looking at the plans but there was no reason not to consider private sources or public private sources in addition to the non-profit sources if they need the funding. Ms. Laird stated that it was something she would consider. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Ms. Laird stated that Delaware State University would be engaged in the visioning, planning, and exploration of investment in how the campus would engage with the whole master plan. She stated that how their involvement in terms of funding correlated to the rest of the community was worth exploring. Page 117

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 6 Responding to Mr. Sudler, Ms. Laird stated that part of the plan should be assessing where a campus of social services could be located or if it should be spread out. Evaluation of Bids - Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program (Sharon Duca, Public Works Director) Ms. Sharon Duca, Public Works Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the evaluation of bids for the Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program. Staff recommended awarding the contract to Grassbuster's Landscaping Company, Inc. for the City of Dover Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program, Bid #21-0039PW, for the amount of $381,083. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Ms. Duca stated that she could get information on the cost overrun by dollar amount and percentage as compared to what was proposed for previous bids that Grassbuster's Landscaping Company, Inc. had been awarded. Mr. Boggerty suggested that going forward it may be beneficial to include whether a company had previously done work for the City and what the percentage of their overruns was in the bid and RFP packages. Mr. Matt Harline, Interim City Manager, stated that if the City included performance measures it would need to be in a system so it can be applied equally. He stated that if this information would be used to penalize companies there needed to be good metrics. Responding to Mr. Neil, Ms. Duca stated that in terms of performance, Grassbuster's had done a good job on various projects in the past and had completed jobs on time as well. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Duca stated that Stevenson Drive was part of the 2021 street program that was accepted by Council the night before so the plan was to have Stevenson Drive done first. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Duca stated that Public Works was trying to work on a phased in plan that would leave a significant number of trees in place by trying to work around them. She stated that they were working through that with a contractor for the 2020 program and it would come back to committee for review once they received further information on the cost and were able to ensure the ability to not disturb the trees as a part of the project. Responding to Mayor Christiansen, Ms. Duca stated that as long as everything worked out with the contractor and the equipment they should be able to pave the road surface before cold weather settled in. She advised that some of the issues that would take more time were the sidewalks on the other side of the trees due to the Page 118

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 7 need to develop the possibilities for routing around them and the need for various public involvement as it could affect homeowner's properties. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of staff's recommendation to award the contract to Grassbuster's Landscaping Company, Inc., for the City of Dover Fiscal Year 2021B Street and Alley Program. The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Elimination of the City Assessor's Position (Cheryl Bundek, City Assessor) Mrs. Cheryl Bundek, City Assessor, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the elimination of the City Assessor's position. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Bundek stated that her biggest con for eliminating the assessor position would be the loss of a position in the department, the pro would be the cost savings to the City which would be the case if they awarded the job to the contractor or if they chose to go with the County. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mrs. Bundek stated that Human Resources was looking for a position for the employee whose position would be eliminated if the assessor's position was eliminated and that the employee was looking at and applying for the open positions within the City. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mrs. Bundek stated that if Kent County had the revaluation, Tyler was doing that revaluation and had also done the City's. She advised that if the City did not go with Kent County revaluations, if it chose to go with the Kent County route after the reevaluation was done, it would be in the City's best interest because the values would be different. Mrs. Bundek noted that even if the City did a valuation in the same year, Kent County was using a different valuation software. She stated that Tyler was going to be using Patriot software, which is what Kent County currently had so there would be a different value probably between the City value and Kent County's value, which could make for appeals for whoever has the highest value between the two properties. Mrs. Bundek stated that it would not make sense to a property owner how the valuation year can be that close and maybe extremely different. She advised that the City would also have to make a judgment call on quality of home and condition of home from an assessor that is working in Kent County versus either an assessor that is working for the City or a contractor that is working for the City. Mrs. Bundek stated that her only concern if the City chose not to go with the county value was that it may incur a lot more appeals because of judgement calls between two different jurisdictions and two different software being used. She noted that the contractor cost right now was not to exceed $59,900 a year. Page 119

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 8 Mayor Christiansen stated that the Assessor's office had kept current with the assessment values of the properties within the City and he firmly believed that the City should keep the position. He noted that after the end of the Kent County Assessment the City could see if it dovetails with theirs and make the decision then. Mr. Hare noted that the City pays County taxes which covers having property assessed. He stated that he agreed with Mayor Christiansen that the position could stay vacant and be kept available while the City waits to see what the County comes up with before spending the money to do a reassessment. Mr. Sudler stated that he agreed with Mayor Christiansen and he would like to see some type of relief in regards to constituents being hit with County and City taxes simultaneously. Mayor Christiansen stated that in some areas where there is duplication of services, there is a separate service function budget. He noted that it had been considered for the City of Dover and the County over the last forty years. Mayor Christiansen advised that he did not know if it would change but it was something that should be discussed on a regular basis. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mrs. Bundek advised that the City had already signed the contract with Tyler Technologies for additional services, so they were at its disposal. She stated that they would not be needed unless asked for any contract work, so the City could use them until a decision is made. Mrs. Bundek advised that if the City's route was to search for another assessor, they would have to be certified with the State to be appointed as the assessor to value properties. She stated that the contractor could be utilized in the interim to value any new building permits. Mrs. Bundek stated that she, Mrs. Patricia Marney, Customer Service Director, Mr. Randy Robertson, City Manager, and Mr. Matt Harline, then Assistant City Manager, met with Mr. Mike Petit de Mange, Kent County Administrator, to discuss what the future was with the reevaluation. She advised that it was not in the settlement that the County had to do a reoccurring reassessment like the City does, but Mr. Petit de Mange stated that was what he was proposing. Mrs. Bundek stated that the first City reassessment in 2010 was just short of a million dollars and has since gone down to about one hundred thousand ($100,000) because the properties will be looked at within a five-year period, so a contractor does not have to be hired to look at every property like the whole State has to do right now. Mrs. Bundek advised that the State was going to go out and look at every property again, including the City of Dover properties. She stated that the contractor would get the information from the Planning and Inspections Department via the Tax Assessor's administrator, they would value the properties and the Tax Assessor's administrator would do the rest of the leg work. Mrs. Bundek noted that the way it was positioned was for the Tax Assessor's administrator to go under customer service and be directly supervised Page 120

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 9 by Mrs. Marney. She stated that the contractor would come in and probably just deal with the administrator in that aspect. Mrs. Bundek stated that if the City went with the county valuations the Tax Assessor's administrator would send the permits to the county, the county would do all the permits and valuation and the City could just do an export. She stated that it was currently $15.00 for each export so it would probably be best to do that four times a year prior to each billing and then bill based on that information. Mrs. Bundek sated that one of the big pros for using Kent County was that there would no longer be a need for a Board of Assessment Appeal because all of the appeals would be sent directly to Kent County, who would handle all appeals to property values. Mr. Harline stated that the information from the Council retreat was used to guide the construction of the 2022 Fiscal Year Budget which did not currently include funds for a new assessor so if Council wanted to hire a new assessor in the next several months there would be a substantial increase in the budget. He stated it was also assumed that the City would be able to find a way to absorb the field assessor if the Tax Assessor position was eliminated so that position would also have to be added back into the budget as well. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mrs. Bundek stated that if the position was kept vacant to see what happened with the County before a decision was made there would be some interim ordinance changes that would need to be made. She noted that Mrs. Marney had an intern in her office that had been working on the senior citizen issue and was willing to work on the ordinance issues as well but the City would need direction on whether the Tax Assessor's office would remain under Council or go under the City Manager and who would be supervising the one person in that position. Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer, stated that she was concerned that if the assessor's position was left vacant rather than removing the department the City would have to budget for those positions. Responding to Ms. Peddicord, Mr. Harline stated that the administrative assistant position for the Tax office was budgeted but the field assessor was not budgeted and the assessor position was only budgeted through Mrs. Bundek's retirement. He advised that if another assessor was hired the City would be paying retirement costs, the Assessor's costs, and the field assessor's position that was not funded because of the increased Tyler amounts. Mr. Harline noted that if the City did not use Tyler and instead used that position, the amount would be less, however, he did not have the actual costs at the time. Mr. Neil moved to table the discussion and bring it back at the next Council Committee of the Whole meeting with a staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. Page 121

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 10 By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees' recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Discussion of Business License Rates (Matt Harline, Interim City Manager) Mr. Dave Hugg, Planning and Community Development Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the City of Dover business license fee structure. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that he had not received a lot of feedback from the business community however, due to the deadline, he had not done as much direct one-on-one as he would have liked. He stated that due to the time crunch both he and Mr. Matt Harline, interim City Manager, felt that if the City were to consider raising the fee amounts they should be nominal now and a serious adjustment should come at a later date. Mr. Lindell moved to refer the discussion back to staff for continued work and to report back at a time that was convenient once the appropriate information had been gathered, including talking to the business community as well as any ordinances that may need to be done. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Mr. Hugg stated that a 10-10.8% increase would yield about $150,000. He advised that the expected revenues were around $147,000. Mr. Hugg stated that they would go down a little bit in the current fiscal year but were expected to bounce back in the new fiscal year. He noted that with an increase of 10% the proposed dollar amount would be roughly $150,000. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Mr. Hugg stated that the only rush was that license renewals had to be sent out by July 1st so if a change were to be made a notice would need to be included in the license renewal, otherwise the City would need to wait until the same time next year. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Harline stated that because the fees were all in Appendix F there would need to be an amendment to the ordinance. He advised that according to the Code licenses begin on August 1st and if they are not paid by August 31st a fine can be assessed for late payment so a lot of the timing is built into the Code. Mr. Harline stated that it was his understanding that it would need to be moved along pretty quickly. The motion to refer the discussion back to staff for continued work and to report back at a time that was convenient once the appropriate information had been gathered, including talking to the business community as well as any ordinances that may need to be done was unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees' recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Page 122

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 11 Police Department Executive Compensation (Thomas Johnson, Police Chief) Chief Thomas Johnson reviewed the background and analysis regarding Police Department Executive Compensation. Responding to Mr. Contant, Chief Johnson stated that the Deputy Chief was just below $124,000 and his recommendation was $135,000 which would be an increase of $11,000 for that position. He stated that if Council was in favor of addressing the shortage in Fiscal Year 2021, his salary would increase from $139,000 to $147,000 which would be an additional $8,000. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Chief Johnson stated that the compression issue was present at the time he was offered the position and was working out the details of his employment. He noted that he was going to be making less than the person he supervised and once he got a better understanding of what the salary landscape was, he requested the City provide him with a mechanism to discuss his salary. Chief Johnson advised that the Mayor was identified as his point of contact for that discussion and they had a meeting in the City prior to him signing the offer letter. He stated that at that time the mayor had a figure and he had a figure, he was trying to create a separation between ranks and a placement in market value in Delaware. Chief Johnson noted that at the time, the mayor was prepared to offer $130,000. He believed it was related to the residual funds in the Fiscal Year 2020 budget because it was a mid-budget year and there was a concern on his end, but the appendix to that conversation was, there would be 7% added in Fiscal Year 2021 to make up the difference in market value which he believed the mayor recognized at the time. Chief Johnson stated that there was some type of communication disconnect internally from the time of that meeting and he discovered the issue later in the year, which was approximately in May. He advised that at that time he was trying to position for the Deputy Chief's promotional process and had two viable candidates. Chief Johnson stated that looking at the compression issue for the published salary for Deputy Chief against where the Captains were as the most recent FOP contract was progressing, he was concerned that there would be a challenge getting one of the captains to accept the position. He advised that during that discussion with the previous City manager, it became clear that they were not aware of the 7% piece of his hire so he began the process of trying to rectify it. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Matt Harline, Interim City Manager, stated that 20 or 25,000 would not be impossible to find if the City did a property tax increase. He noted that if it was closer to a 40 or 50,000 increase total and if the City did not increase property taxes he would advise Council to look at it as a $50,000 expenditure just to be safe in terms of load for retirement, etc. Mr. Harline stated that he had not had a chance to review the information with Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer. Page 123

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 12 Mr. Harline clarified that the original budget was built with a two and a half percent raise for non-bargaining and to increase that to 3% across the board for the extra half a percent would be a little over $20,000, and when the proposal for the Chief and Deputy Chief are added that is where it becomes $50,000. Mr. Lindell moved to recommend increasing the Deputy Police Chief's salary to $135,000 and increasing the Police Chief's salary to $147,000, as recommended by Staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Review of Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Annual Budget (Matt Harline, Interim City Manager) Mr. Matt Harline, Interim City Manager, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Annual Budget. Mr. Harline shared an action form for budget amendment options (Attachment #1). Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mayor Christiansen stated that $50,000 of his economic development budget immediately goes to the Kent Economic Partnership and the rest is used by he and Mr. Hugg, Director of Planning and Community Development for advertisements, site visits, and promotion for the virtues of the City of Dover to generate jobs. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Harline advised that the City currently had $520,000 of revenue recognized. He stated that he and Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer, were pretty confident that they could say it was lost revenue directly related to COVID. Mr. Harline noted that they were continuing to review where money could and could not be expended from the COVID monies and they were pretty confident that the direct amount from the federal government for the year would be in the neighborhood of $4.3 million. He stated that he believed the Committee members already knew some of the things they were allowing the City to expend it on were things the City did not usually do but there were some opportunities to use it in things like housing, COVID vaccinations, and things like that. Mr. Harline noted that there was also some money for water and wastewater which he thought could be used but the City had not given up on efforts to secure more funding. He stated that he, Mr. Hugg, and the Mayor had met with the U.S. Treasury Department and representatives from both Senator's offices and their representatives, particularly Senator Carper, but also Senator Coons, who helped bring the Treasury to the table. Mr. Harline advised that they had learned there were possibilities for the City and ways that the City could get more money, but it would have to be through the State or the County. He stated that the other way would be if new legislation were proposed and passed in the U.S. Congress, or if there were some legal decisions saying that distribution was constitutional so basically $520,000 was all that was recognized in the 2022 budget currently. Page 124

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 13 Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Harline stated that he was not suggesting that the City spend the other million dollars from the real estate transfer tax on the sale of Dover Downs yet. He advised that he would like to use that million dollars to build the reserve because there were a lot of things that had been cut and he and Ms. Peddicord were not absolutely sure where the City would be at the end of Fiscal Year 2021. Mr. Harline noted that he and Ms. Peddicord would like to go back and re-analyze what the priorities were with all of the departments. Responding to Mr. Sudler, Mr. Harline stated that the $50,000 he had referenced for non-bargaining employees was separate from the Segal Water Assessment. He advised that the only thing from the Segal study that was in the budget was the recommendation to bring the supervisor in Grounds, supervisor in Streets, and some other positions up to the minimum according to the market study part of the Segal Assessment. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that when the COPS Grant was adopted, the City assumed in its model that there would be a one cent increase in property tax for the current year and another half cent increase in Fiscal Year 2023 to cover the cost for the five additional police officers. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that regardless of what is done in the current year between the cameras and other items, the commitment would be up to $664,000 next year. Mr. Sudler stated for the record that Council needed to continue to work on their statesmanship behavior and attitude when conducting the business of the public. Responding to Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Harline stated that if a constituent owned a $250,000 home and the City put a one cent property tax for $100, the cost of the increase would be $25 a year for a $250,000 house. Mrs. Arndt stated that she would ask Council to look at a one cent increase versus a two cent increase. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Peddicord stated that there were a lot of unknowns and a lot of cuts being considered. She advised that the cost of a one cent tax increase equated to about $352,000 and a two cent increase equated to about $700,000, which she did not think the tax payers would notice significantly. She stated that she agreed with a lot of the statements being made about not being able to count on one-time money because it was unknown if it would continue and there may be a decrease going forward. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Peddicord stated that the trash fee, water rates, and other increases already built into the budget were the general fund budget, which was different. She stated that there were unknown expenses that were not recognized yet. Page 125

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 14 Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Harline stated that purchases were made with the assumption of raising taxes one cent or one and a half cents to cover the cost in Fiscal Year 2022 and 2023. Mr. Rocha moved to move the budget forward as amended by Staff to include a one cent tax increase, to put $25,000 into the Economic Development Budget, and to include the recommendation to have a 3% increase for non-bargaining employees and to have equity with the Chief and Deputy Chief's positions. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sudler and carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes (Hare, Arndt, Rocha, Lindell, Sudler, Shevock, Contant), three (3) no (Anderson, Boggerty, Taylor), and one (1) absent (Neil). By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the Committees’ recommendation, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Mr. Taylor moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting. The motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:46 p.m. By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole Report, seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by a unanimous roll call vote. APPOINTMENTS (REAPPOINTMENTS) RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the following appointments, as recommended by Mayor Christiansen. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by unanimous roll call vote. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - THREE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE JULY 2024 Richard D. Senato PUBLIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PAC) OF THE DOVER-KENT COUNTY MPO - TWO YEAR TERMS TO EXPIRE ON JULY 1, 2023 Jonathan Contant Albert W. Holmes, Jr. Karen E. McGloughlin Page 126

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 15 APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT SUDLER - CITY CHAPLAIN - ELDER ELLIS B. LOUDEN (PRESIDING ELDER OF DOVER DISTRICT DELAWARE CONFERENCE) - ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE JUNE 2022 By consent agenda, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the appointment of Elder Ellis B. Louden as the City Chaplain, as recommended by Council President Sudler. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and carried by unanimous roll call vote. FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2021-15 The First Reading of the Proposed Ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of June 14, 2021. Council President Sudler reminded members of the public that copies of the proposed ordinance were available on the City’s website at www.cityofdover.com under “Government.” Mr. Neil moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mrs. Arndt and unanimously carried. Mr. Matthew Harline, Interim City Manager, provided an update to the revised proposed ordinance #2021-15 (Exhibit #1). He noted the following revisions: • A slight decrease in Interfund Service Receipts in General government from $1,337,200 to $1,362,000. • An increase in Miscellaneous Grant Revenue from $520,000 to $595,000. • An increase in Council Expenses from $157,200 to $190,800. • An increase in Police Extra Duty from $500,000 to $541,400. Mr. Anderson moved for the adoption of ordinance #2021-15, seconded by Mr. Hare. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that Council Expenses were $25,000 less than what was presented during the Council Committee of the Whole meeting. He advised that there is a need to cover some expenses and lodging, reimbursable through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARP), but some of the people coming in for the Innovative Readiness Training (IRT) Event need lodging at Delaware State University (DSU). Mr. Harline noted that lodging was originally planned as free and that William Henry Middle School was no longer available, so adjustments were made that did not get into the budget before this time. Responding to Mr. Lindell, Mr. Harline stated that the funds would be coming out of Council’s Contractual Services budget, but the increased expenditure was offset in revenue. By motion of Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Hare, Council, by unanimous roll call vote, adopted Ordinance #2021-15 (Exhibit #2). INTERIM CITY MANAGER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Matthew Harline, Interim City Manager, thanked Council members for their input and taking a Saturday to review policies and set guidelines for the budget. He noted that Dover Downs Casino is a benefit for economic development. Mr. Harline stated that the City maintains the American Public Power Association RP3 Award for reliability. Page 127

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 16 COUNCIL MEMBERS' ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Taylor thanked Council members and the citizens that attended the Police Chief’s Advisory Committee meeting. He noted that creative strategies were brought forward and that two meetings have been scheduled within Manchester Square and Liberty Court in an effort for them to go and communicate with the citizens. Mr. Taylor stated that it was a collaborative effort between Mayor Christiansen and Dover Housing Authority, and Delaware State Housing Authority is involved. Mr. Boggerty commended Mr. Taylor and all those who attended the Police Chief’s Advisory Committee meeting. He noted that he had the opportunity to go to the vehicle when it was in Simon Circle. Mr. Boggerty stated that the vehicle was empty and asked if they could include coloring books or footballs to give out and engage kids. Mr. Anderson thanked Council members for their continued support of the Central Delaware Partnership for Hope, the Greater Dover Healthcare Blitz, also known as the Innovative Readiness Training (IRT) Event. He stated that there will be yard signs soon and invited members to participate. Mr. Anderson stated that there are over 7,000 people on the waiting list right now for dental care. Mayor Christiansen commended City Staff, Council President Sudler, and Council members for their due diligence in preparing the budget for the new fiscal year. He advised that there will be a 4th of July celebration celebrating their diversity and inclusion and 242 years of independence and freedom for the Nation. Mayor Christiansen invited anyone listening to the meeting to join them beginning at 2:00 p.m. with a parade at 7:00 p.m. and fireworks to bring them together. Mr. Sudler wished Mr. Hare a happy birthday on July 6th. Mr. Sudler advised that he witnessed a high-speed chase where the perpetrator almost ran over a curb and hit him while he was riding his bike. He noted that the important thing was how the Dover Police Department handled the situation. Mr. Sudler stated that on his route, he saw the Dover Police Department team working together and moving traffic the way it should be. He extended his appreciation. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:08 p.m. TRACI A. McDOWELL CITY CLERK Page 128

Item #14. CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 28, 2021 PAGE 17 All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of June 28, 2021 are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /TM/jt S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Council-Minutes\2021\06-28-2021 REGULAR.wpd Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Revised Proposed Ordinance #2021-15 Exhibit #2 - Ordinance #2021-15 - 2021/2022 City of Dover Budget Ordinances Page 129

SECOND READING Item #14. EXHIBIT #1 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Regular City Council Meeting of 06/28/2021 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 2 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fifty-Two Million Three Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Nine 3 Hundred dollars ($52,375,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 4 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 5 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 6 GENERAL FUND 7 CASH RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR 2021-2022 8 2020/21 2021/22 9 REVISED BUDGET 10 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 5,813,100 $ 5,546,400 11 RECEIPTS 12 FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 572,800 630,300 13 LIBRARY REVENUES 123,400 142,100 14 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 245,000 250,000 15 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,470,000 1,500,000 16 PERMITS AND OTHER FEES 1,446,000 1,400,000 17 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 30,000 10,000 18 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 595,000 370,000 19 PROPERTY TAXES 14,885,800 15,267,700 20 RECREATION REVENUE 135,000 110,000 21 FRANCHISE FEE 645,000 600,000 22 SANITATION FEES 3,090,600 3,421,000 23 RENT REVENUE - GARRISON FARM 105,000 105,000 24 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 1,440,000 1,400,000 25 INVESTMENT INCOME 140,000 90,000 26 RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 24,923,600 25,296,100 27 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS 28 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS GENERAL GOV 1,370,700 1,362,000 29 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS PUBLIC WORKS 782,000 617,000 30 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS CENT SRVCS 842,100 835,700 31 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS FIN ADMIN 2,597,900 2,536,300 32 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 5,592,700 5,351,000 33 GRANTS: 34 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 155,000 130,000 35 POLICE GRANTS FUND - 308,900 36 POLICE PENSION GRANT 500,000 500,000 37 GREEN ENERGY GRANT 98,500 98,500 38 MISC GRANT REVENUE 102,274 595,000 39 GRANTS SUBTOTAL 855,774 1,632,400 40 TRANSFERS FROM: 41 TRANSFER TAX 1,433,500 1,400,000 42 MUNICIPAL STREET AID 750,000 750,000 43 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 445,000 400,000 44 WATER/WASTEWATER 1,000,000 1,000,000 45 ELECTRIC 10,000,000 11,000,000 46 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 13,628,500 14,550,000 47 TOTAL REVENUES 45,000,574 46,829,500 48 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUE $ 50,813,674 $ 52,375,900 Page 130 1

Item #14. SECOND READING 49 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 50 GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2020-2021 51 2019/20 2021/22 52 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 53 CITY CLERK $ 511,891 $ 535,800 54 COUNCIL 156,600 190,800 55 TAX ASSESSOR 238,400 263,800 56 PLANNING 658,300 642,000 57 CITY MANAGER 1,004,800 920,100 58 HUMAN RESOURCES 529,200 600,200 59 MAYOR 221,700 222,800 60 FIRE 769,900 797,200 61 LIFE SAFETY 434,974 472,300 62 CODE ENFORCEMENT 815,000 654,100 63 INSPECTIONS 595,300 651,200 64 POLICE 17,819,900 18,544,700 65 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 750,000 541,400 66 PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION 603,400 587,200 67 STREETS 697,700 636,000 68 SANITATION 2,502,425 2,564,800 69 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,456,600 1,487,500 70 STORMWATER 682,900 774,100 71 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 655,800 837,000 72 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 294,900 181,100 73 LIBRARY 1,822,700 1,859,900 74 RECREATION 1,129,700 1,191,500 75 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 730,284 738,600 76 FLEET MAINTENANCE 924,600 906,500 77 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 912,800 738,500 78 FINANCE 992,700 932,100 79 CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,107,600 1,048,300 80 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 39,020,074 39,519,500 81 OTHER EXPENSES 82 DEBT SERVICE 462,200 632,000 83 CONTRIBUTION TO DDP 150,000 150,000 84 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT RELATED EXP 100,000 - 85 INSURANCE 835,000 1,050,000 86 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 2,045,400 2,156,000 87 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 27,000 30,000 88 UNCOLLECTIBLES - TRASH AND OTHER 100,000 - 89 STREET LIGHTS 815,000 800,000 90 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 4,534,600 4,818,000 91 TRANSFERS 92 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND - PROJECTS 2,083,000 3,025,900 93 APPROP. TO THE POLICE PENSION FUND 435,100 435,100 94 APPROP. POLICE PENSION - STATE GRANT 500,000 500,000 95 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND (ERP) - 25,000 96 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 3,018,100 3,961,000 97 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 46,572,774 48,298,500 98 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 4,240,900 4,077,400 99 TOTALS $ 50,813,674 $ 52,375,900 100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 101 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 102 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 131 2

Item #14. SECOND READING 103 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 104 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 105 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 106 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 107 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Million Three Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Two Hundred 108 dollars ($8,344,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 109 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 110 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 111 REVENUES 112 2020/21 2021/22 113 REVISED BUDGET 114 BEGINNING BALANCE - PROJECTS $ 3,387,600 $ 3,331,500 115 REVENUES 116 STATE GRANTS - Other 1,440,000 1,333,000 117 POLICE GRANTS - 23,800 118 BUDGET BOND/BANK PROCEEDS 1,498,300 - 119 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 2,083,000 3,025,900 120 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE - 490,000 121 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 346,400 140,000 122 SUBTOTAL PROJECT RECEIPTS 5,367,700 5,012,700 123 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 5,367,700 5,012,700 124 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE AND REVENUES $ 8,755,300 $ 8,344,200 125 EXPENSE SUMMARY 126 2020/21 2021/22 127 EXPENDITURES REVISED BUDGET 128 FIRE $ 173,300 $ 250,300 129 GROUNDS - 125,000 130 LIBRARY 19,900 25,000 131 RECREATION 904,000 756,000 132 LIFE SAFETY 67,500 - 133 CODE ENFORCEMENT 37,800 50,300 134 PLANNING 20,400 - 135 INSPECTIONS 23,500 25,100 136 POLICE 986,800 526,000 137 STREETS 3,209,400 506,000 138 STORMWATER 1,342,200 2,546,200 139 SANITATION 475,200 166,200 140 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 61,600 36,600 141 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 700,000 - 142 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 39,600 - 143 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 325,000 - 144 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 8,386,200 5,012,700 145 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,386,200 5,012,700 146 BUDGET BALANCE 369,100 3,331,500 147 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENDITURES $ 8,755,300 $ 8,344,200 148 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 149 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 150 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 132 3

Item #14. SECOND READING 151 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 152 GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY 153 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 154 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 155 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand dollars ($788,000) 156 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the 157 use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending 158 June 30, 2022: 159 CASH RECEIPTS 160 2020/21 2021/22 161 REVISED BUDGET 162 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 773,000 $ 775,000 163 INTEREST EARNED 2,000 13,000 164 TOTALS $ 775,000 $ 788,000 165 EXPENSE SUMMARY 166 2020/21 2021/22 167 REVISED BUDGET 168 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR $ 775,000 $ 788,000 169 TOTALS $ 775,000 $ 788,000 170 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 171 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 172 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 133 4

Item #14. SECOND READING 173 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 174 GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 175 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 176 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 177 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Fourteen Thousand One Hundred dollars 178 ($1,014,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 179 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 180 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 181 CASH RECEIPTS 182 2020/21 2021/22 183 REVISED BUDGET 184 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 1,139,300 $ 999,300 185 INTEREST EARNINGS 14,800 14,800 186 TOTALS $ 1,154,100 $ 1,014,100 187 EXPENSE SUMMARY 188 2020/21 2019/20 189 REVISED BUDGET 190 TRANSFER TO GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 154,800 $ 140,000 191 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 999,300 874,100 192 TOTALS $ 1,154,100 $ 1,014,100 193 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 194 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 195 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 134 5

Item #14. SECOND READING 196 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 197 PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE 198 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 199 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 200 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred dollars 201 ($867,500) much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 202 funds for the use other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the 203 fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021: 204 OPERATING REVENUES 205 2020/21 2021/22 206 REVISED BUDGET 207 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 44,500 $ 831,500 208 STATE AID/GRANT 1,310,000 $ 33,000 209 MISCELANEOUS RECEIPTS 210 INTEREST EARNINGS 3,000 3,000 211 TOTALS $ 1,357,500 $ 867,500 212 OPERATING EXPENSES 213 2020/21 2021/22 214 REVISED BUDGET 215 TRANSFER TO GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 526,000 $ 490,000 216 TRANSFER TO GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUND - - 217 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 831,500 377,500 218 TOTALS $ 1,357,500 $ 867,500 219 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 220 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 221 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 135 6

Item #14. SECOND READING 222 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 223 WATER FUND 224 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 225 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 226 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven MillionNine Hundred Ninety-One Thousand One 227 Hundred dollars ($7,991,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 228 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 229 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 230 2020/21 2021/22 231 REVISED BUDGET 232 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,218,900 $ 642,000 233 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,218,900 642,000 234 BASE REVENUE 235 STATE GRANT 71,800 - 236 WATER SERVICES 6,231,700 6,353,800 237 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 420,100 436,700 238 WATER IMPACT FEES 570,000 420,000 239 INTEREST - WATER 34,000 34,000 240 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 67,800 104,600 241 TOTAL REVENUES 7,395,400 7,349,100 242 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 8,614,300 $ 7,991,100 Page 136 7

Item #14. SECOND READING 243 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 244 WATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2019-2020 245 2020/21 2021/22 246 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 247 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 441,400 $ 294,400 248 WATER DEPARTMENT 669,800 676,300 249 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 2,066,300 2,370,600 250 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 3,177,500 3,341,300 251 OTHER EXPENSES 252 DEBT SERVICE - WATER 762,800 762,800 253 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 176,900 192,000 254 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 1,033,200 967,600 255 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 20,000 27,000 256 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 1,992,900 1,949,400 257 TRANSFER TO: 258 GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 500,000 500,000 259 WATER IMP AND EXT 1,455,300 1,148,600 260 ELECTRIC IMP AND EXT - 25,000 261 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,955,300 1,673,600 262 TOTAL EXPENSES 7,125,700 6,964,300 263 BUDGET BALANCES 264 BUDGET BALANCE WATER 1,488,600 1,026,800 265 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,488,600 1,026,800 266 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 8,614,300 $ 7,991,100 267 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 268 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 269 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 137 8

Item #14. SECOND READING 270 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 271 WASTEWATER FUND 272 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 273 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 274 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twelve Million One Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Eight 275 Hundred dollars ($12,142,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 276 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 277 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 278 2020/21 2021/22 279 REVISED BUDGET 280 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 47,900 1,672,200 281 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 47,900 1,672,200 282 BASE REVENUE 283 WASTEWATER SERVICES 4,467,500 4,709,500 284 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES 3,275,100 3,275,100 285 GROUNDWATER INFLOW ADJUSTMENT 2,040,400 2,023,100 286 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES 480,000 380,000 287 STATE GRANT - WASTEWATER - 62,700 288 INTEREST - WASTEWATER 20,000 20,000 289 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 1,300 200 290 TOTAL REVENUES 10,284,300 10,470,600 291 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 10,332,200 $ 12,142,800 Page 138 9

Item #14. SECOND READING 292 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 293 WASTEWATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2019-2020 294 2020/21 2021/22 295 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 296 ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 288,300 $ 393,700 297 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 1,144,200 1,112,500 298 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 1,432,500 1,506,200 299 OTHER EXPENSES 300 DEBT SERVICE - WASTEWATER 659,900 659,900 301 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 81,500 93,000 302 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,302,900 4,302,900 303 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 782,000 736,000 304 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 10,000 12,000 305 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 5,836,300 5,803,800 306 TRANSFER TO: 307 GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER 500,000 500,000 308 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 1,200,000 799,200 ELETRIC FUND (ERP) - 25,000 309 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,700,000 1,324,200 310 TOTAL EXPENSES 8,966,400 8,634,200 311 BUDGET BALANCES 312 BUDGET BALANCE WASTEWATER 1,363,400 3,508,600 313 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,365,800 3,508,600 314 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 10,332,200 $ 12,142,800 315 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 316 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 317 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 139 10

Item #14. SECOND READING 318 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 319 WATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND 320 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 321 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 322 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Million Eight Hundred Two Thousand Five 323 hundred dollars ($6,802,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 324 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Governmentr 325 for the fiscal year begining July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 326 CASH RECEIPTS 327 2020/21 2021/22 328 REVISED BUDGET 329 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 4,618,200 $ 4,896,200 330 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 4,618,200 4,896,200 331 REVENUES 332 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WATER 1,455,300 1,148,600 333 TRANSFER FR WATER IMPACT FEE 70,100 707,700 334 INTEREST INCOME 50,000 50,000 335 TOTAL REVENUES 1,575,400 1,906,300 336 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 6,193,600 $ 6,802,500 337 EXPENSE SUMMARY 338 2020/21 2021/22 339 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 340 ENGINEERING $ 20,400 $ - 341 WATER 1,647,200 1,729,000 342 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 568,500 177,300 343 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,236,100 1,906,300 344 BUDGET BALANCE - WATER 3,957,500 4,896,200 345 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 3,957,500 4,896,200 346 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 6,193,600 $ 6,802,500 347 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 348 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 349 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 140 11

Item #14. SECOND READING 350 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 351 WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND 352 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 353 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 354 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Seven Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand 355 Nine hundred dollars ($1,723,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated 356 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 357 from the fiscal year begining July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 358 CASH RECEIPTS 359 2020/21 2021/22 360 REVISED BUDGET 361 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 1,243,700 $ 892,700 362 REVENUES 363 STATE LOAN FUND - WASTEWATER 578,600 - 364 TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WW 1,200,000 799,200 365 TRANSFER FR WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE 31,600 22,000 366 INTEREST INCOME 10,000 10,000 367 TOTAL REVENUES 1,820,200 831,200 368 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 3,063,900 $ 1,723,900 369 EXPENSE SUMMARY 370 2020/21 2021/22 371 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 372 ENGINEERING $ 14,000 $ - 373 WASTEWATER 2,665,200 831,200 374 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,679,200 831,200 375 BUDGET BALANCE - WASTEWATER 384,700 892,700 376 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 384,700 892,700 377 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 3,063,900 $ 1,723,900 378 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 379 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 380 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 141 12

Item #14. SECOND READING 381 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 382 WATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 383 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 384 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 385 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Fifty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred dollars 386 ($554,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 387 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 388 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 389 CASH RECEIPTS 390 2020/21 2021/22 391 REVISED BUDGET 392 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 539,600 $ 550,700 393 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 539,600 550,700 394 RECEIPTS 395 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 4,200 4,200 396 TOTAL RECEIPTS 4,200 4,200 397 TOTALS $ 543,800 $ 554,900 398 EXPENSE SUMMARY 399 2020/21 2021/22 400 REVISED BUDGET 401 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 543,800 $ 554,900 402 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 543,800 554,900 403 TOTALS $ 543,800 $ 554,900 404 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 405 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 406 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 142 13

Item #14. SECOND READING 407 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 408 WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 409 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 410 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 411 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 412 ($298,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 413 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 414 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 415 CASH RECEIPTS 416 2020/21 2021/22 417 REVISED BUDGET 418 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 282,800 $ 287,000 419 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 282,800 287,000 420 RECEIPTS 421 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 4,200 11,800 422 TOTAL RECEIPTS 4,200 11,800 423 TOTALS $ 287,000 $ 298,800 424 EXPENSE SUMMARY 425 2020/21 2021/22 426 REVISED BUDGET 427 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 287,000 298,800 428 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 287,000 298,800 429 TOTALS $ 287,000 $ 298,800 430 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 431 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 432 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 143 14

Item #14. SECOND READING 433 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 434 WATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 435 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 436 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 437 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Seven Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Two Hundred 438 dollars ($1,791,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current 439 revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 440 year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 441 CASH RECEIPTS 442 2020/21 2021/22 443 REVISED BUDGET 444 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,764,800 $ 1,778,000 445 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,764,800 1,778,000 446 RECEIPTS 447 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 13,200 13,200 448 TOTAL RECEIPTS 13,200 13,200 449 TOTALS $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 450 EXPENSE SUMMARY 451 2020/21 2021/22 452 REVISED BUDGET 453 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 454 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,778,000 1,791,200 455 TOTALS $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 456 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 457 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 458 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 144 15

Item #14. SECOND READING 459 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 460 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE 461 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 462 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 463 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Million Six Hundred Seven Thousand dollars 464 ($4,607,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 465 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 466 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 467 CASH RECEIPTS 468 2020/21 2021/22 469 REVISED BUDGET 470 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 4,603,600 $ 4,607,000 471 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 4,603,600 4,607,000 472 RECEIPTS 473 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 35,000 - 474 TOTAL RECEIPTS 35,000 - 475 TOTALS $ 4,638,600 $ 4,607,000 476 EXPENSE SUMMARY 477 2020/21 2021/22 478 REVISED BUDGET 479 TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES $ 31,600 $ - 480 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 4,607,000 $ 4,607,000 481 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 4,638,600 4,607,000 482 TOTALS $ 4,638,600 $ 4,607,000 483 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 484 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 485 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 145 16

Item #14. SECOND READING 486 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 487 WATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 488 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 489 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 490 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand dollars Eight Hundred dollars 491 ($266,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 492 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 493 July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 494 CASH RECEIPTS 495 2020/21 2021/22 496 REVISED BUDGET 497 BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 262,900 $ 264,900 498 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 262,900 264,900 499 RECEIPTS 500 INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 2,000 1,900 501 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,000 1,900 502 TOTALS $ 264,900 $ 266,800 503 BUDGET SUMMARY 504 2020/21 2021/22 505 REVISED BUDGET 506 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 264,900 $ 266,800 507 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 264,900 266,800 508 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 264,900 $ 266,800 509 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 510 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 511 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 146 17

Item #14. SECOND READING 512 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 513 WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE 514 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 515 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 516 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 517 ($298,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 518 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 519 July 1, 2021 andending June 30, 2022: 520 CASH RECEIPTS 521 2020/21 2021/22 522 REVISED BUDGET 523 BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 294,200 296,500 524 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 294,200 296,500 525 RECEIPTS 526 INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 2,300 2,300 527 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,300 2,300 528 TOTALS $ 296,500 $ 298,800 529 BUDGET SUMMARY 530 2020/21 2021/22 531 REVISED BUDGET 532 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 296,500 $ 298,800 533 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 296,500 298,800 534 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 296,500 $ 298,800 535 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 536 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 537 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 147 18

Item #14. SECOND READING 538 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 539 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND 540 REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 541 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 542 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ninety-Two Million Seven Hundred Seventy-Four Thousand Eight Hundr 543 dollars ($92,774,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 544 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 545 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 546 2020/21 2021/22 547 REVISED BUDGET 548 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,230,300 $ 10,913,400 549 DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS - PCA CREDIT (5,246,100) (5,196,000) 550 BEGINNING BALANCE - ADJUSTED 4,984,200 5,717,400 551 BASE REVENUE 552 DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 80,417,400 81,960,900 553 UTILITY TAX 1,245,100 1,271,500 554 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 640,000 538,000 555 RENT REVENUE - 110,000 556 GREEN ENERGY 127,000 127,000 557 INTEREST EARNINGS 157,400 175,000 558 TRANSFER FROM RATE STABILIZATION 2,500,000 2,800,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS (ERP) - 75,000 558 TOTAL REVENUES 85,086,900 87,057,400 559 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUES $ 90,071,100 $ 92,774,800 Page 148 19

Item #14. SECOND READING 560 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES 561 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2018-2019 562 2020/21 2021/22 563 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 564 POWER SUPPLY $ 19,715,300 $ 19,773,200 565 SOLAR ENERGY 3,401,100 3,237,300 566 SOLAR RENEWAL ENERGY CREDITS 384,100 409,600 567 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 634,800 634,800 568 REC'S (Renewable Energy Credits) 614,600 1,300,000 569 RGGI (Regional Greenhouse Gas Init.) 12,300 33,700 570 PJM CHARGES - ENERGY 5,871,900 5,508,400 571 PJM CHARGES - TRANSMISSION & FEES 8,476,800 6,772,100 572 CAPACITY CHARGES 15,048,100 13,322,900 573 SUB-TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 54,159,000 50,992,000 574 PLANT OPERATIONS 4,706,100 2,219,500 575 GENERATIONS FUELS 488,400 300,200 576 PJM SPOT MARKET ENERGY (808,300) (366,200) 577 PJM CREDITS (369,400) (87,000) 578 CAPACITY CREDITS (12,191,700) (5,411,200) 579 GENERATION SUBTOTAL (8,174,900) (3,344,700) 580 POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 45,984,100 47,647,300 581 DIRECT EXPENDITURES 582 TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 4,010,600 4,127,400 583 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,381,400 1,419,600 584 ADMINISTRATION 707,400 910,100 585 METER READING 375,300 389,400 586 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 871,100 942,200 587 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 7,345,800 7,788,700 588 OTHER EXPENSES: 589 UTILITY TAX 1,245,100 1,271,500 590 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 300,000 300,000 591 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - RFP'S - 60,000 592 LEGAL EXPENSES 100,000 50,000 593 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 789,600 843,500 594 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 127,000 127,000 595 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 3,798,900 3,647,400 596 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 21,000 21,000 597 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 330,300 500,000 598 BOND ISSUANCE COST - 40,000 599 DEBT SERVICE 1,378,600 1,800,000 600 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 8,090,500 8,660,400 601 TRANSFER TO: 602 IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 6,000,000 3,711,100 603 GENERAL FUND 10,000,000 11,000,000 604 RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE 2,000,000 2,000,000 605 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 18,000,000 16,711,100 606 TOTAL EXPENSES 79,420,400 80,807,500 607 BUDGET BALANCE - WORKING CAPITAL 10,650,700 11,967,300 608 TOTALS $ 90,071,100 $ 92,774,800 609 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 610 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 611 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 149 20

Item #14. SECOND READING 612 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 613 ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND 614 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 615 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 616 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Forty-Four Million Four Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand Five Hundred 617 dollars ($44,453,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 618 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 619 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 620 REVENUES 621 2020/21 2021/22 622 REVISED BUDGET 623 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 16,384,800 $ 22,581,700 624 REVENUES 625 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 6,000,000 3,711,100 626 BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS - 8,575,200 627 GENERAL SERVICE BILLING 400,000 400,000 628 TRF FROM DEPRECIATION RSV 1,000,000 9,000,000 629 INTEREST EARNINGS 218,200 185,500 630 TOTAL REVENUES 7,618,200 21,871,800 631 TOTALS $ 24,003,000 $ 44,453,500 632 EXPENSE SUMMARY 633 2020/21 2021/22 634 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET 635 ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION $ 2,064,400 $ 1,843,200 636 ELECTRIC GENERATION 1,301,700 9,070,000 637 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 1,293,000 1,320,800 638 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2,706,600 8,952,300 639 ERP SYSTEM 1,244,800 500,000 640 TOTAL EXPENSES 8,610,500 21,686,300 641 BUDGET BALANCE 15,392,500 22,767,200 642 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENSES $ 24,003,000 $ 44,453,500 643 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 644 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 645 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 150 21

Item #14. SECOND READING 646 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 647 ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE 648 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 649 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 650 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 651 ($942,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 652 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 653 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 654 CASH RECEIPTS 655 2020/21 2021/22 656 REVISED BUDGET 657 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 908,300 $ 928,800 658 RECEIPTS 659 INTEREST EARNINGS 20,500 14,000 660 TOTAL RECEIPTS 20,500 14,000 661 TOTALS $ 928,800 $ 942,800 662 EXPENSE SUMMARY 663 2020/21 2021/22 664 REVISED BUDGET 665 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 928,800 $ 942,800 666 TOTALS $ 928,800 $ 942,800 667 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 668 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 669 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 151 22

Item #14. SECOND READING 670 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 671 ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE 672 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 673 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 674 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twenty Million Eight Hundred Ninety-Three Thousand 675 dollars ($20,893,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 676 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for 677 the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 678 CASH RECEIPTS 679 2020/21 2021/22 680 REVISED BUDGET 681 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 21,244,200 $ 20,568,600 682 INTEREST EARNINGS 324,400 324,400 683 TOTALS $ 21,568,600 $ 20,893,000 684 BUDGET SUMMARY 685 2020/21 2021/22 686 REVISED BUDGET 687 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC I & E $ 1,000,000 $ 9,000,000 688 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 20,568,600 11,893,000 689 TOTALS $ 21,568,600 $ 20,893,000 689 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 690 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 691 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 152 23

Item #14. SECOND READING 692 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 693 ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE 694 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 695 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 696 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fourteen Million One Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand 697 Eight Hundred dollars ($14,123,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 698 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 699 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 700 CASH RECEIPTS 701 2020/21 2021/22 702 REVISED BUDGET 703 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 13,896,600 $ 13,984,000 704 INTEREST EARNINGS 87,400 139,800 705 TOTALS $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 706 BUDGET SUMMARY 707 2020/21 2021/22 708 REVISED BUDGET 709 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 710 TOTALS $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 711 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 712 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 713 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 153 24

Item #14. SECOND READING 714 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 715 ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABLIZATION RESERVE 716 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 717 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 718 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand One Hundred dollars 719 ($864,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 720 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 721 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 722 CASH RECEIPTS 723 2020/21 2021/22 724 REVISED BUDGET 725 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 797,500 $ 815,200 726 INTEREST EARNINGS 17,700 48,900 727 TOTALS $ 815,200 $ 864,100 728 BUDGET SUMMARY 729 2020/21 2021/22 730 REVISED BUDGET 731 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 815,200 $ 864,100 732 TOTALS $ 815,200 $ 864,100 733 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 734 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 735 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 154 25

Item #14. SECOND READING 736 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 737 ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABLIZATION RESERVE 738 SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 739 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 740 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twenty-Four Million Two Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand Two 741 Hundred dollars ($24,276,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 742 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 743 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 744 CASH RECEIPTS 745 2020/21 2021/22 746 REVISED BUDGET 747 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 22,348,600 $ 22,206,200 748 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 749 INTEREST EARNINGS 357,600 70,000 750 TOTALS $ 24,706,200 $ 24,276,200 751 BUDGET SUMMARY 752 2020/21 2021/22 753 REVISED BUDGET 754 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND $ 2,500,000 $ 2,800,000 755 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 22,206,200 21,476,200 756 TOTALS $ 24,706,200 $ 24,276,200 757 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 758 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 759 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 155 26

Item #14. SECOND READING 760 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 761 MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND 762 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 763 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 764 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand One Hundred dollars 765 ($750,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 766 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 767 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 768 CASH RECEIPTS 769 2020/21 2021/22 770 REVISED BUDGET 771 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 772 STATE GRANT 796,000 750,000 773 TOTALS $ 796,100 $ 750,100 774 BUDGET SUMMARY 775 2020/21 2021/22 776 REVISED BUDGET 777 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 796,000 $ 750,000 778 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 779 TOTALS $ 796,100 $ 750,100 780 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 781 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 782 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 156 27

Item #14. SECOND READING 783 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 784 ELECTRONIC RED LIGHT SAFETY PROGRAM 785 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 786 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 787 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Thousand One Hundred dollars 788 ($400,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 789 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 790 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 791 CASH RECEIPTS 792 2020/21 2021/22 793 REVISED BUDGET 794 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 795 POLICE FINES 445,000 400,000 796 TOTALS $ 445,100 $ 400,100 797 BUDGET SUMMARY 798 2020/21 2021/22 799 REVISED BUDGET 800 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 445,000 $ 400,000 801 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 802 TOTALS $ 445,100 $ 400,100 803 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 804 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 805 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 157 28

Item #14. SECOND READING 806 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 807 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 808 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 809 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 810 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Six 811 Hundred dollars ($2,825,600) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from 812 current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government 813 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 814 OPERATING REVENUES 815 2020/21 2021/22 816 REVISED BUDGET 817 BEGINNING BALANCE $ 2,450,500 $ 1,803,600 818 INTEREST INCOME 31,500 28,500 819 PREMIUM FROM CITY 880,100 993,500 820 TOTALS $ 3,362,100 $ 2,825,600 821 OPERATING EXPENSES 822 2020/21 2021/22 823 REVISED BUDGET 824 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES - CLAIMS $ 394,000 $ 480,000 825 INSURANCE 110,800 145,000 826 STATE OF DEL - SELF INSURANCE TAX 33,500 39,000 827 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,100 25,000 828 TOTAL EXPENSES 560,400 689,000 829 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,801,700 2,136,600 830 TOTALS $ 3,362,100 $ 2,825,600 831 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 832 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 833 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 158 29

Item #14. SECOND READING 834 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 835 COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND 836 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 837 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 838 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand Eight Hundred dollars 839 ($795,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 840 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 841 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 842 OPERATING REVENUES 843 2020/21 2021/22 844 REVISED BUDGET 845 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 334,000 $ 312,400 846 GRANTS REVENUE 500,000 483,400 847 TOTALS $ 834,000 $ 795,800 848 OPERATING EXPENSES 849 2020/21 2021/22 850 REVISED BUDGET 851 PROGRAM EXP. GRANT RELATED $ 171,600 $ 596,500 852 853 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 662,400 199,300 854 TOTALS $ 834,000 $ 795,800 855 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 856 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 857 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 159 30

Item #14. SECOND READING 858 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 859 LIBRARY GRANT FUND 860 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 861 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 862 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred dollars 863 ($277,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 864 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 865 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 866 OPERATING REVENUES 867 2020/21 2021/22 868 REVISED BUDGET 869 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 18,900 $ - 870 STATE GRANT 280,800 275,000 871 FEDERAL GRANT 1,800 2,700 912 TOTALS $ 301,500 $ 277,700 913 OPERATING EXPENSES 914 2020/21 2021/22 915 REVISED BUDGET 916 STATE GRANTS 917 FURNITURE/FIXTURES $ 5,500 $ 5,000 918 OFFICE SUPPLIES 28,000 23,100 919 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 13,700 15,000 920 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 25,500 28,200 921 BOOKS 128,800 125,000 922 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2,500 3,000 923 COMPUTER HARDWARE 5,300 500 924 AUDIO VISUAL SUPPLIES 79,000 67,700 925 POSTAGE 200 100 926 TRAINING/CONF/FOOD/TRAV 4,200 3,000 927 OFF EQP/REPAIRS & MAINT 4,000 1,900 928 OTHER EQUIP - LEASE 2,100 2,500 929 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES STATE GRANTS 298,800 275,000 930 FEDERAL GRANTS 931 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 2,700 2,700 932 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES FEDERAL GRANTS 2,700 2,700 933 GRAND TOTAL EXPENSES 301,500 277,700 934 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 935 TOTALS $ 301,500 $ 277,700 936 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 937 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 938 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 160 31

Item #14. SECOND READING 939 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 940 CDBG GRANT FUND 941 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 942 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 943 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Three 944 dollars ($334,943) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 945 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 946 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 947 OPERATING REVENUES 948 2020/21 2021/22 949 REVISED BUDGET 950 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 2,500 $ 2,500 951 CDBG GRANTS RECEIVED 632,077 332,443 952 TOTALS $ 634,577 $ 334,943 953 OPERATING EXPENSES 954 2020/21 2021/22 955 REVISED BUDGET 956 EXPENDITURES 957 PRIOR YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM $ 1,855 $ - 958 PRIOR YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 55,522 - 959 PRIOR YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 35,385 - 960 CURRENT YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM 97,845 100,000 961 CURRENT YEAR DOVER INTERFAITH MINISTRY 30,000 61,016 962 CURRENT YEAR DOVER NCALL - 30,000 963 CURRENT YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 33,000 40,000 964 CURRENT YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 25,000 25,827 965 CURRENT YEAR DIMH & CENTRAL DE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE 75,284 20,600 966 CURRENT YEAR CARES ACT (COVID-19) 163,211 - 967 CURRENT YEAR ADMIN EXPENSE 114,976 55,000 968 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 632,078 332,443 969 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,500 2,500 970 TOTALS $ 634,578 $ 334,943 971 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 972 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 973 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 161 32

Item #14. SECOND READING 974 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 975 207 - POLICE GRANTS FUND 976 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 977 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 978 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Thirty Thousand dollars ($830,000) 979 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 980 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 981 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 982 OPERATING REVENUES 983 2020/21 2021/22 984 REVISED BUDGET 985 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 129,000 $ 50,000 986 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 635,000 780,000 987 TOTALS $ 764,000 $ 830,000 988 OPERATING EXPENSES 989 2020/21 2021/22 990 REVISED BUDGET 991 EXPENDITURES 992 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 993 POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 643,600 235,000 TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT - 210,000 994 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 995 CELL PHONE CHARGES 20,000 15,000 996 TRAINING 19,700 10,000 997 AUDIT FEES 1,000 - 998 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 684,300 470,000 999 OTHER FINANCING USES 1000 OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 4,300 310,000 1001 TOTAL FINANCING USES 4,300 310,000 1002 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 75,400 50,000 1003 TOTALS $ 764,000 $ 830,000 1004 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 1005 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1006 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1007 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 162 33

Item #14. SECOND READING 1008 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1009 209 - POLICE GRANTS FUND 1010 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1011 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1012 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thirty Thousand dollars ($330,000) 1013 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other 1014 funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year 1015 beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1016 OPERATING REVENUES 1017 2020/21 2021/22 1018 REVISED BUDGET 1019 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ - $ - 1020 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 212,400 330,000 1021 TOTALS $ 212,400 $ 330,000 1022 OPERATING EXPENSES 1023 2020/21 2021/22 1024 REVISED BUDGET 1025 EXPENDITURES 1026 MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 1027 POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 118,000 265,000 1028 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 63,500 1029 TRAINING - 15,000 1030 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 181,500 280,000 1031 OTHER FINANCING USES 1032 OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 30,900 50,000 1033 TOTAL FINANCING USES 30,900 50,000 1034 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 1035 TOTALS $ 212,400 $ 330,000 1036 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 1037 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1038 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1039 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 163 34

Item #14. SECOND READING 1040 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1041 SUBSTANCE ABUSE GRANTS FUND 1042 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1043 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1044 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Seven Hundre dollars ($144,700) 1045 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds 1046 for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning 1047 July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1048 OPERATING REVENUES 1049 2020/21 2021/22 1050 REVISED BUDGET 1051 PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 52,000 $ 83,700 1052 STATE GRANTS RECEIVED 28,000 28,000 1053 RECREATION REVENUE 33,000 33,000 1054 TOTALS $ 113,000 $ 144,700 1055 OPERATING EXPENSES 1056 2020/21 2021/22 1057 REVISED BUDGET 1058 EXPENDITURES 1059 TEMPORARY HELP/BENEFITS $ 68,500 $ 68,500 1060 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 35,000 35,000 1061 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 103,500 103,500 1062 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 9,500 41,200 1063 TOTALS $ 113,000 $ 144,700 1064 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. 1065 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1066 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1067 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 164 35

Item #14. SECOND READING 1068 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1069 REALTY TRANSFER TAX FUND 1070 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1071 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1072 The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Four Hundred Thousand dollars ($1,400,000) 1073 or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and 1074 other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 1075 year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1076 CASH RECEIPTS 1077 2020/21 2021/22 1078 REVISED BUDGET 1079 BEGINNING BALANCE $ - $ - 1080 REALTY TRANSFER TAXES 1,525,000 1,400,000 1081 TOTALS $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 1082 BUDGET SUMMARY 1083 2020/21 2021/22 1084 REVISED BUDGET 1085 TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 1086 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 1087 TOTALS $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 1088 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1089 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1090 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 165 36

Item #14. SECOND READING 1091 CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 1092 LODGING TAX FUND 1093 CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 1094 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: 1095 The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thousand 1096 dollars ($300,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues 1097 and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal 1098 year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 1099 CASH RECEIPTS 1100 2020/21 2021/22 1101 REVISED BUDGET 1102 BEGINNING BALANCE $ - $ - 1103 LODGING TAXES 110,000 300,000 1104 TOTALS $ 110,000 $ 300,000 1105 BUDGET SUMMARY 1106 2020/21 2021/22 1107 REVISED BUDGET 1108 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECT FUND $ 110,000 $ 300,000 1109 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - 1110 TOTALS $ 110,000 $ 300,000 1111 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make 1112 interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any 1113 department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. Page 166 37

EXHIBIT #2 Regular City Council Meeting of 06/28/2021 Item #14. CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fifty-Two Million Three Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Nine Hundred dollars ($52,375,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPT SUMMARY FOR 2021-2022 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 5,813,100 $ 5,546,400 RECEIPTS FINES AND POLICE REVENUE 572,800 630,300 LIBRARY REVENUES 123,400 142,100 KENT COUNTY BOOK REIMBURSEMENT 245,000 250,000 BUSINESS LICENSES 1,470,000 1,500,000 PERMITS AND OTHER FEES 1,446,000 1,400,000 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 30,000 10,000 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 595,000 370,000 PROPERTY TAXES 14,885,800 15,267,700 RECREATION REVENUE 135,000 110,000 FRANCHISE FEE 645,000 600,000 SANITATION FEES 3,090,600 3,421,000 RENT REVENUE - GARRISON FARM 105,000 105,000 COURT OF CHANCERY FEES 1,440,000 1,400,000 INVESTMENT INCOME 140,000 90,000 RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 24,923,600 25,296,100 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS GENERAL GOV 1,370,700 1,362,000 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS PUBLIC WORKS 782,000 617,000 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS CENT SRVCS 842,100 835,700 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS FIN ADMIN 2,597,900 2,536,300 INTERFUND SERVICE RECEIPTS SUBTOTAL 5,592,700 5,351,000 GRANTS: POLICE EXTRA DUTY 155,000 130,000 POLICE GRANTS FUND - 308,900 POLICE PENSION GRANT 500,000 500,000 GREEN ENERGY GRANT 98,500 98,500 MISC GRANT REVENUE 102,274 595,000 GRANTS SUBTOTAL 855,774 1,632,400 TRANSFERS FROM: TRANSFER TAX 1,433,500 1,400,000 MUNICIPAL STREET AID 750,000 750,000 CIVIL TRAFFIC PENALTIES 445,000 400,000 WATER/WASTEWATER 1,000,000 1,000,000 ELECTRIC 10,000,000 11,000,000 TRANSFERS FROM SUBTOTAL 13,628,500 14,550,000 TOTAL REVENUES 45,000,574 46,829,500 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUE $ 50,813,674 $ 52,375,900 Page 167 1

Item #14. 2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2020-2021 2019/20 2021/22 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET CITY CLERK $ 511,891 $ 535,800 COUNCIL 156,600 190,800 TAX ASSESSOR 238,400 263,800 PLANNING 658,300 642,000 CITY MANAGER 1,004,800 920,100 HUMAN RESOURCES 529,200 600,200 MAYOR 221,700 222,800 FIRE 769,900 797,200 LIFE SAFETY 434,974 472,300 CODE ENFORCEMENT 815,000 654,100 INSPECTIONS 595,300 651,200 POLICE 17,819,900 18,544,700 POLICE EXTRA DUTY 750,000 541,400 PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION 603,400 587,200 STREETS 697,700 636,000 SANITATION 2,502,425 2,564,800 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 1,456,600 1,487,500 STORMWATER 682,900 774,100 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 655,800 837,000 PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 294,900 181,100 LIBRARY 1,822,700 1,859,900 RECREATION 1,129,700 1,191,500 PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 730,284 738,600 FLEET MAINTENANCE 924,600 906,500 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 912,800 738,500 FINANCE 992,700 932,100 CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,107,600 1,048,300 DEPARTMENT SUBTOTALS 39,020,074 39,519,500 OTHER EXPENSES DEBT SERVICE 462,200 632,000 CONTRIBUTION TO DDP 150,000 150,000 MISCELLANEOUS GRANT RELATED EXP 100,000 - INSURANCE 835,000 1,050,000 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 2,045,400 2,156,000 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 27,000 30,000 UNCOLLECTIBLES - TRASH AND OTHER 100,000 - STREET LIGHTS 815,000 800,000 OTHER EXPENSE SUBTOTAL 4,534,600 4,818,000 TRANSFERS TRANSFER TO CAPITAL FUND - PROJECTS 2,083,000 3,025,900 APPROP. TO THE POLICE PENSION FUND 435,100 435,100 APPROP. POLICE PENSION - STATE GRANT 500,000 500,000 TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC FUND (ERP) - 25,000 TRANSFERS SUBTOTAL 3,018,100 3,961,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 46,572,774 48,298,500 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 4,240,900 4,077,400 TOTALS $ 50,813,674 $ 52,375,900 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 168 2

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Million Three Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($8,344,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - PROJECTS $ 3,387,600 $ 3,331,500 REVENUES STATE GRANTS - Other 1,440,000 1,333,000 POLICE GRANTS - 23,800 BUDGET BOND/BANK PROCEEDS 1,498,300 - TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 2,083,000 3,025,900 TRANSFER FROM PARKLAND RESERVE - 490,000 TRANSFER FROM CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE 346,400 140,000 SUBTOTAL PROJECT RECEIPTS 5,367,700 5,012,700 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES 5,367,700 5,012,700 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE AND REVENUES $ 8,755,300 $ 8,344,200 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 EXPENDITURES REVISED BUDGET FIRE $ 173,300 $ 250,300 GROUNDS - 125,000 LIBRARY 19,900 25,000 RECREATION 904,000 756,000 LIFE SAFETY 67,500 - CODE ENFORCEMENT 37,800 50,300 PLANNING 20,400 - INSPECTIONS 23,500 25,100 POLICE 986,800 526,000 STREETS 3,209,400 506,000 STORMWATER 1,342,200 2,546,200 SANITATION 475,200 166,200 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 61,600 36,600 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 700,000 - PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 39,600 - PROCUREMENT & INVENTORY 325,000 - DEPARTMENT SUBTOTAL 8,386,200 5,012,700 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,386,200 5,012,700 BUDGET BALANCE 369,100 3,331,500 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENDITURES $ 8,755,300 $ 8,344,200 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 169 3

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand dollars ($788,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 773,000 $ 775,000 INTEREST EARNED 2,000 13,000 TOTALS $ 775,000 $ 788,000 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR $ 775,000 $ 788,000 TOTALS $ 775,000 $ 788,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 170 4

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Fourteen Thousand One Hundred dollars ($1,014,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 1,139,300 $ 999,300 INTEREST EARNINGS 14,800 14,800 TOTALS $ 1,154,100 $ 1,014,100 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2019/20 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 154,800 $ 140,000 CARRY FORWARD TO NEXT YEAR 999,300 874,100 TOTALS $ 1,154,100 $ 1,014,100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 171 5

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. PARKLAND/RECREATION RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($867,500) much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 44,500 $ 831,500 STATE AID/GRANT 1,310,000 $ 33,000 MISCELANEOUS RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS 3,000 3,000 TOTALS $ 1,357,500 $ 867,500 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GOVERNMENTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 526,000 $ 490,000 TRANSFER TO GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUND - - CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 831,500 377,500 TOTALS $ 1,357,500 $ 867,500 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 172 6

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WATER FUND REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven MillionNine Hundred Ninety-One Thousand One Hundred dollars ($7,991,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,218,900 $ 642,000 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,218,900 642,000 BASE REVENUE STATE GRANT 71,800 - WATER SERVICES 6,231,700 6,353,800 WATER TANK SPACE LEASING 420,100 436,700 WATER IMPACT FEES 570,000 420,000 INTEREST - WATER 34,000 34,000 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 67,800 104,600 TOTAL REVENUES 7,395,400 7,349,100 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 8,614,300 $ 7,991,100 Page 173 7

2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES Item #14. WATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2019-2020 2020/21 2021/22 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 441,400 $ 294,400 WATER DEPARTMENT 669,800 676,300 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 2,066,300 2,370,600 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 3,177,500 3,341,300 OTHER EXPENSES DEBT SERVICE - WATER 762,800 762,800 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 176,900 192,000 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 1,033,200 967,600 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 20,000 27,000 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 1,992,900 1,949,400 TRANSFER TO: GENERAL FUND FROM WATER 500,000 500,000 WATER IMP AND EXT 1,455,300 1,148,600 ELECTRIC IMP AND EXT - 25,000 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,955,300 1,673,600 TOTAL EXPENSES 7,125,700 6,964,300 BUDGET BALANCES BUDGET BALANCE WATER 1,488,600 1,026,800 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,488,600 1,026,800 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 8,614,300 $ 7,991,100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 174 8

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WASTEWATER FUND REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twelve Million One Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($12,142,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER 47,900 1,672,200 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 47,900 1,672,200 BASE REVENUE WASTEWATER SERVICES 4,467,500 4,709,500 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES 3,275,100 3,275,100 GROUNDWATER INFLOW ADJUSTMENT 2,040,400 2,023,100 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES 480,000 380,000 STATE GRANT - WASTEWATER - 62,700 INTEREST - WASTEWATER 20,000 20,000 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE FEE 1,300 200 TOTAL REVENUES 10,284,300 10,470,600 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES AND REVENUES $ 10,332,200 $ 12,142,800 Page 175 9

2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES Item #14. WASTEWATER FUND - EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2019-2020 2020/21 2021/22 DIRECT EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET ENGINEERING & INSPECTION $ 288,300 $ 393,700 WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT 1,144,200 1,112,500 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTAL 1,432,500 1,506,200 OTHER EXPENSES DEBT SERVICE - WASTEWATER 659,900 659,900 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 81,500 93,000 KENT COUNTY TREATMENT CHARGE 4,302,900 4,302,900 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 782,000 736,000 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 10,000 12,000 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 5,836,300 5,803,800 TRANSFER TO: GENERAL FUND FROM WASTEWATER 500,000 500,000 WASTEWATER IMP AND EXT 1,200,000 799,200 ELETRIC FUND (ERP) - 25,000 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 1,700,000 1,324,200 TOTAL EXPENSES 8,966,400 8,634,200 BUDGET BALANCES BUDGET BALANCE WASTEWATER 1,363,400 3,508,600 BUDGET BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,365,800 3,508,600 TOTAL CURRENT YEAR BALANCES AND EXPENSES $ 10,332,200 $ 12,142,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 176 10

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Six Million Eight Hundred Two Thousand Five hundred dollars ($6,802,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Governmentr for the fiscal year begining July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 4,618,200 $ 4,896,200 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 4,618,200 4,896,200 REVENUES TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WATER 1,455,300 1,148,600 TRANSFER FR WATER IMPACT FEE 70,100 707,700 INTEREST INCOME 50,000 50,000 TOTAL REVENUES 1,575,400 1,906,300 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 6,193,600 $ 6,802,500 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET ENGINEERING $ 20,400 $ - WATER 1,647,200 1,729,000 WATER TREATMENT PLANT 568,500 177,300 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,236,100 1,906,300 BUDGET BALANCE - WATER 3,957,500 4,896,200 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 3,957,500 4,896,200 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 6,193,600 $ 6,802,500 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 177 11

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Seven Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand Nine hundred dollars ($1,723,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for from the fiscal year begining July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 1,243,700 $ 892,700 REVENUES STATE LOAN FUND - WASTEWATER 578,600 - TRANS FR OPERATING FUND - WW 1,200,000 799,200 TRANSFER FR WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE 31,600 22,000 INTEREST INCOME 10,000 10,000 TOTAL REVENUES 1,820,200 831,200 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES & REVENUES $ 3,063,900 $ 1,723,900 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET ENGINEERING $ 14,000 $ - WASTEWATER 2,665,200 831,200 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,679,200 831,200 BUDGET BALANCE - WASTEWATER 384,700 892,700 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 384,700 892,700 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCES & EXPENSES $ 3,063,900 $ 1,723,900 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 178 12

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Five Hundred Fifty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred dollars ($554,900) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 539,600 $ 550,700 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 539,600 550,700 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 4,200 4,200 TOTAL RECEIPTS 4,200 4,200 TOTALS $ 543,800 $ 554,900 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 543,800 $ 554,900 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 543,800 554,900 TOTALS $ 543,800 $ 554,900 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 179 13

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WASTEWATER CAPITAL ASSET RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($298,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 282,800 $ 287,000 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 282,800 287,000 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 4,200 11,800 TOTAL RECEIPTS 4,200 11,800 TOTALS $ 287,000 $ 298,800 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER 287,000 298,800 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 287,000 298,800 TOTALS $ 287,000 $ 298,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 180 14

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Seven Hundred Ninety-One Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($1,791,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 1,764,800 $ 1,778,000 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 1,764,800 1,778,000 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 13,200 13,200 TOTAL RECEIPTS 13,200 13,200 TOTALS $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 1,778,000 1,791,200 TOTALS $ 1,778,000 $ 1,791,200 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 181 15

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Million Six Hundred Seven Thousand dollars ($4,607,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 4,603,600 $ 4,607,000 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 4,603,600 4,607,000 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 35,000 - TOTAL RECEIPTS 35,000 - TOTALS $ 4,638,600 $ 4,607,000 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO I & E FUND FROM WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES $ 31,600 $ - CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 4,607,000 $ 4,607,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 4,638,600 4,607,000 TOTALS $ 4,638,600 $ 4,607,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 182 16

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand dollars Eight Hundred dollars ($266,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WATER $ 262,900 $ 264,900 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 262,900 264,900 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WATER 2,000 1,900 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,000 1,900 TOTALS $ 264,900 $ 266,800 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WATER $ 264,900 $ 266,800 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 264,900 266,800 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 264,900 $ 266,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 183 17

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WASTEWATER CONTINGENCY RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($298,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 andending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 294,200 296,500 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCES 294,200 296,500 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS - WASTEWATER 2,300 2,300 TOTAL RECEIPTS 2,300 2,300 TOTALS $ 296,500 $ 298,800 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - WASTEWATER $ 296,500 $ 298,800 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE SUBTOTALS 296,500 298,800 TOTAL EXPENSES AND CURRENT YEAR BALANCES $ 296,500 $ 298,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 184 18

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Ninety-Two Million Seven Hundred Seventy-Four Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($92,774,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 10,230,300 $ 10,913,400 DISTRIBUTION OF EARNINGS - PCA CREDIT (5,246,100) (5,196,000) BEGINNING BALANCE - ADJUSTED 4,984,200 5,717,400 BASE REVENUE DIRECT SALES TO CUSTOMER 80,417,400 81,960,900 UTILITY TAX 1,245,100 1,271,500 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 640,000 538,000 RENT REVENUE - 110,000 GREEN ENERGY 127,000 127,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 157,400 175,000 TRANSFER FROM RATE STABILIZATION 2,500,000 2,800,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS (ERP) - 75,000 TOTAL REVENUES 85,086,900 87,057,400 TOTAL BEGINNING BALANCE & REVENUES $ 90,071,100 $ 92,774,800 Page 185 19

2021-2022 BUDGET ORDINANCES Item #14. ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND EXPENSES AND BUDGET BALANCE FOR 2018-2019 2020/21 2021/22 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET POWER SUPPLY $ 19,715,300 $ 19,773,200 SOLAR ENERGY 3,401,100 3,237,300 SOLAR RENEWAL ENERGY CREDITS 384,100 409,600 POWER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT 634,800 634,800 REC'S (Renewable Energy Credits) 614,600 1,300,000 RGGI (Regional Greenhouse Gas Init.) 12,300 33,700 PJM CHARGES - ENERGY 5,871,900 5,508,400 PJM CHARGES - TRANSMISSION & FEES 8,476,800 6,772,100 CAPACITY CHARGES 15,048,100 13,322,900 SUB-TOTAL POWER SUPPLY 54,159,000 50,992,000 PLANT OPERATIONS 4,706,100 2,219,500 GENERATIONS FUELS 488,400 300,200 PJM SPOT MARKET ENERGY (808,300) (366,200) PJM CREDITS (369,400) (87,000) CAPACITY CREDITS (12,191,700) (5,411,200) GENERATION SUBTOTAL (8,174,900) (3,344,700) POWER SUPPLY & GENERATION SUBTOTAL 45,984,100 47,647,300 DIRECT EXPENDITURES TRANSMISSION/DISTRIBUTION 4,010,600 4,127,400 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 1,381,400 1,419,600 ADMINISTRATION 707,400 910,100 METER READING 375,300 389,400 SYSTEMS OPERATIONS 871,100 942,200 DIRECT EXPENDITURE SUBTOTALS 7,345,800 7,788,700 OTHER EXPENSES: UTILITY TAX 1,245,100 1,271,500 ALLOW FOR UNCOLLECTIBLES 300,000 300,000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - RFP'S - 60,000 LEGAL EXPENSES 100,000 50,000 RETIREES HEALTH CARE 789,600 843,500 GREEN ENERGY PAYMENT TO DEMEC 127,000 127,000 INTERFUND SERVICE FEES 3,798,900 3,647,400 INTEREST ON DEPOSITS 21,000 21,000 BANK & CREDIT CARD FEES 330,300 500,000 BOND ISSUANCE COST - 40,000 DEBT SERVICE 1,378,600 1,800,000 OTHER EXPENSES SUBTOTAL 8,090,500 8,660,400 TRANSFER TO: IMPROVEMENT & EXTENSION 6,000,000 3,711,100 GENERAL FUND 10,000,000 11,000,000 RATE STABILIZATION RESERVE 2,000,000 2,000,000 TRANSFER TO SUBTOTAL 18,000,000 16,711,100 TOTAL EXPENSES 79,420,400 80,807,500 BUDGET BALANCE - WORKING CAPITAL 10,650,700 11,967,300 TOTALS $ 90,071,100 $ 92,774,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 186 20

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Forty-Four Million Four Hundred Fifty-Three Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($44,453,500) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 16,384,800 $ 22,581,700 REVENUES TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC 6,000,000 3,711,100 BOND ISSUE PROCEEDS - 8,575,200 GENERAL SERVICE BILLING 400,000 400,000 TRF FROM DEPRECIATION RSV 1,000,000 9,000,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 218,200 185,500 TOTAL REVENUES 7,618,200 21,871,800 TOTALS $ 24,003,000 $ 44,453,500 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 EXPENSES REVISED BUDGET ELECTRIC ADMINISTRATION $ 2,064,400 $ 1,843,200 ELECTRIC GENERATION 1,301,700 9,070,000 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION 1,293,000 1,320,800 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2,706,600 8,952,300 ERP SYSTEM 1,244,800 500,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 8,610,500 21,686,300 BUDGET BALANCE 15,392,500 22,767,200 TOTAL BUDGET BALANCE & EXPENSES $ 24,003,000 $ 44,453,500 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 187 21

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRIC UTILITY CONTINGENCY RESERVE CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Nine Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($942,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 908,300 $ 928,800 RECEIPTS INTEREST EARNINGS 20,500 14,000 TOTAL RECEIPTS 20,500 14,000 TOTALS $ 928,800 $ 942,800 EXPENSE SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 928,800 $ 942,800 TOTALS $ 928,800 $ 942,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 188 22

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPRECIATION RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twenty Million Eight Hundred Ninety-Three Thousand dollars ($20,893,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 21,244,200 $ 20,568,600 INTEREST EARNINGS 324,400 324,400 TOTALS $ 21,568,600 $ 20,893,000 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC I & E $ 1,000,000 $ 9,000,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 20,568,600 11,893,000 TOTALS $ 21,568,600 $ 20,893,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 189 23

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRIC UTILITY FUTURE CAPACITY RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Fourteen Million One Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($14,123,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 13,896,600 $ 13,984,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 87,400 139,800 TOTALS $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 TOTALS $ 13,984,000 $ 14,123,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 190 24

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRIC UTILITY INSURANCE STABLIZATION RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Sixty-Four Thousand One Hundred dollars ($864,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 797,500 $ 815,200 INTEREST EARNINGS 17,700 48,900 TOTALS $ 815,200 $ 864,100 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET CURRENT YEAR BALANCE $ 815,200 $ 864,100 TOTALS $ 815,200 $ 864,100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 191 25

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRIC UTILITY RATE STABLIZATION RESERVE SOURCES AND USE OF FUNDS FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Twenty-Four Million Two Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand Two Hundred dollars ($24,276,200) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 22,348,600 $ 22,206,200 TRANSFER FROM ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 357,600 70,000 TOTALS $ 24,706,200 $ 24,276,200 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO ELECTRIC OPERATING FUND $ 2,500,000 $ 2,800,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 22,206,200 21,476,200 TOTALS $ 24,706,200 $ 24,276,200 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 192 26

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. MUNICIPAL STREET AID FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand One Hundred dollars ($750,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 STATE GRANT 796,000 750,000 TOTALS $ 796,100 $ 750,100 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 796,000 $ 750,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 TOTALS $ 796,100 $ 750,100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 193 27

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. ELECTRONIC RED LIGHT SAFETY PROGRAM CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Four Hundred Thousand One Hundred dollars ($400,100) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 100 $ 100 POLICE FINES 445,000 400,000 TOTALS $ 445,100 $ 400,100 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 445,000 $ 400,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 100 100 TOTALS $ 445,100 $ 400,100 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 194 28

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Million Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Six Hundred dollars ($2,825,600) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ 2,450,500 $ 1,803,600 INTEREST INCOME 31,500 28,500 PREMIUM FROM CITY 880,100 993,500 TOTALS $ 3,362,100 $ 2,825,600 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES - CLAIMS $ 394,000 $ 480,000 INSURANCE 110,800 145,000 STATE OF DEL - SELF INSURANCE TAX 33,500 39,000 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,100 25,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 560,400 689,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,801,700 2,136,600 TOTALS $ 3,362,100 $ 2,825,600 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 195 29

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Seven Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($795,800) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 334,000 $ 312,400 GRANTS REVENUE 500,000 483,400 TOTALS $ 834,000 $ 795,800 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PROGRAM EXP. GRANT RELATED $ 171,600 $ 596,500 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 662,400 199,300 TOTALS $ 834,000 $ 795,800 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 196 30

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. LIBRARY GRANT FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Two Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred dollars ($277,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 18,900 $ - STATE GRANT 280,800 275,000 FEDERAL GRANT 1,800 2,700 TOTALS $ 301,500 $ 277,700 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET STATE GRANTS FURNITURE/FIXTURES $ 5,500 $ 5,000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 28,000 23,100 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 13,700 15,000 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 25,500 28,200 BOOKS 128,800 125,000 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2,500 3,000 COMPUTER HARDWARE 5,300 500 AUDIO VISUAL SUPPLIES 79,000 67,700 POSTAGE 200 100 TRAINING/CONF/FOOD/TRAV 4,200 3,000 OFF EQP/REPAIRS & MAINT 4,000 1,900 OTHER EQUIP - LEASE 2,100 2,500 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES STATE GRANTS 298,800 275,000 FEDERAL GRANTS PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 2,700 2,700 SUBTOTAL EXPENSES FEDERAL GRANTS 2,700 2,700 GRAND TOTAL EXPENSES 301,500 277,700 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - TOTALS $ 301,500 $ 277,700 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 197 31

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. CDBG GRANT FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-Three dollars ($334,943) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 2,500 $ 2,500 CDBG GRANTS RECEIVED 632,077 332,443 TOTALS $ 634,577 $ 334,943 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET EXPENDITURES PRIOR YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM $ 1,855 $ - PRIOR YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 55,522 - PRIOR YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 35,385 - CURRENT YEAR CLOSING COST/DOWN PAYMENT PROGRAM 97,845 100,000 CURRENT YEAR DOVER INTERFAITH MINISTRY 30,000 61,016 CURRENT YEAR DOVER NCALL - 30,000 CURRENT YEAR MHDC EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR 33,000 40,000 CURRENT YEAR MHDC HOMEOWNER REHAB. 25,000 25,827 CURRENT YEAR DIMH & CENTRAL DE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE 75,284 20,600 CURRENT YEAR CARES ACT (COVID-19) 163,211 - CURRENT YEAR ADMIN EXPENSE 114,976 55,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 632,078 332,443 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 2,500 2,500 TOTALS $ 634,578 $ 334,943 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 198 32

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. 207 - POLICE GRANTS FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Eight Hundred Thirty Thousand dollars ($830,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 129,000 $ 50,000 STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 635,000 780,000 TOTALS $ 764,000 $ 830,000 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET EXPENDITURES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 643,600 235,000 TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT - 210,000 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES CELL PHONE CHARGES 20,000 15,000 TRAINING 19,700 10,000 AUDIT FEES 1,000 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 684,300 470,000 OTHER FINANCING USES OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 4,300 310,000 TOTAL FINANCING USES 4,300 310,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 75,400 50,000 TOTALS $ 764,000 $ 830,000 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 199 33

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. 209 - POLICE GRANTS FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thirty Thousand dollars ($330,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ - $ - STATE AND FEDERAL GRANTS RECEIVED 212,400 330,000 TOTALS $ 212,400 $ 330,000 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET EXPENDITURES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES POLICE EQUIPT & PROG SUPP 118,000 265,000 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURES 63,500 TRAINING - 15,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 181,500 280,000 OTHER FINANCING USES OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT 30,900 50,000 TOTAL FINANCING USES 30,900 50,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - TOTALS $ 212,400 $ 330,000 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 200 34

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. SUBSTANCE ABUSE GRANTS FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Seven Hundre dollars ($144,700) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: OPERATING REVENUES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET PRIOR YEAR BALANCE $ 52,000 $ 83,700 STATE GRANTS RECEIVED 28,000 28,000 RECREATION REVENUE 33,000 33,000 TOTALS $ 113,000 $ 144,700 OPERATING EXPENSES 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET EXPENDITURES TEMPORARY HELP/BENEFITS $ 68,500 $ 68,500 PROGRAM EXPENSES/SUPPLIES 35,000 35,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 103,500 103,500 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE 9,500 41,200 TOTALS $ 113,000 $ 144,700 The above budget represents the combination of all State & Federal Grants. The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 201 35

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. REALTY TRANSFER TAX FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating One Million Four Hundred Thousand dollars ($1,400,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ - $ - REALTY TRANSFER TAXES 1,525,000 1,400,000 TOTALS $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - TOTALS $ 1,525,000 $ 1,400,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 202 36

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # 2021-15 Item #14. LODGING TAX FUND CASH RECEIPTS/REVENUES AND BUDGET FOR 2021-2022 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: The amount hereinafter named aggregating Three Hundred Thousand dollars ($300,000) or so much thereof as may be necessary are hereby appropriated from current revenues and other funds for the use by several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022: CASH RECEIPTS 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET BEGINNING BALANCE $ - $ - LODGING TAXES 110,000 300,000 TOTALS $ 110,000 $ 300,000 BUDGET SUMMARY 2020/21 2021/22 REVISED BUDGET TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECT FUND $ 110,000 $ 300,000 CURRENT YEAR BALANCE - - TOTALS $ 110,000 $ 300,000 The City Manager is hereby authorized, without further approval of the City Council, to make interdepartmental transfers of up to five percent of the amount hereinafter appropriated to any department with the exception of any transfers prohibited by City Procedure #F306. ADOPTED: June 28, 2021 Page 203 37

Item #15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE The Council Committee of the Whole Meeting was held by video conference on June 29, 2021 at 6:00 p.m., with Council President Sudler presiding. Members of Council present via video or telephone were Mr. Anderson, Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Mr. Hare, Mrs. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Lindell. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Contant (arrived at 6:02 p.m) and Mr. Shevock (arrived at 6:09 p.m.) (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Anderson presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Hare moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Discussion - Fiscal Year 2021 Audit Program (Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer) Ms. Lori Peddicord, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Fiscal Year 2021 Audit Program. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Peddicord stated that the audit service is put out to bid every couple of years in order to solicit a new set of eyes and costs to review the City’s systems. She advised that this was the last year of the current award period and that for Fiscal Year 2022 there could be a new auditor. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Ms. Peddicord stated that if the auditor finds a discrepancy they bring it to staff’s attention and in most cases they need to review the City’s policy, procedure, or internal control process. She advised that the auditor would also go out in the field to see what other municipalities, governments, and state entities are doing and they give suggestions from time to time. Ms. Peddicord noted that the auditor keeps the City in line with any generally accepted accounting standards (GASB) implementations that change and new accounting practices. She stated that there are not disputes with the auditor, but they may suggest that the City change a process. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Peddicord stated that GASB are the guidelines that govern how transactions are processed and reported on. Mr. Hare moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation to accept the audit program. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. National Council on Agricultural Life and Labor Research Fund, Inc. (NCALL) Restoring Central Dover Community Renewal Plan - Request for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds (Will Grimes, Director of Operations, NCALL) Ms. Karen Speakman, Executive Director, Ms. Chanda Jackson, Community Engagement Specialist, Mr. Will Grimes, Neighborhood Revitalization Coordinator, and Ms. Patricia Kelleher, Real Estate Development Director with National Council on Agricultural Life and Labor Research Fund, Inc. (NCALL) reviewed their request for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. Page 204

Item #15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 29, 2021 PAGE 2 Responding to Mr. Contant, Ms. Jackson stated that the $100,000 requested for public health would be used to hire another staff member that would be more intentional about targeting specific individuals, providing case management services, and ensuring the service delivery of the professionals are adequate enough so that people can be successful, rather than duplicating services offered by other groups fighting the opioid problems in the City. Responding to Mr. Contant, Ms. Jackson stated that the new staff member would conduct training for behavioral health specialists and would be a counselor/case manager working with clients directly. She advised that NCALL currently had an opioid outreach specialist who was working on training with Delaware State University (DSU) and Bayhealth. Ms. Jackson noted that by bringing on another staff member it would allow them to expand what they were currently doing. Responding to Mr. Contant, Ms. Jackson stated that they were in the process of doing research, identifying best practices, looking at what other States were doing, and service delivery and how it impacts the success rate among the population being looked at. She advised that NCALL had funds from Healthy Communities Delaware for additional support. Mr. Contant asked that if NCALL were to come back and request this funding that they provide an idea of how the money would be spent for each of the four line items presented to include what the return would be, whether it was a program already in existence, and provide multiple examples of the long-term positive impact that it would have. He advised that this would help in determining where the money would be best used. Responding to Mr. Taylor, Mr. Grimes stated that Capitol School District was a partner because it was within their target area, however, they were moving into workforce development because it was something brand new for NCALL. He advised that Solid Rock Community Center had become a testing site with over one thousand certification credentialing courses, and they would like to get scholarships for people in the community to be able to take advantage of the courses. Mr. Grimes noted that in the first year they were targeting 10 to 20 young adults age 16 to 24 for a pilot program. He stated that the courses cost anywhere from $400 to $4,000 and they wanted to use the platform they had in place to take advantage. Mr. Anderson stated that he had asked that the NCALL presentation be limited to 10 minutes and have a broader scope and that details could be sent to staff for further analysis. Mr. Sudler moved to recommend referral of this item to staff for qualifications of the supplemental American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) appropriation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried. North Bradford Street - Street, Sidewalk and Tree Plan (Phase 1) (Sharon Duca, Public Works Director) Ms. Sharon Duca, Public Works Director, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the North Bradford Street - Street, Sidewalk and Tree Plan (Phase 1). Responding to Mrs. Arndt, Ms. Duca stated that the Public Works Department had gone door-to-door that morning with flyers that were also posted to the website, DoverTV, and Facebook, and spoke to residents that had called in with questions to inform them of the public meeting on July 7, 2021. Page 205

Item #15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 29, 2021 PAGE 3 Responding to Mrs. Arndt, Ms. Duca stated that they would be accepting comments after the meeting on July 7th. She advised that Public Works would need more one-on-one interaction with the property owners as they looked at alternatives which would be best suited for each location. Ms. Duca noted that she expected the meeting on July 7th would be a preliminary meeting to go over what was being looked at to-date and to hear the voices of the public as to what they were looking for. Responding to Mrs. Arndt, Ms. Duca confirmed that Public Works intended to modify the plan included in the packet and present it again. Ms. Kesha Braunskill, Urban and Community Forestry Program Director, Delaware Forest Service, advised that she met with Ms. Duca to discuss the project and look at alternatives for tree preservation considering the health of the tree, disease, canopy health, decay, and then making recommendations for the protection of those trees. She noted that they also encouraged replacement of trees in a more suitable place. Mrs. Arndt moved to recommend that staff continue to develop a plan for North Bradford Street paving and curbing with input from Delaware Forest Service Professionals and the public. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. City Manager Search Mr. Hare reviewed the process used for the last City Manager Search in 2020. Mr. Hare moved to have the Council President appoint members for an interview committee and bring their suggestions and recommendations to City Council for approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil. Mr. Sudler stated that he was prepared to name the individuals he had selected for the City Manager Search Committee if approved. Mr. Lindell asked when the meeting was held to discuss the process presented. Mr. Hare moved to recommend that the Council President appoint a City Manager Search Committee to bring their suggestions and recommendations to City Council for approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and carried with Mr. Lindell voting no. Selection of Interview Committee for City Manager and City Clerk Mr. Sudler recommended the appointment of Council members Tricia K. Arndt, Andre M. Boggerty, William F. Hare, Gerald L. Rocha, Sr. (Chair), and Mayor Robin Christiansen, and Mrs. Kim Hawkins, Human Resources Director, to serve on the Interview Committee for the City Manager and City Clerk. Mr. Neil moved to recommend acceptance of the appointments to the Interview Committee for the positions of City Manager and City Clerk, as recommended by Council President Sudler. The motion was seconded by Mr. Taylor and unanimously carried. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance and Administration Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Shevock and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:38 p.m. Page 206

Item #15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 29, 2021 PAGE 4 SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. Strategies for a Safer Dover (Councilman Ralph L. Taylor, Jr) Mr. Taylor, Police Chief Johnson, and Ms. Chanda Jackson, Community Engagement Specialist, NCALL, reviewed the strategies for a Safer Dover presented at the Police Chief’s Advisory Committee Meeting on June 22, 2021. Chief Johnson provided the following statistics: • There was a 60% drop in homicides within the City of Dover from January 1st to June 15th, 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. • There was a 17% drop in robberies. • There was a 32% drop in sexual assaults. • There was a 15% drop in aggravated assaults. • There was an 18% drop in crimes where someone points a weapon or fires a weapon at someone. • There was a 56% drop in reckless endangerment. • There had been no damage to property by firearm in the current year, a 100% drop from four (4) incidents in 2020 to none in 2021. • 57 firearms had been taken off the street, which was 40 more than the same period in 2020. Ms. Jackson provided the following information regarding the Police Chief’s Advisory Committee: • The committee had been focusing on learning more about the departments and had a presentation from the different units at each meeting. • They had discussed the police hiring process, the municipal police academy program and its curriculum, field orientation, training, the role of psychology in training, drug and burglary investigations. • The meeting was open to the community and comment and feedback was received regarding the mobile substation in addition to the Group Violence Intervention (GVI) initiative coming forward. • There was now a youth focus group of the Police Advisory Committee from Dover High School. Mr. Taylor discussed the following regarding the Police Chief’s Advisory Committee Meeting on June 22, 2021: • Reverend Theodore Henderson from Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance of Dover and Vicinity (IMA) had discussed a comprehensive marketing strategy to market Dover as safe, clean, welcoming, and inclusive. • A gun buyback program was discussed. • Chief Johnson provided a presentation and strategy on approaching gang violence. • Under Restoring Central Dover, Ms. Jackson had scheduled a meeting of the Police Chief’s Advisory Committee on July 1, 2021 to include Manchester Square, Derby Estates, and Willis Road and to jumpstart the work they would begin in those areas. • Mr. Taylor scheduled another meeting of the Police Chief’s Advisory Committee on July 7, 2021 at Liberty Court in the multi-purpose room. Page 207

Item #15. COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JUNE 29, 2021 PAGE 5 Mrs. Arndt and Mr. Neil advised Mr. Taylor that the July 7, 2021 meeting would conflict with the North Bradford Street Rehabilitation Project Community Meeting scheduled for the same day and time so they would be unable to attend. Police Chief Johnson discussed the following regarding Group Violence Intervention (GVI): • It is a national program closely associated with gang violence. • It was brought to Delaware through the office of the Governor and it had been in place in Wilmington for over two years. • The basic premise of GVI is to target the identified less than 1% of individuals doing the majority of violent crimes in a given area in partnership with the Department of Corrections and other state level social services agencies with relevant data and give them options. • The first option is to accept services that will address some of the challenges they face that leads to violent behavior. • The second option is that if help is declined, law enforcement focuses on that individual in a constitutional right to identify their behavior and address it with arrest and incarceration. Mr. Hare moved for adjournment of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee meeting, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m. Mr. Neil moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Arndt and unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m. Roy Sudler Jr. Council President RS/MR/jt/tm S:\AGENDAS-MINUTES-PACKETS-PRESENTATIONS-ATT&EXH\Committee-Minutes\2021\06-29-2021 CCW MINUTES.wpd Page 208

Item #22. Monthly Report May 2021 Office of City Assessor Page 209

Item #22. ASSESSOR’S REPORT Number of Deeds Stamped for Transfer Tax Dollar Amount for the Month of May 2020/2021 the Month of May 2020/2021 50 41 $200 40 33 Thousand $118 30 24 13 17 $100 $63 20 14 s $32 $26$39 $21 $0 $0 10 1 1 0 1 2020 2020 0 $0 2021 2021 First Time Buyer for the Month May 2020/2021 Realty of May 2020/2021 Property Sales in Dollars Received Prior to Recording 50 41 $8 $8 $5 40 $4 Millions Res. Non‐First $6 $2 $3 24 $4 30 17 $0 $0 $0 2020 13 Time Buyers $2 20 $0 Res. First Time 2021 10 Buyers 0 2020 2021 Major Updates March ‐ 21 April ‐ 21 May ‐ 21 Assessment Change $1,688,600 $228,300 ‐$6,282,100 Residential Sales Ratio Report Sales in Study Total Assessed Total Sale Price Ratio PRD Value 45 $7,431,600 $9,460,856 0.79 1.05 1 Page 210

Item #22. ASSESSOR’S REPORT Ratio – Assessed Value divided by Sale Price. PRD – Mean – A PRD above 1.03 tends to indicate assessment regressivity – high valued properties are under appraised relative to low valued properties. A PRD below .98 tends to indicate assessment progressivity – high valued properties are relatively over appraised. Points of Interest Scanning & Filing ‐ All new deeds are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All appeal documents and correspondence are being scanned and attached to the CAMA software for easy retrieval. ‐ All old property record cards are being scanned and indexed into DocuWare. Assessor’s Office 2020 Appeal Hearings have been completed. (see attached spread sheet) 2 Page 211

Item #22. 2021 Appeal Log Residential Name PIN # Property Address# 2021 Amount Reque. Amount Board Decision in $ Approved/Denied Commercial Name PIN# Property Address# 2021 Amount Reque. Amount Board Decision in $ Approved/Denied Exempt Request Name PIN# Property Address # 2021 Amount Reque. Amount Board Decision in $ BAYHEALTH MEDICAL CENTER INC ED05‐086.00‐02‐07.03 30 OLD RUDNICK RD $1,969,700 $0 $1,969,700 Approved CENTRAL DE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ED05‐076.08‐01‐32.00 801 W DIVISION ST $296,200 $0 $296,200 Approved CENTRAL DE HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ED05‐076.08‐01‐34.00 731 W Division St $112,000 $0 $112,000 Approved ST NICHOLAS UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH ED05‐076.12‐01‐08.00 870 FOREST STREET $699,700 $0 $699,700 Approved ‐$411,200 DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ED05‐067.16‐03‐02.00 225 WALKER RD $578,600 $0 $578,600 Approved DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ED05‐067.16‐03‐10.00 WALKER RD $800 $0 $800 Approved DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ED05‐067.16‐03‐07.00 WALKER RD $4,900 $0 $4,900 Approved FARMLAND EXEMPTION Name Pin# Property Adress# 2021 Amount Reque. Amount Board Decision in $ Approved/Denied FARM LANDS ED05‐076.00‐02‐08.00 43 AC WYOMING MILL RD $995,300 $0 $995,300 Approved Disabled Citizen Reduction Appeal Name Pin# Property Address# 2021 Amount Reque. Amount Approved / Denied PARKER INNUS ED05‐057.17‐02‐20.00 239 GRINDING WHEEL DR Denied Stipulations Name Pin# Property Address # 2021 Amount Stipulated Amount Borad Decision in $ Approved / Denied WARNER TERRY & PAMALA ED05‐067.15‐01‐67.00 93 QUAIL HOLLOW DR 203,900 177,700 26,200 Approved DOVER MALL ED05‐057.00‐01‐13.03 1365 N DUPONT HWY/SEARS 5,482,500 $2,885,500 2,597,000 Approved DOVER MALL ED05‐057.00‐01‐13.02 1365 N DUPONT HWY/MACYS 6,591,900 $6,297,500 294,400 Approved DOVER MALL ED05‐057.00‐01‐14.00 1365 N DUPONT HWY 49,462,900 $46,543,700 2,919,200 Approved DOVER COMMONS ED05‐057.00‐01‐14.02 1231‐1275 N DUPONT HWY 6,759,100 $5,837,400 921,700 Approved Consent Agenda Items Name Pin# Property Address # 2021 Amount Reque. Amount Board Decision in $ Approved / Denied CENTRAL DE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ED05‐077.09‐01‐08.00 133 S QUEEN ST $15,600 $0 $15,600 Approved CENTRAL DE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ED05‐077.09‐01‐07.00 127 S QUEEN ST $18,600 $0 $18,600 Approved Total $73,191,700 $61,741,800 $11,449,900 Page 212

JUN 17, 2021 CITY OF DOVER PAGE: 1 02:01 PM SALES RATIO REPORT CA324 PARID NBHD LUC ADDRESS UNITS STYLE YRBLT STORIES SFLA GRADE CDU TOTAL APPR SALE DT PRICE ASR Item #22. ED05-066.12-01-36.00 3 R10 89 PINE VALLEY RD 1 3 1985 1.5 2541 B+ AV 270,300 28-MAY-21 410,000 .66 ED05-067.09-03-12.00 3 R10 323 PINE VALLEY RD 1 13 1985 2 1841 B- AV 187,300 18-MAY-21 200,000 .94 ED05-067.11-01-70.00 10 R10 911 SCHOOLHOUSE LN 1 5 1967 2 1939 C GD 199,100 21-MAY-21 216,000 .92 ED05-067.14-01-40.00 3 R10 116 BALTUSROL RD 1 5 1973 2 2096 C+ AV 203,900 05-MAY-21 285,000 .72 ED05-067.14-04-26.00 18 R10 3 PIN OAK DR 1 6 1993 2 2510 B- AV 224,800 28-MAY-21 355,000 .63 ED05-067.15-01-18.00 2 R10 82 VILLAGE DR 1 13 1974 2 1324 C- AV 111,500 14-MAY-21 160,000 .70 ED05-067.16-02-77.00 8 R10 645 N GOVERNORS AVE 1 1 2011 2 2768 B AV 263,000 07-MAY-21 415,000 .63 ED05-067.17-01-40.00 3 R10 48 WINGED FOOT RD 1 5 1979 2 1882 C+ AV 199,400 19-MAY-21 220,000 .91 ED05-067.17-01-52.00 3 R10 61 CARNOUSTIE RD 2 5 1970 2 2891 B- GD 297,000 27-MAY-21 330,000 .9 ED05-067.17-04-49.00 3 R10 24 ARBOR DR 1 6 1993 2 1842 B- AV 207,500 17-MAY-21 250,000 .83 ED05-067.20-02-48.00 10 R10 526 N GOVERNORS AVE 1 3 1947 1 1490 C+ AV 159,100 07-MAY-21 220,000 .72 ED05-068.10-02-59.00 13 R10 916 BUCK DR 1 14 1964 1 1680 C AV 170,400 24-MAY-21 252,000 .68 ED05-068.10-03-55.00 13 R10 974 CARVEL DR 1 14 1964 1 1056 C AV 132,900 05-MAY-21 230,000 .58 ED05-068.10-04-17.00 13 R10 12 ANCHOR LN 1 5 2001 2 1772 C+ GD 192,700 21-MAY-21 261,900 .74 ED05-068.14-04-27.00 7 R10 132 SPRUANCE RD 1 13 1986 2 1045 C- PR 73,700 27-MAY-21 71,000 1.04 ED05-068.17-02-48.00 8 R10 222 N STATE ST 1 1 1900 2 2481 B+ GD 259,600 24-MAY-21 355,000 .73 ED05-068.18-02-38.00 7 R10 67 UPLAND AVE 1 3 1951 1 1080 C AV 135,500 07-MAY-21 189,900 .71 ED05-068.18-02-47.00 7 R10 129 UPLAND AVE 1 14 1950 1 932 C AV 123,600 28-MAY-21 183,500 .67 ED05-068.18-03-52.00 7 R10 62 MITSCHER RD 1 14 1950 1 780 C AV 108,800 14-MAY-21 163,000 .67 ED05-068.19-02-60.00 6 R10 40 ACACIA PL 1 8 1998 2 1640 C AV 152,700 12-MAY-21 185,000 .83 ED05-068.19-05-50.00 14 R10 169 LEXINGTON PL 1 13 2007 2 2030 C+ GD 184,600 28-MAY-21 240,900 .77 ED05-076.03-02-39.00 14 R10 352 PARADEE DR 1 13 2007 2 1760 C+ AV 167,400 28-MAY-21 180,000 .93 ED05-076.03-02-69.00 14 R10 331 TRIBBITT ST 1 13 2018 2 1792 C+ AV 168,500 02-MAY-21 211,551 .80 ED05-076.05-02-02.00 14 R10 3 STONEY DR 1 8 1985 2 1406 C+ GD 161,100 14-MAY-21 175,000 .92 ED05-076.05-04-01.120 102 R50 97 PAR HAVEN DR 1 20 1978 1 1008 C- AV 46,600 25-MAY-21 85,000 .55 ED05-076.06-02-68.00 2 R10 321 COLD SPRING PL 1 13 1985 2 1120 C- AV 114,100 07-MAY-21 108,000 1.06 ED05-076.06-04-07.00 17 R10 29 LAMPLIGHTER LN 1 13 1983 2 1120 C GD 121,600 14-MAY-21 160,000 .76 ED05-076.08-05-37.00 9 R20 29 N NEW ST 2 1 1925 2 1591 C AV 110,900 10-MAY-21 120,000 .92 ED05-076.09-03-21.00 14 R10 388 NORTHDOWN DR 1 14 2014 1 1271 C+ AV 165,500 13-MAY-21 245,105 .68 ED05-076.12-02-68.00 9 R30 112 S QUEEN ST 3 1 1925 2 1750 C+ AV 146,400 05-MAY-21 118,000 1.24 ED05-076.13-04-18.00 14 R10 254 NORTHDOWN DR 1 13 2000 2 1848 C+ AV 148,600 06-MAY-21 196,000 .76 ED05-076.20-01-63.00 5 R10 943 JANEKA LN 1 16 1960 1 1626 C+ AV 173,000 11-MAY-21 260,000 .67 ED05-077.05-02-05.00 10 R10 141 N AMERICAN AVE 1 3 1941 1 1266 C AV 154,600 11-MAY-21 210,000 .74 Page 213

JUN 17, 2021 CITY OF DOVER PAGE: 2 02:01 PM SALES RATIO REPORT CA324 PARID NBHD LUC ADDRESS UNITS STYLE YRBLT STORIES SFLA GRADE CDU TOTAL APPR SALE DT PRICE ASR Item #22. ED05-077.05-03-26.00 9 R20 12 S GOVERNORS AVE 2 1 1930 2 2576 C AV 167,700 10-MAY-21 120,000 1.40 ED05-077.05-03-33.00 9 R40 32 S GOVERNORS AVE 4 1 1910 2 2104 C+ AV 187,600 28-MAY-21 150,000 1.25 ED05-077.05-04-24.00 8 R40 20 S STATE ST 4 1 1895 2 3740 A+ AV 319,800 05-MAY-21 422,500 .76 ED05-077.06-01-78.00 8 R10 232 BAYARD AVE 1 3 1970 1 1884 C+ GD 187,300 20-MAY-21 260,500 .72 ED05-077.17-03-26.00 4 R20 101 WYOMING AVE 2 1 1925 2 1672 C- AV 178,600 21-MAY-21 230,000 .78 ED05-077.17-05-44.00 4 R10 166 ORCHARD AVE 1 14 1952 1 1344 C FR 134,900 12-MAY-21 80,000 1.69 ED05-077.18-02-41.00 4 R10 140 EVERGREEN DR 1 14 1952 1 1112 C- AV 131,600 21-MAY-21 225,000 .58 ED05-085.11-01-62.00 12 R10 167 TURNER DR 1 5 1968 2 1714 C+ GD 188,100 21-MAY-21 173,000 1.09 ED05-085.12-04-32.00 12 R10 384 MAYBERRY LN 1 6 1979 2 2448 C+ AV 186,000 07-MAY-21 234,000 .79 LC05-058.14-01-01.108 1 R10 108 KURT DR 1 11 2002 1 1080 C- GD 49,400 13-MAY-21 75,000 .66 LC05-058.14-01-01.551 1 R10 551 WEAVER DR 1 11 2004 1 1514 C- GD 63,700 20-MAY-21 100,000 .64 LC05-058.18-01-89.00 1A R10 139 BETH PL 1 11 1990 1 1512 D+ AV 101,200 14-MAY-21 129,000 .78 Page 214

Item #23. Page 215

CITY COUNCIL - FY 20/21 Page 1 of 5 Item #23. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT FUND JULY 1, 2020 - JULY 7, 2021 100-10-12-99-000-53037 Current Balance - $13,650.00 COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT FUND - $2,500 FOR EACH COUNCIL MEMBER PER DISTRICT AND $5,000 FOR THE AT-LARGE COUNCIL MEMBER. THE PURPOSE OF BUDGETED AMOUNT $25,000.00 THE FUND IS TO ALLOW MEMBERS TO CONTRIBUTE FUNDS TO A SMALL PROJECT OR COMMUNITY NEEDS IN EACH DISTRICT. TOTAL $25,000.00 COUNCIL P.O. #/ TOTAL YEAR TO DATE SPONSOR VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE # CHARGES DATE BALANCE 07/01/20 Anderson P.R.I.D.E Councilman Anderson authorized the Email from 250.00 250.00 24,750.00 designation of $250.00 of his community David enhancement funds to the House Of Pride for Anderson installation of a handicap ramp dated 06/30/2020 and letter from Marion Lott, P.R.I.D.E, dated 06/30/2020 07/01/20 Anderson Inner City Cultural Councilman Anderson authorized the Email from 1,000.00 1,250.00 23,750.00 League designation of $1000.00 of his community David enhancement funds to the Inner City Cultural Anderson League for their performance arts program dated 06/30/2020 and letter from Katrina Stroud, ICCL, dated 06/30/2020 08/12/20 Anderson Team Rubicon Councilman Anderson authorized the Email from 350.00 1,600.00 23,400.00 designation of $350.00 of his community David enhancement funds to Team Rubicon for Anderson Emergency Management Meal dated 08/12/2020 07/08/21 Page 216 S:\BUDGETS\Coun-21 .qpw

CITY COUNCIL - FY 20/21 Page 2 of 5 Item #23. 08/21/20 Anderson Demco Inc. Councilman Anderson authorized the Email from 150.00 1,750.00 23,250.00 designation of $150.00 of his community David enhancement funds to Demco Inc. for back to Anderson school supplies dated 08/19/2020 and letter from Desiree Wilson, Demco, dated 08/17/2020 08/21/20 Cole Team Rubicon Councilman Cole authorized the designation of Email from 500.00 2,250.00 22,750.00 $500.00 of his community enhancement funds Scott Cole to Team Rubicon for Emergency dated Management Meal 08/21/2020 09/16/20 Neil Central Delaware Councilman Neil authorized the designation of Email from 100.00 2,350.00 22,650.00 Habitat for $100.00 of his community enhancement funds Fred Neil Humanity to CDHFH dated 09/07/2020 and letter from Dylan Grimes CDHFH dated 09/16/2020 12/18/20 Slavin Code Purple Kent Councilman Slavin authorized the designation of Email from Tim 1,000.00 3,350.00 21,650.00 County $1000.00 of his community enhancement funds Slavin dated to Code Purple Kent County for new freezers 12/18/2020 and letter from Ennio Emmanuel CPKC dated 12/17/2020 12/18/20 Anderson Code Purple Kent Councilman Anderson authorized the Email from 500.00 3,850.00 21,150.00 County designation of $500.00 of his community David enhancement funds to Code Purple Kent Anderson County for food truck distribution routes dated 12/18/2020 and letter from Ennio Emmanuel CPKC dated 12/17/2020 07/08/21 Page 217 S:\BUDGETS\Coun-21 .qpw

CITY COUNCIL - FY 20/21 Page 3 of 5 Item #23. 03/15/21 Rocha Tracy Palmer Councilman Rocha authorized the designation Email from 500.00 4,350.00 20,650.00 Ministries, Inc. of $500.00 of his community enhancement Gerald Rocha, funds to Tracy Palmer Ministries, Inc. to fund Sr. dated community events and the food pantry 03/12/2021 and letter from Tracy Palmer dated 03/09/2021 03/24/21 Sudler Tracy Palmer Councilman Sudler authorized the designation Email from 1,000.00 5,350.00 19,650.00 Ministries, Inc. of $1000.00 of his community Roy Sudler, Jr. enhancement funds to Tracy Palmer Ministries, dated Inc. to fund community events (community 03/23/2021 health and well-being initiatives) and letter from Tracy Palmer dated 03/09/2021 05/17/21 Rocha Sankofa Coumcilman Rocha authorized the designation Email from 1,000.00 6,350.00 18,650.00 of $1000.00 of his community enhancement Gerald Rocha, funds to Inner City Cultural League to fund Sr. dated community events and outreach 05/17/2021 and a letter submitted by Katrhina Stroud dated April 22, 2021 05/26/21 Boggerty Tracy Palmer Councilman Boggerty authorized the Email from 500.00 6,850.00 18,150.00 Ministries, Inc. designation of $500.00 of his community Andre enhancement funds to Tracy Palmer Ministries, Boggerty dated Inc. to fund community events and the food 05/23/2021 pantry and letter from Tracy Palmer dated 04/14/2021 05/26/21 Boggerty Dover Interfaith Councilman Boggerty authorized the Email from 1,000.00 7,850.00 17,150.00 Mission for Housing designation of $1000.00 for refrigerator repairs Andre and utility costs to Dover Interfaith Mission for Boggerty dated Housing 05/26/2021 and letter from Jeanine Kleimo dated 05/25/2021 07/08/21 Page 218 S:\BUDGETS\Coun-21 .qpw

CITY COUNCIL - FY 20/21 Page 4 of 5 Item #23. 05/26/21 Boggerty Hope Foundation Councilman Boggerty authorized the Email from 1,000.00 8,850.00 16,150.00 designation of $1000.00 for Community events Andre and youth programs for the HOPE Foundation Boggerty dated 05/26/2021 and letter from Gregg Bunkley dated 05/24/2021 05/26/21 Boggerty Vines Community Councilman Boggerty authorized the Email from 1,500.00 10,350.00 14,650.00 Project designation for $1500.00 for education and Andre preventsion resources and activity costs for the Boggerty dated Vines Community Project 05/26/2021 and letter from Rev. Carol E. Harris 06/09/21 Rocha Central Delaware Councilman Rocha authorized the designation Email from 1,000.00 11,350.00 13,650.00 Habitat for of $1000.00 to the Central Delaware Habitat for Gerald Rocha, Humanity Humanity for the Fourth Annual Hearts 4 Homes Sr. dated fundraiser to build six new Habitat Homes in 06/09/2021 Downtown Dover and letter from Dylan Grims dated 05/12/2021 11,350.00 13,650.00 07/08/21 Page 219 S:\BUDGETS\Coun-21 .qpw

CITY COUNCIL - FY 20/21 Page 5 of 5 Item #23. Budgeted District Council Sponsor YTD Expenditures Balance Amount 5,000.00 At-Large Slavin/Boggerty 5,000.00 0.00 2,500.00 1st District Lindell 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 1st District Rocha 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 2nd District Hare 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 2nd District Taylor 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 3rd District Cole/Arndt 500.00 2,000.00 2,500.00 3rd District Neil 100.00 2,400.00 2,500.00 4th District Anderson 2,250.00 250.00 2,500.00 4th District Sudler 1,000.00 1,500.00 TOTAL 11,350.00 13,650.00 07/08/21 Page 220 S:\BUDGETS\Coun-21 .qpw

Item #24. CITY MANAGER’S MONTHLY REPORT May 2021 Page 221

Item #24. Blank Page Page 222

Item #24. Jan. – May 2021 continues to show an increase in Customer use of automated payment options as compared to the same time period in 2020. Automated payment options include credit / debit card payments made through our online portal and phone pay system as well as lockbox, and auto draft options. Overall revenue collections have increased. Planning and Inspection revenue collections have increased by 59% as compared to the same period in 2020. Revenue collections for utilities and real estate taxes continue to improve. Average Disconnects -Note- Due to COVID-19 utility account disconnections were limited per the State of Emergency Orders, Staffing and Weather limitations from March 2020 – February 2021. 80 80 71 65 68 Total All Delinquent Accounts as of 4652 4848 4243 4041 4041 May 31, 2021 = 794, $141,278.58 0 0 0 0 2727 1 2 5 3939 Total Collected through disconnections for May 2021 = 715, $178,757.93 Average Accounts Cut Per Day Average Accounts Available to Cut Per Day Page 223

ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT Item #24. Electric Divisions System Peak Total System Load Number of New Month outages customers Aug 19 78,519 Services Aug 19 163.55 Sep 19 67,274 Apr 19 5 277 Apr 19 77 Sep 19 150.74 May 19 3 148 May 19 18 Oct 19 150.16 Oct 19 57,886 Jun 19 11 418 Jun 19 23 Nov 19 98.35 Nov 19 55,732 Jul 19 15 4,066 Jul 19 8 Dec 19 60,552 Aug 19 9 335 Aug 19 16 Dec 19 104.57 Sep 19 5 225 Sep 19 15 Jan 20 103.57 Jan 20 60,649 Oct 19 7 386 Oct 19 15 Feb 20 98.58 Feb 20 54,412 Nov 19 7 61 Nov 19 14 Mar 20 92.30 Mar 20 54,764 Dec 19 2 1,325 Dec 19 4 Apr 20 49,236 Jan 20 4 78 Jan 20 15 Apr 20 82.01 Feb 20 4 2,120 Feb 20 16 May 20 114.40 May 20 52,403 Mar 20 3 1,518 Mar 20 24 Jun 20 143.64 Jun 20 66,905 Apr 20 3 76 Apr 20 6 Jul 20 155.89 Jul 20 82,800 May 20 3 181 May 20 2 Aug 20 76,230 Jun 20 11 2,828 Jun 20 19 Aug 20 153.38 Jul 20 19 536 Jul 20 10 Sep 20 142.05 Sep 20 61,833 Aug 20 16 13,167 Aug 20 17 Oct 20 102.70 Oct 20 55,494 Sep 20 5 3551 Sep 20 16 Nov 20 52,898 Oct 20 5 738 Oct 20 8 Nov 20 95.03 Nov 20 7 3,230 Nov 20 12 Dec 20 103.07 Dec 20 60,904 Dec 20 0 0 Dec 20 15 Jan 21 103.85 Jan 21 62,356 Jan 21 1 2 Jan 21 9 Feb 21 103.54 Feb 21 58,116 Feb 21 3 1518 Feb 21 7 Mar 21 56,803 Mar 21 4 568 Mar 21 20 Mar 21 96.05 Apr 21 4 1,287 Apr 21 14 Apr 21 106.06 Apr 21 52,494 May 21 9 733 May 21 6 May 21 135.17 May 21 56,801 Electric Monthly Outage Report The annual outage goal will be less than 295 minutes per customer, which is a Delaware Standard. This will be measured by calculating the System Average Interruption Duration Index. FY 21 YTD FY 20 FY 19 342.82 35.45 39.97 Outages Average Response Time Goal is less than 30 minutes Month Year-to-date Month Year-to-date 9 72 27.67 Minutes 28.79 Minutes PROGRAM UPDATES MAY 21 MAY 20 FY21 YTD Tree Trimming 336 161 2581 Number of Oil Releases 0 0 1 Lost Time Accidents – All Electric Utility Divisions 1 0 1 New Services 6 2 128 Page 224

Item #24. Fleet & Facilities Management Monthly Report MAY 2021 Fleet Maintenance PM Work Orders Completed: 41 Number of Tire Repairs: 13 Number of Road Repairs: 8 Other Work Orders: 79 Repair Hours: 310.5 Road Repair Hours: 10.5 Total Work Orders: 120 Fabrication Hours: 5 Misc. Hours: -.5 PM Hours: 102.5 # Of Scheduled PM’s: 29 # Of PM’s Completed: 41 Major Program Updates MAY MAY MEASURE 2021 2020 DIFFERENCE Fleet Maintenance - Completed PM 41 out of 29 21 out of 29 appointments vs scheduled PM’s 68.97 % 141.38 % 72.41 % (Quantity and Percentage) Facilities Maintenance Facilities - Routine work orders 49 out of 77 4 out of 7 completed within 5 days 6.50 % 63.64 % 57.14 % (Quantity and Percentage) Facilities - Emergency work orders 8 out of 8 0 out of 1 completed within 2 days 100.00 % 100.00 % 0.00 % (Quantity and Percentage) Facilities: Total Work Orders Written in May: 85 Total Work Orders Completed in May: 61 (includes previous month’s W/O that were incomplete) Page 225

Item #24. Grant Writer’s Report for City Council Meeting, July 2021 Respectfully submitted by Lisa Chase, MA, MBA, Grant Writer The following work was completed in May 2021 • Researched, prepared and submitted six (6) project requests for funding considerations for Senate Appropriations Committee. Totaling $12,0875,000 in funding request. The process on my end included working with the department heads whose projects we were submitting, drafting letters of support for community leaders, developing attachments, and drafting resolutions. (Update: The overall congressional appropriations process is different than what we expected. Appropriations are projects that Congress has supported in the past. However, we all agreed it was important for our Delaware Congressional Delegation to know what the city’s pressing needs were, regarding infrastructure and economic development. The Senate Appropriations Committee opened their own process in May.) • Began researching IT project information for T-Mobile Hometown Grant opportunity • Researching regularly grant opportunities on Grants.gov – homing in on EPA and EDA grant opportunities. • Began, in earnest, on Bike Friendly Community Application for Bronze status renewal. Grant funding received in May 2021 Name Type of Department Program Area Status Amount Match Request Believe in Grant Dover Public Prime Time AWARDED $3,000 NA Reading Library Family Literacy Foundation Total Grant Funding Secured since July 2020: $68,574 Submitted Grants to-date: Name Type of Department Program Area Status Ask Match/Notes Request Amount AARP Grant City Clerk’s Meeting System Submitted $9,051.00 In-Kind - Community Office 4/2021 Staff Challenge Grant Excellence in Grant Dover Public PRIME TIME Submitted $2,850 Will hear Education Grant Library Family Literacy February back by 2021 - May 2021 DENIED FireHouse Subs Grant Fire Marshal’s Protective Submitted $13,000 No Match. Foundation Office Turnout Gear – May 2021 Should four complete hear back sets in July. Cabelas Grant Parks and Hiking Trails 12/2/2020 $15,000 Recreation DENIED M & T Bank Grant Parks and Parks Projects 1/11/2021 $75,000 No Foundation Recreation USDA Rural Grant Downtown Dover Revolving Loan Submitted $30,000 $2,500 Development Partnership Fund March Program 2021 Page 226

Item #24. Congress. Appropr. 1# Water Appropriations Water/Wastewater Water Quality 5/27/2021 $.6.7 mil $1,000,000 and Expansion #2 Planning Appropriations Planning Garrison Oak 4/7/2021 $18.8 mil - Kent Aeropark #3 Utilities Appropriations Utilities Garrison Oak 4/7/2021 $5 mil 2,000,000 Substation #4 Public Works Appropriations Public Words Meeting House 4/7/2021 $9.5 mil - Drainage #5 Water Appropriations Water/Wastewater Inflow/Infiltration 4/7/2021 $8.54 mil - #6 Parks Appropriations Parks and Community 4/7/2021 $1.4 mil Recreation Building and Accessible Playground #7 Dover Police Appropriations Dover Police Wireless Outdoor 4/7/2021 $600K - Cameras Total $50,540,000 Congressional Approps. Senate Appropriations FY22 1# Water Congressional. Water/Wastewater Water Quality 5/27/2021 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 – Directed and Expansion Spending #2 Planning Congressional.– Planning Garrison Oak 5/27/2021 $4,750,000 -0- Directed Kent Aeropark Spending #3 Utilities Congressional. Utilities Garrison Oak 5/27/2021 $5 mil $2,000,000 – Directed Substation Spending # 4 Parks and Congressional. Parks and Dover Park 5/27 $475,000 $475,000 Recreation – Directed Recreation Building Spending #5 Dover Police Congressional. Dover Police Expansion of 5/27 $600,000 $156,000 Department – Directed Department Outdoor Camera Spending Network – 40 cameras # 6 Dover Post Congressional. Planning Reuse Plan for 5/27 $262,500 $87,500 Office Reuse – Directed Department Dover Post Office Spending Total requests $12,087,500 for Senate Congressionally- Directed Spending Grant applications in Process Name Type of Department Program Status Ask Match Request Area Amount T-Mobile Grant Information Downtown In Process $49,280 No Community and Wifi Challenge Technology Page 227

Item #24. HUMAN RESOURCES May 2021 In May 2021, the Human Resources Director continued to focus her attention on labor contract negotiations or mediation with three labor unions. The Director has been addressing the affects of the Tax Assessor’s retirement, specifically the reduction in force of another staff within the department. Other matters that required the Director’s attention included, preparing and presenting a disability pension application to the General Employee’s Pension Board and continuing to assist with Kronos implementation. HR staff had the opportunity to job shadow or tour the Water Treatment Plant, Dover Police Dispatch and the Fire Department. HR was able to observe different departments while gaining the opportunity to view the roles, skills and responsibilities of other co-workers. This experience will increase the team’s knowledge of varies positions while recruiting for different departments within the City of Dover. HR continues to assist Dover Police Department every Tuesday from 10 am – Noon with any human resources questions they may have. Recruitment remains strong with almost 30 open positions. Administrative Assistant, Hollie Ford held Open Enrollment May 3-19, 2021. Active employees and retirees were encouraged to reach out to Human Resources with questions regarding their health, dental and vision. Category May May 2020 2021 Caucasian* 299 316 Minorities* 75 82 Hired 0 2 Terminated/Resigned/Retired/Other 5 3 Transferred/Promoted 1 2 Jobs Posted 4 3 Workers Comp. Injuries 2 0 Workers Comp. Hours 401 90 *368 Full-time Employees: Part-time Employees: 24 (3 Pitts Center, 1 Recreation, 16 Library, 3 Police Department, 1 Central Services) -Numbers do not reflect, temporary, seasonal, relief fire dispatchers, committee or council members. Recruitment Information (May) Page 228

Item #24. HUMAN RESOURCES (Continued) Open or Currently Recruiting* Open or Currently Recruiting by Dept. May May 2020 2021 Electric 5 2 Public Works 8 4 Police 7 5.5 Water Wastewater 6 3 All Other Departments 14.5 14 Totals 40.5 28.5 *Not used for Budgeting Purposes Workers Compensation Cost Calendar Year 2021 $20 $36 Department $6 $10 $5 $3 Total Cost (In thousands) Total: $80,000 Page 229

Item #24. Technology Department Larry Josefowski, Director Incident tracking: Work is under way reviewing alternatives to our work tracking tool. It is a freeware application that is not performing well. Alternatives are being considered, including the development of a much simpler tool created by our own IT team. We want a simpler tool that will be easier to capture the myriad of requests we get on a daily basis. Network Security (External): We are reviewing and, in some cases, increasing the security posture of our existing Internet Firewall and workstation and server protection tool from outside threats. We continue to see attempts to gain access to our network, with phishing attempts being the main threat. We have also identified and notified those workers who are especially targeted for their access. We determined there was an issue with logging attacks; we had to reconfigure the size to more accurately capture the amount of attacks coming in. We have had our first meeting with the the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency from the Department of Homeland Security. We are reviewing their information and determining what resources we feel would best protect the city’s IT and possibly other infrastructure such as electric and water. Network Security (Internal): We implemented several areas of improvements to our security posture, using the capabilities of our existing tools. First, we have started to encrypt the hard drives of all laptops, and we have completed approximately 60% of them at this time and are scheduling the rest. This will eliminate one possibility of loss of data, if a laptop is lost or stolen. We now have a policy where screens are locked after a certain time and require a password to unlock. All servers and workstations continue to be patched in a timely matter. Hardware Vulnerability: End of service hardware, which means that it is still functioning but is not getting security or performance updates are the biggest IT vulnerabilities. Our multilevel protection helps diminish the threat, but hardware such as our switches and routers need to be updated. We have engaged our vendors to get a more accurate picture of the condition of our hardware and are working with Cisco to help determine the priority of effort, as we begin to try to acquire replacement hardware. Other: We are working with Lisa Chase to try to get a grant that would provide some of our bandwidth for public WiFi, but also provide some updated hardware to better protect the network. Page 230

Reference Transactions May 2021 Item #24. 959 Telephone Reference Transactions 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 The Library closed on March 14, 2020 due to the COVID 19 outbreak. Circulation May '21 FYTD '21 May '20 FYTD '20 Dover Residents 7,669 59,623 0 154,283 E-Books 3,461 39,974 3,870 38,070 Kent Residents Total - 4,141 31,651 0 81,561 ~Harrington 2 0 ~Milford 9 0 ~Smyrna 304 0 ~Unincorporated Kent Co. 3,826 0 Non-County Residents 765 5,688 0 17,059 New Registrations Dover Residents 84 1,037 0 2,454 Kent Residents Total - 31 86 0 607 ~Harrington 0 0 ~Milford 0 0 ~Smyrna 0 0 ~Unincorporated Kent Co. 31 0 Non-County Residents 0 1 0 32 Registered Library Users as of 05/31/21 Registered Library Users as of 05/31/20 City of Dover Residents 19,497 City of Dover Residents 22,535 Kent County Residents 6,250 Kent Co. Residents 7,229 Sussex County Residents 283 Sussex Co. Residents 341 New Castle Co. Residents 369 New Castle Co. Residents 425 Out of State 23 Other 32 TOTAL 26,422 30,562 Other Visitors 5,005 12,505 0 191,916 *Visitors - Curbside Pick-up 0 27,314 Meeting Room Usage 696 1,395 0 4,080 Photocopier Usage 96 559 0 7,890 Computer Printing Usage 1,032 2,498 0 31,107 Computer Users 477 1,644 0 38,003 Wireless Computer Users 689 2,639 97 13,637 Inter/Intralibrary - Loaned 31 10 Inter/Intralibrary - Borrowed 62 0 Holds Sent 3,908 0 Holds Received 2,574 0 TOTAL 6,575 94,872 10 71,415 Tech Services/Items Added 1,991 2,037 Tech Services/Items Deleted 618 961 310 Passport Services/Customers 158 675 0 1,615 Passport Services/Revenue $6,722 $29,922 $0 $63,166 Monthly Highlights ►110 viewed 5 programs for adults. Job Center Statistics ►0 viewed 1 program for teens. May 2021 May 2020 ►133 viewed 8 programs for children. Number of Walk-in Hours Open 0 0 ►0 volunteers completed 0 hours of service. Number of Walk-in Participants 0 0 Number of Volunteer Hours 0 0 * Estimated Figure 0 attended 0 programs/classes coordinated through the Job Center. Page 231

Parks & Recreation and Grounds Item #24. May 2021 Monthly Report Parks & Recrea on Highlights  Five Park Projects con nue to move forward. A Public Hearing has been scheduled for June on the Dover Park Building and Spray Pad.  Parks & Playground Improvement, ORPT Grant 19 ‐ 187 work has started on the Kayak Launch.  Celebra ng Na onal Bicycle Month staff organized the 8th Annual Bike To Work day and the Ride of Silence events. A great turn out of cyclists for both events! Thanks for Georgia Boys Bagels for dona ng 2 dozen bagels the Bike To Work day social. JW Pi s Recrea on May (outdoor) League May 21 FYTD 21 May 20 FYTD 20 Center Par cipants Programming Par cipant Count General Recrea on 120 349 COVID 759 Ac vity Par cipants Spectators Loca on Open Gym 123 1,161 COVID 2,455 Youth Soccer 452 150 Schu e Park League 405 4,101 COVID 31,898 Sports 0 COVID COVID 937 Fields, Parks, and May 21 FYTD 21 May 21 FYTD 20 Pavilions Bookings & Rentals 25 69 COVID 119 Recreation Revenue Breakdown No Revenue received in May 2020 due to COVID 19 closure. May 2021 May 2020 General Recrea on 309.00 General Recrea on 0 Trips 0.00 Trips 0 Camps 7,110.00 Camps 0 Leagues 3,465.00 Leagues 0 Bldg./Field/Pavilions 190.00 Bldg./Field/Pavilions 0 Page 232

Item #24. Grounds Division Monthly Report May 2021 Arborist Crew Completed Trees Trimmed 104 Trees Removed 36 Root Prune 0 Stumps Removed 0 Trees Planted 3 Arborist Crew: - Removed 4 trees from Cherry St. ditch. - Trimmed Hazel St. Beautification Crew: - Dug tulips. - Sprayed Library roof top. - Put up hanging baskets on Loockerman St. - Prepared tulips for giveaway. Mowing Crew - Mowing is on schedule. Litter Removal: - Litter is being picked up on City properties as per the weekly schedule. - Litter person has been diligent in the reporting of destruction in City parks. - Total Trash Cans Collected 237. - Replace 14 trash can lids for litter route. Miscellaneous: - Planted 3 Trees at Williams Park. - Put up sun screen on softball field. - Power washed pavilions. - 3 employees attended flagger training - Removed fence and concrete from Williams Park and Mayfair. Page 233

Item #24. May 2021 Procurement & Inventory Report Measure FY 2021 FY 2020 DIFFERENCE Issue Effectiveness – How often the FY 2021 (To date) FY 2020 (Total) warehouse has what the departments [1732/ (1732+267)] *100 [2,292/ (2,292+156)] *100 -6.99% need when it’s needed. 86.64% 93.63 % [issues / (issues + back orders)] * 100 Turn Over Rate – Indicates that the material stocked is the material being 0.93 Turnovers per year 0.76 Turnovers per year 0.17 Turnovers per year used. (2020-2021 Goal 1 per year) WITHOUT TRANSFORMERS FUEL USE FY 2021 TO DATE FY 2020 TO DATE STOCK WITH OVER 60 MONTH SUPPLY (5 YEARS) Unleaded: 120,963 gallons 116,537 gallons Electric: $ 366,961.32 240 Line Items Diesel: 70,609 gallons 63,437 gallons Water: $ 13,654.15 31 Line Items Dollars Spent: $305,421.83 $300,715.91 General: $ 23,432.65 87 Line Items Total: $ 404,048.12 358 Line Items Purchase Orders for Stock by Fund Issues from Stock by Fund FY 2021 TO DATE FY 2020 TO DATE FY 2021 TO DATE FY 2020 TO DATE Electric: $1,692,064.24 $845,923.63 Electric: $1,013,190.48 $863,311.11 Water: $59,572.01 $84,678.95 Water: $95,900.25 $98,083.78 Wastewater: $1,090.86 $484.57 Wastewater: $2,724.13 $1,228.15 General: $110,648.17 $99,493.16 General: $106,336.46 $88,061.71 Total: $1,863,375.28 $1,030,580.31 *Total: $1,218,169.65 $1,073,268.35 Warehouse Stock Money Spent for Postage/Postal Services FY2021 FY2020 FY 2021 TO DATE FY2020 TO DATE Total Dollar Value: $1,816,744.27 $1,829,987.20 $137,530.63 $130,431.48 Total Line Items: 1,081 1,147 * Total of Issues from Stock by Fund includes Issues from Sale from Stock (SS) and Electric Returns (ER). BID REQUESTING COMMODITY TERM STATUS as of June 1, 2021 NUMBER DEPARTMENT Automated Trash Truck for Sanitation 21-0033PW One Time Public Works Forwarded to Public Works on 4/27/2021 FY2021 Street and Alley Program 21-0034PW One Time Public Works Forwarded to Public Works on 5/03/2021 North Bradford Street Tree Removal 21-0035PW One Time Public Works Forwarded to Public Works on 5/13/2021 US 13 East Pump Station #7 Force 21-0036WW One Time Water/WasteWater Forwarded to Water/Wastewater on 5/25/2021 Main Repairs Inflow and Infiltration Improvement 21-0037WW One Time Water/WasteWater Forwarded to Water/Wastewater on 5/25/2021 Water Meter Term Contract 21-0038WW One Time Water/WasteWater Forwarded to Water/Wastewater on 5/19/2021 FY2021B Street and Alley Program 21-0039PW One Time Public Works Forwarded to Public Works on 5/24/2021 Triple Combination Pumper for Dover 21-0040FD One Time Fire Department Bid opening scheduled for July 8, 2021 @ 2:00 PM Fire Department US 13 East Pump Station (Station #7) 21-0041WW One Time Water/WasteWater Bid opening scheduled for July 7, 2021 @ 2:00 PM Wet Well Relining Three Phase Pad Mount Transformers 21-0042WH One Time Warehouse Bid opening scheduled for June 17, 2021 @ 2:00 PM for Stock Utility Locating Contract 21-0043COD Three Years Electric- W/WW RFP opening scheduled for July 15, 2021 @ 2:00 PM Engineering Consultant Services for 21-0044FN Finance In Draft Electric Department Page 234

Item #24. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY 2021 MONTHLY REPORT GIS GIS PROJECT HOURS Create Data Requests Printing Technical Support Updates Configure Training 6% 0% 35% 28% 9% 1% 21% GIS PROJECT HOURS Other City-Wide DWW DPW Tax Mayor IT Cust. Service Dover PD City Manager City Clerk Planning & Insp. Library Parks & Rec Electric 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 GIS Project Hours Page 235

Item #24. SANITATION MONTHLY REFUSE (TONS) Bulk Rear Automated 1019.95 1017.24 970.81 972.27 952.91 954.82 910.54 930.83 916.61 858.45 848.32 781.51 727.65 203.1 210.54 124.71 190.58 95.73 132.29 159.68 101.2 126.37 208.54 139.96 203.01 178.39 122.7 156.2 78.08 181.91 160.15 195.51 177.7 113 162.45 49.52 147.16 102.2 77.23 MAY 20 JUN 20 JUL 20 AUG 20 SEP 20 OCT 20 NOV 20 DEC 20 JAN 21 FEB 21 MAR 21 APR 21 MAY 21 SANITATION HOURS 700 623 600 509 500 451 402 381 367 400 300 200 100 52 0 0 Bulk Automated Hand Trash Yard Waste May 2020 May 2021 SANITATION MAY 21 FYTD 21 MAY 20 FYTD 20 Trips to DSWA Sandtown Landfill 200 2,325 222 2,171 Total Tonnage to DSWA 1,170 13,186 1,256 11,729 90-gallon Containers Delivered 47 623 75 497 300-gallon Containers Delivered 0 15 0 9 Total Man Hours Containers Delivered 16 321 47 336 CURBSIDE RECYCLING TOTAL CANS COLLECTED TOTAL ACCOUNTS WEIGHT (LBS) AVE. WEIGHT (LBS) May 2021 19,652 9,923 257,580 13.11 Page 236

Item #24. STREETS / STORMWATER MONTHLY STREET SWEEPING & LEAF COLLECTION Sweeper Waste (cu.yd.) Street Sweeping (miles) Leaf Collection (miles) Leaf Debris (cu.yd.) 0 1620 0 156 0 1494 0 834 1895 0 780 425 0 652 0 0 2853 1529 0 6130 0 359 0 0 0 0 2749 34 122 3950 1738 122 30 1726 413 476 98 437 0 1604 Leaf Debris (cu.yd.) MAY JUN 452 0 560 2013.5 20 JUL AUG 6 117 Leaf Collection (miles) 20 20 SEP 0 OCT 122 0 Street Sweeping (miles) 20 20 NOV DEC 127 20 20 JAN 112 Sweeper Waste (cu.yd.) 20 FEB 21 MAR 21 APR STREETS / STORMWATER DIVISIONS 21 MAY 21 ASSISTING SANITATION DIVISION DUE TO 21 COVID (MAY 20). STREETS / STORMWATER MAY 21 FYTD 21 MAY 20 FYTD 20 Signs Installed 1 42 1 71 Signs Repaired 8 100 1 102 Curbs Painted Yellow (ft) 15,521 15,722 0 474 New Posts Installed 7 102 0 51 Storm Catch Basins Repaired 4 48 0 20 Storm Catch Basin Repairs (hrs) 19.5 183.25 0 75 Storm Catch Basins Cleaned (l.f.) 0 39 3 1,260 Storm Catch Basin Cleaning (hrs) 0 37.25 2 16 Hot Mix Patching (tons) 14.403 17.473 0 91 Hot Mix Patching (hrs) 44 50 0 100 Cold Mix Patching (hrs) 3 111.75 2 61 Concrete Work (hrs) 27 275 1 247 Concrete Patching (cu.yd.) 4.58 35.77 0 36 Ditch Work (hrs) 0 36 0 1 Street and Alley Maintenance (hrs) 0 38.5 0 12 Street Sweeping (miles) 1,604 12,199 0 9,454 Street Sweeping (cu.yd.) 112 895 0 748 Leaf Collection (miles) 20 7,306 0 7,374 Leaves Collected (cu.yd.) 13.5 11,885.5 0 11,261 Page 237

Item #24. CITY OF DOVER DEPARTMENT OF WATER & WASTEWATER MONTHLY REPORT May-21 Inflow & Infiltration Costs $350,000.00 This chart indicates the amount of money the City $300,000.00 is spending on treating ground and / or rain water through Kent County. This cost is being offset by $250,000.00 the Ground Water Inflow Adjustment rate passed on to the customers $200,000.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $50,000.00 $- May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 I & I Cost Water & Wastewater Repairs 5 4 3 2 1 - May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Water Mains Repaired Water Services Repaired Wastewater Mains Repaired Wastewater Laterals Repaired Number of Brown Water Complaints 70 This chart indicates the number of complaints the Department receives. Please note that our 60 flushing operatinons occured in September 2020 and April 2021. 50 40 30 20 10 - May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Number of Brown Water Complaints Linear (Number of Brown Water Complaints) Page 238

Item #25. City Planner’s Monthly Report Department of Planning & Inspections MAY 2021 Planning & Inspections Highlights Some Items to Call to Your Attention Construction activity during May resulted in 151 Permits being issued with a construc- tion value of about $5,770,300, bringing the total value of new construction year to date to $128,670,000. Three new residential Building Permits were issued in May in the Downtown Develop- ment District (DDD) area, but there is continued uncertainty in the residential market (58 total Permits YTD). Certificates of Occupancy were issued for seven (7) one family dwellings and for commercial renovations at Enterprise Business Park and Bayhealth. A Building Permit was issued for a new warehouse on Rosemary Lane. Additionally, Building Permits were issued for several interior renovations and tenant fit-out pro- jects including a building at 756 S. Little Creek Road, DSU, and William Henry Middle School. Two WCF building permits were issued for installation of Small Wireless Com- munications Facilities. Code Enforcement saw 356 new cases opened in May; 40% of these were grass and weed violations A total of 940 Code Inspections were undertaken. The City continues to abate violations at six Dangerous Buildings and to close cases resulting from last Au- gust’s tornado. 139 buildings were registered as vacant in May. The meetings of the Boards and Commissions supported by the Planning Office are conducted in a Virtual Meeting format using the WebEx telephone/video conferencing platform. Planning Staff conducted the Planning Commission Meeting of May 17, 2021 in the Virtual Meeting format. The maps and lists of proposed Rezonings resulting from the Comprehensive Rezoning Project Review and the text and map changes from the Comprehensive Plan Amend- ments were approved by the Planning Commission on May 17th and sent to Council. The Department continues to assess and respond to continuing updates from the Na- tional League of Cities, the US Treasury and others regarding the rollout of the Ameri- can Rescue Plan. The City continues to protest the allocation process which underfunds Dover and other CDBG cities. Additional guidance was provided in the Final Interim Rule issued in early May. Work also proceeded on a number of project applications submitted to the Delaware Congressional Delegation for the Appropriations and “earmarks” process. Page 239

Item #25. PROGRESS IN PICTURES 250 Beiser Blvd Page 240

Item #25. PROGRESS IN PICTURES 126 Overlook Place—Silver Lake 118 Mourning Dover—Oak Shadows 26 S. Queen Street 14 S. Queen Street 404 Beauvale Lane 15 Wellington Avenue Nottingham Meadows Nottingham Meadows Page 241

Item #25. Planning & Inspections Revenue FY2021 Actual Revenue Stream FY2021 Budget (YTD) May % of Budget Business License $1,470,000 $1,378,076 94% Manufactured Home License $17,000 $ 15,451 91% Building Permits $450,000 $ 546,656 121% Cert. of Occupancy $10,000 $ 5,685 57% Public Occupancy $25,000 $ 22,640 91% Lodging House $14,000 $ 12,780 91% Plumbing/Heating/Air $100,000 $ 95,424 95% Rental Inspection Fee $437,000 $ 400,909 92% Miscellaneous $20,000 $ 18,827 94% Fire Protection Fees $70,000 $ 63,512 91% Code Enforcement Fines $35,000 $ 22,575 65% Vacant Building Reg. $150,000 $ 65,875 44% Total P&I Revenue $2,798,000 $2,648,410 95% 31-May-21 Department Operations—Planning Office The City of Dover Buildings (including City Hall) continued to be open to the public in May with limitations on occupancy, social distancing, and mask requirements as part of the City’s Continuity of Government re- sponse to the COVID-19 pandemic and the compliance with the Governor’s Declaration of a State of Emer- gency for Delaware. The high volume of plan and project inquiries to the Planning Office continues. Staff continues plan and permit responsibilities including accepting Plan submissions by appointment and elec- tronically, CO inspections, conducting Meetings virtually, and managing on-going communication efforts. Other meetings, trainings, and workshops continue in a Virtual format. As AICP certified planners, the following Planning Staff members Dawn Melson-Williams (Principal Plan- ner), Samantha Bulkilvish (Planner I), and Julian Swierczek (Planner I) attended virtual sessions of the American Planning Association’s NPC21 (National Planning Conference) held May 5-7, 2021. These train- ing sessions count as continuing education credits (Certification Maintenance credits) for the AICP (American Institute of Certified Planners) certification. PLANNING OFFICE—Permit Reviews The Planning Office is part of the review process for certain types of construction activity permits (Building Permits, Sign Permits, etc.) and Certificate of Occupancy permits. For May 2021, Planning Staff was in- volved with the review of 68 Building Permits and 11 Certificates of Occupancy permit that were issued. This activity results in a 2021 calendar year-to-date total of 315 Permits and Certificates of Occupancy thru May 2021 as compared to 2020 calendar year-to-date total of 275 Permits and COs and 2019 calendar year -to-date total of 384 Permits and COs. Staff also reviews new applications for Business Licenses and Rental Dwelling Permits. Page 242

Item #25. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 2019 Comprehensive Plan The next steps with the 2019 Comprehensive Plan focus on the Implementation Plan (Chapter 15) items for the projects, studies, code amendments, and other activities. A copy of the Final Plan is available on the Comprehensive Plan website: https://www.cityofdover.com/2019-comprehensive-plan. Chapter 15 - Implementation focuses on plan implementation tasks. Comprehensive Rezoning Project 2021 & Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set 2 The Comprehensive Rezoning Project is an implementation item of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan that must be completed by June 2021. After data analysis of the Zoning Map and Map 12-1: Land Development Plan, Staff identified the potential zoning and land use classifications/category conflicts and created the Preliminary List of Rezonings; a Public Outreach effort was conducted in February - March 2021. The Maps and Lists of the Proposed Zoning Map Amendments (Rezonings) were finalized as of April 26, 2021 and the formal review process began with First Reading at City Council of Proposed Ordinance #2021-09. The Pub- lic Hearing was held by Planning Commission on May 17, 2021 and they recommended approval of the Rezonings with the exception of two properties. The Public Hearing at City Council is set for June 7, 2021. For more information and an interactive ArcHUB Site on the project see the Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project page on the City’s Website: https://www.cityofdover.com/ ComprehensiveRezoning2021Project As a companion piece, the Planning Staff also developed the Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2 to address Plan text changes and revisions to Land Use Categories designated on Map 12-1: Land De- velopment Plan. These revisions were discovered during the parcel-by-parcel analysis associated with the Comprehensive Rezoning Project. This Set #2 of Amendments also began the formal review process in April with the First Reading of the Proposed Ordinances #2021-10 and #2021-11. The Public Hearings were held by the Planning Commission on May 17, 2021 and they recommended approval of the Amendments. The Public Hearing at City Council is set for June 7, 2021. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY • In May 2021, Residential Building Permits for new dwelling units were issued for three (3) one-family dwellings in the Downtown Development District being developed by NCALL. • Certificates of Occupancy were issues to two (2) single-family dwellings in Nottingham Meadows, two (2) single-family dwellings in Oak Shadows, one single-family dwelling in the Overlook on Silver Lake, and two (2) single-family dwelling in the Downtown Development District. • Building Permits were issued for a Warehouse Building 4 (and its tenant fit-out) at 131 Rosemary Road by Blue Collar Guild, LLC (C-20-01). In addition, Building Permits were issued for several interior reno- vation projects and tenant fit-out projects including Building at 756 S. Little Creek Road, Delaware State University, William Henry Middle School, and other project locations. • Certificates of Occupancy were issued for several renovation projects and tenant fit-outs including pro- jects at Enterprise Business Park and at Bayhealth Medical Center. • Two (2) WCF Building Permits were issued for the installation of Small Wireless Communications Facil- ities (WCFs) by the ZAYO Group under the provisions for Wireless Communications Facility that were adopted in November 2020 (Ordinance #2020-13). MAY 2021 (FY21) TOTAL FOR FY21 New Home Permits Issued 3 58 Value of Commercial Projects $5,770,303.00 $128,670,376.00 Downtown Incentives (Fees Waived) $4,661.00 $23,018.00 Page 243

Item #25. BOARD AND COMMISSION ACTIVITY The May Meetings of the Boards and Commissions supported by the Planning Office again were conducted successfully in a Virtual Meeting format using the WebEx telephone/video conferencing platform. Planning Staff conducted the Planning Commission Meeting of May 17, 2021 in the Virtual Meeting format. The Board of Adjustment and the Historic District Commission did not meet in May due to lack of agenda items. Planning Staff is utilizing the Municode Meetings software system for preparation of Agendas and Packets for these Boards and Commissions. Board of Adjustment The Board of Adjustment did not meet on May 19, 2021. The next Board of Adjustment meeting is sched- uled for June 16, 2021. Historic District Commission The Historic District Commission did not meet on May 20, 2021. The next Historic District Commission meeting is scheduled for June 17, 2021. Planning Commission The Planning Commission met virtually on May 17, 2021. The next regular Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for June 21, 2021. The Applications listed below were considered. • C-19-06 Calvary Baptist Church of Dover at 2285 Forrest Avenue - The Planning Commission approved the Request for One-year Extension of Plan Approval granted by the Planning Commission in July 2019 for a Conditional Use Site Plan Application to permit the construction of a place of worship and associat- ed site improvements at 2285 Forrest Avenue for the Calvary Baptist Church of Dover. The subject prop- erty is 75.51 acres +/- and is located on the south side Forrest Avenue west of Dover High Drive. The property is zoned R-10 (One Family Residence Zone) and is subject to the COZ-1 (Corridor Overlay Zone). • AX-21-02 Lands of Edward C. and Joan N. Larrivee at 115 Fox Hall Drive – The Planning Commission recommended approval to City Council of an Annexation Request and Rezoning Request for a parcel of land totaling 1.131 acres +/- located at 115 Fox Hall Drive, Dover. The property is currently zoned RS-1 (Residential Single Family Zone) in Kent County. The proposed zoning is R-20 (One Family Residence Zone). The property is located on the north side of Fox Hall Drive and approximately 1600 feet west of Kenton Road. The annexation category according to Dover’s 2019 Comprehensive Plan is Category 1: High Priority Annexation Areas and the land use designation is Residential Low Density. City Council will consider this Annexation Request on June 14, 2021. • SB-21-02 Lands of Fountainview, LLC at 100 Ridgely Street: Minor Subdivision Plan - The Planning Commission recommended approval to City Council of a Minor Subdivision Plan inclusive of the DAC comments that would require cross access easements among Lots 1 and 2 and other parties served by the access drive and the waiver request for the width of the required lot frontage on a public street. The subdi- vide property consists of 7.3386 acres +/- into two parcels (Lot 1 and Lot 2). Lot 1 is to be 3.5429 acres+/ - and encompasses the east side of the property including an access easement area extending from the northern stub of Ridgely Street. Lot 1 only has a street frontage of 40.12 feet on Ridgely Street. Lot 2 is to be 3.7957 acres+/- and encompasses the western residual portion of the property with frontage on Ridgely Street and on unimproved segment of Fulton Street. The subject property is located at the termi- nus of Ridgely Street and north of Fulton Street. The property is zoned IPM (Industrial Park Manufactur- ing Zone). The Subdivision Waiver Request was forwarded to Council Committee of the Whole: Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee for review on May 25, 2021 where it received a recommenda- tion for approval. City Council will consider the Request on June 14, 2021. Page 244

Item #25. Planning Commission (Continued) • C-21-04 Bay Pointe Apartments (One Building Concept) at 1080 and 1106 Bay Road - The Planning granted conditional approval of the Conditional Use to permit the construction of one Multiple Dwelling -Unit (Apartment) Building as a three-story 54,105 SF building with 54 apartment units and associated site improvements. The proposed Apartment building requires Conditional Use review in the C-4 zoning district. The three existing lots to be consolidated total 3.302 +/- acres and are zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The property is located on the southwest side of Bay Road at the intersection with Lafferty Lane. • S-21-05 Bay Road Office Park Master Plan (Revised) – The Planning Commission granted conditional approval of a Site Development Master Plan as Revised to permit continued phased construction of Bay Road Office Park to consist of three buildings in three phases. Phase 1 is complete with a 25,120 SF Of- fice Building, parking, stormwater management facility, and other site improvements. Phase 2 proposes a 25,606 SF Office Building with potential 4,800 SF building addition. Phase 3 proposes a 17,374 SF Office Building. The subject properties consist of four (4) parcels: 1.11+/- acres, 1.10+/- acres, 1.2+/- acres, and 4.17+/- acres. The properties are zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial Zone). The properties are located on the southwest side of Bay Road and south of Miller Drive with access from Martin Street. • MI-21-03 Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project: Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendments - The Planning Commission recommended approval to City Council of Amendment the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the City of Dover by Changing the Zoning Designations to conform with the 2019 Com- prehensive Plan, as amended. Two properties (Item ID #128 and #161) were recommended to remain as currently zoned. • The Planning Commission recommended rejection of Staff’s recommendation for MI-21-03 Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project: Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendments ID #128 and allow the property to remain as it is currently zoned based on the comments from Mr. Torbert (property owner) and the controls that would still be in place if it were to remain as C-4( High- way Commercial Zone). • The Planning Commission recommended rejection of Staff’s recommendation for MI-21-03 Comprehensive Rezoning 2021 Project: Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendments ID #161 and allow the property to maintain a zoning classification of C-3 (Service Commercial Zone) based on the comments from Mr. Harmon and the fact that it is sited next to his business that is always been zoned C-3 (Service Commercial Zone). These recommendations of parcels for Rezoning have been identified as part of the Comprehensive Re- zoning 2021 Project and will be presented in map and listing formats. Ordinance #2021-09. Public Hearing before City Council is set for June 7, 2021 with Final Reading and Final Action by City Coun- cil on June 14, 2021. • MI-21-04 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2021 Set #2 – The Planning Commission Recommended approval to City Council of a series of Amendments to the 2019 Comprehensive Plan include considera- tion of the following: A. Consideration of a series of plan text changes to Table 12-1: Land Use and Zoning Matrix of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan (as amended). The changes to the Land Use and Zoning Matrix will add several zoning districts to certain Land Use Categories. Ordinance #2021-10. B. Consideration of a series of Amendments to Map 12-1: Land Development Plan Map of the 2019 Comprehensive Plan (as amended). The Recommendations for the Land Use Classifications to be revised is for a series of parcels citywide as discovered during the parcel-by-parcel analysis and/or Comprehensive Rezoning Project process and are as listed in the Summary Chart of Land Use Classifications. Ordinance #2021-11. Public Hearing before City Council is set for June 7, 2021 with Final Reading and Final Action by City Council on June 14, 2021. Page 245

Item #25. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM CDBG FY20 Projects • CARES Act Funding The City of Dover was awarded $475,211 in Federal Funds to assist in reducing the spread of COVID-19. The City has partnered with the Department of Health and Social Services to administer the grant that will be used for motel vouchers and rent subsidies that will service homeless persons or those at risk of becoming homeless. Ninety-six (96%) of these funds have been spent year-to-date. • Homeownership Assistance Program CDBG funds will be used to provide homeownership assistance to first-time homebuyers who purchase affordable housing in the City of Dover. Eleven (11) families have purchased affordable housing in the City of Dover with one (1) family shopping for a home. • Dover Interfaith Mission for Housing (DIMH) CDBG funds will be used to provide operations cost for the shelter. This project is completed. DIMH is also in the process of purchasing a building for its new shelter location that will be renovated with CDBG funds. • Central Delaware Housing Collaborative CDBG funds will be used to provide operations cost for a women’s shelter. This project is underway. • Milford Housing Homeowner Rehabilitation/Emergency Home Repair Programs CDBG funds will be used to rehabilitate existing owner-occupied housing in the City that is in violation of the City’s Housing Code and complete emergency home repairs to eliminate housing conditions that threaten the health and safety of low-income homeowners. Emergency home repairs have been com- pleted for seven (7) families and two (2) homes rehabbed. • NCALL Research Inc. CDBG funds will be used to demolish two existing homes in the Restoring Central Dover area in order to construct two affordable housing units on the vacant lots. One property is located at 49 S. Kirkwood Street and has been demolished. Construction of the new home is underway. Page 246

Item #25. Code Enforcement Activity— May 2021 Case Type # cases # cases % staff % staff initiated current YTD (July initiated YTD month 2020 to current month June 2021) No valid Rental Permit 64 149 100% 97% No valid Building Permit 2 43 100% 67% Tall grass and weeds 142 569 86% 83% Unregistered vehicle 2 37 50% 78% Abandoned vehicle 2 49 0% 82% Annual Housing Inspection 44 194 98% 89% Property Maintenance 36 884 53% 80% Exterior Electric Termination 8 63 100% 92% Dover Code of Ordinances 31 871 48% 86% Zoning 4 21 75% 76% Total Cases Opened 356 3329 Total # of Inspections For 940 Month Dangerous Buildings, Vacant Buildings & Demolitions  23 & 25 S Governors Avenue – These two dwellings have been condemned by the City; owner has applied for Demolition Permits.  209 N New Street—This dwelling has been condemned by the City; boarded by City Staff.  688 Buckson Drive— This dwelling has been condemned by the City. The dwelling was boarded by the City to keep people out.  846 Westview Terrace – This dwelling has been condemned by the City due to storm damage. Progress is being made to lift the condemnation.  1173 Long Point Road– This dwelling has been condemned by the City due to storm damage. Progress is being made to lift the condemnation.  Vacant Buildings currently registered - 139 Page 247

Building Inspections & Licensing Summary Item #25. July 2019— July 2020– Current June 2021 May 2020 June 2020 PERMITTING AND LICENSING Permits Issued May (2021) May (2020) FY 21 FYTD 21 FY20 FYTD 20 Administrative Permit 4 38 2 26 Building Addition/Renovation Permits 44 344 30 309 Building Permits 18 366 17 120 Demolition Permits 2 17 3 40 Fence Permits 17 149 20 121 Fire Prevention Permits 5 61 7 70 Mechanical Permits 35 283 10 242 Plumbing Permits 18 216 9 194 Sign Permits 6 86 12 117 Swimming Pool Permits 2 6 5 10 Subtotal 1566 1249 Business Licenses 33 1840 16 2030 Merchant Licenses 1 355 0 396 Contractor Licenses 31 1266 22 1241 Subtotal 3461 3629 Lodging House Licenses 1 67 0 35 Public Occupancy 15 445 2 418 Rental Dwelling 111 3132 32 3040 Subtotal 3644 3493 Manufactured Homes 4 335 2 329 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Inspections May (2021) May (2020) FY 21 FYTD 21 FY20 FYTD 20 Building (Inspections/CBI/Site Meetings) 219 2394 143 2468 Plumbing/Mechanical 318 2189 101 2920 Certificate of Occupancy 11 79 10 103 Page 248

Item #25. Fire Marshal’s Office—At a Glance The Fire Marshal’s Office investigated five (5) in- cidents during the month of May. Staff worked race weekend to ensure that all of the residents and visitors were safe. Staff has finished their annual fire and life safety inspections at hotels/motels and is now starting apartments and clubhouses. Month Year to Date Previous Year to Date Annual Fire & Life Safety Inspections 27 258 210 Deficiencies From the Above Inspections 92 1,072 661 Fire Code Violations/Deficiencies/Complaints 49 434 280 C/O & Fire Equipment Acceptance Tests 13 83 81 Meetings & Walk Through 13 156 168 Fire Plan Review & DAC 5 106 112 Month Year to Date Previous Year to Date Accidental 2 totaling $501 21 totaling $510,602 22 totaling $5,473,000 Undetermined 2 totaling $1,200 8 totaling $561,201 13 totaling $466,751 Incendiary 1 totaling $500 4 totaling $20,501 4 totaling $1,750 Arrest Made with DPD 0 1 0 Investigation Time 6 118 hours 89 hours Injuries 1 6 2 Deaths 0 0 0 Please feel free to contact our office at any time with any questions or concerns. Thank you! Page 249

Item #26. Page 250

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 This page intentionally left blank Page 251 Page 2

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 CITY OF DOVER ACTIVITY REPORTS May 2021 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY LEVELS FY20 YTD FY21 YTD BANK TRENDS Number of Deposits Made (Hand, ACH & Wire, Lockbox) 6,378 5,631 Total Amount of All Deposits $ 164,168,264 $ 164,025,950 Other Activity Number of Pay Periods 24 24 Number of Payroll Checks & Direct Deposits Issued 9,424 9,233 Number of Pension Checks Issued 2,843 2,908 Total Pension Benefits Paid - Defined Benefit Plan $ 5,173,322 $ 5,330,300 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Number of Check Vouchers 5,473 5,284 Number of EFT Vouchers 2,543 2,595 Vouchers Dollar Amount Disbursed $ 62,784,752 $ 61,369,619 FY20 YTD Wages FY21 YTD Wages $42,284 $337,558 $53,899 $615,426 $66,424 $611,925 $46,4 $513,705 $530,315 33 $365,139 $1,239,247 $1,061,396 $1,225,612 $1,981,049 $15,494,059 $14,520,842 Regular Regular All over time All over time Vacation Vacation Sick Sick Terminal Leave - Retiree Vacation/Sick Payout Terminal Leave - Retiree Vacation/Sick Payout Personal Personal Other Comp Time Comp Time Other Page 252 Page 3

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 City of Dover General Fund Summary Fiscal Year to Date (May 2021) Revenues Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Property & Transfer Taxes $ 16,319,300 $ 16,319,300 $ 17,249,533 106% Program Revenues 10,312,800 10,312,800 8,664,205 84% Utility Transfers 11,000,000 11,000,000 10,083,331 92% Grants 778,500 780,774 1,223,215 157% Interfund Services 5,592,700 5,592,700 4,124,559 74% All Other 1 920,000 995,000 730,248 73% $ 44,923,300 $ 45,000,574 $ 42,075,091 93% Expenditures Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % 2 $ 29,235,400 $ 29,212,099 $ 23,081,899 79% Program Expenses Interfund Services 10,622,300 10,642,975 8,308,710 78% Debt Service 462,200 462,200 425,359 92% Post Retirement Benefits 2,045,400 2,045,400 1,874,950 92% Pension Fund Contributions 935,100 935,100 951,118 102% Capital Project Transfers 2,078,100 2,078,100 2,078,100 100% All Other 3 1,117,000 1,192,000 1,120,875 94% $ 46,495,500 $ 46,567,874 $ 37,841,010 81% 1 Includes Cable Franchise Revenue, Miscellaneous Receipts, Garrison Farm Rent, Sale of Assets, Return Check Fees, Fund Interest Income, Investment Manager Cost and Transfer in Other Reserves 2 Includes Stormwater Division 3 Includes Misc. Grant Exp., Bank and CC Fees, Street Lights Expense, DDP Contribution, Bond Issue Costs, Trf to Cable Franchise Reserve and Trf to Uncollectible Reserve Page 253 Page 4

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 General Fund Revenues $20,000,000 $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- Property & Transfer Taxes Program Revenues Utility Transfers Grants Interfund Services All Other 1 Original Budget Revised Budget Actual General Fund Expenditures $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $- Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Page 5 Page 254

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 City of Dover Water Fund Summary Fiscal Year to Date (May 2021) Revenues Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Customer Sales $ 6,231,700 $ 6,231,700 $ 5,242,962 84% Impact Fees 570,000 570,000 169,666 30% Rents 420,100 420,100 634,995 151% Miscellaneous 1 101,800 101,800 165,640 163% $ 7,323,600 $ 7,323,600 $ 6,213,262 85% Expenditures Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Program Expenses $ 3,289,200 $ 3,177,500 $ 2,318,639 73% Interfund Services 1,028,800 1,028,800 754,060 73% Debt Service 762,800 762,800 747,965 98% Post Retirement Benefits 176,900 176,900 162,161 92% Capital Project Transfers 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 100% General Fund Transfer 500,000 500,000 458,334 92% All Other 2 20,000 20,000 23,169 116% $ 7,077,700 $ 6,966,000 $ 5,764,329 83% 1 Includes Interest Earnings and Miscellaneous Income 2 Includes Bank & CC Fees and sale of water meters Page 6 Page 255

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Water Revenues $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- Customer Sales Impact Fees Rents Miscellaneous 1 Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Water Expenditures $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- Program Expenses Interfund Services Debt Service Post Retirement Benefits Capital Project Transfers General Fund Transfer All Other 2 Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Page 7 Page 256

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 City of Dover Wastewater Fund Summary Fiscal Year to Date (May 2021) Revenues Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Customer Sales $ 9,783,000 $ 9,783,000 $ 8,471,214 87% Impact Fees 480,000 480,000 149,468 31% Miscellaneous 1 21,300 21,300 27,392 129% $ 10,284,300 $ 10,284,300 $ 8,648,074 84% Expenditures Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Program Expenses $ 1,432,500 $ 1,432,500 $ 1,105,384 77% Kent County Treatment Fee 4,302,900 4,302,900 4,412,271 103% Interfund Services 779,600 779,600 576,607 74% Debt Service 659,900 659,900 577,324 87% Post Retirement Benefits 81,500 81,500 74,711 92% Capital Project Transfers 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 100% General Fund Transfer 500,000 500,000 458,333 92% All Other 2 10,000 10,000 10,456 105% $ 8,966,400 $ 8,966,400 $ 8,415,086 94% 1 Includes Interest Earnings, Miscellaneous Income, and Wastewater Penalties 2 Includes Bank & CC Fees and Bond Issuance Cost Page 8 Page 257

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Wastewater Revenues $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- Customer Sales Impact Fees Miscellaneous 1 Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Wastewater Expenditures $5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- Program Expenses Kent County Treatment Interfund Services Debt Service Post Retirement Benefits Capital Project Transfers General Fund Transfer All Other 2 Fee Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Page 9 Page 258

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 City of Dover Electric Fund Summary Fiscal Year to Date (May 2021) Revenues Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Customer Sales $ 81,662,500 $ 81,662,500 $ 71,976,194 88% Distribution of Earnings (5,246,100) (5,246,100) (4,583,150) 87% All Other 1 3,424,400 3,424,400 2,772,557 81% $ 79,840,800 $ 79,840,800 $ 70,165,601 88% Expenditures Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Power Supply & Generation $ 46,084,100 $ 46,084,100 $ 32,840,486 71% Electric Operating Div. Exp. 7,345,800 7,345,800 5,551,532 76% Interfund Services 3,784,300 3,784,300 2,793,892 74% Debt Service 1,378,600 1,378,600 1,264,930 92% Post Retirement Benefits 789,600 789,600 723,800 92% Capital Project Transfers 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 100% General Fund Transfer 10,000,000 10,000,000 9,166,664 92% Rate Stabilization Reserve 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 100% All Other 2 2,023,400 2,023,400 2,028,797 100% $ 79,405,800 $ 79,405,800 $ 62,370,101 79% 1 Includes Rental Revenue, Miscellaneous Service Revenue, Interest Income, Penalties, General Service Billing Received from Uncollectible, and Green Energy Charge 2 Includes Utility Tax, Interest on Deposits, Green Energy, A/R Write-offs, and Bank & CC Fees, and Transfer to Other Reserve. Megawatt Hours Sold & Purchased Budget Rev. Budget Actual Sales to Customers MWh (excl. Street Light MWh) 749,446 749,446 658,134 Sales per MWh $100.30 $100.30 $100.82 Purchased/Generated MWh 779,796- 779,796- 683,016- All In MWh Supply & Generation $59.10 $59.10 $48.08 Page 10 Page 259

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Electric Fund - Revenues Mi llions $(10) $- $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Customer Sales Distribution of Earnings All Other 1 Electric Fund - Expenditures $50,000,000 $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $- Power Supply & Electric Operating Post Retirement Capital Project General Fund Rate Stabilization Interfund Services Debt Service All Other 2 Generation Div. Exp. Benefits Transfers Transfer Reserve Original Budget $46,084,100 7,345,800 3,784,300 1,378,600 789,600 6,000,000 10,000,000 2,000,000 2,023,400 Revised Budget $46,084,100 7,345,800 3,784,300 1,378,600 789,600 6,000,000 10,000,000 2,000,000 2,023,400 Actual $32,840,486 5,551,532 2,793,892 1,264,930 723,800 6,000,000 9,166,664 2,000,000 2,028,797 Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Page 11 Page 260

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 This page intentionally left blank Page 12 Page 261

Item #26. Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 City of Dover Division Expense Summary (General Fund) Fiscal Year to Date (May 2021) Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % General Fund Divisions % of Budget City Clerk $ 508,400 $ 511,891 $ 351,438 69% Council 156,600 156,600 92,839 59% Mayor Tax Assessor 245,900 238,400 207,678 87% Human Resources Fire 769,900 769,900 693,772 90% Customer Services Grounds 1,456,600 1,456,600 1,176,181 81% Fleet Maintenance Library 1,822,700 1,822,700 1,394,992 77% Procurement & Inventory Recreation 1,129,700 1,129,700 692,476 61% Life Safety 432,700 434,974 354,044 81% Engineering Code Enforcement 815,000 815,000 341,770 42% Facilities Management Planning 663,200 658,300 483,016 73% Pub. Services Administration Public Inspections 595,300 595,300 493,606 83% Finance Police 17,819,900 17,819,900 14,877,590 83% Information Technology Police Extra Duty 750,000 750,000 224,359 30% City Manager Streets 699,700 697,700 575,297 82% Sanitation 2,506,800 2,502,425 2,094,737 84% Stormwater Stormwater 785,900 682,900 472,357 69% Sanitation City Manager 1,044,800 1,004,800 826,600 82% Streets Information Technology 912,800 912,800 645,122 71% Police Extra Duty Finance 992,700 992,700 750,513 76% Police Pub. Services Administration 594,600 603,400 456,237 76% Public Inspections Facilities Management 655,800 655,800 537,846 82% Engineering 198,700 294,900 176,206 60% Planning Procurement & Inventory 715,900 730,284 583,524 80% Code Enforcement Fleet Maintenance 930,600 924,600 771,671 83% Life Safety Customer Services 1,107,600 1,107,600 928,156 84% Recreation Human Resources 524,200 529,200 407,439 77% Library Mayor 221,700 221,700 153,416 69% Grounds $ 39,057,700 $ 39,020,074 $ 30,762,882 79% Fire Tax Assessor Council City Clerk 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Page 13 Page 262

Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Item #26. City of Dover Utilities Expenditure Summary Fiscal Year to Date (May 2021) Water Divison Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Engineering & Inspection $ 397,800 $ 441,400 $ 249,288 56% Water Department 669,800 669,800 481,525 72% Water Treatment Plant 2,221,600 2,066,300 1,587,827 77% $ 3,289,200 $ 3,177,500 $ 2,318,639 73% Wastewater Divison Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Engineering & Inspection $ 288,300 $ 288,300 $ 208,749 72% Wastewater Department 1,144,200 1,144,200 896,635 78% $ 1,432,500 $ 1,432,500 $ 1,105,384 77% Electric Division Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Transmission/Distribution $ 3,995,600 $ 4,010,600 $ 3,139,292 78% Electrical Engineering 1,396,400 1,381,400 1,040,492 75% Administration 707,400 707,400 436,737 62% Meter Reading 375,300 375,300 327,595 87% Systems Operations 871,100 871,100 607,416 70% $ 7,345,800 $ 7,345,800 $ 5,551,532 76% Page 263 Page 14

Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Item #26. Water Division % of Budget Water Treatment Plant Water Department Engineering & Inspection 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Wastewater Division % of Budget Wastewater Department Engineering & Inspection 69% 70% 71% 72% 73% 74% 75% 76% 77% 78% 79% Electric Division % of Budget Systems Operations Meter Reading Administration Electrical Engineering Transmission/Distribution 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Page 264 Page 15

Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Item #26. City of Dover Capital Outlay Summary (All Funds) Fiscal Year to Date (May 2021) General Fund Original Budget Revised Budget Actual % Fire $ 173,300 $ 173,300 $ 110,125 64% Life Safety - 67,500 67,291 100% Code Enforcement - 37,800 37,776 100% Planning 20,400 20,400 3,716 18% Inspections 18,600 23,500 - 0% Police 912,400 986,800 686,777 70% Streets 936,000 3,209,400 496,820 15% Sanitation 475,200 475,200 - 0% Stormwater 1,110,700 1,342,200 54,568 4% Facilities Management 700,000 700,000 - 0% Library County Grant - 19,900 23,414 118% Recreation 395,000 904,000 250,946 28% Purchasing 25,000 325,000 1,792 1% Information Technology 61,600 61,600 8,312 13% Public Works Engineering 39,600 39,600 1,858 5% General Fund Capital Projects $ 4,867,800 $ 8,386,200 $ 1,743,394 21% Water Fund Water $ 1,205,500 $ 1,647,200 $ 763,486 46% Water Engineering 20,400 20,400 929 5% Water Treatment Plant - 568,500 329,411 58% Water Fund Capital Projects $ 1,225,900 $ 2,236,100 $ 1,093,826 49% Wastewater Fund Wastewater Engineering $ 14,000 $ 14,000 $ 929 7% Wastewater 1,085,000 2,665,200 1,288,550 48% Wastewater Fund Capital Projects $ 1,099,000 $ 2,679,200 $ 1,289,479 48% Electric Fund Electric Generation $ 1,267,000 $ 1,302,700 $ 79,553 6% Transmission/Distribution 1,100,000 1,293,100 614,783 48% Electrical Engineering 2,968,900 2,706,600 1,081,750 40% ERP System 500,000 1,244,800 50,583 4% Electric Administration 360,000 2,064,400 135,426 7% Electric Fund Capital Projects $ 6,195,900 $ 8,611,600 $ 1,962,094 23% TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $ 13,388,600 $ 21,913,100 $ 6,088,793 28% Page 265 Page 16

Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Item #26. Capital Outlay - All Divisions $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- Original Budget Revised Budget Actual Capital Outlay - By Fund $10,000,000 $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- ORIGINAL BUDGET REVISED BUDGET ACTUAL EXPENDED General Fund Capital Projects Water Fund Capital Projects Wastewater Fund Electric Fund Capital Projects Page 266 Page 17

Finance Department Monthly Report May 2021 Item #26. This page intentionally left blank Page 267 Page 18

Item #27. Page 268

Item #27. DEPARTMENT OF POLICE Thomas A. Johnson, Jr. 400 South Queen Street Chief of Police Dover, Delaware 19904 302-736-7111 July 12, 2021 Honorable Robin Christiansen, Mayor Members of Dover City Council City Hall Dover, DE 19901 Mayor Christiansen and Council Members: The following is the monthly report for Dover Police Department activities for the month of May: COMPLAINTS Total complaints received through May 31, 2021 numbered 15,250 this is an increase of 1,277 complaints over the same period last year. 20,000 17,845 16,717 16,563 15,250 13,973 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burglary Robbery Rape Homicide Sudden Death Cases Reported in May Cases Cleared In May Cases Cleared from Previous Months 1|Page Page 269

Item #27. DRUGS, VICE, & ORGANIZED CRIME (DVOC) AND STREET CRIMES SECTION SEIZURES Along with the drug seizures listed below, the units also recovered 42.3 grams/doses of miscellaneous other drugs and $750.00 during the month of May 2,000.00 1,780.67 1,000.00 3.23 97.00 0 1.05 0.00 Marijuana Cocaine Ecstasy (Doses) Prescription Heroin Pills (Doses) GRAMS/DOSES FIREARM SEIZURES/INSIDE CITY LIMITS 15 10 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI DVOC/STREET CRIMES PATROL SEU HANDGUN RIFLE SHOTGUN COMMUNITY POLICING & CADETS COMMUNITY POLICING CONTACTS ABANDONED VEHICLES 0 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI’S 0 CADETS CONTACTS ASSIST OTHER 17 PARKING 0 WARRANTS ON FILE 0 SMOKING 0 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 0 OPEN CONTAINER 0 PARKING DCO’S 0 LOUD NOISE 0 LOUD MUSIC 0 OTHER DCO’s 5 MISCELLANEOUS DCO’S 0 PROPERTY CHECKS 0 PARKING COMPLAINTS 2 BUSINESS CONTACTS 36 PEDDLER 0 LIBRARY CHECKS 0 COMMUNITY OUTREACH 24 COMPLAINTS ASSIGNED 4 CRIME PREVENTION CHECK 0 SPECIAL EVENTS 0 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 2 TOTAL CONTACTS 45 BIKE PATROL 0 PROPERTY CHECKS 1 WARNINGS 6 TOTAL CONTACTS 52 2|Page Page 270

Item #27. STREET CRIMES STREET CRIMES ENFORCEMENT CONTACTS ABANDONED VEHICLES 0 ALCOHOL VIOLATIONS/DUI'S 0 ASSIST OTHER 1 WARRANTS ON FILE 0 CITY PARK VIOLATIONS 0 CRIMINAL ARRESTS 5 DRUG RELATED ARRESTS 3 LOUD MUSIC 0 MISCELLANEOUS VIOLATIONS 0 PARKING VIOLATIONS 0 PEDDLER 0 MEETINGS 0 CURFEW CHECKS 60 CRIME PREVENTION CHECKS 0 TRAFFIC ARRESTS 3 WARNINGS 0 FUGITIVES 2 DCO'S 0 PROSTITUTION 0 TOTAL CONTACTS 74 TRAFFIC ARRESTS The department issued 2,473 traffic citations through this reporting period; this is a decrease of 22citations over the number issued during the same period last year. 6,000 5,302 5,000 3,859 3,820 4,000 3,000 2,495 2,473 2,000 1,000 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 3|Page Page 271

Item #27. TRAFFIC CRASHES 1,000 882 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 138 100 0 Thru May Reportable Non-Reportable 911 Center During the month of May, the Dover Police Department handled 7,474 calls, an increase of 1,059 calls received during the same period last year. 10,000 9,025 9,000 8,058 7,789 8,000 7,474 7,000 6,415 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 4|Page Page 272

Item #27. CITY ORDINANCE SUMMONS Through May 31, 2021, we issued 1,615 city ordinance summons, a decrease of 70 summonses for the same period last year. 3,000 2,503 2,500 2,192 1,863 1,685 2,000 1,615 1,500 1,278 1,081 1,000 802 649 450 500 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 ISSUED 2,503 2,192 1,863 1,685 1,615 PAID 1,278 1,081 802 649 450 SEX OFFENDER STATISTICS/MAY MONTHLY NON COMPLIANT VERIFICATIONS NOTIFICATIONS REVERIFICATIONS WARRANTS TIER 1 0 0 0 0 TIER 2 14 1,302 25 2 TIER 3 12 1,716 16 2 ACTIVE SEX OFFENDERS THAT RESIDE IN THE CITY OF DOVER (please note, Tier 1 offenders are not contacted by Dover Police Sex Offender Agents). 200 187 178 180 160 140 120 101 97 100 80 60 40 20 0 APRIL MAY TIER 2 178 187 TIER 3 101 97 (Please note, Tier 1 offenders are not contacted by Dover Police Sex Offender Agents) 5|Page Page 273

Item #27. Please visit our website at www.doverpolice.org for up to date information on crimes and activities in the City of Dover. Respectfully Submitted, Thomas A. Johnson, Jr. Chief of Police 6|Page Page 274