Este texto se extrajo de el PDF de forma automática y puede contener errores. El PDF es el registro oficial, así que consúltelo antes de confiar en esto.
7 páginas tienen poco o ningún texto legible aquí, a menudo por ser escaneos o dibujos. Para verlas, consulte el PDF.
Página 1
CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
Tuesday, November 25, 2025 at 6:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers, 15 Loockerman Plaza, Dover, Delaware
AGENDA
Public comments are welcomed on any item and will be permitted at the appropriate time. When possible,
please notify the City Clerk (302-736-7008 or email at cityclerk@dover.de.us) should you wish to be
recognized.
VIRTUAL MEETING NOTICE
This meeting will be held in City Hall Council Chambers with electronic access via WebEx. Public
participation information is as follows:
Dial: 1-650-479-3208
Link: https://shorturl.at/oJhW2
Event number: 2539 666 7157
Event password: DOVER (if needed)
If you are new to WebEx, get the app now at https://www.webex.com/ to be ready when the meeting
starts.
CALL COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING TO ORDER
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
COUNCIL REPORTS - OCTOBER 2025
1. First District
2. Second District
3. Third District
4. Fourth District
5. At-Large
6. Council President Neil
1
Página 2
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - November 25, 2025 PAGE 2
SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
1. Quarterly Briefing on Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
Projects (Marilyn Smith, Executive Director of the Dover/Kent MPO)
(Committee Action Not Required)
2. Prioritization of City of Dover State Capital Transportation Program (CTP) Projects
(David S. Hugg, III, City Manager)
(Staff Recommendation: Approval of the 2026 Transportation Priorities)
ADJOURNMENT OF THE SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
MEETING
UTILITY COMMITTEE
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
1. Evaluation of Bids - Security Fence Replacement for Water Treatment Plant (Jason Lyon,
Water & Wastewater Director)
(Staff Recommendation: Award the contract to Pierce Fence Company for the Security
Fence Replacement for the Water Treatment Plant, Bid #26-0006WW, for the amount of
$216,650.00)
2. Evaluation of Bids - Pump Station #7 Upgrades (Jason Lyon, Water & Wastewater
Director)
(Staff Recommendation: Award the contract to A-Del Construction for the Pump Station #7
Upgrades project, Bid #26-0008WW, for the amount of $636,548.00.)
ADJOURNMENT OF THE UTILITY COMMITTEE MEETING
LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
1. Evaluation of Bids - Fiscal Year 2026 Street & Alley Program (Jason Lyon, Water
&Wastewater Director)
(Staff Recommendation: Award the contract to Grassbusters Landscaping Co., Inc, for the
City of Dover FY 2026 Street and Alley Program, Bid #26-0007WW, for the amount of
$874,256.)
2. Consideration of the Reclassification and Re-grading of the Senior LAN Analyst Position
(David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Naomi Poole, Human Resources Director)
(Staff Recommendation: Approval of the reclassification and the compensation)
2
Página 3
COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - November 25, 2025 PAGE 3
3. Proposed Ordinance #2025-17 - Proposed Changes and Additions to Strengthen the
Current Stormwater Ordinance by Amending Chapter 98 - Streets, Sidewalks, Storm
sewers, and other public places, Article I. - In General, and Appendix F (Mark Nowak,
Public Works Director)
(Staff Recommendation: Forward Proposed Ordinance #2025-17 to city council for
approval)
4. Staff Substitute - Proposed Ordinance #2025-21 - Amending Chapter 106 - Traffic and
Vehicles, Article III - Stopping, Standing, and Parking, by adding Sec. 106-139 - Pedestrian
Safety (Councilman Anderson, David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, and Chief Johnson)
(During its meeting of October 28, 2025, the Legislative, Finance, and Administration
Committee referred the Ordinance back to Staff)
(Recommendation: Forward Staff Substitute #1 for Proposed Ordinance #2025-21 to council
for approval)
ADJOURNMENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION
COMMITTEE MEETING
ADJOURNMENT OF THE COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
THE AGENDA ITEMS AS LISTED MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN SEQUENCE. PURSUANT TO
29 DEL. C. §10004(e)(2), THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO INCLUDE THE ADDITION
OR THE DELETION OF ITEMS, INCLUDING EXECUTIVE SESSIONS, WHICH ARISE AT THE
TIME OF THE MEETING
3
Página 4
Dover City Council
Council Committee of the Whole
November 25, 2025
Marilyn J. Smith, Executive Director
Introductions & Purpose City of Dover - Completed MPO Projects since 2021
• Mayor Christiansen, Chair of the MPO Council • East/West Freight Routes Phase 2 (7/3/25) - Identify east/west routes that
• Jason Lyon, Water and Wastewater, is a member of the Technical Advisory pose challenges for freight movement and recommend targeted improvements
Committee (TAC) or potential new alignments
• Department of Planning & Inspection, has a seat on the TAC, but no one is • South Dover Elementary School Traffic Circulation & Traffic Safety Assessment
currently attending the meetings (5/7/25) - Evaluate South Dover Elementary campus and South State Street
• Councilman Rocha - “Recommend a metropolitan traffic study for the City of approaches north and south of the campus entrance, specifically during peak
Dover and surrounding area. If a recent study has been conducted by DelDOT AM and PM
or the MPO, can we have someone come and brief us of the results so our
• SR 1 / SR 9 Interchange Improvements (3/12/25) - Evaluate the feasibility of
constituents will be properly informed.”
converting the right shoulder of southbound SR 1 to an auxiliary lane
• Dover Municipal Freight Plan (2/10/25) - Develop a freight plan for City of
Garrison Oak Connector Road Update Dover that can be incorporated into the comprehensive plan
• Downtown Dover Pathways/Loockerman Street Design (8/12/24) - Identify
• In the draft FY27-FY32 CTP – Garrison Oak Connector Road (SR 1 to White Oak
means to better connect major activity centers within Dover by walking,
Road), continued preliminary engineering in FY27
bicycling, scooter; put back the infrastructure differently such that it better
• Status as of November 12, 2025
serves downtown businesses and Dover residents, workers, and visitors
Initial contact letters have been sent to area property owners, some have
responded • Bay Road Path & Walking Trail Connections (9/6/23) - Identify inadequate
Aerial drone survey and wetland delineation efforts are underway pedestrian amenities and safety concerns
Alternatives are being drafted • Dover High School Walk Zone Sidewalk Study (7/5/23) - Identify locations
Public workshop with draft PEL (FHWA-required Planning and Environment within the school walk zone with the greatest need of improvement
Linkages document) and alternatives to be scheduled in summer 2026 • US13 Sidewalk Gaps (5/3/23) - Identify prioritized locations where existing
facilities are inadequate or do not exist
Kent County Comprehensive Safety Action Plan • McKee Saulsbury Road Corridor Study (5/3/23) - Address future capacity
needs, improve safety, operation and nonmotorized infrastructure conditions
• Identify a High Injury Network
• 29 intersections and 24 corridors in Dover • US13 North Corridor Study (3/1/23) - Identify parcels that have access to
• Toolkit of Proven Safety Countermeasures transportation facilities with a capacity to meet the needs of potential
• Can be used by municipalities in Kent industrial and manufacturing facilities
County to apply for SS4A project • Truck Parking Amenities (3/1/23) and Subsequent Parcel Inventory - Examine
implementation funding existing conditions of truck parking amenities and make recommendations for
• MPO applied (June 2025) for SS4A for a improving amenities for drivers
comprehensive safety study of the US13
• DAFB Compatible Use Plan (March 2023) - Develop a tool for surrounding
corridor, waiting for awards to be
communities and the installation, to understand land use planning and develop
announced
strategy and implementation actions that support community goals and the
• City declined to apply installation’s mission
• East/West Freight Routes Phase 1 (11/2/22) - Identify potential alternatives to
DAC (Development Advisory Committee) existing conditions; through these examples, municipalities may consider
changes in local infrastructure that will benefit both truck drivers and the
• MPO staff attends and prepares the MPO Advisory Briefing
community
• We focus on applying existing studies, transportation plans, City ordinances,
City comprehensive plan, etc., to proposed development • Rail Corridor Land Use (7/6/22) - Identify available land adjacent to rail
• Our recommendations are largely ignored by staff and applicants corridors which could be designated and preserved for industrial use
• Planning Commission grants waivers (sidewalks, bike racks, loading berths) • Banning & Clarence Streets (11/3/21) - Develop alternatives to separate traffic
based on its destination by providing an alternate connection to Forest Street
• Dover Air Cargo Freight Access (9/1/21) - Examine possible transportation
Draft FY27-FY32 DelDOT Capital Transportation Program
improvements needed to support economic growth on the east side of SR1
• McKee Road/Saulsbury Road Corridor Improvements between US13 North from the DAFB to north of White Oak Road
and US13 South
• Dover Bike & Pedestrian Plan 2020 (5/5/21) - Guide improvements to the
• This is THE ONLY NEW project added to the CTP, statewide
transportation network for people who walk and bike
• Programmed for project development FY29, FY30, and FY31
Investment
Dover Comprehensive Plan (1/13/2020)
• Total cost of these studies = $1,410,609, plus the amount DelDOT paid directly
• Chapter 9 - Transportation Plan - 22 pages, Del. Code Title 22 ,Ch 7, Sec 702
for existing task orders
• Extensive analysis
• Total cost to City of Dover = less than $10,000
• Nine Recommendations and Policies for Roadways and Development
• DDP = $20,800
• List of prioritized projects, many of which have been completed
• KEP = $34,485
DelDOT Ongoing Programs MPO Long-Range Plan (MTP) - Innovations 2050 (1/8/25)
• Transportation Alternatives (TAP) & Bike/Ped • 15 of the 41 short-range projects are in Dover
• Pave & Rehab • 12 of the 24 mid-range projects are in Dover
• Intersection Studies • 5 of the 16 long-range projects are in Dover
• Strategic Highway Safety Program • 8 of the 22 system maintenance projects are in Dover
GET YOUR VOICE HEARD!
WWW.DOVERKENTMPO.ORG 302-387-6030
Página 5
Item 2.
ACTION FORM
PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole – Safety, Advisory & Transportation Committee
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: City Manager DATE SUBMITTED: 11/18/25
PREPARED BY: David Hugg
SUBJECT: Prioritization of City of Dover State Capital Transportation Program (CTP) Projects
REFERENCE: N/A
RELATED PROJECT: N/A
REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, (City Manager) and Marilyn Smith (Dover Kent County MPO
Executive Director)
EXHIBITS: 2026 Transportation Priorities List
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: n/a AMOUNT BUDGETED: n/a
FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): n/a
TIMETABLE: November 25 CCOW; December 8 Council
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of 2026 Transportation Priorities
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
Each year the City of Dover prepares a prioritized list of transportation projects for consideration by
DelDOT and the Dover/Kent County MPO. Projects are organized by category classification to better
indicate how these projects address important needs in the city. The list includes 16 projects: 4 are
primarily economic development projects; 4 are safety and capacity projects; 1 is transportation system
enhancement; and 3 projects have been removed from consideration. 4 projects are new/carried over from
2025) this year: sidewalk improvements to N. State Street from Division Street to Walker Road,
Downtown Strategic Plan Improvements, Bay Road Pedestrian Improvements and Landscaping and
Development Regulations – Freight Issues. A new category, Local Streets, was added this year to
incorporate this component of the transportation network. The list and scheduled dates were reviewed by
the MPO Executive Director and by staff as appropriate.
Following approval by the Committee and Council, the recommended 2026 Transportation Priorities will be
sent to the Secretary of Transportation (DelDOT) and the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO), for consideration and ranking for funding.
5
Página 6
Item 2.
For consideration by Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee
CITY OF DOVER
2026 TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES
DRAFT Revised November 18, 2025 with MPO comments.
Approved by Committee on _________________
Each year the City of Dover prepares a prioritized list of transportation projects for consideration by
DelDOT and the Dover/Kent County MPO. We employed a category classification format to indicate
how these projects address important needs in the city. The first project in each grouping is our
highest priority. The 2026 list follows.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES:
Garrison Connector
This project continues to be the City’s highest priority request, providing a direct connection
between the Garrison Oak Business and Technology Park and the Route 1 interchange at N. Little
Creek Road (Route 8). A direct connection from the Garrison Oak Business and Technology Center
to the SR 1 Interchange has been Dover’s highest priority transportation project request for several
years. The city is working with a number of business development opportunities at GOBTP that are
dependent on alternatives to existing access which is not conducive to efficient freight
transportation. Access to this business center involves using local roads for the movement of
goods and materials and for employee access. The list of permissible uses of GOBTC continues to
be expanded to include warehousing, distribution and logistics support, light manufacturing, food
related storage, and other uses.
The Dover Air Cargo Freight Access Study (Dover/Kent County MPO, July 2021) reinforced the
potential for significant employment growth in the Garrison Oak - Central Delaware Aviation
Complex portion of the city. For these opportunities to be realized a complete business-to-business
connector serving the area is essential. The Garrison Oak portion is recommended as Phase I of
that program. The study outlined scope, existing conditions, primary alignments and design, and
costs for a multi-phased project. This roadway system is consistent with and supportive of the
future growth and development plans set forth in both the City and County Comprehensive Plans.
The project is included in the FY27-32 CTP . Preliminary engineering is scheduled for FY 2027.
As business activities are realized in GOBTP, the city is honoring the original commitment with
DelDOT for analysis and potential improvements to White Oak Road adjacent to the park. A TIS has
been completed, and the design process is underway. We are investigating the TIIF eligibility of this
segment.
Business-Business Connector Roads (N. Little Creek Road to Horsepond Road; Horsepond
Road, Lafferty Lane and Starlifter Drive)
These roads were priority requests to DelDOT and the Dover/Kent County MPO as early as 2022,
and again in both 2023 and 2024 priorities, reflecting the completion of regional freight and air
cargo studies by the MPO. These roads are a continuation of the Dover Air Cargo Freight Access
6
Página 7
Item 2.
Study project, extending a business focused limited access connection from the SR1/N. Little
Creek Road (Route 8) interchange south to S. Little creek Road ; improvements to Horsepond Road
and Lafferty Lane to facilitate imminent business development; and an extension of Starlifter Road
to facilitate the development of the East Dover Employment Center as outlined in City and County
Comprehensive Plans. These improvements increase safety by taking industrial traffic off local
streets, improving regional freight access, and support the long-term viability of the East Dover
Industrial Center, the Kent County Aeropark and the Central Delaware Aviation Complex. The city
urges that initial funding for these improvements, including planning, engineering, ROW, and
construction. be approved as soon as possible. The recent renewal of the Joint Use Agreement with
DAFB increases the potential for these roadways. As the City and County work toward achieving
the East Dover Employment Center, the priority of these improvements will become clearer.
Loockerman Street and Forest Avenue Intersection Improvements
This project was requested by the city to help spur redevelopment activities in the Downtown
Development District while improving traffic circulation and safety. It was identified as a needed
improvement through the Restoring Central Dover Study and the Westside Redevelopment Study
conducted in 2001. It is complementary to the Capital Gateway Study and would result in improved
traffic circulation, a more pedestrian friendly zone at the railroad crossing, and creation of a new
gateway into Downtown. Work on this project has been deferred due to opposition to the original
design option (roundabout). It was reviewed again as part of the DDP’s proposed “Capital City 2030
Downtown Master Plan.” The recently completed Downtown Dover Pathways Study (2024) includes
conceptual design concepts for nearby properties and high-level recommendations such as street
realignments, informational signage, and added parking and open space.
SAFETY AND CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS PRIORITIES
College Road – Kenton Road to McKee Road
This high priority project consists of pavement rehabilitation, construction of shoulders and
sidewalks on both sides of College Road, intersection and drainage improvements, bike safety
improvements, utility relocations and complete pavement replacement. This roadway serves as a
critical east-west connector. The project addresses transportation and safety issues for all modes
and users. It is very narrow, poorly drained, and unsafe for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists.
College Road from Oakmont Drive to College Park Drive and the intersection at McKee Road are
part of the High Injury Network (HIN) identified in the 2025 MPO Comprehensive Safety Action Plan.
It is scheduled to finish design in FY 2025 with ROW acquisition in FY 2025 and FY 2026 and
construction in FY2027. ROW acquisition will be difficult. The project is listed in the FY27-32 CTP,
but no funding is programmed. College Road/McKee Road intersection will be part of the
McKee/Saulsbury Road project that has been included in draft FY27-32 CTP.
Sidewalks within the Walk Zone of Dover High School
Critical gaps in the sidewalk system on both State and city-maintained roadways near Dover High
School remain, including along Mifflin Road and Route 8 on the south side of the roadway traveling
west. This project incorporates recommendations from the Capital Gateway Study and Senator
Bikeway Plan, as well as a more recent assessment completed by the MPO in July 2023.
7
Página 8
Item 2.
Connectivity gaps include portions along Route 8, Mifflin Road, Hazlettville Road and various
neighborhoods, although sidewalk is now complete on the southside of Route 8 from Mifflin Road
to Dover High School. The city identifies this as a high priority safety concern in this area. The city
urges funding through the statewide safety improvement program at the earliest opportunity . The
city will seek funding through other sources such as CTF and TAP.
US 13 Sidewalk Construction and Related Improvements
DelDOT and the MPO have completed a Comprehensive Safety Action Plan for Kent County that
identifies US 13 as part of the High Injury Network (HIN) and is seeking an SS4A grant to conduct
additional study development of recommendations to address the concerns on this corridor. The
city requests that part of the study examines US 13 from Division Street to the SR1 interchange to
determine improvements to intersections, signals, turn lanes, pedestrian safety, lighting and private
entrances to the road. This area experiences frequent accidents, serious and fatal incidents, traffic
congestion, and delays (examples: recent pedestrian fatality near DSU, vehicles blocking through
traffic from turn lanes at Lowes/Sams Club, and Lapore Street, dangerous traffic movements near
Wilmington University and direct entrances such as at Dunkin Donuts and Kings Highway).
Construction of multi-use paths and complete sidewalk systems along Route 13 continues to be a
city priority. Construction of sidewalks is required when properties are developed or redeveloped
but significant sections of the sidewalk system are either missing or in poor condition. This program
is ongoing and funded through the state’s sidewalk safety improvement program. In June 2023 the
MPO conducted an inventory and assessment of the existing sidewalk system throughout the US13
commercial corridor. Substantial improvements have been made including construction of major
sidewalk segments along Route13 on both sides of the highway. Some gaps still exist but these will
be addressed in the near future.
McKee Road/Saulsbury Road Study
The Dover/Kent County MPO completed in May 2023 a capacity study of the McKee/Saulsbury
corridor from the US13/Scarborough Road intersection to the POW-MIA Parkway/US13
intersection. This initiative examined potential capacity expansion as a result of past and future
development, as well as the impact of recent improvements such as those at the Route 8/Route 15
intersection. The goal of the study was to address present and future traffic volume in consideration
of residential growth. The study identified crash patterns and notable safety concerns.
The Scarbrough Road/McKee Road/College Road Corridor, including intersections, is identified on
the High Injury Network (HIN). The project was added to the draft FY27-32 CTP with project
development programmed for FY29-31.
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES
Kings Highway/White Oak Road and Route 13 Intersection
The intersection of Kings Highway/White Oak Road/US 13 continues to need improvements to meet
acceptable levels of service (now functioning at LOS “E”). Extensive adjacent commercial
development, along with nearby recreational and institutional uses, have added traffic and access
burdens to this intersection. Nearby multi-use paths contribute to increased bike and pedestrian
8
Página 9
Item 2.
traffic as well. This intersection was identified in the DelDOT Transportation Operations
Management Plan as a congestion hotspot in Kent County. Recommendations included adding a
two-stage pedestrian crossing system and revising the intersection at White Oak Road and Centre
Drive to provide additional access to US 13. The revised plans for Senator Bikeway include a
crossing of US 13 at this intersection. This enhanced bicycle crossing must be included in the
planning and engineering of this project. This intersection is also a gateway to the downtown.
Based on an MPO recommendation, this project was removed from draft FY27-32 CTP. There is
currently an active construction project implementing safety and multi-modal facilities at the
intersection. Improvements include new pedestrian crosswalk on the south leg of US13, ADA
upgrades, and geometric modifications to tighten corner radii and realign side street crosswalks
closer to US 13 for improved pedestrian crossing visibility.
NEW PROJECT REQUESTS (carried over from 2025)
Sidewalk Improvements to N. State Street from Division Street to Walker Road (New Project)
State Street is one of the oldest developed portions of the city, with mature trees, stately homes on
well landscaped lots, and a complete sidewalk and curb system. But the maturity of the trees and
relative age of curbs and sidewalks bring problems associated with tree roots and lifted walks,
crumbled curbs, ADA conflicts, etc. The city recently replaced the water line in N. State Street but
was not able, due to funding requirements, to effectively assess and remedy these issues. Last year
the city requested that the MPO conduct a study to determine existing conditions and make
recommendations leading to adding this project to the DelDOT TAP program to examine
alternatives that would minimize tree removal while improving pedestrian safety. The MPO
determined that sidewalks exist in most of the area, although some segments are in disrepair.
Because the city has an inventory pf sidewalks, curb cuts and other obstructions along N. State
Street in its ADA Transition Plan, an additional study was not needed. The city was advised to apply
for a DelDOT TAP grant. An application was submitted in February 2025 but was not approved.
Downtown Strategic Plan Improvements (New Project)
The recently completed Capital City 2030 Downtown Dover Master Plan and the Downtown Dover
Pathways Study has recommended to the Downtown Dover Partnership a number of items for
consideration. Many of the short-term recommendations involve painted crosswalks (2 have been
completed), curb extensions, increased walkability, signage and wayfinding improvements. Also
considered recommendations that include physical changes to crosswalks and curbs, roadway
modification, signalization, raised street beds, street furniture, and possible connectivity/mobility
improvements. As the Downtown Master Plan evolves these projects will be more fully detailed and
costed. Capital investment is needed to implement these improvements. Portions of Loockerman
Street will be redesigned and replaced as part of the City’s water/wastewater improvement
program, now in design.
Bay Road Pedestrian Improvements and Landscaping (new project)
Dover Kent County MPO completed the Bay Road Pedestrian Path and Walking Trail Study in 2023.
This study describes the existing conditions along Bay Road, identifies the lack of adequate
pedestrian amenities such as sidewalks, walking paths and crosswalks, and lists the most
9
Página 10
Item 2.
important recommended changes for improving pedestrian connectivity in the area. The city
supports this project as well as related projects along Horsepond Road and at the US13/Bay
Road/MLK/South Little Creek Road intersections. The section of the roadway from Blue Hen
Boulevard to Transportation Circle is part of the High Injury Network (HIN). The city asks that
consideration also be given to improving the visual appearance attributes of this gateway to the city.
The city submits this request for consideration in the FY27 UPWP process.
Development Regulations - Freight Issues
The MPO recently completed studies addressing freight parking and movement in the city. That
study, Dover Municipal Freight Plan, recommends land use and development regulations be
reviewed and revised to require consideration of truck parking and travel as part of new industrial
development plans and development of a checklist of to assist in determining what general types of
freight and land use impacts may need to be considered as part of local planning and economic
development initiatives.
PROJECTS REMOVED FROM CONSIDERATION
Leipsic Road/Persimmon Tree Lane from US13 to east of SR1 overpass)
This project was submitted last year as a new project request. This section of roadway is
significantly impacted whenever there is a large event at Bally’s Casino/Dover International
Speedway. The impact extends from the US13/Leipsic Road intersection east to at least Persimmon
Tree Lane and perhaps as far as Route 9, impacting residents at Persimmon Place, Persimmon Tree
Apartments, Wild Meadows, and various businesses and residents along the roadway. Although
improvements have been made to the east side at the Leipsic Road/Persimmon Tree Lane
intersection, this area becomes highly congested during large events restricting EMS/Public Safety
response and endangering the public. The city requested a study of Leipsic Road/Persimmon Tree
Lane be a part of the FY26 UPWP. The project was considered by the MPO which determined that
the minimally frequent nature of the congestion does not warrant a full study, and the problems
seem to be created by events hosted by private entities.
West Street Improvements from New Burton Road to the Transit Center
This project was proposed to widen West Street to urban collector standards and included bike
lanes and sidewalk connections to the Dover Transit Hub. The project was identified by the
Dover/Kent County MPO as part of their pedestrian studies. West Street is an important connection
for the DART transit services to the city. Improvements were made in 2018 with the completion of a
multi-use path along West Street. The completion of the new Dover Post Office increases the
importance of this project. Sidewalk exists on much of the corridor, including extension to the
Dover Transit Hub Planning and engineering were scheduled to begin in FY 2025; no additional
funding is allocated to CTP. The other changes have occurred in the area, including completion of
the POW-MIA Parkway, which appear to make this project unnecessary.
Banning Street/Clarence Street/Forest Street Connector
The Dover/Kent County MPO completed a study assessing the construction of a connector from
North Street at the Banning Street signal running along Clarence Street, extending north to Forest
10
Página 11
Item 2.
Street. It includes consideration of flooding, traffic flow, and intersection alignments near Lincoln
and Forest Streets. Based on an MPO recommendation, this project was removed from draft
FY27-32 CTP. The MPO recommended that a new study be done in consideration of the
development elements in the Downtown Dover Master Plan.
LOCAL STREETS (CITY-MAINTAINED)
The City of Dover currently owns and maintains over 113 miles of streets and alleys. Streets and
alleys are rated based on software that takes into account the traffic volume and condition of the
street. The city utilizes Community Transportation Funds (CTF) from local legislators to enhance
and upgrade transportation infrastructure in the limits of the municipality. The city is also
responsible for maintaining the pedestrian network within the boundary. An ADA Transition Plan
has been adopted and lays out the long-term plan of bringing the network into compliance.
11
Página 12
Item 1.
CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE
ACTION FORM
PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole (Utility Committee)
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Water & Wastewater SUBMITTED ON: November 14, 2025
PREPARED BY: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater / Engineering Services
REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Patricia M. Marney, Controller / Treasurer
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – Security Fence Replacement for Water Treatment Plant
TIMETABLE: Notice to Proceed to be issued within thirty (30) days of Council approval. Project
anticipated to be completed within ninety (90) calendar days from issuance of Notice
to Proceed, weather permitting.
RELATED PROJECT: X
REFERENCE: CIP- General Fund Projects
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $216,650.00
AMOUNT BUDGETED: $222,000.00
FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Department of Water & Wastewater, Water
Treatment Plant Division, WD2605 WTP
Security Fence. Account No.: 401-40-76-99-
000-54031
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to Pierce Fence Company for the Security Fence Replacement for the Water
Treatment Plant, Bid #26-0006WW, for the amount of $216,650.00.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
As part of the FY2026 CIP Budget, a project was proposed to upgrade the current security at the Water
Treatment Plant. This includes a new security fence to protect the city’s asset.
The bid was advertised to the public as an Invitation to Bid in accordance with the City’s purchasing
policy by the City’s Purchasing Agent under ITB #26-0006WW. Bids were opened on October 21, 2025.
The City of Dover received five (5) bids as shown in the table below:
BID PRICE EVALUATED
CONTRACTOR LOCATION
PRICE
PIERCE FENCE COMPANY DOVER, DE $216,650.00 $210,150.50*
GUARDIAN FENCE COMPANY MIDDLETOWN, DE $242,050.00 $242,050.00
12
Página 13
Item 1.
NEW HOLLAND CHAINLINK1 NEW HOLLAND, PA $209,762.00 $209,762.00
ALL STATE FENCE LYNCHBURG, VA $238,343.00 $231,192.71^
PRO-MAX FENCE SYSTEMS1 WYOMISSING, PA $184,910.00 $184,910.00
*Pierce Fence Company was awarded a three percent (3%) reduction due to local vendor preference.
^All State Fence was awarded a three percent (3%) reduction due to minority owned preference.
1
Both New Holland Chainlink and Pro-Max Fence Systems did not provide the required documentation
for the bid and are found non-responsive, thus eliminating them from consideration.
City staff reviewed the submission and found that Pierce Fence Company's bid met all project
qualifications. Staff recommends awarding the contract to Pierce Fence Company for $216,650 for the
Security Fence Replacement for the Water Treatment Plant.
13
Página 14
Item 2.
CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE
ACTION FORM
PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole (Utility Committee)
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Water & Wastewater SUBMITTED ON: November 14, 2025
PREPARED BY: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater / Engineering Services
REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Patricia M. Marney, Controller / Treasurer
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – Pump Station #7 Upgrades
TIMETABLE: Notice to Proceed to be issued within thirty (30) days of Council approval. Project
anticipated to be completed within ninety (90) calendar days from issuance of Notice
to Proceed, weather permitting.
RELATED PROJECT: X
REFERENCE: CIP- General Fund Projects
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $636,548.00
AMOUNT BUDGETED: $680,000.00
FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Department of Water & Wastewater,
Wastewater Division, WW2606 Pump Station
#7 Upgrades. Account No.: 403-41-69-99-000-
54031
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to A-Del Construction for the Pump Station #7 Upgrades project, Bid #26-0008WW,
for the amount of $636,548.00.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
As part of the FY2026 CIP Budget, a project was proposed to upgrade portions of an existing sewer pump
station. The improvements include a new valve, a new bypass connection, and the relining of the existing
wet well to prevent deterioration.
The bid was advertised to the public as an Invitation to Bid in accordance with the City’s purchasing
policy by the City’s Purchasing Agent under ITB #26-0008WW. Bids were opened on November 6, 2025.
The City of Dover received two (2) bids as shown in the table below:
BID PRICE EVALUATED
CONTRACTOR LOCATION
PRICE
A-DEL CONSTRUCTION NEWARK, DE $636,548.00 $617,451.56*
14
Página 15
Item 2.
CHESAPEAKE TURF SALISBURY, MD $869,944 $869,944
*A-Del Construction was awarded a three percent (3%) reduction due to local vendor preference.
City staff reviewed the submission and found that A-Del Construction bid met all requirements for the
qualifications of the project. Staff recommends awarding the contract to A-Del Construction for $636,548
for the Pump Station #7 Upgrade project.
15
Página 16
Item 1.
CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE
ACTION FORM
PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole (Leg & Fin)
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Water & Wastewater SUBMITTED ON: November 14, 2025
PREPARED BY: Jason A. Lyon, P.E., Director of Water & Wastewater / Engineering Services
REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager and Patricia M. Marney, Controller / Treasurer
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Bids – FY 2026 Street and Alley Program
TIMETABLE: Notice to Proceed to be issued within thirty (30) days of Council approval. Project
anticipated to be completed within one hundred and twenty (120) calendar days from
issuance of Notice to Proceed, weather permitting.
RELATED PROJECT: X
REFERENCE: CIP- General Fund Projects
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $874,256.00
AMOUNT BUDGETED: $1,000,000.00
FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): Department of Public Works Streets Division,
ST2601 Street, Concrete and Alley Program.
Account No.: 101-12-18-35-000-54031
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Award the contract to Grassbusters Landscaping Co., Inc, for the City of Dover FY 2026 Street and
Alley Program, Bid #26-0007WW, for the amount of $874,256.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
As part of the FY2026 CIP Budget, a project was proposed to rehabilitate the following streets/alleys:
Bicentennial Boulevard, Carver Road, three (3) alleys adjacent to East Division Street, and two (2) alleys
adjacent to South Governors Avenue. The total length of scheduled street/alley repaving is approximately
1.16 miles.
The bid was advertised to the public as an Invitation to Bid in accordance with the City’s purchasing
policy by the City’s Purchasing Agent under ITB #26-0007WW. Bids were opened on November 5, 2025.
The City of Dover received eight (8) bids as shown in the table below:
BID PRICE EVALUATED
CONTRACTOR LOCATION
PRICE
GRASSBUSTERS LANDSCAPING NEWARK, DE $874,256.00 $874,256.00
CO. INC.
16
Página 17
Item 1.
SAM’S CONSTRUCTION WILMINGTON, DE $1,584,825.00 $1,584,825.00
GATEWAY CONSTRUCTION CLAYTON, DE $1,031,478.35 $1,031,478.35
HCE LLC FRANKFORD, DE $1,322,839.18 $1,322,839.18
DAVID A. BRAMBLE CHESTERTOWN, MD $943,794.55 $943,794.55
GEORGE & LYNCH DOVER, DE $1,126,573.65 $1,092,776.44*
A-DEL CONSTRUCTION NEWARK, DE $1,184,932.75 $1,184,932.75
DELAWARE ENVIRONMENTAL NEWARK, DE $912,973.61 $912,973.61
*George & Lynch was awarded a three percent (3%) reduction due to local vendor preference.
City staff reviewed the submission and found that Grassbusters Landscaping Co. Inc. bid met all
requirements for the qualifications of the project. Staff recommends awarding the contract to Grassbusters
Landscaping Co. Inc. in the amount of $874,256 for the FY 2026 Street and Alley Program.
17
Página 18
Item 1.
18
Página 19
Item 1.
19
Página 20
Item 1.
20
Página 21
Item 1.
21
Página 22
Item 1.
22
Página 23
Item 1.
23
Página 24
Item 1.
24
Página 25
Item 2.
TO: Council
FROM: David Hugg City Manager
DATE: November 20, 2025
SUBJ: Summary of Issues – Network Administrator in Dover Police Department
Chief Johnson wishes to fill the vacant Network Administrator (Sr. LAN Analyst) position in
the Dover Police Department with an in-house candidate, requiring significant adjustment
to the job title and compensation. This action would also require a similar compensation
adjustment to another position, Network Administrator in the City IT Department. HR
opposes this action for equity and morale concerns. Budget implications are also of
concern to Finance and the City Manager.
OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION – NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR - DPD
Issue:
DPD recently lost its Sr. LAN Analyst (resignation) and needs to fill that vacancy quickly.
DPD wishes to reclassify and retitle the position to Network Administrator, consistent with
that title as used in the City’s IT Department. The position was posted in-house only. The
position would be grade 129 with a FY2027 salary range of $70,637.80 minimum,
$86,881.60 mid-point and $110,552.80 maximum.
The current LAN Analyst has applied for the position. He is an 8-year employee of the
police department in grade 126, step 6 and earns $71,032. A 5% increase would take him to
$76,440. (+$5400). He has requested much higher compensation in the mid-$90,000-
$100,000 range. This represents a possible increase of $25,000- $30,000. Chief supports a
salary in the $94,000 - $95,000 level.
The City IT Department recently hired a Network Administrator under the current salary
range starting at $67,912 (Grade 129, Step 1). Since both positions are essentially similar
both positions should fall on the same salary scale in order to provide equity.
Chief has provided job descriptions and compensation for the IT Systems Administrator
position in Milford (in excess of $105,000) and the Assistant IT Manager position in Newark
(range of $98,649 - $147,806). The Chief suggests this is the market for individuals with
experience at this level. No market study was done, and these are the only comps offered.
Chief supports a salary offer in the $94,000 - $95,000 level. Chief notes that it is
increasingly hard to recruit individuals in senior technical and managerial fields and that
the City’s 5% rule is insufficient (a 5% increase over the current compensation would result
in about $76,440 -difference). Chief believes, based on conversation, that the current
25
Página 26
Item 2.
employee intends to leave DPD for a position in the private sector should his request not be
approved. The Chief also notes that should the incumbent leave the DPD its IT function not
be able to fulfill its mission, causing significant operational disruption.
HR has objected to the increase “continually singling out individuals for large, selective
increase, rather than taking a comprehensive and equitable approach that evaluates all
employees, creates significant risk for morale, internal equity, and retention.” Further, HR
notes: “we set a dangerous precedent when we make decisions based on who threatens to
leave or has the propensity of leaving rather than on objective criteria and consistent
policy.”
Comment:
Many high skill jobs are hard to fill or retain employees because of a very competitive
market – too few qualified candidates, excessive bonuses and enticements, restrictive
requirements, certifications, education, perceptions, etc.
Our market study/wage study was done in 2023 and may already be outdated, at least in
certain highly competitive fields (technology, engineering, skilled trades).
Many functional units such as IT in DPD have small staff and are highly susceptible to crisis
if an employee leaves.
Incumbents have corporate history and operational knowledge not quickly acquired by a
new employee, increasing their value to the organization.
New employees have a steep learning curve and need time to develop necessary staff
contacts and build team relationships versus an incumbent, limiting the scope of their
performance.
Significant compensation adjustments create budgetary issues in salary/benefits
allocations, possibly resulting in insufficient funding and deferral of other spending through
reallocation.
Negative responses from other staff can damage employee perceptions and attitudes.
Action Required of Council:
Council must approve both the reclassification and the compensation for it to take effect
as it is a major budget and personnel change.
26
Página 27
Item 3.
CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE
ACTION FORM
PROCEEDING: Council Committee of the Whole (Legislative, Finance and Administration
Committee)
DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN: Public Works SUBMITTED ON: October 9, 2025
PREPARED BY: Mark Nowak GISP, Director of Public Works, Bryn Wambaugh, Stormwater
Coordinator, and Eddie Kopp CCEO, Chief Code Enforcement Officer
REVIEWED BY: David S. Hugg, III, City Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed Changes and Additions to Strengthen Current Stormwater Ordinance
TIMETABLE: Effective December 31, 2025
RELATED PROJECT: n/a
EXHIBITS: Ordinance #2025-17
REFERENCE: n/a
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $0
AMOUNT BUDGETED: $0
FUNDING SOURCE (Dept./Page in CIP & Budget): n/a
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council approve the recommended ordinance including Ordinance #2025-17.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
On September 25, 2023, the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
(DNREC) issued a new NPDES Phase II MS4 Tier I General Permit (MS4 Permit). To be in compliance
with the MS4 Permit the permittee (City of Dover) must: “Maintain an ordinance or other regulatory
means to implement and enforce a program that includes the prohibition of unauthorized non-stormwater
discharges to the MS4.” As stated in Part IV. Standard Permit Conditions B. Duty to Comply, “The
permittee [City of Dover] shall comply with all conditions of this permit. … The violation of any condition
specified in this permit shall be grounds for enforcement as provided in 7 Del. C. § 6005.” 7 Del. C. §
6005 (b) states, “Whoever violates this chapter … shall be punishable as follows: (1) If the violation has
been completed, by a civil penalty imposed by Superior Court of not less than $1,000 nor more than
$10,000 for each completed violation. Each day of continued violation shall be considered as a separate
violation.”
27
Página 28
Item 3.
Therefore, these proposed changes and additions to the current stormwater ordinance were created
because of the City of Dover’s Duty to Comply with the MS4 Permit and to avoid future fines for
noncompliance.
The information below is to summarize the proposed changes and additions provided regarding
implementing and enforcing a program that includes the prohibition of unauthorized non-stormwater
discharges to the MS4.
• This draft ordinance reorganizes sections to provide more clarity for the citizens of Dover.
• This draft provides a more detailed list of unauthorized non-stormwater discharges based on cases
Code Enforcement has issued violations for in the past.
• This draft ordinance would create a separate section within Chapter 98 to address sump pumps
with direct connections to the MS4. In general, it would require persons to provide evidence
(official lab results) to the Department of Public Works that their sump pump is not discharging
an unauthorized non-stormwater discharge. Upon receiving evidence, the Director of Public Works
may issue a letter of authorization to discharge their sump pump via a direct connection.
• This draft ordinance shortens the period to remedy the violation from ten days to 24 hours to
maintain compliance with the MS4 Permit and prevents destructive damage to the stormwater
systems.
• This draft ordinance also includes the establishment of penalties in Appendix F. No penalty would
be imposed without the issuance of a warning.
• Based upon the above, staff recommends that City Council approve the recommended ordinance,
Ordinance #2025-17
28
Página 29
Item 3.
1 Sec. 98-5. Duty of tenants or owners to maintain sidewalks and landscaped areas within the
2 street right-of-way.
3 (a) It shall be unlawful for the owner or occupant of any premises abutting upon a sidewalk to permit or allow
4 snow or ice to remain thereon for longer than 12 hours of daylight after it has ceased snowing, or to permit
5 debris or other materials to accumulate at any time so that pedestrians may conveniently and safely pass.
6 (b) It is the responsibility of the owner or occupant of any premises abutting upon a sidewalk to keep the
7 landscaped area between the sidewalk and the curbline, or where no sidewalk exists between the property
8 line and curbline or paved street, maintained in accordance with the standards set forth in chapter 114,
9 article II, pertaining to weeds.
10 (c) It shall be unlawful to sweep, blow, or otherwise discharge grass clippings into any street, sidewalk, storm
11 drain, or water course more than incidental amounts of grass.
12 (d) Violations; penalties. Any person(s) violating any provision of this section shall be fined as provided for in
13 Appendix F—Fees and Fines.
14
15 Sec. 98-164. Prohibited discharges into system.
16 (a) Injurious substances. It shall be unlawful for any person or group of persons to throw, place, or deposit, or
17 attempt to throw, place or deposit, or cause to be thrown, placed or deposited, any article, object or
18 substance in any of the storm sewers or into any of the inlets into the storm sewers of the city, or into any of
19 the streets, lanes, alleys, or gutters of the streets in the city from which such article, object, or substance
20 would be likely to enter into or run into the storm sewers of the city, which object, or substance would injure
21 in any manner said storm sewer system or area into which such storm sewers empty.
22 (b) Definition. Wherever the term "system" is used, such term shall be taken to include, in addition to any other
23 meaning herein indicated, any conduits, reservoirs, ditches, grates, catch basins, storm manholes, gauges,
24 and building or buildings and the attachments thereto wherein any such machinery or parts thereof are kept
25 or stored.
26 (c) Tar, petroleum, etc. It shall be unlawful to pour, drain or run into the storm sewers of the city, by any
27 method whatsoever, any tar or tar product, or petroleum or petroleum product, or any inflammable
28 substance or material. Trash produced by these products must be properly disposed of.
29 (d) It shall be unlawful to sweep, blow, or otherwise discharge grass clippings into any street, alleyway,
30 sidewalk, storm drain, or water course more than incidental amounts of grass. Amounts that constitute
31 “more than incidental amounts” are at the discretion of the code official or the stormwater division
32 personnel.
33 (e) Unauthorized non-stormwater discharges include but are not limited to:
34 • Antifreeze/transmission fluid
35 • Paint
36 • Solvent/degreaser
37 • Grease/oil
38 • Detergent
39 • Home improvement waste (concrete, mortar)
40 • Pet/human waste
29
Página 30
Item 3.
41 • Yard waste (leaves, grass, mulch)
42 • Excessive dirt and gravel
43 • Trash
44 • Pesticides and fertilizers
45 • Pool/spa waters
46
47 (f) Authorized non-stormwater discharges must be in accordance with the Phase II MS4 Tier I General Permit.
48
49 (d) (g) Protection of equipment. It shall be unlawful to pour or drain into or permit the drainage into any of the
50 storm sewers or storm sewer system of the city any substance or chemical which would hinder the proper
51 functioning of the storm sewer system or in any way negatively impact any related permits held by the city.
52 (e) Garbage, etc. It shall be unlawful to deposit or throw, or cause to be deposited or thrown into any receptacle
53 connected with a public or private storm sewer of the city, any garbage, ashes, cinders, rags, waste of any
54 kind whatsoever or to discharge or permit to be discharged into any private or public storm sewer within the
55 city, anything that will injure such storm sewer or will obstruct the use and operation thereof.
56 (h) Violations; Penalties. Any person(s) violating any provision of this section shall be fined as provided for in
57 Appendix F—Fees and Fines.
58 1. First Offense. When prohibited discharges are unlawfully deposited into the stormwater system a notice of
59 violation will be issued with a citation in accordance with Appendix F- Fees and Fines.
60 2. Second Offense. When prohibited discharges are unlawfully deposited into the stormwater system an
61 additional notice of violation will be issued with a citation in accordance with Appendix F- Fees and Fines.
62 3. Third and Subsequent Offenses. When prohibited discharges are unlawfully deposited into the stormwater
63 system an additional notice of violation will be issued with a citation in accordance with Appendix F- Fees
64 and Fines.
65 4. The City of Dover reserves the right to use all resources available to abate any violation that will cause
66 immediate harm to the storm water system. All associated costs will be billed to the property owner and/or a
67 municipal lien placed against the property.
68
69
70 Sec 98-167. Sump Pumps.
71
72 (a) Testing. All persons wishing to begin or continue discharging sump pump water to any of the storm sewers,
73 ditches, or inlets into the storm sewers of the city or into any of the streets, lanes, alleys, or gutters of the
74 streets via a direct connection must submit evidence from an accredited laboratory of testing that proves all
75 discharges from the sump pump are uncontaminated pumped groundwater and not unauthorized non-
76 stormwater discharges.
77
78 (b) Evidence. Evidence includes a Chain of Custody from the laboratory and a final report from an accredited
79 laboratory, on official letterhead. The sample must be tested for MBAS, Oil & Grease, and pH.
80 Evidence must be submitted to the Director of Public Works to maintain compliance with this ordinance.
81 Evidence must be submitted to:
82
30
Página 31
Item 3.
83 Director of Public Works
84 City of Dover
85 5 E Reed St
86 Dover, DE, 19901
87
88 (c) Approval and Authorization. Upon approval from the Director of Public Works, citizens will receive an
89 authorization letter. The authorization letter will have a date of authorization and a date of expiry. Within 30
90 days of the date of expiry, new evidence must be submitted to the Director of Public Works. Approval and
91 authorization is at the full discretion of the Director of Public Works and his/her advisors.
92 (d)Unlawful discharging. If at any time it is discovered that property is discharging their sump pump without an
93 authorization letter, either because it was not applied for or because it has expired, a code official reserves the
94 right to issue a notice of violation and order testing. The code official reserves the right to terminate all
95 discharges pending the outcome of testing. The cost of any required testing shall be the responsibility of the
96 property owner. All related costs shall be billed against the property and/or placed on the municipal lien docket
97 for collection.
98 (e) Penalties. If at any time it is discovered that a property is discharging their sump pump without an
99 authorization letter, either because it was not applied for or because it expired, a code official reserves the right
100 to issue a notice of violation, order testing and cause for the immediate termination of discharge pending the
101 outcome of the investigation. All fines and fees will be charged in accordance with Appendix F.
102 1. Initial Inspection. When discharge of a sump pump is discovered without an authorization letter the code
103 official will issue a letter of violation and require testing. In the event the results are returned that the discharge
104 is uncontaminated pumped groundwater and not an unauthorized non-stormwater discharge, the property
105 owner will be issued an authorization letter.
106 2.First Occurrence. In the event the results are returned that the discharge is an unauthorized non-stormwater
107 discharge, a notice of violation letter will be sent to the property owner, and a citation will be issued in
108 accordance with Appendix F. The maximum time for compliance shall be 30 days from the date of each notice of
109 violation.
110 3.Second Occurrence. In the event the results are returned that the discharge is an unauthorized non-
111 stormwater discharge, and/or the discharge continues a notice of violation letter will be sent to the property
112 owner and a citation will be issued in accordance with Appendix F. The maximum time for compliance shall be
113 30 days from the date of each notice of violation.
114 4. Third and Subsequent Occurrence(s). In the event the results are returned that the discharge is an
115 unauthorized non-stormwater discharge, and/or the discharge continues a notice of violation letter will be sent
116 to the property owner and a citation will be issued in accordance with Appendix F. The maximum time for
117 compliance shall be 30 days from the date of each notice of violation.
118
119 (f) Definition. Uncontaminated pumped groundwater is any discharge from a sump pump that is proven not to
120 be an unauthorized non-stormwater discharge.
121
122
123 Sec. 98-166. Violations.
124 (a) Notice. Whenever the city manager or his authorized agents shall determine that a condition exists which
125 violates any portion of this article, the city manager or his authorized agents shall notify the property owner
126 or occupant of the specific violation.
31
Página 32
Item 3.
127 (b) Action by city. Unless the condition is remedied within ten days 24 hours after notice is given, the city may
128 cause the condition to be remedied and assess the cost thereof against the property owner.
129 (c) Payment of cost. Any person violating any of the provisions of this article shall, upon conviction therefore,
130 pay to the city the cost of any of the repairs resulting from the violation and be subject to the penalty
131 provided in section 1-17.
132
133
134 Appendix F- Chapter 98. Streets, Sidewalks and Other Public Places
Chapter 98. Streets, Sidewalks and Other Public Places Fees and Fines
Article I. In General
Sec. 98-5. Duty of tenants or owners to maintain sidewalks and Not in excess of
landscaped areas within the street right-of-way $100.00, nor less
than $5.00 for each
violation
Sec. 98-11. Placement of wireless communications facilities within
rights-of-way
(c) Use of Rights-of-Way Permit
(1) Permit Fee $25.00 for ROW
Permit
(2) Annual Fee for Rights-of-way Use No charge for WCF
placement on
existing City owned
wireless support
structure in City ROW
$220.00 for
Placement of new
wireless support
structure/pole in City
ROW
$220.00 for WCF
placement on a third
party/non-City
wireless support
structure/pole in City
ROW
Article V. Streets, Sidewalks, and Other Public Places
Sec. 98-164. Injurious Substances
Subsec. (c) Tar, petroleum, etc. and Subsec. (e) Other illegal
pollutants
First offense $250.00
32
Página 33
Item 3.
Second offense $500.00
Third and subsequent offense(s) $1,000.00
Subsec. (e)
Sec. 98-167 Not in excess of
$100.00, nor less
than $5.00 for each
violation
Failure to renew or apply for authorization $100.00
First occurrence of unauthorized non-stormwater discharge $250.00
Second occurrence of unauthorized non-stormwater discharge $500.00
Third and subsequent occurrence(s) of unauthorized non- $1,000.00
stormwater discharge
Article VI. Excavations
Sec. 98-253. Bond Maximum of
$5,000.00 per
opening
Article VII. Parades
Sec. 98-303. Fee at the time of filing the application for a parade $10.00. This fee may
permit be waived, in whole
or in part, by the
chief of police.
135
33
Página 34
Item 4.
City of Dover
PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2025-21
WITH STAFF SUBSTITUTE #1 AND CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT #1
(CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT #1 IS INDICATED IN GREEN TEXT)
1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN
2 COUNCIL MET:
3
4 That Chapter 106 – Traffic and Vehicles, Article III – Stopping, Standing, and Parking, Division
5 I - Generally, be amended by adding Sec. 106-139 – Pedestrian Safety by inserting the text
6 indicated in bold, blue font and deleting the text indicated in red strikeout as follows:
7
8 Sec. 106-139. – Pedestrian Safety.
9
10 A. Limitation of occupancy of medians or the adjacent roadway at intersections
11 serves to prevent driver distraction, traffic congestion, delay of traffic, and
12 accidents, especially on median strips or in the roadway itself.
13
14 B. No person, other than a person in or on a vehicle, shall stand, sit, or remain on a
15 portion of a City Street as designated below and approach any vehicle in
16 operation causing it to slow or stop, except a vehicle that is legally parked at the
17 curb on the shoulder.
18
19 C. No person shall stand, sit, or remain upon a median of a City Street as designated
20 below unless that person is in the process of crossing the highway in a safety
21 zone or crosswalk. It is prima facie evidence of a violation of this sub-section if a
22 person stays on the median through two consecutive opportunities to complete
23 their crossing of the highway in a legal manner under this Chapter and the State
24 of Delaware traffic laws. This may include, but would not be limited to, a change
25 in the traffic control signal or a lack of traffic, as applicable. After such two
26 consecutive opportunities, such a person shall not be considered to be “using
27 the safety zone or crosswalk to cross the highways”.
28
29 D. No operator of a vehicle shall park, stop, or leave standing a vehicle, or permit a
30 passenger to leave it, on any City Street where prohibited or suddenly decrease
31 the speed of said vehicle or deviate from a traffic lane for the purpose of
32 responding to persons violating this ordinance.
34
Página 35
Item 4.
33 E. This ordinance applies to intersections at any street or right-of-way within the
34 incorporated boundaries of The City of Dover, but only for the first two-hundred
35 (200) feet on major principal arterials, minor arterials, and urban collectors and
36 one-hundred (100) feet on the urban local street system as defined in the City’s
37 currently adopted Comprehensive Plan, measured along the center lines at the
38 designated painted stop bars where the two rights-of-way intersect. Boundaries
39 will be defined by appropriate marking or signage, but such is not required where
40 impractical. Failure to mark a boundary does not limit the enforcement of this
41 ordinance.
42
43 F. Violators may be charged a fine as specified in Appendix F. A law enforcement
44 officer shall have discretion to consider reasonable defenses to this Section,
45 such as mechanical breakdown, etc.
46
47 G. This ordinance shall not apply to sidewalks, private property, or other pedestrian
48 walkways not within a vehicular lane of travel.
49 Secs. 106-139 140 – 106-160. – Reserved.
50
51 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
52
53 That Appendix F – Fees and Fines, be amended by inserting the text indicated in bold, blue font
54 as follows:
55
56 Chapter 106. – Traffic and Vehicles
Chapter 106. Traffic and Vehicles Fees and Fines
Article I. In General
Fines not paid within 14 days of the day the fine was issued, including the day the fine was
issued, shall be automatically doubled in amount.
Sec. 106-7. Obedience to state law; violation of any provision of 21 A fine of not less
Del. C. § 101 et seq. (except Sec. 106-7(1)—Handicapped parking than $25.00, nor
and Sec. 106-7(2)—Fire lanes) more than $1,000.00
Subsec. (1) Handicapped parking Minimum fine, as
defined in 21 Del. C.
§ 4183, at the time
the violation occurs
Subsec. (2) Fire lanes Minimum fines, as
defined in 21 Del. C.
§ 7001(a), at the time
the violation occurs
Sec. 106-14. Off-road motor vehicle regulations
Subsec. (d) Penalties A minimum fine of
$25.00 and a
maximum fine of
35
Página 36
Item 4.
$100.00
Sec. 106-15. Failure to stop for a red traffic signal; traffic light signal
violation monitoring program; penalties
Subsec. (b)(3) Traffic light signal violation monitoring program;
civil or administrative assessment
Failure to comply with a traffic light signal $75.00
If not paid within 14 days, an additional assessment shall be added $10.00
to the original assessment
Additional assessment shall be increased if the assessment is not $20.00
paid within 45 days
Additional assessment shall be increased if the assessment is not $30.00
paid within 90 days
Court costs or similar administrative fees may also be assessed if Maximum $30.00
the owner requests a hearing to contest the violation, and is ultimately
found to be in violation or fails to pay or contest the violation in a
timely manner
Sec. 106-16. Violations; except as otherwise provided
Subsec. (a)(1) Moving offense Minimum of $10.00
Subsec. (a)(2) Nonmoving offense Minimum of $15.00
Subsec. (a)(3) Parking violation $20.00 for each
offense, if the fine is
paid within 72 hours
from the date the
offense is recorded in
time, the fine shall be
$15.00
Article II. Bicycles
Fines not paid within 14 days of the day the fine was issued, including the day the fine was
issued, shall be automatically doubled in amount.
Sec. 106-55. Penalties for violation Not to exceed
$100.00 and not less
than $10.00
Article III. Stopping, Standing and Parking
Sec. 106-135. Residential parking
Subsec. (i)(1) Expiration; Two-hour parking $20.00 fine or $15.00
if paid within 72
hours of issuance of
such fine
Subsec. (i)(2) Expiration; change of residence, etc. $20.00 fine or $15.00
if paid within 72
hours of issuance of
such fine
Subsec. (m) Violations; penalties Any violation of this
section not having a
stated, specified
36
Página 37
Item 4.
penalty will result in
a $20.00 fine or
$15.00 if paid within
72 hours of issuance
of such fine
Sec. 106-137. Parking areas for persons with disabilities
Subsec. (c)(3) Signage; fines Failure to achieve
compliance within 30
calendar days of the
issuance of the notice
of violation shall be
subject to the fines
set forth in subsection
(f) of this section
Subsec. (f) Penalties Whoever violates this
section shall be fined
not less than the
minimum fine as
defined in 21 Del. C.
§ 4183 at the time the
violation occurred
Sec. 106-139. Pedestrian Safety $50.00
Sec. 106-139. Pedestrian Safety
First Offense Written Warning
Second Offense $15.00
Third Offense within a twelve (12) month period $50.00
Sec. 106-163. Use of meters required
Subsec. (a) Failure to make the required payment in the parking $20.00 fine or $15.00
meter if paid within 72
hours of issuance of
such fine
Subsec. (b) Payments accepted
Each $0.25 coin Permits the vehicle to
be parked for a period
of one hour
Each $1.00 Permits the vehicle to
be parked for the
duration of the
enforcement period
of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m.
Sec. 106-164 Violations; penalties
Subsec. (a) Generally; each violation if paid within 24 hours from A fine of not less
time summons giving notice of violation is issued than $1.00 for each
violation
37
Página 38
Item 4.
Subsec. (a) Generally; each violation if paid after expiration of 24 $2.00 for each
hours from time summons giving notice of violation is issued violation, if payment
is made voluntarily
prior to the time and
date set forth in the
summons
Subsec. (a) Fourth violation; each violation if paid within one hour $1.00 for each such
from time summons giving notice of violation is issued violation
Subsec. (a) Fourth violation; each violation if paid after expiration $2.00 for each
of one hour from time summons giving notice of violation is issued violation, if payment
is made voluntarily
prior to the time and
date set forth in the
summons
Subsec. (a) Fifth violation, etc.; any person committing more than $5.00 for each such
four violations within any 30-day period of the provisions of this violation, if payment
division is made voluntarily
prior to the time and
date set forth in the
summons.
Subsec. (b)(4) Any person who unlawfully removes a device for $500.00 fine for each
immobilization of a vehicle violation
Subsec. (b)(5) Any person who tows or otherwise moves an $500.00 fine for each
immobilized vehicle without authorization by the chief of police or his violation
designee
Subsec. (c) Cost. No cost will be assessed if payment of the penalty as hereinbefore
imposed is voluntarily paid without the necessity of a hearing before the proper official.
57
58
59 ADOPTED: *
60
61
62 SYNOPSIS
63 This Ordinance shall take effect on the first day of July after passage and approval.
64
65 (SPONSORS: * and *)
66
67
68 Action History
69 11/25/2025 – Staff Substitute Scheduled for Reintroduction – Council Committee of the Whole/Legislative,
70 Finance, and Administration Committee
71 10/25/2025 - Introduction – Council Committee of the Whole/ Legislative, Finance, and Administration
72 Committee (referred back to staff)
38