Regular Council Minutes & Exhibit

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING The Regular City Council Meeting was held on June 10, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. with Council President Anderson presiding. Council members present were Mr. Hare, Mr. Neil (in at 6:53 via Webex), Dr. Pillsbury, Ms. Arndt, Dr. Sudler, Mr. Rocha, and Mr. Lewis. Mr. Boggerty was absent. Staff members present were Police Chief Johnson, Ms. Marney, Mr. Hugg, Ms. Melson- Williams, Chief Carey, Mr. Rodriguez, and Ms. Bennett. Mayor Christiansen was also present. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum was held at 6:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Hare declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council was not in official session and could not take formal action. Ms. Lachelle Paul, who resides at 501 Silverside Drive, Wilmington, and Ms. Lauren Eisenbraun, City of Dover Code Enforcement Officer, stated that Mr. Rodriguez had been individually named in a complaint. Ms. Paul noted that any future communication from him regarding that matter would be considered unwelcome and should be directed to the Ethics Commission. Ms. Paul informed Council President Anderson that he owed her an apology. There was an email sent to her with unfounded facts and that the next time he comes to her, he should have the proper facts. She stated that moving forward, he should not threaten her or treat her differently than he treats anyone else in public. Furthermore, regarding the complaint about ethical behavior, she emphasized the need for the city council to ensure they understand and operate within the established codes. This is to prevent citizens from feeling mistreated or unjustly treated in any way. She noted that any future complaints brought to the committee should be handled properly according to the Municipal Code. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Elder Ellis B. Louden. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Christiansen. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Mr. Rocha moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Ms. Arndt, and unanimously carried. (Neil and Boggerty absent) ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All Consent Agenda items are considered routine and non-controversial and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of Council requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered a separate item. Mr. Rocha moved for adoption of the consent agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 2 PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2024-09 – APPROVAL OF THE 2024 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ACTION PLAN The City Clerk read the following Resolution into the record: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2024 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Dover is entitled to $309,594 through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant program; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover has prepared the 2024 Action Plan, in accordance with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development guidelines, that serves as the primary planning document for identifying and meeting the housing and community development needs for the low and moderate-income residents of Dover; and WHEREAS, the City of Dover is in favor of utilizing the Community Development Block Grant funds for the community development purposes in accordance with the National Community Development objectives of benefiting low and moderate income families, eliminating slums and blight, and meeting other community development objectives; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development requires the City of Dover to submit a Consolidated Plan and an Action Plan for Application for Federal Assistance including the proposed use of funds and including certain certifications and policies to obtain its $309,594 entitlement; for eligible activities; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover approve the 2024 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan and application for Federal Assistance included in the Action Plan, along with certifications and policies attached and authorize its forwarding to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for consideration. ADOPTED: JUNE 10, 2024 Ms. Arndt moved for approval of Resolution No. 2024-09. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. (Neil and Boggerty absent) PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2024-10 – HONORING THE 95TH BIRTHDAY OF REUBEN SALTERS The City Clerk read the following Resolution into the record: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: WHEREAS, per Ruben Salters, a man of humble beginnings, was born on May 28th, 1929, in South Carolina and pursued his education in North Carolina. His path led him to the United States Air Force, where in 1954, he encountered a woman who would change his life. Jo Anna McCray, at a local USO. Their love story, marked by a dance and a lifelong companionship,

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 3 culminated in their marriage on June 10th, 1955, and the birth of their three children: Michael, Katrina, and Beverly; and WHEREAS, after breaking commission and being stationed at Gunter Air Force Base in Montgomery, Alabama, he attended Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, where he heard the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, preach. At the time, he was unaware that Dr. King would become such a powerful and wonderful man. WHEREAS, after retiring from military service in 1971, he settled into civilian life in Dover, Delaware with his wife Jo Anna and three children following his arrival at the Dover Air Force Base in 1957; and WHEREAS, before his tenure on the Dover City Council. Mr. Salters, in a remarkable display of community spirit, joined forces with the late Dr. Luna I. Mishoe. Their shared vision led to the initiation of the annual Martin Luther King Jr. Day program in 1987, a tradition that continues to unite and inspire the community, serving as a testament to their enduring legacy; and WHEREAS, Ruben Salters is a prominent figure in Dover, Delaware, known for his extensive contributions to the community. Salters successfully ran for Dover City Council in 1989, representing the city’s 4th District, and served over 20 years on Dover City Council before retiring in 2011; and WHEREAS, in addition to his political career, Salters dedicated himself to community development. He founded the Inner City Cultural League, a nonprofit organization that has become a beacon of cultural and educational opportunities for youth and adults in Dover. This organization with its diverse programs in dance, music, and theatre stands as a testament to its commitment to enriching the community. His instrumental role in organizing the city’s African American Festival further underscores his dedication to celebrating and promoting cultural diversity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council wish retired Dover City Councilman Ruben Salters a happy 95th birthday and recognize that he has played a pivotal role in numerous initiatives aimed at enhancing the local community. His work has earned him widespread respect and recognition within the community, making him a central figure in the ongoing efforts to enrich and support Dover’s cultural and civic life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council direct the City Clerk to make this resolution a part of the permanent records of the City of Dover as a lasting symbol of appreciation and gratitude to Ruben J. Salters. ADOPTED: JUNE 10, 2024 Mr. Hare moved for approval of Resolution No. 2024-10. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and unanimously carried. (Boggerty absent)

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 4 PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2023-18 – CENSURE OF COUNCILMAN WILLIAM F. HARE Mr. Rocha took the chair at 6:55 p.m. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Anderson stated that he chose to step down because he made a public statement on the matter. He mentioned that, although not required, doing so would appear fairer to both the person who brought the complaint forward and the person who responded to it. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Dr. Sudler stated that it sounded almost like a half-recusal. He suggested that to avoid any perception of bias, given the public comment made, Mr. Anderson should recuse himself from the chambers. Dr. Sudler noted that this was in line with what he was taught in ethics training. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Anderson stated that there was no conflict of interest nor were there any violations of any rules. He noted that everything was legitimate and there would be no recusal and no abstentions. Mr. Anderson believed that it would be better for the chair to have done this and it is a call he has a right to make. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Dr. Sudler stated that the matter at hand is commonly referred to as the appearance of impropriety. Dr. Sudler expressed his discomfort in making a judgment call, noting that he was not involved in the hearing and therefore did not know the circumstances. He did not see how they could assess whether the resolution should stand or be omitted. Dr. Sudler questioned how council could vote on the recommendation without any merit, foundation, or evidence to make a judgment. Dr. Sudler stated that he did not feel comfortable undermining the Ethics Commission. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Rodriguez stated that the Ethics Commission had requested that the complaint be referred to Council. The commission had already heard the matter, made a decision, and determined that it should be referred to council. Mr. Rocha read into the record Section 30-73(l), which states that the commission shall send a written copy of its findings and recommendations to the respondent and the complainant. He noted that the section does not mention anything about Council. He believed that the recommendation to Council came from the Ethics Commission, and that is the basis of their deliberation. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Dr. Sudler stated that it is his understanding that the Ethics Commission makes a recommendation, and the recommendation was in the form of a resolution of censorship. He believed that the referral versus the recommendation for censorship and the resolution creates a certain distortion and lack of clarity, as they are referring it to Council, but not to Council to make a decision. The matter was referenced in a resolution indicating that a decision has been made and the resolution is being presented for adoption by the council, similar to other resolutions they have received. Dr. Sudler explained that without a hearing where all council members have access to the information, it is unrealistic to expect them to make a judgment call. He expressed his belief that the resolution lacked clarity for them to make a decision, especially since they were not part of the process.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 5 Dr. Pillsbury stated that they need to revisit the entire section because she agrees that the Ethics Commission makes the decision, not Council. She further stated that she had discussed this with a member of the Ethics Committee, and they were under the impression that all decisions came from City Council. She believed that there could be privacy issues with them publicly discussing the matter and that they were not there to hear the whole process. Dr. Pillsbury believed that what triggered the situation was the complainant was not notified of the results of the committee and that it was their responsibility to notify according to the ordinance, not City Council’s responsibility. She noted that there seems to be confusion about the responsibilities of each party involved and suggested establishing a panel consisting of members of the commission and someone from the City Council to clarify these roles. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Arndt cited Section 30-73(k), which states that if the respondent is a city official, the commission may propose actions to the city council that are appropriate to the finding as specified in Section 30-73(o). She interpreted this as the commission proposing an action to the Council, which the Council would then vote on. Responding to Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Lewis stated that he concurs with Dr. Sudler and his concerns. The members of the Ethics Commission are appointed by the mayor, and they are confirmed by Council. He explained that they entrust those that they confirm to the commission to make the appropriate decisions that come before them. Mr. Lewis stated that the statute is very ambiguous. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Rodriguez stated that the Ethics Commission issued an order dated October 3, 2023. The conclusion states that the censure of the respondent is directed to be served upon Council of the City of Dover for the respondent’s actions and conduct with a city employee. He noted that he pursued a complaint issued by an employee on behalf of a constituent in violation of ethical conduct cited in Section 30-20 (a)(2), (3), (4), (b), and the part of the action that the Ethics Commission could take. Dr. Sudler made a motion to suspend the rules for public comment since the complainant is here and the complainant has something to say. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis. Mr. Rocha stated that based on his conversation with Mr. Rodriguez, the purpose was to take action on the resolution as written. He clarified that they should not take any additional action or testimony regarding the matter but should only adopt the resolution into the record. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Dr. Sudler stated that he would rescind his motion to the public if the second is willing to rescind and move to make a motion to accept the Ethics Commission’s recommendation as presented. Mr. Lewis rescinded, as well. Ms. Andria Bennett, City Clerk, read Councilman Neil’s statement into the record. (Exhibit #1) Dr. Sudler stated that could not undermine the Ethics Commission if they made a resolution. He noted that competent individuals serve on the Ethics Commission and are familiar with the details. He emphasized that the process must be able to withstand public scrutiny and expressed

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 6 his belief that it would not. Ms. Arndt stated that, as she understood the process, the commission had their hearing and presented their findings to the Council in the resolution. She noted that, based on a straightforward reading, the Ethics Commission unanimously determined that contact was made with the city employee regarding her duties and functions, which is the only violation stated in the resolution. Ms. Arndt also mentioned that Chapter 30 Standards of Ethical Conduct refers not only to a violation but also to the appearance of a violation. For these reasons, if put to a vote, she would regretfully vote in favor of the resolution. Mr. Anderson believed that the aforementioned video was part of the Ethics Commission's record. He asked if the video could be played so that everyone could have the same information Mr. Lewis called for a point of order, explaining that his reasoning was based on Mr. Rodriguez's indication that the vote was on the resolution and not on the introduction of any evidence at that time Dr. Sudler stated that reopening the dialogue would be unfair, as it would present evidence from only one side, furthering the perception of bias in the process. Mr. Rocha stated that they are voting on the acceptance of the resolution not issuing any punishment, as they are not making any judgments. It is simply a matter of addressing what was presented before them. Mr. Hare stated that if he had stopped at an employee/neighbor’s house to advise them that an issue had been resolved and in doing so violated any city code, he apologized to the family. He added that if the code was indeed violated, he would accept whatever action the council deemed fit. Dr. Sudler moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 2024-18. The motion was seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a roll call vote, five (5) yes (Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Lewis), two (2) no (Neil, Anderson), one (1) abstain (Hare), one (1) absent (Boggerty). Council adopted Resolution #2024-18, as follows: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: WHEREAS, on October 3, 2023, the Commission received a complaint filed by Cameron Eisenbraun alleging ethical violations by Council President William Hare; and WHEREAS, once the Commission had reviewed the complaint, it was decided that in order to further evaluate the complaint the Complainant and the Respondent would be asked to appear at a hearing before the Commission in order to make a determination whether an ethical violation had occurred, all in accordance with Sec. 30-73(f), which hearing was duly held with both the Complainant and the Respondent giving testimony and responding to questions; and WHEREAS, the Commission noted that since the Respondent is a City Official, the

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 7 Commission may propose actions to the City Council that are appropriate to its findings in accordance with Sec. 30-73(o); and WHEREAS, after the hearing was closed, Members of the Commission voted unanimously that Respondent had made contact with a City Employee regarding her duties and functions, which should not have been made so that his conduct was in violation of the ethical standards provided in Secs. 30-20(a)(2), (3), (4), and (b); and WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 30-73(o), the Commission unanimously decided that a censure of Respondent’s conduct should be reported to City Council of the City of Dover. NOW, THEREFORE, this censure of Respondent is directed to be served upon Council of the City of Dover for Respondent’s actions and conduct with a City Employee, although he was pursuing a complaint issued by this employee on behalf of a constituent in violation of ethical conduct cited in Secs. 30-20(a)(2), (3), (4), and (b). ADOPTED: JUNE 10, 2024 Mr. Rocha stepped down from the chair at 7:30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING - ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND BUDGET A public hearing on the Electric Revenue Fund Budget is required for compliance with the City of Dover Electric Revenue Bonds Resolutions prior to the adoption of the budget. Staff recommended that the public hearing be set for June 24, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Hare moved to set a public hearing for June 24, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. for the 2024/2025 City of Dover Electric Revenue Fund Budget, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARING/FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-11 – LANDS OF CHIANG & SONS PROPERTIES, LLC AT 1241 COLLEGE PARK DRIVE A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider the rezoning of the property located at 1241 College Park Drive, consisting of 1.1024 +/- acres, owned by Chiang & Sons Properties, LLC. The property is currently zoned C-PO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone), and the proposed zoning is IO (Institutional and Office Zone). The property is located on the east side of College Park Drive (a private street) and north of State College Road . (Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.00-02-12.08-000; Planning Reference: Z-24-05; Council District 4). Dr. Sudler moved that the Final Reading of Proposed Ordinance #2024-11 be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Ms. Arndt, and unanimously carried. (Boggerty absent). (The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 22, 2024.) Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams explained that the packet shows the zoning for the surrounding area, including the subject parcel. Adjacent to it are properties zoned CPO to the north, while properties zoned M for manufacturing are to the west across College Park Drive.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 8 The land across College Park Drive is the location of North Dover Elementary School. She also noted that the green shading shown on the map is part of the corridor overlay zone and does not fall in the zoning classification. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the distance of the property to the property line of the North Dover Elementary School is around 60 feet. The distance to the actual buildings on the elementary school property would be much greater than that. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that on page three (3) of the report, it has the code excerpt from Article Three (3), Section 10, which describes the permitted uses in the IO zone. She explained that there are conditional and accessory uses, as well as several uses that are prohibited in the IO zone. The conditional uses require a specialized review process and approval from the Planning Commission. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Ms. Melson-Williams stated that the uses that are specifically prohibited in the IO zone are landfills and dumps. Council President Anderson declared the Public Hearing open at 7:42 p.m. Mr. Nick Patel, Avi Consulting Group, 1671 South Street, stated that the building is up for lease, has been on the market for almost a year, and has taken a year and a half to renovate. Mr. Patel explained that they have not gotten any office use requests; the majority of the requests are for public places of assembly, community centers, and daycares. However, these cannot be considered under the current zoning. He suggested that this would be an opportunity to open up more uses within what is allowed in that specific area. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Patel stated that the building is up for sale. Mr. Patel explained that with the additional uses allowed under the IO zoning (Institutional and Office Zone), especially nursing homes and other facilities, they can advertise or market for a much broader range of uses. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Patel stated that any applications for whatever use would have to go through the city for approval. He described the building as two stories, with 6,000 square feet on each floor, totaling 12,000 square feet, and completely renovated from top to bottom with sprinkler systems. They are hopeful of securing a good long-term tenant for the City of Dover. Mr. Patel noted that the building has been sitting vacant for years Council President Anderson declared the Public Hearing closed at 7:46 p.m. Ms. Arndt moved for approval of Ordinance #2024-11, as recommended by the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and by a unanimous roll call vote (Boggerty absent), Council adopted Ordinance #2024-11, as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1241 COLLEGE PARK DRIVE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 9 WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the limits of the City of Dover; and WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property described below from C-PO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) to IO (Institutional and Office Zone). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL, MET: 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dover has been amended by changing the zoning designation from C-PO (Commercial and Professional Office Zone) to IO (Institutional and Office Zone) on that property located at 1241 College Park Drive (on the east side of College Park Drive (a private street) and north of State College Road, consisting of 1.1024 acres, owned by Chiang & Sons Properties, LLC. (Tax Parcel: ED-05-067.00-02-12.08-000; Planning Reference: Z-24-01; Council District 4) ADOPTED: JUNE 10, 2024 ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 13, 2024 The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of May 13, 2024, were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Lewis, seconded by Dr. Sudler, and bore the written approval of Mayor Christiansen. (Neil and Boggerty absent) COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT – May 14, 2024 The Council Committee of the Whole met on May 14, 2024, at 6:10 p.m. with Council President Anderson presiding. Members of Council present were Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Hare, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Neil, Dr. Pillsbury, Mr. Rocha, and Dr. Sudler. Ms. Arndt was absent. Mayor Christiansen was also absent. Civilian members present for their Committee meetings were Mr. Iriowen, and Mr. Pugh (Utility), Mr. Shevock (via WebEx), and Ms. Smith (Legislative, Finance, and Administration). ADOPTION OF AGENDA Dr. Sudler moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. UTILITY COMMITTEE The Utility Committee met with Chairman Rocha presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and unanimously carried.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 10 Proposed Ordinance #2024-20 – Amending Chapter 110 – Utilities, Article V – Stormwater (Mark Nowak, Public Works Director) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, reviewed the background for Ordinance #2024-20, Ordinance #2024-21, and the Stormwater Utility Credits, Grants, and Appeals Manual. Staff recommended approval of proposed Ordinance #2024-20. Dr. Sudler moved to recommend approval of Ordinance #2024-20. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). Responding to Mr. Neil, Mr. Hugg stated that the Stormwater Utility qualifies as an Enterprise Fund because the city provides a service, expecting consumers to pay a fee for said service, thereby meeting the criteria for an Enterprise Fund. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg explained that the current stormwater program is included in the general fund budget and is funded by taxes. He highlighted that implementing a tax increase for Tier One, primarily residential areas, to adequately fund the stormwater program would result in an increase of approximately $245 per year for taxpayers, compared to $72 per year under the proposed program. When enacting the tax increase on commercial operations, the taxes would exceed $1,000, as opposed to $698 under the suggested plan. Mr. Hugg clarified that opting for the proposed program would entail lower costs for consumers compared to funding through taxes. Ms. Anne Smith, 132 Oakmont Drive, Dover, questioned if the program would help protect residents from plastic pollution. Responding to Ms. Smith, Mr. Nowak stated that the proposed fund would help with anything carried through the stormwater system. Mr. Nowak explained that the water that falls from the sky goes into the system coming out cleaner than it went in. Mr. Nowak explained that the fund enables them to enhance their efforts in maintaining the cleanliness of ditches and storm catch basins, conducting street sweeping, and preserving the condition of the pipes. Proposed Ordinance #2024-21 – Amending Chapter 98 – Streets, Sidewalks, Storm Sewers, and Other Public Places, Article IX – Street Sweeping, and Article X – Leaf Collection Services (Mark Nowak, Public Works Director) Mr. David S. Hugg, III, City Manager, reviewed the background for Ordinance #2024-20, and Ordinance #2024-21. Staff recommended approval of proposed Ordinance #2024-21.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 11 Mr. Hare moved to accept the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Nowak stated that in regard to street sweeping, they are back up and running at full capacity, however, they only have two street sweepers. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Nowak stated that they are required to meet or exceed the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, which require the city to be swept four times a year. Mr. Nowak stated that they are currently sweeping every day and night. Stormwater Utility Credits, Grants, and Appeals Manual – Updated May 2024 (Mark Nowak, Public Works Director) Mr. Mark Nowak, Public Works Director, reviewed the background regarding the Stormwater Utility Credits, Grants, and Appeals Manual. Staff recommended approving as recommended. Mr. Hare moved to accept the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Neil and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). Responding to Mr. Pugh, Mr. Nowak stated that the way that it is currently written, an appeal would need to be submitted to the City Clerk’s office and then it would be scheduled to appear on the next available Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee agenda. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Nowak stated that the appeals procedure states that the appeal would be placed on the next Council Committee of the Whole meeting. Mr. Anderson suggested adding a 30-day timeframe to the appeals process. Mr. Anderson stated that there could be instances where an agenda is very full and adding the appeal may not be compatible with that meeting. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Nowak stated that the Public Works Director has 30 days to reach their decision and it states that the appeal would be added to

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 12 the next available meeting. If the agenda is full, it could be added to the following meeting. Mr. Rocha moved for adjournment of the Utility Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met with Chairman Anderson presiding. Adoption of Agenda Mr. Neil moved for adoption of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Rocha and unanimously carried. Discussion – Celebrating 250 Years of America’s Independence (Councilman Anderson) Mr. Anderson stated that the topic of July 4, 2026, was first discussed a few years prior, is getting closer, and is a great opportunity for the city. Committee action not required. Ms. Margaret Hughes, 250th Coordinator for the State of Delaware, 121 Martin Luther King Blvd, Dover, stated that she is based out of the Delaware Public Archives building and appreciated the opportunity to talk about the upcoming anniversary. Ms. Hughes explained that since being brought on, the conversation has focused on the efforts to raise awareness and build momentum for Delaware's upcoming anniversary, marking both the signing of the Declaration of Independence and the state's statehood, highlighted annually by Separation Day. Delaware 250, the official initiative, operates under the Delaware Heritage Commission, with a steering committee representing various sectors across the state. The goal is to coordinate efforts, ensuring that all sectors are aware of and engaged in the upcoming anniversary. The initiative aims to avoid last-minute planning by coordinating statewide conversations, developing a website as a central hub for planning efforts, and implementing strategic marketing campaigns to amplify voices and avoid duplicating efforts. Ms. Hughes also explained that Delaware 250 is helping support fundraising by getting grant programs into museums and nonprofits. The first cycle is coming to a close and the awardees should be announced soon. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Ms. Hughes stated that there are 30 committee members, and several are Dover representatives, however, she is unsure exactly how many are there on behalf of Dover. Ms. Andrea Maucher, President of the 4th of July Celebration Committee, and Carolyn Courtney, a member of the 4th of July Celebration Committee, thanked council for the opportunity to meet Ms. Hughes and connect with her. Ms.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 13 Maucher explained that the 4th of July Committee is very small, and they invited additional participation from both council and the general public. Ms. Maucher emphasized that funding has been the biggest hurdle for the committee and expressed her interest in learning about the available grants. She also explained that they have learned that with the expansion of Legislative Hall and the parking garage area, they may not have a location to set off fireworks. She explained that they have started to explore the possibility of setting them off at Schutte Park because that area is available, but the topic has not been a primary focus yet. Ms. Maucher continued to explain that the 4th of July events are primarily funded through donations from businesses and organizations such as the City of Dover, and the Parks and Recreation Department. Ms. Maucher recognized the American Legion, the Walter Fox Pavilion, which organizes the parade, and the Dover Downtown Rotary Club, which organizes all the vendors as their annual fundraiser. Mr. Anderson expressed appreciation for the 4th of July Committee and their hard work. Mr. Rocha suggested that he may be able to connect Ms. Maucher with the Dover Lions Club to assist her in gathering volunteers. Pete Bradley, President of Kent County Tourism, 435 N Dupont Highway, Dover, explained that Ms. Hughes made a great presentation to the Kent County Tourism Board and that they are committed to collaborating with her and supporting the Delaware 250 celebration. He stated that Ms. Hughes mentioned Dover Days, which Kent County Tourism is heavily involved with, and they believe it is the perfect opportunity to incorporate the 250th anniversary. Mr. Bradley explained that they are open to any thoughts and ideas and will work with Ms. Hughes's team to promote the event. Proposed Ordinance #2024-14 – Amending Chapter 1 – General Provisions, Sec. 1-17. – General penalty; separate offenses; unpaid fines (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background regarding the proposed ordinance #2024-14 changes. Staff recommended approval of the text amendments in proposed Ordinance #2024-14. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Kopp noted that the changes were made based on council feedback as well as constituent concerns. Mr. Kopp explained that along with the Fire Marshal, they made changes to create transparency and provide a fee structure to assist constituents with their responsibilities if they do not correct violations. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Kopp explained that one of the most noticeable changes they made was the removal of all fees doubling.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 14 Responding to Mr. Boggerty, Mr. Kopp elaborated that a second change that was made was that if a fee or fine is issued, it is now due within 30 days instead of the previous 14 days. Mr. Kopp explained that currently any citation issued is due within two weeks and with the new proposal any citation issued from planning and inspections will be due within 30 days. He also emphasized that the fee scale was edited to remove a minimum of $50 up to $1,000 dollars. Both the Code Enforcement and the Fire Marshal ordinances now have flat fees and none of the fees double. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Kopp clarified that the removal of doubling was in reference to citations. He explained that there is another doubling within the ordinance that refers to permits. For example, if someone is caught working on a property without a permit, the permit fee automatically doubles. Dr. Sudler questioned whether in the future there is a way to incorporate into the ordinance penalties for contractors who are taking advantage of the constituents. Dr. Sudler explained that there are people who are unable to do the work themselves, so they use their savings to get the work done, and the contractors take advantage of them. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Kopp explained that the public can call in and ask if a contractor has a license, or if the contractor has a permit to do work on their property. He further explained that it is often written into the contract that the contractor will obtain the permit, so the homeowner can call the licensing staff and verify that they have a permit to work on the property. Mr. Kopp stated that if they do not have a permit, the staff will let them know, and they will go out and address it. Mr. Rocha recommended creating a flyer that outlines what constituents should be thinking about when planning to hire a contractor and includes the number for the licensing office. Mr. Kopp clarified that not all roof work requires a permit; it depends on the type of work being done. He explained that there is a pamphlet on the City of Dover website, under code enforcement titled “Permits Are Needed For” which outlines exactly when a permit is needed. Mr. Hare moved to accept Proposed Ordinance #2024-14. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 15 Proposed Ordinance #2024-15 – Amending Chapter 22 – Buildings and Building Regulations (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background regarding the proposed ordinance #2024-15 changes. Staff recommended approval of the text amendments in proposed Ordinance #2024-15. Mr. Hare moved to accept Proposed Ordinance #2024-15. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). Proposed Ordinance #2024-16 – Amending Chapter 46 – Fire Prevention and Protection (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background regarding the proposed ordinance #2024-16 changes. Staff recommended approval of the text amendments in proposed Ordinance #2024-16. Mr. Hare moved to accept Proposed Ordinance #2024-16. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). Proposed Ordinance #2024-17 – Amending Chapter 90 – Solid Waste, Sec. 90-16. – Violations; penalties (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background regarding the proposed ordinance #2024-17 changes. Staff recommended approval of the text amendments in proposed Ordinance #2024-17. Mr. Hare moved to accept Proposed Ordinance #2024-17. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 16 Proposed Ordinance #2024-18 – Amending Chapter 114 – Vegetation, Article II – Weeds. Sec. 114-34. – Fines (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background regarding the proposed ordinance #2024-18 changes. Staff recommended approval of the text amendments in proposed Ordinance #2024-18. Mr. Hare moved to accept Proposed Ordinance #2024-18. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). Proposed Ordinance #2024-19 – Amending Appendix F – Fees and Fines (Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed the background regarding the proposed ordinance #2024-19 changes. Staff recommended approval of the text amendments in proposed Ordinance #2024-19. Mr. Hare moved to accept Proposed Ordinance #2024-19. The motion was seconded by Dr. Sudler and unanimously carried. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the Committee’s recommendation, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Mr. Anderson moved for adjournment of the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, hearing no objection the meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for acceptance of the Council Committee of the Whole Report, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty).

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 17 MONTHLY REPORTS – APRIL 2024 By motion of Mr. Sudler, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent agenda: City Council’s Community Enhancement Fund Report City Manager’s Report Controller/Treasurer’s Budget Report Fire Chief’s Report Police Chief’s Report APPOINTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CHRISTIANSEN By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the following appointments, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). ELECTION BOARD – THREE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2027 Alfreda F. Dean – First District Dr. Cherritta L. Matthews – Second District CONSTRUCTION AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Matthew D. Campana – Representatives of Homeowners Charles Martin – Representative of Local Real Estate Industry Association APPOINTMENTS RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT ANDERSON (DEFERRED DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING OF MAY 13, 2024) By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the following appointments, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil, Boggerty). COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRS – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee – Councilman Gerald L. Rocha, Sr. Parks, Recreation, and Community Enhancement Committee – Councilwoman Tricia K. Arndt Safety, Advisory, and Transportation Committee – Councilman Andrea M. Boggerty Utility Committee - Councilman Fred A. Neil CITY CHAPLAIN – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Elder Ellis B. Louden

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 18 CONSTRUCTION AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilman Andre M. Boggerty Councilman Fred A. Neil Councilman Gerald L. Rocha, Sr. GENERAL EMPLOYEE PENSION PLAN BOARD – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Julia M. Pillsbury Councilman Gerald L. Rocha, Sr. OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB BOARD) – ONE- YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Julia M. Pillsbury Councilman Gerald L. Rocha, Sr. POLICE PENSION PLAN – RETIREMENT COMMITTEE – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Julia M. Pillsbury Councilman Gerald L. Rocha, Sr. DOWNTOWN DOVER PARTNERSHIP BOARD OF DIRECTORS – ONE- YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Tricia K. Arndt Councilman Fred A. Neil ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Julia M. Pillsbury Councilman Fred A. Neil KENT COUNTY TOURISM BOARD – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilman Fred A. Neil KENT ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP BOARD OF DIRECTORS – ONE- YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Mayor Robin R. Christiansen (Council President Designee) HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION LIASON – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilman Roy Sudler, Jr. CITY/COUNTY COMMITTEE – (LIASON TO KENT COUNTY) – ONE- YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Tricia K. Arndt

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 19 CENTRAL DELAWARE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LIAISON – ONE- YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Julia M. Pillsbury Councilman William F. Hare EDUCATION LIAISON – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Julia M. Pillsbury HEALTHCARE LIAISON – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Julia M. Pillsbury DOVER AIR FORCE BASE (DAFB) LIAISON – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilman William F. Hare COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT LIAISON – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilman Andre M. Boggerty UNSHELTERED AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING LIAISON – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilman Gerald L. Rocha, Sr. HIGHER EDUCATION LIAISON – ONE-YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 2025 Councilwoman Tricia K. Arndt 2024/2025 ANNUAL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS – COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SUBCOMMITTEES – RECOMMENDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT ANDERSON AND COMMITTEE CHAIRS (DEFERRED DURING THE ANNUAL MEETING OF MAY 13, 2024) By consent agenda, Dr. Sudler moved for approval of the following appointments, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury and carried by a unanimous roll call vote and carried by a roll call vote, six (6) yes (Hare, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), two (2) absent (Neil and Boggerty). LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE William Garfinkel (Recommended by Chairman Rocha) Daniel T. Shevock (Recommended by Council President Anderson) PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEE Michael Tholstrup (Recommended by Chairwoman Arndt) Michael W. Lewis (Recommended by Council President Anderson)

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 20 SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Vonderlear Smack (Recommended by Chairman Boggerty) Chanda P. Jackson (Recommended by Council President Anderson UTILITY COMMITTEE Esosa Iriowen (Recommended by Chairman Neil) Michael Pugh (Recommended by Council President Anderson) LUTHER VILLAGE PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN (PND) SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING OPTION – SKETCH PLAN REVIEW Ms. Dawn Melson-Williams, Principal Planner, reviewed Luther Village Planned Neighborhood Design (PND) Senio Citizen Housing. Mr. Hare moved to refer the Luther Village Planned Neighborhood Design (PND) Senior Citizen Housing to the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lewis and unanimously carried. (Boggerty absent) TENTATIVE LABOR CONTRACT WITH FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE (FOP) Mr. David Hugg, III, City Manager reviewed the Labor Contract with the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP). Responding to Mr. Hugg, Mr. Lewis stated his concern with the FOP contract was in section 3.18, Body-Worn Cameras. Mr. Lewis noted that he thought it was a requirement to have the body cameras activated. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg clarified that the one-month grace period for non- disciplinary action regarding body-worn camera activation is specifically intended for new officers who are utilizing this equipment for the first time. This allowance provides a brief window of time for them to become familiar with the device, ensure proper activation, and understand its correct usage. The goal is to facilitate a smooth transition and promote officer awareness of the cameras' importance Responding to Mr. Lewis, Chief Johnson explained that this clause was originally implemented in relation to the initial introduction of body-worn camera technology when officers were not yet trained to develop the necessary "muscle memory" to ensure consistent activation. Chief Johnson noted that he did not anticipate this clause applying to anyone other than those who were part of the initial rollout, specifically new recruits who are still in their first month of service and are working under the supervision of a field training officer. As for any potential modifications to this clause, Chief Johnson clarified that he was not involved in the previous contract negotiations and is unsure if it was a topic of discussion. However, without the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) present, he does not believe it would be possible to renegotiate the clause. In his view, the exposure is limited to a small number of recent sworn members, primarily those who have recently graduated from the academy. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that it is part of their training when they go through the academy and when they are out in their initial field activities. Council has to approve the

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 21 agreement and if council chooses to strike a particular provision, as a condition of approval, they could. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hugg stated that he was correct. The FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) would have to re-ratify the agreement and it is to his understanding that the FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) unanimously ratified the contract. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Chief Johnson noted that at the time the clause was initially implemented, the agency was in the process of acquiring and rolling out this new technology across the entire organization, from newly sworn officers to seasoned veterans with over 20 years of service. He stated that the odds of a failed activation are almost impossible when they are with someone else. It is almost impossible in a group setting for there to be a failure and when an officer is on independent duty, the data that they are looking for would probably become visible. He noted that they do random auditing as a matter of policy, and it has not been brought to his attention that it is of any concern from any of the frontline supervisors that anyone is forgetting consistently to activate their camera. There have been no critical incidents since the program was initiated where they had to address someone for not having a camera activated. They have always captured what they have needed. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Chief Johnson stated that they introduced the body-worn camera during the academy, so it becomes second nature to them as every other piece of equipment they carry on their waist or their load-bearing vest. He explained that it is the same gear they would use when transitioning into the field. The only gap that might exist would be a lateral hire, a certified officer from another agency that perhaps got their basic training from a different academy. Chief Johnson noted the basic academy under the Dover model is around 20 to 21 weeks and the academies can vary in Delaware anywhere from 19 to 24 weeks. He stated that about half the academy is in four phases and they report every day wearing simulation of their working gear around the midway point. The police cadets get several weeks of the body cameras which becomes second nature to them while they learn their skills in the second half of the academy. Responding to Mr. Rocha, Chief Johnson stated that everyone on the scene's camera would activate. As soon as one officer recognizes there is a reason why a camera should be on, they all come on. That is just to make sure that every abundance of caution and the manufacturer recognizes it. Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that the current contract expires at the end of June and the new contract begins July 1, 2024, for two years. They are diligently trying to get all four (4) contracts that are up for renewal this year in place before the beginning of the new fiscal year. Mr. Hugg asked if there were a compelling reason, he would like the contract to be approved and if there is an issue, they need to deal with it at a later date as an MOU or some other by some other mechanism. He would hate to hold the contract up. The FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) could not have been an easier or better more cooperative group of individuals. Mr. Hugg explained that they were very honest about their financial situation and what they were trying to achieve and to make some of the language comparable across the four (4) contracts. This was the first contract that was finished and the only contract that at this point was brought to

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 22 council. Mr. Hugg could not say enough about how good the process went and would hate to throw any kind of a monkey wrench in it if it is not a significant issue. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Mr. Lewis stated that he had nothing against this contract, just concerning that particular clause and its wording. If they come back at a later date and as he indicated with an MOU and revise for legality purposes, he would be fine with it. He would be abstaining due to one particular issue. Responding to Mr. Hugg, Dr. Sudler asked if it would be appropriate to let the FOP know their concerns since other council members have concerns. They do not want to supersede their concerns to get the job done quickly. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Hugg stated that the concern would be on the record. He would communicate to the FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) president that there is a concern and if there is an issue, they will need to address it and make it right. He believes it is a carry-over provision and there may not be an issue at all except for transitional. Mr. Hare moved to accept Staff Recommendation on the Labor Contract with the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), seconded by Mr. Arndt, and was adopted by a roll call vote, seven (7) yes (Hare, Neil, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) abstain (Lewis), one (1) absent (Boggerty). STORMWATER UTILITY CREDITS, GRANTS, AND APPEALS MANUAL – UPDATED MAY 2024 (MARK NOWAK, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR) Mr. Mark Nowak, Public Works Director reviewed the Stormwater Utility Credits, Grants, and Appeals Manual. Mr. Rocha moved to accept Staff Recommendation on the Stormwater Utility Credits, Grants, and Appeals Manual, seconded by Ms. Arndt, and was adopted by a roll call vote, seven (7) yes (Hare, Neil, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) abstain (Lewis), one (1) absent (Boggerty). FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-20 – AMENDING CHAPTER 110 – UTILITIES, ARTICLE V – STORMWATER (MARK NOWAK, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR) Mr. Mark Nowak, Public Works Director reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-20 – Amending Chapter 110 – Utilities, Article V – Stormwater. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-20 – AMENDING CHAPTER 110 – UTILITIES, ARTICLE V – STORMWATER

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 23 FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-21 – AMENDING CHAPTER 98 – STREETS, SIDEWALKS, STORM SEWERS, AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES, ARTICLE IX – STREET SWEEPING, ARTICLE X – LEAF COLLECTION SERVICES (MARK NOWAK, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR) Mr. Mark Nowak, Public Works Director, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-21 – Amending Chapter 98 – Streets, Sidewalks, Storm Sewers, and Other Public Places, Article IX – Street Sweeping, Article X – Leaf Collection Services. Responding to Mr. Anderson, Mr. Nowak clarified that the permit in question is federally mandated and extends jurisdictionally through the state. Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Nowak stated yes, that it needs to be moved forward with what they are doing with utility and be compliant with the NPDS permit. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-21 – AMENDING CHAPTER 98 – STREETS, SIDEWALKS, STORM SEWERS, AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES, ARTICLE IX – STREET SWEEPING, ARTICLE X – LEAF COLLECTION SERVICES FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-14 – AMENDING CHAPTER 1 – GENERAL PROVISIONS, SEC. 1-17. – GENERAL PENALTY; SEPARATE OFFENSES; UNPAID FINES (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-14 – Amending Chapter 1 – General Provisions, Sec. 1-17. – General Penalty; Separate Offenses; Unpaid Fines. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-14 – AMENDING CHAPTER 1 – GENERAL PROVISIONS, SEC. 1-17. – GENERAL PENALTY; SEPARATE OFFENSES; UNPAID FINES FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-15 – AMENDING CHAPTER 22 – BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-15 – Amending Chapter 22 – Buildings and Building Regulations. Responding to Mr. Kopp, Ms. Arndt noted that they are using the 2009 edition of the building codes when the 2024 is currently available. She acknowledged that there is no statewide building code; however, many municipalities within the state are already utilizing more updated and modern codes. Ms. Arndt suggested that they should consider adopting the newer edition in the near future.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 24 Responding to Ms. Arndt, Mr. Kopp stated that they are in the process of obtaining the 2024 building code books. He mentioned that the only book still needed is the 2024 International Residential Code (IRC), which is currently on backorder through the International Code Council (ICC). Mr. Kopp noted that they have all the other necessary materials and are ready to start the process, but they need the 2024 IRC to move forward since it governs all residential buildings. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-15 – AMENDING CHAPTER 22 – BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-16 – AMENDING CHAPTER 46 – FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER) Mr. Phillip Lewis, Deputy Fire Marshall, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-16 – Amending Chapter 46 – Fire Prevention and Protection. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-16 – AMENDING CHAPTER 46 – FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-17 – AMENDING CHAPTER 90 – SOLID WASTE, SEC. 90-16. – VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-17 – Amending Chapter 90 – Solid Waste, Sec. 90-16. – Violations; Penalties. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-17 – AMENDING CHAPTER 90 – SOLID WASTE, SEC. 90-16. – VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-18 – AMENDING CHAPTER 114 – VEGETATION, ARTICLE II – WEEDS SEC. 114-34. - FINES (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-18 – Amending Chapter 114 – Vegetation, Article II – Weeds Sec. 114-34. – Fines. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-18 – AMENDING CHAPTER 114 – VEGETATION, ARTICLE II – WEEDS SEC. 114-34. – FINES

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 25 FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-19 – AMENDING APPENDIX F – FEES AND FINES – GENERAL PENALTY; SEPARATE OFFENSES; UNPAID FINES (EDDIE KOPP, CHIEF CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER) Mr. Eddie Kopp, Chief Code Enforcement Officer, reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-19 – Amending Appendix F – Fees and Fines – General Penalty; Separate Offenses; Unpaid Fines. Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Kopp stated that any citation issued is always sent by certified mail, requiring a signature upon receipt Responding to Dr. Sudler, Mr. Kopp stated that the citation due date is 30 days from the date it is issued, similar to an electric bill. This date is clearly highlighted on the citation. He mentioned that they do work with individuals who request extensions, and he assured them that there would be no doubling of fees within the initial 30-day period. Dr. Sudler moved to accept the Staff Recommendation as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and carried unanimously. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-19 – AMENDING APPENDIX F – FEES AND FINES – GENERAL PENALTY; SEPARATE OFFENSES; UNPAID FINES FIRST READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-26 – FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 CITY OF DOVER BUDGET ORDINANCE Mr. David Hugg, III, City Manager reviewed Proposed Ordinance #2024-26 – Fiscal Year 2024/2025 City of Dover Budget Ordinance. In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the proposed Ordinance as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows: ORDINANCE #2024-26 – FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 CITY OF DOVER BUDGET ORDINANCE FINAL READING PROPOSED ORDINANCE #2024-12 – AMENDING CHAPTER 38 – EMERGENCIES BY ADDING ARTICLE III – EMERGENCY SERVICES Ms. Arndt moved that the Final Reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Rocha, and unanimously carried. (Boggerty absent) (The First Reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of April 8, 2024.) Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that the original proposal was one dollar ($1.00) for residential accounts and eight dollars ($8.00) for commercial accounts. However, Mr. Hugg noted that after the proposed ordinance went through the committee process following the first reading, the amounts were adjusted to one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) for residential accounts and six dollars and fifty cents ($6.50) for commercial accounts. He added that these revised fees were incorporated into Ordinance #2024-19 as part of the staff amendment.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 26 Responding to Mr. Lewis, Mr. Hugg stated that it seemed that the eight dollars ($8.00) seemed like it was a larger charge and was both necessary and fair. They tried to balance the revenue projections, so they were evenly distributed around everybody that was affected. By motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Ms. Arndt, by a roll call vote, seven (7) yes (Hare, Neil, Pillsbury, Arndt, Rocha, Sudler, Anderson), one (1) no (Lewis), one (1) absent (Boggerty) adopted Ordinance #2024-12 as follows: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET: That Chapter 38 – Emergencies, be amended by inserting a new Article III – Emergency Services, as follows: Sec.38-85. Basic Life Support Ambulance Services Fund (a) The city manager is hereby authorized to impose a fee and to bill residents and others for ambulance services. Such fees will be assessed monthly and included as a general billing item, included on monthly residential and commercial utility bills. The Basic Life Support Ambulance Service Fee shall apply to all utility customers in the Robbins Hose/Dover Fire Department district boundaries. (b) Establishment of Specialized Fund (1) All revenues received in accordance with this Ordinance shall be deposited in the Basic Life Ambulance Service Fund. These funds shall be used to pay the contracted annual cost of service, and regular and necessary administrative costs for Basic Life Support Ambulance Services, including allowances for externalities and uncertainties. Funds no expended in any fiscal year shall be maintained in the fund and used in subsequent years as necessary, including establishment of self-funded services. (2) The proceeds of the Basic Life Support Ambulance Service Fund shall be managed by the City of Dover Department of Finance, which shall regularly report the status of the fund, arrange for audit, and oversee disbursements as provided for by any contractual provisions and the city’s financial management policies. (c) Fees and the fee schedule will periodically be reviewed and adjusted to reflect changing costs. The fees are to be added, updated and reflected in the Rates and Tariff annual document, and such amount shall be kept in a separate, interest- earning account and shall be used only for the costs associated with Basic Life Support Ambulance Service. Is subject to the city’s collection policies and procedures but is not lien-able against customers’ property nor subject to the Clean Hands Ordinance. The city manager may authorize commercial collection procedures and utilize the same procedures as other outstanding fees. The Basic

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 27 Life Support Ambulance Service Fee shall added to Appendix F as follows: (1) Residential accounts shall be billed one dollar and fifty cents ($1.50) monthly. (2) Commercial accounts shall be billed six dollars and fifty cents ($6.50) monthly. (d) Severability. If any provision of this ordinance shall be determined to be invalid in whole or in part, all other provisions shall continue to be separately and fully effective. (e) Effective Date. The Basic Life Support Ambulance Service Fee shall be effective on July 1, 2024. ADOPTED: June 10, 2024 CITY MANAGER'S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Hugg had no announcements. MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Christiansen wanted to remind everyone that on June 11th, 2024, at 6:00 p.m., there will be an important Council Committee of the Whole deliberation on the future sales and manufacture of marijuana within the city. There will be a Juneteenth Festival on Legislative Mall on June 15th, and on June 22nd, the African American Festival, founded by former Councilman Reuben Salters, will take place. Mayor Christiansen noted that the 4th of July celebration on Legislative Mall will feature a parade, the 280th National Guard Band, and fireworks. COUNCIL MEMBERS' ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Rocha mentioned that the Friday before Memorial Day weekend, there were several staff members still working after 4:00 p.m. Regarding staff, he is hoping that the city manager would give them a break the day before the holiday weekend, in particular for the 4th of July, letting everyone go two (2) hours early to show how much they are appreciated. He stated that since staff members are always here and spending time at work, it would be nice to give a little bit of family time back to them, as long as there is coverage where needed and necessary. The meeting adjourned at 8:48 p.m. ANDRIA BENNETT CITY CLERK All ordinances, resolutions, motions, and orders adopted by the City Council during their Regular Meeting of June 10, 2024, are hereby approved.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 10, 2024 PAGE 28 ROBIN R. CHRISTIANSEN MAYOR /AB Exhibits Exhibit #1 - Councilman Neil’s statement

EXHIBIT #1 Regular City Council Meeting of 06/10/2024 Fred Neil Dover City Council ! Home address: 521 Weaver Drive, Dover, DE 19901 302-678-3288 ! fredneilbooks@comcast.net Comment at Censure of Councilman William F. Hare. June 10, 2024 In our system of Jurist Prudence there exists an appeal process to insure that a miscarriage of justice hasn’t taken place. In this case, the city council has the power to make a judgement on the correctness of the decision of the Ethics Commission. I learned a very, very long time ago, in my 1st profession as a newsman to look at the details rather than just one side that appears to be obvious. While there is a small modern version of a lynch mob, who in other instances would be standing on the other side of the fence, demanding a censure of Councilman Hare based on the Ethics Committee decision. A spokesperson has added an attack on the handling of the case based on an erroneous interpretation of the law. History has shown the atrocities that have occurred by the hands of the self righteous or totalitarian regimessuch as the Nazis. My decision not to vote for censure is based in 2 parts. One, is the evidence I have seen on a cell phone video which clearly shows the testimony of the husband regarding the position of the car in question to the demeanor of the conversation between the Councilman Hare and the husband was simply in error. Councilman Hare was neither combative or conformational. Quite to the contrary. Second, is what I learned about Bill Hare since I served with him since I was elected in 2015. Even though our votes have not always matched, he never put his self interests in front of what he considered his duty to citizens of Dover. He has frequently gone on personal inspection tours after a complaint by a constituent. He has gone to his pocket and used his own funds to help out on occasion. His sponsorship of the Dover Military Support organization to help our service members in dire need of short term financial help and all that entails is a perfect example of who he is and what he stands for. Even when a Code Inspector issues a citation, the person cited can appeal that decision to a Appeal Board consisting of civilian and members of the council . I have sat on the Board and I have heard Code Inspectors offer solutions that saved the appealee money. If I had setup a meeting with a code inspector to resolve an issue before it reached a time and money costly to the taxpayers Appeal, I would have wondered why Code Inspector Boss showed up rather than his employee who agreed to meet with me. There was enough suspicion to raise questions. The employee did not make the complaint, the husband did. That is as permissible as the complaint we received not to long ago by a woman demanding the council take action against a downtown business that attracted customers causing problems after closing hours of the premisses. However. after meeting with the owners of the property, she changed her mind about closing the business to giving the owners a chance to rectify the problems their customers have caused. Recently, she demanded the police protect the business from the customers this business attracts Although, my personal approach may have been different, I see Councilman Hare’s actions consistent with his desire to see the taxpayers of Dover receive the best bang for their tax money. I can not approve his censure.