Regular Council Minutes

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Regular City Council Meeting was held on April 28, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. with Acting Council President Neil presiding. Council President Anderson attended via WebEx. Council members present were Dr. Pillsbury (via WebEx), Ms. Arndt, Mr. Rocha, Dr. Sudler (via WebEx), and Mr. Lewis. Mr. Boggerty was absent. Staff members present were Police Chief Johnson, Ms. Marney, Mr. Hugg, Mr. Rodriguez, Chief Carey, and Ms. Rivera. Ms. Melson-Williams was absent. Mayor Christiansen was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 6:18 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Acting Council President Neil declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. Alfreda Fisher Dean, 728 Bicentennial Boulevard, expressed her gratitude to the Public Works Department, particularly Tyrell Moses and his supervisor, for their assistance in collecting leaves, bushes, branches, and other yard debris. She noted that residents living in the Bicentennial area often need help maintaining their yards and appreciated the support provided. William Faust, 136 Orchard Avenue, raised concerns about a utility fund introduced by Councilman Anderson to assist people in Downtown Dover with their City of Dover bills. He questioned the timing of the initiative, which came shortly after the election. He questioned why the matter was not done before the election. Mr. Faust highlighted that many businesses suffered during COVID and are still not receiving support, while poor residents and senior citizens were struggling to afford utilities as the weather warms up. Mr. Faust questioned the criteria for selecting individuals to receive assistance, expressing concern about why certain people are chosen over others and what makes one (1) person more deserving than another. He emphasized that the underlying issues in Downtown Dover must be resolved before efforts are made to attract families to the area. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Elder Ellis B. Louden. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Neil. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Ms. Arndt moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha, and unanimously carried (Boggerty absent). ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. Mr. Lewis requested the removal of Item #21 – Quarterly Revenue Reports as of March 31, 2025, from the consent agenda.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 2 Ms. Arndt moved for adoption of the consent agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Lewis, and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). PROCLAMATION-EARTH DAY 2025 The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, on April 22, 1970, millions of people around the world joined the common cause to protect the planet for future generations and all who share it; and WHEREAS, food production is responsible for one-third of global emissions, with meat and dairy farming the leading source of agricultural emissions; and WHEREAS, even if other sectors, including energy, transportation, and buildings, were carbon- neutral by 2050, as is necessary, the current U.S. food system would take us past 1.5 degrees C of warming by 2050; and WHEREAS, the EAT-Lancet Report calls for widespread multisector, multilevel action including a substantial shift toward healthy, earth-friendly dietary patterns; and WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has recognized dietary shifts toward plant-based foods as a key action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, a Chatham House report determined that a global shift toward plant-based foods could draw down more than 25% of emissions by 2050; and WHEREAS, an individual’s swap from conventional meals to plan-based meals for just one day is equivalent to driving 41 fewer miles, sparing over 400 square feet of land, and saving at least 250 gallons of water; and WHEREAS, the city acknowledges meat and dairy represent 13%-20% of most municipal emissions and drive deforestation, species loss, and habitat loss, and the city is committed to fighting biodiversity loss; and WHEREAS, by 2050, 80% of food will be consumed in cities, creating a vital role for cities to build on the past years of progress, and the city is committed to meeting its climate targets across all sectors; and WHEREAS, Earth-friendly, plant-forward foods present diverse options for a multicultural population, and a global majority of people are lactose intolerant, including a substantial population of Americans. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, do hereby proclaim April 22, 2025, as Earth Day and urge all citizens of Dover to promote food on Earth Day that is Earth-friendly and plant forward, encouraging restaurants, events, vendors, schools, and other food providers to celebrate Earth Day with plant- based beverages and culturally diverse plant-based foods, including healthy beans, legumes, and other vegetables.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 3 On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Mayor Christiansen presented the proclamation to Bryn Waumbaugh, Public Works Department, and Aireal Vickers, Public Works Department. Ms. Waumbaugh announced that the first annual Earth Week was a success, with over 120 community members participating in activities from Monday through Thursday, and 50 employees taking part in an in-house stormwater day on Friday, April 25, 2025. She thanked the Parks and Recreation Department and the Dover Public Library for collaborating with the Public Works Department in planning the event. Additionally, she thanked council for supporting and showcasing Earth Week at the April 7, 2025, Regular Council Meeting. Ms. Vickers shared that she has been an environmental advocate since she was young. Reflecting on her time with the city, she mentioned that she has not yet been with the City of Dover for a year, and that this marks her first actual career job outside of college. She expressed how unimaginable it was to her to be involved in something this significant. PROCLAMATION-YOUTH WEEK 2025 The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks has designated May 1 – 7 as Youth Week to honor America’s Junior Citizens for their accomplishments, and to give fitting recognition of their services to Community, State, and Nation; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover will sponsor an observance during the week in tribute to the Junior Citizens of this Community; and WHEREAS, no event could be more deserving of our support and participation than one dedicated to these young people who represent the nation’s greatest resource, and who in the years ahead will assume the responsibility for the advancement of our free society; and WHEREAS, our Youth need the guidance, inspiration, and encouragement which we alone can give in order to help develop those qualities of character essential for future leadership; and go forth to serve America; and WHEREAS, to achieve this worthy objective, we should demonstrate our partnership with Youth, our understanding of their hopes and aspirations, and a sincere willingness to help prepare them in every way for the responsibilities of citizenship. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, do hereby proclaim the week May 1 – 7, 2025, as Youth Week, in the City of Dover and urge all citizens to participate wholeheartedly in its observance. Cooper Hutte was not present to receive the proclamation. PROCLAMATION-DRINKING WATER WEEK The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, water is our most valuable natural resource; and

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 4 WHEREAS, drinking water serves a vital role in daily life, serving an essential purpose to health, hydration, and hygiene needs for the quality of life our citizens enjoy; and WHEREAS, tap water delivers public health protection, fire protection, support for our economy, and the quality of life we enjoy; and WHEREAS, the hard work performed by the entire water sector, designing capital projects, operators ensuring the safety and quality of drinking water, or a member of a pipe crew maintaining the infrastructure communities rely on to transport high quality water from its source to consumers’ taps; and WHEREAS, the coronavirus pandemic has shone a light on the importance of drinking water for health, hydration, and hygiene needs; and WHEREAS, we are all stewards of the water infrastructure upon which current and future generations depend; and WHEREAS, the citizens of our city are called upon to help protect our source waters from pollution, practice water conservation, and get involved with their water by familiarizing themselves with it; NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, do hereby proclaim May 4-10, 2025, as Drinking Water Week. On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Mayor Christiansen presented the proclamation to Jason Lyon, Director of Water and Wastewater. Mr. Lyon thanked Mayor Christiansen, council, and Team Dover, noting that this was the fifth year he has been presented with the proclamation and that he is always humbled to be part of the hardworking team. He highlighted the challenges facing water utilities nationwide due to strict federal regulations, including lead and copper rules, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), and cross-connection control. Despite these pressures, he praised his team for their diligent efforts in securing grants to help offset the costs of compliance and emphasized that they are actively listening to the community's concerns. Mr. Lyon shared that one (1) of his priorities is to assess the performance of the water system. Since COVID, they have been tracking the water system and conducting regular flushing, twice a year, to address issues with discolored water, which they receive complaints about. While the system is not perfect, ongoing improvements include the installation of over two (2) miles of new water main pipes, with an additional mile and a half scheduled to go out for bid soon. They have also added a new water production well and made improvements to the water treatment plant. Those efforts have strengthened the system's redundancy and ability to provide clean, reliable water. As a result, they have reduced the amount of water used for flushing by 8.5% since COVID, which equates to nearly a billion gallons saved. Mr. Lyons acknowledged that while they have made progress, there is still work to be done. He highlighted that the number of encounters related to discolored water during hydrant flushing has

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 5 decreased by over 10%. He expressed pride in being part of the team, recognizing the hard work of his team members who manage both federal regulations and customer demands daily. PROCLAMATION – MILITARY SPOUSE APPRECIATION DAY The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, former President Ronald Reagan established Military Spouse Appreciation Day in 1984. U.S. Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger standardized the date by declaring the Friday preceding Mother’s Day as Military Spouse Day to acknowledge the significant contributions, support, and sacrifices made by spouses of the Armed Forces; and WHEREAS, serving alongside our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Coast Guardsmen, our Nation’s military families selflessly give of themselves and sacrifice their time with loved ones to ensure our safety and freedom. Enduring separation, relocation, heartache, and anticipation, military spouses demonstrate a strength reflective of the spirit of our Nation; and WHEREAS, the spouses of our men and women in uniform shoulder the responsibility of maintaining their families, caring for children, and providing comfort and support while their loved ones are away. Military spouses demonstrate immense courage and unwavering faith. Through their spirit of resilience, we witness the best of America. Let us celebrate these selfless individuals by supporting them and reaffirming our everlasting commitment to stand beside them and their families. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, do hereby proclaim May 9, 2025, as Military Spouse Appreciation Day in the City of Dover and encourage all citizens to be aware of the challenges faced by military spouses and show support by offering their friendship, empathy, and understanding, realizing that they are making daily sacrifices for their country. On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Mayor Christiansen presented the proclamation to Colonel Longmire, Deputy Commander of 436th Airlift Wing, and his wife, Laura Longmire. Mrs. Longmire expressed gratitude for the support received not only from military members but also from their families. She acknowledged Mayor Christiansen and his wife for their strong support of the military community and spouses. She emphasized that the support they receive on base allows them to better support their airmen in fulfilling their duties. Colonel Longmire stated that while May 9, 2025, may be officially recognized as Military Spouse Appreciation Day in Dover, he believes military spouses deserve appreciation every day of the year. PROCLAMATION-FRONTLINE WORKERS APPRECIATION MONTH 2025 The City Clerk read the following Proclamation into the record: WHEREAS, frontline workers are the builders of our community, exercising curiosity, compassion, courage, and creativity to provide essential services that ensure the safety, health, and education of our residents; and

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 6 WHEREAS, over 9 million healthcare workers across the United States serve in hospitals, clinics, and long-term care facilities, often placing themselves at risk to provide lifesaving care; and WHEREAS, firefighters respond to an estimated 36 million emergency calls each year, over 800,000 sworn law enforcement officers nationwide work tirelessly to uphold the law and ensure public safety, and emergency medical services (EMS) personnel respond to more than 240 million calls annually; and WHEREAS, teachers dedicate their careers to shaping the future of our communities, with over 3.7 million educators in the U.S. providing knowledge and guidance to our youth; and WHEREAS, frontline workers embody the essence of Builders – flexible thinkers and constructive problem solvers who respect the dignity of all people – by dedicating themselves to overcoming challenges and uniting communities. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, do hereby proclaim the month of May as Frontline Worker Appreciation Month in the City of Dover and encourage all residents to join in recognizing and honoring the heroic contributions of our healthcare workers, firefighters, law enforcement officers, EMS personnel, and teachers. On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Mayor Christiansen presented the proclamation to Dr. John Fink, Bayhealth Vice President for Quality and Medical Staff. Dr. Fink expressed gratitude to Mayor Christiansen, council, and Team Dover, stating he was honored to represent all first responders and frontline workers. He acknowledged not only his colleagues at Bayhealth but also those across the healthcare system, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), education, law enforcement, and firefighting. He emphasized their shared sense of commitment and vocation. Mr. Hugg introduced Joseph Simmons as a new member of the City of Dover team. He highlighted Mr. Simmons' extensive background in Information Technology (IT), noting over 30 years of experience, including positions at Playtex, the State of Delaware, and seven (7) years with Kent County. Mr. Simmons expressed gratitude for the warm welcome and shared his excitement about joining the City of Dover. He emphasized that serving the public goes beyond technology, it is about helping the city deliver better services and operate more efficiently. When approached by Mr. Hugg, he saw it as an opportunity to give back. As a dedicated public servant, he expressed a strong desire to contribute in any way he can, whether as the Information Technology Director, through the Human Relations Commission, or elsewhere. He feels truly blessed to live in such a great city. Mr. Simmons shared that he will be reaching out to department heads and has already begun developing a plan to assess and align the city's technology needs. With 30 years of experience spanning private industry, state government, and county government, he hopes to bring his expertise to the City of Dover. He expressed enthusiasm about collaborating with city staff to help move Dover forward and ensure departments have the tools they need to succeed.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 7 Mr. Lewis expressed confidence in the selection of Mr. Simmons, stating he was a great choice. He shared that he has known Mr. Simmons for many years through their time on the school board and during his time as county sheriff and affirmed that Mr. Simmons is highly knowledgeable when it comes to computers. PRESENTATION – DEMEC PRESENTATION (HEATHER CONTANT, DEMEC DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS) Ms. Heather Contant, DEMEC Director of Government and Community Relations, reviewed the DEMEC Presentation. Ms. Contant invited council to join the Delaware Municipal Electric Corporation (DEMEC) Joint Council briefing on June 3, 2025, at their Smyrna office. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 07, 2025 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of April 07, 2025, were unanimously approved by motion of Ms. Arndt, seconded by Mr. Lewis, and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen (Boggerty absent). COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT – APRIL 08, 2025 The Council Committee of the Whole met on April 08, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. with Council President Anderson presiding. Members of Council present were Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, and Mr. Rocha. Ms. Arndt, Mr. Lewis, and Dr. Sudler were absent. Mayor Christiansen was also absent. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Tholstrup, and Mr. Lewis (Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement), and Mr. Garfinkel (via WebEx), and Mr. Shevock (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Boggerty, and unanimously carried. Council Reports – March 2025 First District Dr. Pillsbury reported that she attended the Dover Police Department's 100th Anniversary celebration. Mr. Rocha reported that he attended the Dover Police Department's 100th Anniversary celebration and the Delaware League of Local Governments Dinner. Second District Mr. Lewis was absent; no report was given. Third District Mr. Neil reported that he attended the Kent County Tourism and Downtown Dover Partnership meetings. He attended Delaware State University’s Center for Urban Revitalization and Entrepreneurship (CURE) event. Mr. Neil explained

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 8 that the CURE is a marvelous setup that has two locations. The older location is across from City Hall, and the new location is a place where an entrepreneur can invite a client for an hour, a day, or a week and have space to temporarily set up. Mr. Neil also reported attending the Wild Meadows Homeowners Association meeting, the Delaware League of Local Government’s Dinner, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) candidates' event at the library. He reported addressing constituent requests, including sending a letter to Attorney General Jennings requesting an update on an investigator's report that was submitted on a house that had been sold to a disabled mother of two. He also requested help from Senator Paradee and representatives to contact DelDOT for the need to resurface Persimmon Park Lane, which is at risk of developing potholes if it is not addressed. Ms. Arndt was absent; no report was given. Fourth District Dr. Sudler was absent; no report was given. At-Large Mr. Boggerty reported that he attended the City of Dover Police Academy Graduation. He reported planning with local leaders a youth bowling and mentorship night. He also attended the League of Local Governments Dinner and a meeting with the NAACP president at Dover Federal Credit Union to help get members of the NAACP a partnership with Dover Federal Credit Union to help strengthen their economic stability. He also reported coordinating a meeting between the NAACP president and Todd Stonesifer of the Downtown Dover Partnership to address the economic and social issues downtown. Council President Anderson Council President Anderson reported that he has addressed concerns from several constituents and expressed appreciation for the city staff's responsiveness to community issues such as streetlights, sidewalks, and potholes. He announced that a new system would start in November, which has been tested in the past few months, and he believes it will be effective. He also mentioned there are grant resources available through the National League of Cities (NLC). They offer different stages, starting with the grant finder available at grantfinder.com. He emphasized that this is a free resource provided through the National League of Cities (NLC). PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE The Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee met with Council President Anderson presiding in the absence of the chair.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 9 Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha, and unanimously carried. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Proposed Grant Recommendations for the Fiscal Year 2025 Action Plan and Draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan (Tracey Harvey, CDBG Program Manager) Ms. Tracey Harvey, CDBG Program Manager, reviewed the background and analysis regarding the Proposed Grant Recommendations for the Fiscal Year 2025 Action Plan and Draft 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan. Staff recommended approval of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the Fiscal Year 2025 Action Plan, contingent upon an allocation received from HUD and the continuation of the Community Development Block Grant. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Harvey stated that council could not reallocate the funds and could only vote on the recommendations presented to them. She noted that the CDBG Program funds come from an annual entitlement grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Once the allocation was received, recommendations were made and submitted to council for approval. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Harvey clarified that the funds were restricted primarily for housing and the homeless. While the money can also be used for other projects, such as program administration and homeownership assistance, options are limited due to the small amount of funding. She also noted that there was currently no allocation for economic development. Ms. Harvey mentioned that a Request for Proposal (RFP) did go out, so the funding was provided by individuals who submitted applications. If individuals did not apply, then they could not fund something that was with it. It was based on what was submitted. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Harvey stated that a Request for Proposal (RFP) went out in January and that there was a 30-day period for individuals to submit their applications. Once submitted, they would set up an advisory committee to make recommendations based on what was submitted. She noted that the information was available on the City of Dover’s website, and it was also accessible on the Delaware State Housing Authority (DSHA) website. It was heavily advertised. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Harvey clarified that this process occurred annually, with a reset every five years. She explained that since they are currently in the fifth year, she was requesting approval now in order to begin fresh for the next five years. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the Fiscal Year 2025 Action Plan contingent upon an allocation received from

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 10 HUD and the continuation of the Community Development Block Grant, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury. Mr. Anderson expressed the need for improved communication in regard to how individuals can access housing repairs and emergency housing services. He noted that some residents had contacted the city but were unable to get the necessary information, as city employees did not know how to assist them. He urged a collective commitment to making the information publicly accessible, so that residents facing the risk of losing their homes, dealing with code violations, or struggling financially, could receive the help intended for them. This would be pertaining to retirees or those with low income. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Harvey stated that two open houses had been advertised for the housing repair program, with another announcement included in the city’s newsletter for April 17, 2025. She also mentioned that Milford Housing has an advertisement on their website and operates an office in the downtown area, which is open to the public on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of the 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan and the Fiscal Year 2025 Action Plan contingent upon an allocation received from HUD and the continuation of the Community Development Block Grant, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried by a roll call vote (Arndt, Sudler, Lewis absent). By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). Update – City of Dover ARPA Grant Sub-Recipient Funding (Tracey Harvey, CDBG Program Manager) Ms. Tracey Harvey, CDBG Program Manager, provided members of the committee a brief update on the City of Dover ARPA Grant Sub-Recipient Funding. Staff recommended approval of the proposed transfer of funds. Mr. Neil moved to recommend approval of the proposed transfer of funds, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:23 p.m.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 11 LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Rocha presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Boggerty requested that Item #4 – Proposed Ordinance #2025-04 – Amending Chapter 70 – Miscellaneous Provisions, Section 70-7. – Registered Sexual Offenders be removed from the agenda. Mr. Shevock moved for adoption of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Neil, and unanimously carried. Proposed Ordinance #2025-05 – Amending Chapter 98, Sec. 98-5 -Duty of Tenant or Owners to Maintain Sidewalks and Landscaped Areas Within the Street Right-of-Way (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, and Sharon Duca, Assistant City Manager) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background and analysis regarding Proposed Ordinance #2025-05. Staff recommended that the committee approve Proposed Ordinance #2025-05 with either Option A or Option B identified and forward it to council for approval. Responding to Mr. Kopp, Mr. Boggerty commended him and his staff, acknowledging the challenges they faced, particularly in handling the aftermath of the January snowstorm. He praised their willingness to take feedback, reassess the issues, and return with solutions. He highlighted their efforts that provided a solid foundation not only for the current council members but also for future ones to be effectively implemented and enforced. Mr. Anderson moved to recommend that the committee approve Proposed Ordinance #2025-05 with Option A, which includes a warning, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty. Responding to Mr. Shevock, Mr. Kopp clarified that even though property owners do not own the sidewalk, they can be held responsible for the sidewalk. He noted that the property owners are responsible up to the curb. Responding to Mr. Shevock, Mr. Kopp stated that after reviewing the zoning ordinance, building code, and residential code, all legal responsibilities extend up to the curb. He explained that those regulations are part of the International Code Council (ICC) codes, which the city has adopted. According to his research, when the codes refer to “property and premises,” they include the entire property, including sidewalks. He confirmed that the International Code Council (ICC) codes are legally vetted, which is why the city had adopted them, and he praised their quality. Mr. Kopp also noted that he

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 12 specifically looked for any indication that individuals would not be responsible for certain areas but found no such exception in the International Code Council (ICC) codes. Responding to Mr. Shevock, Mr. Kopp clarified that property owners are only responsible for sidewalks if they exist on their property. If there are no sidewalks, there is nothing to maintain or shovel. He specified that the responsibility applies to public sidewalks along the property’s edge, not personal walkways leading to the door. He emphasized that a sidewalk must be present for the ordinance to be enforceable. He noted that no sidewalk means no violation, and that there has to be a sidewalk to enforce the code. Mr. Neil moved to recommend that the committee approve Proposed Ordinance #2025-05 with Option A, which includes a warning, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). Proposed Ordinance #2025-06 – Amending Chapter 1 – General Provisions by Adding Sec. 1-18. – Code Board of Appeals (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, and Sharon Duca, Assistant City Manager) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background and analysis regarding Proposed Ordinance #2025-06. Staff recommended that the committee approve Proposed Ordinance #2025-06 and forward it to council for approval. Responding to Mr. Kopp, Mr. Neil stated that the code enforcement officers have done a commendable job in looking out for the residents. When issues arise or are observed, the code enforcement officers respond with solutions. He praised the efforts of his staff as outstanding, even if those who received penalties may not agree with the outcomes. He expressed hope that there would be consensus in extending support or coverage to individuals who are not currently included. Mr. Neil moved to recommend that the committee approve Proposed Ordinance #2025-06, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty. Responding to Mr. Kopp, Mr. Anderson expressed that the proposed ordinance reflected his confidence in the quality of work done by both him and his staff, highlighting their unique willingness to invite oversight and transparency into the bureaucracy. While acknowledging that criticism was part of the job, he stressed that it should not be taken personally, as the work ultimately benefits everyone. He reiterated that the work that they do is essential to the city’s quality of life and thanked the team for increasing transparency throughout the process. He voiced his support for the proposed ordinance and mentioned that the building codes

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 13 need to be updated, hoping that it would happen next year. He also suggested removing references to the International Code Council (ICC) Board of Appeals and replacing them with references to the Dover code, in line with other items. Ms. Jinnell Barrett, 56 Greenway Square, Dover, questioned the responsibility of cleaning walkways within apartment complexes, specifically asking what would be considered a sidewalk. She noted that the complexes have walkways leading to parking lots, and due to snow and ice, it was unclear who was responsible for clearing them within the required 24 hours. She sought clarification on the roles of the occupants versus the code’s guidelines in such cases. Responding to Ms. Barrett, Mr. Kopp clarified that in the case of apartment complexes, the responsibility for cleaning walkways and sidewalks falls on the apartment complex, not the individual occupant. He noted that most apartment complexes have plans and landscaping services in place to handle snow and ice removal in the event of a storm. Responding to Mr. Kopp, Ms. Barrett asked what the occupants should do if the apartment complex was at fault for not cleaning the sidewalks, especially since the 24-hour timeframe for snow and ice removal seemed unfair to her. She expressed concern due to her disability, as the icy conditions outside make it slippery and difficult for her. Responding to Ms. Barrett, Mr. Kopp explained that if the apartment complex failed to clear the sidewalks, it would violate the ordinance. In such cases, code enforcement would address the issue with the apartment complex, not the individual occupant. He emphasized that one of the key purposes of the ordinance was to protect safety and ensure that everyone can navigate safely during snow and ice conditions. He also pointed out that apartment complexes are treated similarly to single-family dwellings in terms of responsibility for snow and ice removal. Mr. Neil moved to recommend that the committee approve Proposed Ordinance #2025-06, as recommended by staff, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Boggerty and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and Findings (Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer) Ms. Patricia Marney, Controller/Treasurer, reviewed the Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and the findings. This item was informational, and committee action was not required.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 14 Responding to Ms. Marney, Mr. Neil complimented her efforts, acknowledging that it was a massive task, but one that was carried out exceptionally well. He noted that the city has maintained its excellence in financial handling of its money and ratings, which he believes is essential. Especially as they face increasing challenges, such as inflation and potential tariffs, which could worsen the situation. He expressed his appreciation for her work and was glad that she and the team were able to come together to complete the task successfully. Responding to Ms. Marney, Mr. Boggerty echoed Mr. Neil's praises, emphasizing that she had faced a lot of criticism when stepping into her role but handled it with poise and has been calm. He commended her for addressing several challenges, providing numerous options, and keeping the process moving forward. He acknowledged that no one is perfect in their role, especially when tasked with cleaning up and moving things forward, while also balancing responsibilities for both 2023 and 2024 and working with an understaffed team. He recognized the significant pressure that she faced and praised her for managing it so well. He also noted that her skill set is highly valuable and thanked her for sticking with them through the challenges. Responding to Ms. Marney, Mr. Shevock also echoed the praise from Mr. Neil and Mr. Boggerty, expressing his agreement with their comments. He added that the most important takeaway from the report was that, despite all the frustrations and challenges, the city was able to maintain its AA rating. Ms. Marney mentioned that she has been working closely with their bond council and rating agencies, keeping them well-informed regarding the status and the challenges the city was facing. She noted that the agencies were more than willing to collaborate and work with them throughout the process. Responding to Ms. Marney, Dr. Pillsbury commended her on an amazing job. Responding to Ms. Marney, Mr. Anderson explained that one of the reasons the report was delayed was due to the discovery of a significant error that needed to be corrected, which could have negatively impacted their outlook. He emphasized that the error was not their fault, and despite the staff’s busy schedule, if she and her team had not thoroughly reviewed the reports and identified the misclassification, it could have caused a serious problem. He stressed that accuracy is crucial. He also praised her for being the right person for the job, noting that not only did her experience make her skilled in accounting, but she also had the expertise in staff building and information technology (IT), something he would not have anticipated a year ago. Ms. Marney explained that anyone interested in reviewing the error could look at Table 15, which relates to the city’s bonds. She clarified that in 2023, they had to charge a PCA debit, and this was the first time in the city’s history that the Fiscal Year 2023 included such a charge. There were no clear instructions for the financial reporting staff on how to record this particular item on the table, which

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 15 the bond raters look at. Had the charge not been properly included, the city’s financial position would have been misstated by nearly $16.5 million, potentially impacting its compliance with financial policies. Responding to Ms. Marney, Mr. Rocha expressed his appreciation, stating that they are fortunate to have someone like her in such an important position. He commended her for her work. Dover Strong Fund (Council President Anderson) Council President Anderson reviewed the background and analysis regarding the proposed Dover Strong Fund. It was recommended to refer the Dover Strong Fund to staff to develop the appropriate policy criteria and incorporate into the budget proposal from the utility funds, not to exceed $75,000. Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Anderson stated that, while he does not believe that it was specifically outlined, he noted that staff are expected to develop the appropriate policy criteria, and this aspect was intended to be part of that plan. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Anderson stated that he is aware of a nonprofit previously called the Dover Strong Fund. He acknowledged that the name could be changed when they returned in 30 days and thanked him for pointing it out, as he believed the organization was no longer active. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rocha stated that they primarily work with Parks and Recreation to write grants, typically for projects such as Schutte Park. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Anderson stated that they can change the name to Dover Strong Utility Fund or choose another name if needed. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Anderson stated that this would fall under the responsibility of the city manager, who would assign it to the appropriate staff. He noted that utilities, roads, streets, and related matters remain under the city manager’s purview. Mr. Olawale Maiyegun, 421 Northdown Drive, expressed concern in regarding using money from the electric fund for the proposed Dover Strong Fund project. He questioned why any amount, whether it was $75,000 or more, should come from the electric fund. He expressed concern that past decisions have had unintended consequences, such as increased taxes, rates, and electricity. He emphasized that past decisions had unintended consequences and asked whether the impact on taxpayers and tariffs had been evaluated. Mr. Maiyegun urged that the proposal be set aside, especially given the economic challenges many are facing. He specifically called on Dr. Pillsbury, whom he described as a strong advocate for children and lower-income families, to oppose the recommendation, stating that it was a bad decision that could not be justified.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 16 Responding to Mr. Maiyegun, Mr. Anderson explained that the $1.5 million in question was specifically designated for piping and street repairs. Legally, it could only be used for that purpose, since redirecting it elsewhere would be considered fraud. He acknowledged concerns regarding the electric and utility funds but emphasized that similar investments in major businesses, such as Kraft and Edgewell, had significant returns. This has helped retain and expand those companies and preserved or created hundreds of jobs. He stressed that small businesses are just as important as large businesses. He emphasized that they cannot revitalize downtown and destroy the individuals who were supposed to be helping and revitalizing it. Mr. Anderson explained that the cost limit exists for a reason and emphasized that the amount in question was a small amount out of $200 million. Which roughly $150 million comes from utility funds. He noted the $75,000 as a rounding error, highlighting that the long-term benefits of preventing business closures and maintaining active storefronts are substantial. Mr. Anderson emphasized that showing support for small businesses was essential in attracting and retaining commerce in Dover. He highlighted the city’s progress over the past seven years, reducing unemployment from 9.9% to 3.5%, which is now below the national average, due to deliberate and proactive economic strategies. He suggested that funding for this project should be addressed during the budget process and could potentially come from utility funds, an economic development fund from property sales, or a mix of both. He cautioned against micromanaging staff, urging that they be allowed to present their best professional recommendations. Mr. Anderson concluded by noting that this proposal has been under discussion with the business community and staff since January. What is being presented now is not the final decision but an important step forward in a longer process involving ongoing collaboration with stakeholders, staff, and council before a final vote. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Maiyegun expressed doubt in regards to the process. He stated that in his view, it was an exercise in futility because it seemed that the decision had already been made. He suggested that the council president appeared to be working out the details, but regardless of the funding source, whether from the utility fund, economic development fund, or property sales, he believed it would ultimately be a waste of resources. He questioned the effectiveness of providing payment relief on electricity bills as a strategy to retain businesses, asserting that such measures would not make a meaningful difference. Mr. Maiyegun highlighted the struggles of low-income residents in the district, burdened by rising taxes and fees, and asked whether any of the proposed funds would be directed toward helping those individuals rather than only businesses. He urged council to be more people-oriented, pointing out that many residents are living in debt in those affected areas. They would also be impacted by road construction near their homes or businesses. He questioned whether those individuals would receive any financial consideration, noting that construction could disrupt customer and client access, further affecting already vulnerable communities.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 17 Mr. Anderson moved to accept the recommended action and refer to staff to develop the policy criteria and incorporate into the budget proposal, not to exceed $75,000, with a name change, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). Mr. Neil stated that the funding in question was not guaranteed income that they were expecting to receive, and its use would not represent a full loss. Instead, he viewed it as an investment that could act as a catalyst for business development. He emphasized that the proposal was not finalized and that further consideration was needed regarding how it would be implemented. Mr. Neil expressed his belief that the initiative was worthwhile, which was why he chose to second the motion. Mr. Rocha moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting, hearing no objection, the meeting adjourned at 7:18 p.m. Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, hearing no objection, the meeting adjourned at 7:19 p.m. By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole Report, seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). QUARTERLY REVENUE REPORTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2025 Members were provided the Quarterly Revenue Report as of March 31, 2025. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney stated that she was unable to pull up the report due to connection issues with the network. She noted that the sale of assets was from several vehicles from the police department through government deals, and that it was captured in the report, which was the majority of the funds from the $152.5 million. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney clarified that most of the rent had to do with Garrison Park. She also noted that there were cell tower lease agreements that had affected rent. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney clarified that from the report, what was rented had to do with cell towers and the land of Garrison Park. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney stated that she would need to follow up on what the abbreviation for GSB is. She would be sending that information to him via email. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney stated that she would need to follow up on information on the reasoning for the -$160.4 million for wastewater, which was located under the other miscellaneous revenue on the report. She apologized for not being able to access the network to answer his question with more clarity.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 18 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney stated that under the electric fund, miscellaneous revenue, the -$943.2 million was a write-off. It was an agreement with a vendor. She would follow up on that for him. She mentioned that it was a billing from last year for that amount. It was a penalty billing to an electric vendor that they agreed with, and settled it for a specific range of payments. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Marney clarified that there was a delay in the contract details and that they billed the vendor $943,000. The vendor did honor the contract, and the city collected over $300,000. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Marney clarified that property tax collections exceeded 100% of the projected amount, with $16.4 million billed and over 98% of that amount already collected. She explained that the figures shown in the report reflected what had been physically billed. She noted that she would run an outstanding receivables report and send the report to him by the end of the week. Mr. Lewis moved for acceptance of the Quarterly Revenue Report as of March 31, 2025, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried (Boggerty absent). QUARTERLY REVIEW – CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP) (JANUARY, FEBRUARY, AND MARCH) Members were provided the Quarterly Review for the Capital Investment Plan (CIP) as of March 31, 2025. By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for acceptance of the Quarterly Review of the Capital Investment Plan (CIP), seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent). SEMI-ANNUAL INSPECTION BY CITY MANAGER – ROBBINS HOSE COMPANY (DAVID S. HUGG, III, CITY MANAGER) In accordance with Chapter 46 – Fire Prevention and Protection, Article II – Fire Department, Division 1 – Generally, Section 46-43 – Semiannual Inspections, of the City Code, the City Manager, Mr. David S. Hugg, III, met with Fire Chief David Carey to discuss fire company issues. Mr. Hugg submitted a memorandum outlining the items discussed and noted the Robbins Hose Company continued to provide an outstanding level of service to the City of Dover and the Unincorporated areas of the fire district. By consent agenda, Ms. Arndt moved for acceptance of the Semi-Annual Inspection by Robbins Hose Company Inspection, as submitted by the City Manager. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 19 2025 REGULAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION RESULTS Ms. Arielle Rivera, Assistant City Clerk, reported the results of the 2025 Regular Municipal Election held on April 15, 2025, as follows: AT-LARGE CANDIDATE TOTAL VOTES Andre M. Boggerty 806 (68.71%) Shereen I. Woodard Onyekachi 367 (31.29%) FIRST DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE TOTAL VOTES Justina Brinkley 118 (29.35%) Anthony Floyd, Jr. 108 (26.87%) Gerald I. Rocha, Sr. 176 (43.78%) SECOND DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE TOTAL VOTES Donyale Hall 171 (44.07%) Donna S. Mitchell 168 (43.30%) Stephan D. Pierce 36 (9.28%) Faye D. White 13 (3.35%) THIRD DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE TOTAL VOTES Jo Ann Mather 95 (33.45%) Fred A. Neil 189 (66.55%) FOURTH DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL CANDIDATE TOTAL VOTES David A. Anderson 137 (71.35%) Leroy Bradshaw, Jr. 55 (28.65%) In accordance with Title 15 Del.C. §7555(j), where the number of qualified candidates for an office is equal to or less than the number of seats up for election, the Board of Elections shall declare the candidate or candidates elected. Therefore, the following Council members have been re-elected: At-Large – Andre M. Boggerty First District – Gerald I. Rocha, Sr. Second District – Donyale M. Hall Third District – Fred A. Neil Fourth District – David A. Anderson

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 20 Ms. Arndt moved for approval of the 2025 Election Results, as reported by the Assistant City Clerk. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried (Boggerty absent). FIRST READING – PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2025-05 – AMENDING CHAPTER 98, SECTION 98-5 – DUTY OF TENANTS OR OWNERS TO MAINTAIN SIDEWALKS AND LANDSCAPED AREAS WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, AND SHARON DUCA, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2025-05 – Amending Chapter 98, Section 98-5 – Duty of Tenants or Owners to Maintain Sidewalks and Landscaped Areas within the Street Right-Of-Way. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Kopp clarified that the committee had selected Option A, which includes a warning system. Under this option, residents would first receive a notice and have 24 hours to comply. If noncompliance continues, Code Enforcement would return to issue a citation after that period. He explained that the only difference between Option A and Option B is the warning: Option A requires a door hanger notice and extends the compliance period by an additional 24 hours, while Option B issues citations without a prior warning. Ms. Arndt raised concerns about the additional staff time required under Option A, which involves two (2) property visits to issue a door hanger before a citation. She questioned how frequently residents might claim they never received the notice. While she agreed that extending the compliance window from 12 to 24 hours and offering an appeals process was sufficient, she stressed that the ordinance’s intent should be to change behavior, not generate revenue. She argued that the added workload would strain limited staff resources and that residents should already understand the importance of keeping sidewalks clear for safety and accessibility. Ms. Arndt stated she would prefer to see Option B, return for a final vote, and would not support the ordinance. Mr. Rocha pointed out that residents who live on properties with sidewalks often clear the snow, only for the city plows to later push snow back onto the same sidewalks. He emphasized that the city could not hold someone accountable with a $100 fine if the city themselves were the one creating a problem of safety. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Kopp clarified that the purpose of the original ordinance and the way it was written was for the safety of the pedestrians on the sidewalk. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Kopp clarified that, in a way, the ordinance was supposed to emulate the high grass ordinance, but snow is unique and needed to be treated uniquely. That was the reason why the ordinance was amended to be a standalone. He acknowledged that grass was used as a reference, but emphasized that snow was different because it involves specific steps not applicable to grass. There is a warning, then a first citation, a second citation, and then a third citation. The citations advance in fees, as snow is a one-time citation. The snow citation is a $100 citation, but it does not increase. He mentioned that if there were three (3) snowstorms, the fee would always be $100. He pointed out that the snow ordinance, in particular, does have the right of an appeal, so if any homeowner believes that they were issued a citation incorrectly, they do have the right to appeal. This was written in the ordinance to alleviate any issues if snow was piled on

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 21 their sidewalk or not, or if they felt like they were not in violation. That would be a workaround for homeowners to where they have the opportunity to fight their case. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Kopp clarified that the high grass ordinance would not include the appeal process. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Kopp explained that the high grass ordinance needs another year to fully implement and evaluate. He noted that last year was unusually dry, resulting in very few cases, making it a poor reference for data. However, with grass growing rapidly this year, he expects more cases and believes that they will have better data after this season to assess the effectiveness of the door hanger process. Ms. Arndt followed up with what Mr. Kopp had stated, that the fail-safe was the appeals process. She mentioned that if something were to happen where the city plows and puts snow back on the sidewalk, by mistake or because there was no other operational means to do it, then the homeowner could appeal. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Kopp raised concerns that implementing the door hanger system would reduce the city’s enforcement capacity, cutting coverage by half. He explained that door hangers are time-consuming due to being handwritten rather than digitally generated, and also pose safety risks for staff. During snowstorms, it is safer and more efficient for staff to stay in their vehicles and take photos. Requiring them to exit vehicles and physically post notices increases the risk of injury and potential workers’ compensation claims, as this would be the only time staff would need to step onto private property. Mr. Kopp further explained that the use of door hangers would significantly increase staff workload, especially in deciding where and how to post them. Based on limited experience with similar processes, such as grass violations, he noted that door hangers often do not prevent citations, as many residents still contest them. Staff must also photograph the hangers as proof, which adds time and keeps them on the property longer, often in hazardous conditions. This raises safety concerns and reduces the enforcement coverage staff can provide citywide. Ms. Arndt moved to amend the motion to have Option B come back for the final reading. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha. Mr. Rocha acknowledged the valid concern that Code Enforcement officers would need to exit their vehicles and approach properties in inclement weather. He said that the door hanger option should be removed. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Kopp clarified that both Option A and Option B contain the same language, with the only difference being the inclusion of a warning system in Option A. Option B removes the warning component, including the line in Appendix F that notes a $0 warning. Aside from that, all other wording remains the same between the two (2) options. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Kopp clarified that residents do get 24 hours to correct the violation.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 22 Responding to Mr. Kopp, Mr. Rocha stated that it would offer increased risk for the employees and was convinced that going with Option B would be better. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Kopp clarified that with Option B, the warning system is removed, but the rest of the language would be the same. Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Rodriguez clarified that council has the option to vote for Option B during the final reading of the ordinance. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Kopp explained that the door hanger system was created in response to council's request for more supportive enforcement measures and has since been expanded to address issues such as snow, high grass, and cars parked on grass. He emphasized Dover’s unique position, highlighting its fully staffed Code Enforcement team, unlike many other municipalities where roles are combined with building inspection or public works. As a larger city, Dover often leads by example. Mr. Kopp expressed concern for his staff's safety, particularly with sidewalk conditions during snow and ice, noting the risk involved in walking up to properties to post hangers. He stated that he would not wait for injury data before acting and supported continuing with the door hanger system to protect staff and maintain full enforcement coverage across the city. Mr. Kopp emphasized that the purpose of the sidewalk ordinance is to protect pedestrians. While he acknowledged arguments focused on roadway conditions, he clarified that the ordinance is intended to prevent pedestrians from walking in the streets. He and his staff have witnessed individuals nearly being hit by cars while walking in the roadway, and he stressed that he would prefer proactive enforcement rather than waiting for a tragic incident before acting on the ordinance. Mr. Lewis stated he would be open to eliminating the use of door hangers for safety reasons but emphasized the importance of having a warning system in place to demonstrate due diligence and give residents fair notice. He suggested alternatives such as public announcements through radio, WBOC, the Daily State News, or the City of Dover’s website to inform residents that they have a certain amount of time to clear their sidewalks. He emphasized the necessity of a warning system to ensure residents are made aware that they have a specific amount of time to clear their sidewalks. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Kopp mentioned that when postings are made, whether regarding city hall hours or other notices, they would involve Ms. Kay Sass, Public Affairs and Emergency Management Coordinator, to assist with spreading the word. He stated that Ms. Sass would use social media and the City of Dover’s website to get the information out. He emphasized that social media is a powerful tool for reaching large audiences quickly. Mr. Lewis acknowledged that social media would be a great tool to use to reach out to everyone, but mentioned that it might not be as effective for senior citizens. He suggested using a police vehicle with a loudspeaker, similar to how announcements were made during elections, to inform residents about the time they have to clear their sidewalks. He stressed the importance of ensuring citizens are aware of what is happening in the city.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 23 Ms. Arndt sought clarification on the motion, asking if it was to include both Option A and Option B in the final reading so that members would have the choice to vote on either option. She noted that they were not voting on the ordinance that evening but would do so at the final reading when the ordinance, including both options, would be up for a vote. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Neil clarified that, based on Mr. Rodriguez’s explanation, the motion was to include both Option A and Option B in the final reading of the ordinance. Mr. Rocha agreed with Mr. Lewis on the importance of education, suggesting that instead of waiting until a snowstorm, they could start educating the community at the beginning of the winter season. He proposed using social media, such as Facebook posts, to spread the word and prepare residents for what to expect. Regarding senior citizens, he recognized that some may need assistance with snow removal and may require phone calls to arrange help. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Mr. Kopp stated that he was aware that a newsletter had been posted about the coming grass season. He noted that they try to advertise the best they can. One of the outreaches he did was attend HOA meetings. Granted, not a lot of people attend those meetings, but when they can get out in the community to spread the word, they do try to spread the word on common violations, such as car parking or grass. He noted that a newsletter would be a great tool to use. It may not be great for all senior citizens, but unfortunately, that would be the best way to get the messages across. He was not aware of anything else to do besides word of mouth and newsletters. They have tried using hangers in the past to spread information, but it was unsuccessful. Mr. Rocha suggested working with organizations like Modern Maturity Center and Meals on Wheels to distribute newsletters. Mr. Lewis suggested using robocalls as a method to disseminate information to the public, though he was unsure of the associated costs for the city. He noted that the school district uses robocalls to reach families and indicated that it could be a viable option for city outreach. Dr. Sudler suggested that when the grass-cutting season approaches, the city could include informational notices in utility bills, which many residents, including senior citizens, regularly read. He believed this could be an effective way to reach a large number of residents. Dr. Sudler expressed that he would be amenable to eliminating door hangers, provided an alternative system is put in place to ensure residents are informed in advance, such as a friendly reminder. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2025-05 – AMENDING CHAPTER 98, SECTION 98-5 – DUTY OF TENANTS OR OWNERS TO MAINTAIN SIDEWALKS AND LANDSCAPED AREAS WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. Ms. Arndt moved to have Option B come back for the final reading. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 24 FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2025-06 – AMENDING CHAPTER 1 – GENERAL PROVISION BY ADDING SECTION 1-18. CODE BOARD OF APPEALS (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, AND SHARON DUCA, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2025-06 – Amending Chapter 1 – General Provision by Adding Section 1-18. Code Board of Appeals In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2025-06 – AMENDING CHAPTER 1 – GENERAL PROVISION BY ADDING SECTION 1-18. CODE BOARD OF APPEALS. CITY MANAGER'S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Hugg had no announcements. MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Christiansen announced that the 92nd Annual Dover Days Festival will take place on May 2–3, 2025, in Dover. The festivities begin on Friday, May 2, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. with a kick- off event, live music by the Milford Community Band, and a fireworks display around 9:00 p.m. On Saturday, May 3, 2025, the celebration continues from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., starting with the parade. Throughout the day, attendees can enjoy various activities, including Maypole dancing, historical reenactments, a hot air balloon, bounce houses, and over 100 craft and food vendors. COUNCIL MEMBERS' ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Lewis reported attending the Clearview Meadow Homeowners Association meeting on April 12, 2025, where residents shared concerns about speeding, loose dogs, litter, grass maintenance, and curb damage. He submitted these issues to Assistant City Manager Sharon Duca for follow- up. He also attended the Tracy Palmer Ministry Easter Egg Hunt at the Murphy School on April 19, 2025, and participated in an informative tour of the Garrison Power Plant with Mr. Rocha, Ms. Arndt, and Mr. Anderson on April 18, 2025. Mr. Anderson thanked the citizens and shared that he had attended two neighborhood meetings on April 23, 2025. He expressed hope for the revival of the neighborhood watch program under the new administration and emphasized the importance of supporting it. He noted that citizens have raised several concerns, with a report to follow. He also mentioned that once budget hearings are scheduled, the information will be shared, and he encouraged residents to sign up for the City of Dover newsletter to stay informed weekly. Mr. Neil acknowledged and welcomed Councilwoman-elect Donyale Hall of the Second District to council. The meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 28, 2025 PAGE 25 ANDRIA BENNETT CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by the City Council during their Regular Meeting of April 28, 2025, are hereby approved. ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /AB